• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제20권11호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2020

본 연구에서는 로봇 활용 SW융합교육에서 SW효능감이 컴퓨팅 사고력, 융합인재소양에 미치는 영향과 이들 관계에서 흥미와 학습 참여의 이중매개효과를 규명하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 서울 소재 중학교에 재학 중인 146명의 학생을 대상으로 자유학기제 로봇활용 SW융합교육을 진행한 후 SW효능감, 컴퓨팅사고력, 융합인재 소양, 흥미, 학습참여를 측정하였다. 수집된 데이터는 이중매개효과 검증을 위해 SPSS macro process를 활용하여 분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, SW효능감은 컴퓨팅 사고력, 융합인재소양에 유의하게 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다, 둘째, 흥미는 SW효능감과 컴퓨팅 사고력, 융합인재소양의 관계를 매개하지 않은 반면, 학습참여는 SW효능감과 컴퓨팅 사고력, 융합인재소양의 관계를 매개하였다. 셋째, SW효능감은 흥미와 학습참여를 이중매개 과정을 거쳐 컴퓨팅 사고력과 융합인재소양에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과는 로봇 활용 SW융합교육에서 컴퓨팅 사고력과 융합인재소양을 향상시키기 위한 SW효능감과 흥미 및 학습참여의 역할을 제시하고, 수업 설계 및 수업 방향에 대한 시사점을 제공한다.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2015

본 논문의 목적은 Computational Thinking(CT) 교육에서의 학습자 평가를 위한 방안으로 학습자가 제작한 프로젝트의 코드를 분석하는 방법을 제안한다. 최근 초중등 SW교육에서는 블록형 프로그래밍 도구를 활용한 교육이 이루지고 있으므로, 학생들의 산출물인 스크래치 프로젝트의 코드를 분석하여 CT 개념 습득과 학습자의 수준을 평가하는 방안을 모색하였다. 초보학습자 45명의 프로젝트를 분석한 결과 초보학습자들의 잘못된 습관에 대한 패턴이 나타났으며 CT 개념 학습을 코드의 패턴에 의해 평가할 수 있다는 것을 검증하였다. 학습자의 수준이 높을수록 논리적 사고, 동기화, 플로우 제어, 데이터 표현의 요소 점수가 높게 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 초중등 SW 교육에서 CT 개념 학습에 대한 평가를 위해 활용할 수 있다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.15-26
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study was to develop the student-centered elementary science textbook model and explore the applicability of the school. For this study we conducted a literature survey and analysis of domestic and foreign books, surveys, and then developed a textbook model of student-centered instruction. We have selected the three elementary school, three grades, fifty-seven students to apply the model developed textbooks. Textbook model of Earth was developed as a center of student activity. Applying the results of development of textbooks in the field, students were interested about the student-centered textbooks and they were felt that the development of textbooks were textbook that students can study on their own. Through this research it could confirm that it should be provided feedback to causes of the reflective thinking of students in the textbook for the development of student-centered textbook.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.51-65
• /
• 2006

This research assumes that expanding the depth and range of thinking can be achieved through systems thinking education to the youth. To verify this assumption, degree of expansion of thinking was evaluated after the systems thinking education was done to middle school students in Kyeongi province. As a result, significant statistical difference was found. More variables were presented after systems thinking education. This means education program enhances student's thinking ability. Possibility of systems thinking application can be verified through systems thinking education to the various ranges of students in the future.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.34-42
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the effects of science lessons using six thinking hats techniques on creativity and science academic achievement. To verify the research problem, the subject of this study was fourth-grade students selected from four classes of an elementary school located in Busan. For ten weeks, the experimental group of 40 students was taught using the six thinking hats techniques. The comparative group also of 40 students, was taught in normal classes which used a Text-book. Children were given a creativity test and academic achievement test in science to measure the effects on six thinking hats techniques. Likert scales were used to gather students feedbacks on creativity and science academic achievement. Through these procedures, the following results were obtained: First, the six thinking hats techniques had a more effect on creativity than the normal classes, where a text-book was used. Second, the six thinking hats techniques could be seen to be effective in improving the student's academic achievements in science than the normal classes which used a Text-book. Third, the result of the student recognition investigation, we could know that the students showed lots of interest in the science lessons using six thinking hats techniques, and they were able to understand the scientific theories. As a result, the elementary science class with six thinking hats techniques had the effects of developing creativity and science academic achievement. It means the science class with six thinking hats techniques has potential possibilities and value to develop creativity and science academic achievement.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.7-13
• /
• 2009

This study examined 1) student pilots' personality types, 2) the correlation between students' personality types and their achievement in flight training, 3) the correlation between students' personality types and Instructor Pilot(IP)s' personality type. The study used the Korean version of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) form. A total of 164 students in the year of 2000-2003 completed the inventory. The noticeable majority of student pilot were extroverted (59.6%) - Sensing (79.5%) - Thinking (70.2%) - Judgers (68.9%). Comparing personality types with flight achievement in showed no significant correlation. There was, however, a significant difference seen in comparing personality types with students' flight achievements. Thinking-type students showed higher flight achievements than feeling-type, and some of the personality types combination affects trainee's flight achievement. When both student and the Instructor have same attitude such as E-E or I-I, student's flight achievement was higher than when they have opposite attitude of personality. these findings implicate that the cooperation of students' and IP's personality could affect the students' flight achievement.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제32권8호
• /
• pp.1281-1294
• /
• 2012

