1 |
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria- referenced self-Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181.
DOI
|
2 |
Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effect of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29-58.
DOI
|
3 |
Biggs, J. B., & Moore, P. J., (1993). The Process of Learning (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
|
4 |
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
|
5 |
Brindley, C. & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-80.
DOI
|
6 |
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 301-314.
DOI
|
7 |
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328-338.
DOI
|
8 |
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A Restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the Educative Process. Boston; D.C. Heath.
|
9 |
Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
10 |
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2007). Argumentation in science education: an overview. Argumentation in Science Education, 35, 3-27.
DOI
|
11 |
Fairbrother, B., Black, P., & Gill, P. (Eds.). (1995). Teachers Assessing Pupils. London: The Association of Science Education.
|
12 |
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
13 |
Gama, C. (2004). Metacognition in interactive learning environments: The reflection assistant model. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp.668-677). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
|
14 |
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2013). Structuring the peer assessment process: Impact on feedback quality. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, N. Mitchell, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings, 2, 255-256.
|
15 |
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation, Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
DOI
|
16 |
Heo, E. The Impact of General Chemistry Laboratory Using Reading Frame-Based Science Writing Heuristic Approach on College Students' Reflective Thinking. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea, 2011.
|
17 |
Kollar, I. & Fischer F. (2012). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348.
DOI
|
18 |
Hwang, S., Kim, H., Yoo, J., & Pak, S. (2001). Ninth Graders' Self-Assessment of Scientific Process Skills in Open Investigation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(3), 506-515.
|
19 |
Jang, K., Nam, J., & Choi, A. (2012). The Effects of Argument-Based Inquiry Using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach on Argument Structure in Students' Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1099-1108.
DOI
|
20 |
Keys, C., Hand, B., Prian, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.
DOI
|
21 |
Larson, A., Britt, M., & Kurby, C. (2009). Improving students' evaluation of informal arguments. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 339-366.
DOI
|
22 |
Lee, S., Bak, D., & Nam, J. (2015). Impact of Peer Assessment Activities on High School Student's Argumentation in Argument-Based Inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 353-361.
DOI
|
23 |
Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536.
DOI
|
24 |
Li, L., Steckelberg, A. L., & Srinivasan, S. (2008). Utilizing peer interactions to promote learning through a computer-assisted peer assessment system. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(2), 133-148.
|
25 |
Nam, J., Koh, M., Bak, D., Lim, J., Lee, D. & Choi, A. (2011). The Effects of Argumentation-based General Chemistry Laboratory on Preservice Science Teachers' Understanding of Chemistry Concepts and Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1077-1091.
|
26 |
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strike rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14-19.
DOI
|
27 |
Ministry Of Education. (2015). 2015 Revised national curriculum. MOE, Notice No. 2015-74.
|
28 |
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 117-128.
DOI
|
29 |
Nam, J., Kwak, K., Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
|
30 |
Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 214-228.
DOI
|
31 |
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
32 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simmon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
|
33 |
Phillips, L., & Norris, S. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the readers' world meets the world on paper?. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327.
DOI
|
34 |
Purchase, H. (2000). Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 341-352.
|
35 |
Pierce, A. E. (2003). Irruptions of voice: A critique of "Rhizovocality: by a white feminist researcher. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 721-723.
DOI
|
36 |
Pope, N. (2001). An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 235-246.
DOI
|
37 |
Prins, F., Sluijsmans, D., & Kirschner, P. (2006). Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles, and preferences. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 289-303.
DOI
|
38 |
Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147-164.
DOI
|
39 |
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670.
DOI
|
40 |
Smyth, K. (2004). The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 369-378.
|
41 |
Spiller, D. (2009). Assessment matters: Self assessment and peer assessment. New Zealand: University of Waikato.
|
42 |
Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 121-148.
DOI
|
43 |
Tavares, M., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M., & Mortimer, E. (2010). Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems. Science & Education, 19(6-8),573-598.
DOI
|
44 |
Strijbos, J. W., Van Goozen, B., & Prins, F. (2012). Developing a coding scheme for analysing peer feedback messages.
|
45 |
Sung, H., Hwang, S., & Nam, J. (2012). Examining the Relation Between Students' Reflective Thinking and the Reading Framework in the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 146-159.
DOI
|
46 |
Sung, H. & Nam, J. (2013). The Impact of Reading Framework as a Reading Strategy on Writing for Reflection of Middle School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 249-265.
DOI
|
47 |
Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
DOI
|
48 |
Zoller, U. (1999). Teaching tomorrow's college science courses are we getting it right?. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(6), 409-414.
|
49 |
Zoller, U., Fastow, M. & Lubezky, A. (1997). Student self- assessment in chemistry examinations requiring higher and lower order cognitive skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(1), 112-113.
DOI
|