• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.167-175
• /
• 2024

Purpose: To measure the level of reflection, this study analyzes diaries written by third-year nursing students before and after the debriefing stage in simulation training. A qualitative study using diary entries from 15 nursing students to explore reflection depth. Methods: Students engaged in simulation training and the debriefing stage, documenting their reflections in diaries. Before and after debriefing, reflections were rated from Level 1 (reflectivity) to Level 7 (theoretical reflectivity). Results: The total number of reflection levels rose significantly from 545 to 829 post-debriefing, enhancing higher-order reflection. The shift signifies a move from superficial to deep reflection, highlighting debriefing's role in fostering critical thinking. Conclusion: The findings underscore the critical role of debriefing in enhancing reflective thinking in nursing education. There is a demonstrated need for further research into the specific elements of debriefing that are most effective at promoting deep reflection. Future studies should conduct comparative analyses of different debriefing methods and approaches across various educational settings. This research could lay the foundation for designing more effective debriefing strategies that foster critical thinking and improve learning outcomes in nursing education.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2016

본 논문에서는 2015 교육과정에서 SW교육이 확대됨에 따라 운영되고 있는 SW교육 연구학교의 초등학생 2,547명을 대상으로 컴퓨팅 사고력 평가를 실시하고, 보다 효과적인 SW교육 환경을 마련하고자 학교별 교육정보화 수준에 따라 학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고력이 어떠한 차이를 나타내는지 분석하였다. 그 결과, 초등학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고력 점수는 학교장의 정보 연수 경험과 학교의 정보 인프라 구성에 따라 차이가 나타나는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 특히, 학교장의 CEO 정보 연수 경험, 무선 네트워크와 모바일 기기 구성, 무선 네트워크 속도에 따라 학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고력 검사 점수는 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이에 따라 본 논문에서는 초등학교에서 SW교육의 효과성을 높이기 위한 방안으로 SW교육에 대한 체계적인 학교장 연수 실시, 학교 교실의 무선 네트워크 시설 확대, 모바일 기기에 대한 보급 확대 등을 제안하였다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.69-89
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to develop a test which can be used in identification of the gifted students in the area of mathematics. This study was carried out for two years from 1996. Mathematical giftedness is, in this study, regarded as a result of interaction of mathematical thinking ability, mathematical creativity, mathematical task committment, background knowledge. This study presumed that mathematical thinking ability is composed of seven thinking abilities: intuitive insights, ability for information organization, ability for visualization, ability for mathematical abstraction, inferential thinking ability(both inductive and deductive thinking abilities), generalization and application ability, and reflective thinking. This study also presupposed that mathematical creativity is composed of 3 characteristics: fluency, flexibility, originality. The test for mathematical creative problem solving ability was developed for primary, middle, and high school students. The test is composed of two parts: the first part is concentrated more on divergent thinking, while the second part is more on convergent thinking. The major targets of the test were the students whose achievement level in mathematics belong to top 15~20% in each school. The goodness of the test was examined in the aspects of reliability, validity, difficulty, and discrimination power. Cronbach $\alpha$ was in the range of .60~.75, suggesting that the test is fairly reliable. The validity of the test was examined through the correlation among the test results for mathematical creative problem solving ability, I. Q., and academic achievement scores in mathematics and through the correlation between the scores in the first part and the scores in the second part of the test for mathematical creative problem solving ability. The test was found to be very difficult for the subjects. However, the discrimination power of the test was at the acceptable level.

• 재활간호학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This study was to examine the relationship between mental health status and suicidal thinking among cancer patients. Methods: The data set of the 4th Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey (2009) was used and 230 subjects with cancers were included in the present study. Using SPSS/WIN 18.0 program, data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, ${\chi}^2$ test and logistic regression analysis. Results: About one-third of subjects had stress, symptoms of depression and suicidal thinking. Female had more suicidal thinking than male (${\chi}^2$=5.44, p=.020). In addition, subjects with high income level had more thinking about suicide compared with those in low income level (${\chi}^2$=7.54, p=.023). There was a significant difference in suicidal thinking according to the educational levels (${\chi}^2$=13.25, p=.004). In the logistic regression analysis, it was indicated that gender, depression and stress were significant predictors on suicidal thinking, accounting for 26.7~38.1%. Conclusion: From the findings in this study, it was suggested that the healthcare providers should try to improve their mental health status in order to prevent suicidal thinking among the individuals diagnosed with cancer.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.653-662
• /
• 2020