This paper describes the types of models that biology majors use and how they go about making their models in learning key concepts in biology such as the cell membrane, cytoskeleton and cell structure. Initially, a total of 44 biology students from all year levels enrolled in the second semester of calendar year 2008-2009 were asked to make their respective models of the cell membrane, cytoskeleton and cell structure. They were also asked to answer an open-ended questionnaire. Of the 44, only 20 (five from each year level) were randomly selected for a one-on-one interview. Results showed that the student-generated models from all year levels were mostly analogies, some textbook definitions and occasional drawings. In making their model, students first read the text; second, outline similarities in structure and function or both; and third, make the model. Data suggest that models are good diagnostic tools for identifying critical thinking skills of students. In this case, students mostly demonstrate the ability to recognize similarities in structure and function between the concept and their model. Some senior students demonstrated integration and reflective thinking in making their models. Thus, more opportunities for student-generated models must be available if students were to develop integration and reflective thinking in their models.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.624-633
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to compare problem finding ability, creative thinking ability, creative tendency, and science process skill between the scientifically gifted students and the general students. For this study, problem finding ability test, integrating creativity test, and science process skill test were conducted to the elementary gifted students (n=95) in science and the general students (n=149) at the same school district. The results of this study were as follows: The mean scores of problem finding, creative thinking, creative tendency, and science process skill of the gifted students were statistically higher than the general students. The problem finding ability had partially weak correlation with sub-domains of the creative thinking ability, creative tendency, and science process skill. Findings suggest that there are needs of further study about factors affecting problem finding and considering the degree of structure of problem situation.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.275-283
• /
• 2009

Purpose: This study investigated the effects of reeducation of nursing process on nurses' expertise, critical thinking disposition, and clinical decision making. Methods: Data were collected from March to June, 2007. The subjects were 47 Academic Credit Bank System Student Nurses. They were taught 'nursing process' during 1 semester(15weeks). 47 nurses were divided into three groups according to clinical experience(under 3 years, 3 to under 5 years, 5 years or more). After 15 weeks, the effects of education were compared using a paired t-test between pre-test and post-test. Results: There was a significant difference in the 3 to under 5 years experienced nurses's expertise(t=-3.659, p=.004) between the pre-test and post-test. There was a significant difference in the 5 years or more experienced nurses's expertise(t=-5.781, p<.001) and critical thinking disposition(t=-3.345, p=.003) between the pre-test and post-test. There were no significant differences in clinical decision making(accuracy, proficiency, and confidence) of 3 groups. Conclusion: Reeducation of nursing process is a valuable teaching and an evaluation strategy for 5 years or more experienced nurses to improve expertise and critical thinking disposition. We need to develop continuing education program for improving nurses' clinical decision making.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.347-360
• /
• 2016

이 연구는 학생 평가활동을 적용한 논의기반 탐구 과학수업이 고등학생들의 반성적 사고에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 광역시의 인문계 고등학교 1학년 6개 학급의 학생 166명을 대상으로 한 학기에 걸쳐 5개의 논의기반 탐구 과학수업을 실시하였다. 실험집단(84명)은 논의기반 탐구 과학수업의 주장과 증거 단계에 동료평가활동과 자기평가활동을 적용하여 논의의 질을 평가하는 경험을 제공하였으며 비교집단(82명)은 이 단계를 생략하였다. 학생 평가활동이 학생들의 반성적 사고에 미치는 효과를 알아보기 위해 학생들이 작성한 반성 글쓰기를 분석하였으며, 인터뷰와 설문조사를 통해 평가활동에 대한 학생들의 인식을 탐색하여 학생 평가활동의 타당성과 활용 정도를 알아보았다. 반성 글쓰기 분석 결과, 1차 반성 글쓰기에서 두 집단 간의 유의미한 차이가 없었으나 3차와 5차 반성 글쓰기에서 실험집단의 점수가 비교집단보다 유의미하게 높았다. 반성 글쓰기의 하위 요소에서 탐구과정 분석, 학습의 이해, 생각의 변화 요소는 실험집단과 비교집단 모두 메타인지 수준의 반성을 나타내는 학생 비율이 증가하였으나, 실험집단이 비교집단보다 메타인지 수준의 반성을 보이는 학생 비율이 더 높았다. 반성적 실천 요소의 분석 결과, 실험집단은 메타인지 수준의 반성적 실천 학생 비율이 증가하였으나 비교집단은 오히려 감소하였다. 학생 설문조사와 인터뷰를 분석한 결과, 학생들은 평가활동이 자신의 학습에 도움이 된다고 인식하고 있었다. 또한 평가활동을 통해 자신이 무엇을 얼마나 알고 있는지를 깨닫게 되고 문제점을 파악하여 개선할 수 있는 방법을 탐색하는 메타인지 능력이 향상되었다고 응답하였다. 이러한 메타인지적 반성을 통해 부족한 부분을 개선하려 노력하였으므로 평가활동이 반성적 실천을 이끌었다고 인식하였다. 따라서 학생 평가활동은 학습의 과정으로 통합되어 학생들을 능동적으로 학습에 참여시킬 뿐만 아니라 학습에 대한 책임감을 향상시켜 학습을 스캐폴딩하는 도구로써 활용이 가능하다고 생각된다.