• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.65-103
• /
• 2019

Purpose The purpose of this study is to find out in extent to which the companies in Korea and oversea, which has been subjected by different laws of their country, have guaranteed the personal information rights and have provided proper 'right to access' to the information subjects. Design/methodology/approach This study compared Korean laws with 'General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)' of EU and 'California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)' to check each of the level of 'right to access' guarantee. In terms of the difference in guaranteeing the right, this study compared Korean IT leading companies with US global leading IT companies to find out how much 'right to access' are properly implemented in their policies and functions they provide. Findings The result of the study shows that 'right to access' has not been well guaranteed by Korean law, as it does not provide the right to choose method and medium by information subjects and does not clarify the types of diverse information. This was clearly opposite with the other laws providing the right to choose what method and medium that subjects want with clarifying every types of personal information possible to be more. In addition, 'right to access' has not been well guaranteed by Korean companies in comparison with by the oversea companies which proactively guarantee the right by setting the function enabling subjects to browse their information through their websites or applications.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.151-157
• /
• 2017

In the case of uploading privacy information of an information owner in the Internet, the information owner may want to deliver the privacy information itself or remove such information from the search list in order to prevent third parties from accessing the privacy information of the information owner. Such a right to be forgotten may collide with the freedom of expression of a third party. The right to be forgotten, which originates from the self-determination right on privacy information based on Article 10 and 17 of the Constitution and the freedom of expression, which is based on Article 21 thereof are all relative basic rights and are both limited by Item 2 under Article 37 of the same law, which is the general limitation provision for the basic rights. Therefore, when the right to be forgotten and the freedom of expression collides, it is not possible to give priority to one of the those unilaterally. It depends on the nature of the case at hand to find a natural balance for the harmonious solution for both parties. The criteria can be the sensitivity to the privacy of the information owner caused by the disclose of the privacy information, the public benefits such information may serve, the social common good that could be expected by the disclosure of the privacy information and the damages suffered in terms of the personal interest caused by the disclosure of the information, in a comprehensive manner.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.591-605
• /
• 2017

개인정보자기결정권이란 "자신에 관한 정보가 언제 누구에게 어느 범위까지 알려지고 또 이용되도록 할 것인지를 그 정보주체가 스스로 결정할 수 있는 권리"로서 2005년 헌법재판소에서 헌법상으로 인정한 권리이다. 개인정보 자기결정권 증에는 정보주체가 정보보유자가 보유중인 본인의 정보에 대한 현황 및 처리내역을 열람할 수 있도록 하는 자기정보접근권이 있다. 이러한 자기정보접근권을 보장하기 위하여 개인정보와 관련된 각종 법률에서 정보보유자에게 개인정보의 처리에 관한 사항을 정보주체에게 무조건적으로 통지하도록 의무(이하 "무조건적 자기정보접근권")를 부여하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 무조건적 자기정보접근권 부여에 대한 국내 법률 현황 및 외국의 규제 현황을 분석한다. 이어서 국내 기업들의 대응 사례를 소개하고, 관련 문제점 및 개선방안을 제시하며 결론을 낼 것이다.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제21권7호
• /
• pp.103-107
• /
• 2021

The article analyzes the theoretical aspects of the relationship between the right to medical secrecy and the employer's right to receive information on the employee's state of health, resulting in a more complete description of the implementation of the right to medical secrecy and the employer's right to information on the employee's health state and the possibilities of protecting violated rights. The limits of permissible restrictions on the right to secrecy of health in terms of ensuring the person's performance of their job function have been clarified.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.89-101
• /
• 2022

Objectives: By comparing and examining how important issues concerning industrial health information for workers are viewed in other advanced countries, it is intended to ascertain problems in the approach found in Korean legislation and obtain legal and policy implications. Methods: The results of a survey were introduced and analyzed through a comparative method for each case after investigating in detail what and how important issues surrounding workers' right to know industrial health information are reflected in the legislation of Germany, the U.S., the U.K., and Japan. Based on the results of this comparative analysis, theoretical and policy implications and legal policy improvement tasks were drawn to strengthen workers' right to industrial health information for each case in Korea. Results: For access to industrial health information, most of the other advanced countries clearly stipulate a right to access for current and past workers and/or their representatives. As a result, workers or their representatives do not need to use the Information Disclosure Act to access exposure records, and there is no debate over the Information Disclosure Act. In other words, industrial health information is focused on ensuring free access to workers or their representatives and is not interested in reporting it to the government. Conclusions: In order to strengthen workers' right to know about industrial health, it is most important to address the legal issues related to this right, which is considered insufficient by comparative law. This should start with a concrete and effective definition of what and how to guarantee workers' rights to industrial health, such as the right to freely access industrial health information, including for retired workers and bereaved families of deceased workers.