본 연구에서는 초등 실과 교과서의 소프트웨어교육 영역에 나타난 컴퓨팅 사고력의 요소의 내용, 수준 등을 분석하고 교과서 학습활동별 컴퓨팅 비율을 분석하였다. 컴퓨팅 사고력 요소는 교육부에서 제시한 컴퓨팅 사고력의 구성 요소와 정의를 바탕으로 구성하였고, 6개 출판사에서 출판된 실과 교과서의 소프트웨어 교육 학습 내용을 분석하였다. 교과서별 컴퓨팅 사고력 요소와 컴퓨팅 수준을 분석한 결과 교과서별로 컴퓨팅 사고력의 하위 요소 포함 여부의 차이가 나타나며, 컴퓨팅과 연결된 추상화 활동을 제시하는 교과서의 비율이 비교적 낮게 나타났다. 추후 교육과정 개편 또는 교과서 개정시 컴퓨팅 사고력 요소가 균형있게 포함되도록 보완하고, 문제 발견과 이해부터 자동화까지 컴퓨팅 사고의 일련의 과정들이 이어질 수 있도록 차시를 편성할 필요가 있으며, 일상생활의 요소를 사용하되 컴퓨팅이 포함된 추상화 활동을 내포할 필요가 있다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.531-547
• /
• 2013

The purpose of the study is to examine how effects of activities using Google SketchUp on students' spatial ability and 3D geometric thinking in measuring the volume of solid figures. By comparing the results from pre- and post-tests between the experimental group and control group, we found that activities using Google SketchUp help students improve their spatial ability in the spatial orientation and visualization. In addition, more than half students in the experimental group moved from level 4 up to level 7 in thinking process of measuring the volume in terms of Battista(2004)'s levels. This study suggests that the instruction with Google SketchUp can help to improve students' spatial ability and 3D geometric thinking in the regular class in middle school. In addition, SketchUp can be an advanced technological tool to support students' self-directed learning, which create an efficient educational environment and a great opportunity to learn geometry in an effective manner.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2023

This study was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study that confirms the effect on subjects that prefer clinical practice in order to prepare basic data for efficient clinical practice guidance for nursing college students. The study participants were 201 students attending C University, and the data collection period was from October 1 to October 15, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 as descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, Chi square test, ANOVA test, and Multiple regression test. As a result of the analysis, it was found that clinical decision-making and critical thinking were correlated under the statistical significance level (r=.730, p<0.01). The most favorite clinical practice department was community nursing, and male students preferred community nursing the most (Male=45.6%, χ²=.000), female students were found to prefer similar levels of practical subjects with child nursing , adult nursing, and maternal nursing(χ²=000).Clinical decision-making was found to be higher in students who preferred community nursing at a statistical significance level than those who preferred child nursing (F=4.91, p<0.01). Critical thinking was higher among students who preferred adult nursing than those who preferred other subjects (F=4.65, p<0.01). Through the analysis results, it was found that general characteristics vary, but clinical decision-making ability and critical thinking affect the preference of clinical practice subjects. Therefore, based on the results of this study, the professor of clinical practice suggests the development of a program to foster clinical decision-making and critical thinking to make students interested in clinical practice subjects.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.119-131
• /
• 2013

It is the first time that there is a subject, advanced mathematics in the 2009 revised high school curriculum. Therefore it is posing a challenge to the teachers who are teaching it. At the advanced level, it is important for learners to reflect on their mental mathematical activities. This research analysed pre-service secondary teachers' reflective thinking in solving the tasks specific for the teaching and learning of polar coordinates. We report how and through what process mathematical tasks that can create disequilibrium for pre-service secondary teachers enable reflective thinking and expand preservice secondary teachers' thoughts and recognition of defining reflective thinking in looking back on one's problem solving and thinking processes.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.147-164
• /
• 2009

본 연구에서는 초등학교 4학년 수학학습 부진학생을 대상으로 도형영역에 대해 수학저널 쓰기를 활용한 보충학습을 실시하여 수학 부진학생의 기하학적 사고 수준에 어떤 변화가 있는지 알아보았다. 연구 대상의 사전 기하학적 사고 수준 검사 결과에 기초하여 지도 내용을 van Hiele의 5단계 학습과정에 따라 재구성하여 주 1회 이상 12주간의 보충수업 후, 사후 기하학적 사고 수준 검사 결과 및 학생들이 작성한 수학저널과 수업 중 나타난 반응 및 면담 내용을 분석함으로써 부진학생들 외 기하학적 사고 수준 변화에 주목하였다. 더불어 의사표현력이나 협동활동과 같이 수학학습 부진학생의 교수-학습과 관련한 교수학적 함의를 얻을 수 있었다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.569-580
• /
• 2013

This study examined how a Structured Reading Framework (SRF) is related to improving students' critical thinking ability in an argument-based inquiry approach, called the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. A total of 75 $8^{th}$ graders participated in the study, with 34 in the control group and 41 in the treatment group. The gains in critical thinking skills were compared between two groups, and relationships among the components of the reading framework and the critical thinking skills were explored at the group level. Result indicates that the treatment group who used the SRF had larger gains in critical thinking scores than control group who used the Original Reading Framework (ORF). In addition, results show that the correlations between Reading Framework (RF) components and critical thinking scores are statistically significant in the treatment group, while no correlations exist in the control group. It appears that using the SRF have an impact on developing students' critical thinking ability by providing a scaffold to assist argumentation practice.