• 정보화정책
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.84-96
• /
• 2018

잊힐 권리는 정보의 주체가 온라인상에서 자신과 관련된 모든 정보를 삭제하거나 확산의 방지를 요구할 수 있는 자기결정권 및 통제 권리를 뜻한다. 개인정보를 보호하고 사생활 침해로 인한 피해를 방지하기 위한 사회적 관심이 높아지면서 우리나라에서도 잊힐 권리에 대한 다양한 논의가 진행되고 있다. 그러나 잊힐 권리에 대한 선행연구는 주로 법적 개념을 다루고 있으며, 경제적 가치에 대한 고려는 미흡한 상황이다. 이에 본 연구는 잊힐 권리에 대한 우리나라 국민의 인식을 파악하고 잊힐 권리의 경제적 가치를 정량적으로 측정하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 분석 결과, 현재 개인정보 공개에 대한 우려는 존재하는 반면 잊힐 권리에 대한 인식은 아직 부족한 상황으로 나타났다. 잊힐 권리에 대한 응답자의 월평균 지불의사금액은 약 1,218원으로 도출되었으며, 연간 경제적 가치는 2017년 기준 약 5,400억 원으로 산정되었다. 특히 개인정보 유출 경험이 있는 응답자의 경우 잊힐 권리에 부여하는 가치는 더욱 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 향후 잊힐 권리에 대한 사회적 쟁점을 논의하는 과정에서 유용한 참고자료로 활용될 것이다.

• 한국측량학회지
• /
• 제33권6호
• /
• pp.527-536
• /
• 2015

Recently, the demand for three-dimensional spatial information has continuously been increasing, and especially, studies of indoor/outdoor spatial information or data construction have actively been conducted. However, utilization of spatial information does not universally spread to the private sector, but it is mostly used for the government offices. Thus, this study deals with the creation of three-dimensional right objects and the technique of expression to further vitalize the private sector, three-dimensional right objects, aiming to create and express three-dimensional right spaces in a particular system or open platform more conveniently. Unlike a plane text or apartment building used in existing maps was iconified and displayed simply, this study proposes a method of extracting data from the outer border of the building by the relevant level based on the existing structured three-dimensional building, a method of providing two-dimensional right spatial objects in XML, and expressing them as three-dimensional right objects efficiently. In addition, this study will discuss a method of creating right objects in a way in which an owner who was provided with a cross section of a building involves the direct detailed right objects in additional production or reproduction to utilize three-dimensional data (right objects) produced through this study.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.131-141
• /
• 2013

Matters related to the right to be forgotten started the dispute Europe to introduce it first when Data Protection Directive established in 1995 proceeded revision. Relating to this, diverse disputes proceed on responding to personal information protection and internet laws in our nation. Especially as our National Assembly submitted the law regarding the promotion of information and communication network use and protection of information and amendment of copyright, it is necessary to look into the movement on introduction of law of right to be forgotten closely in detail. EU which attempted the institutionalization for the first time, relating to review of General Data Protection Regulation, proposed opinions such as the necessity to define subjects of personal information concretely and specifically and or protection target and balanced consideration on freedom of expression which is constitutional value. In the case of our nation, there was legislation attempt to introduce the regulation but it was limited in the form of fallen effectiveness without concrete and detailed review on internet law. To solve such problems, it is necessary to look into issues and matters to be considered required to accept right to be forgotten closely and discuss possibility of introducing right to be forgotten, conflicts between fundamental rights becoming issue, effect of goal achievement of personal information protection through the system introduction, and other rational acceptance method.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.127-132
• /
• 2007

본 논문에서는 주어진 기수 ${\gamma}$ 표현법을 SPA에 안전하게 리코딩 하는 방법을 제안한다. 제안된 알고리즘들은 기존의 것들과는 달리, Left-to-Right 리코딩이 가능하도록 구성되어져 있기 때문에 최상위 비트부터 스캔하면서 스칼라 곱셈을 계산하는 알고리즘과 연동이 되어 질 경우, 추가 메모리 없이 쉽게 구현된다는 장점이 있다. 따라서 Left-to-Right리코딩 기법들은 메모리의 제약을 받는 장비인 스마트 카드, 센서 노드에 적합하다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제20권10호
• /
• pp.113-119
• /
• 2015

In this paper, we propose an efficient freedom of information and Information access right which improves transparent and speedy administration process. To build open Information, we scrutinize that causes of non access right and change of civil service consciousness, attitude for open information by effectively open system circumstances. The Important thing is basic information that is available to the public through an agency's FOIA Reference Guide, all agencies must notify potential FOIA requesters of the formal rules and requirements for the making and handling of FOIA request, through their FOIA regulations. The characteristics of this paper focused on Information access right, causes of non access right and proposed policy. In this paper, The author emphasize are as follows: first, to examine freedom of information' necessity and problem that scrutinize a theoretic analysis, second, to understand civil servant's attitude for the freedom of information, third, to suggest action plan and agenda for the better of Good Governance and Democracy of information.