• 제목/요약/키워드: quality evaluation factor

검색결과 1,002건 처리시간 0.028초

상황적 소비자 적대감이 소비자 태도 및 행동에 미치는 영향-문화 내재화의 조절효과를 중심으로 (The Effect of Situational Consumer Animosity on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior-Focused on the Moderating Effect of Cultural Internalization)

  • 배성주;채명수
    • 무역학회지
    • /
    • 제47권3호
    • /
    • pp.111-128
    • /
    • 2022
  • This study tried to verify the effect of situational consumer animosity on consumer attitudes and behaviors with the moderating effect of cultural internalization. For this purpose, 460 valid survey data were collected from Koreans. The causal and regulatory relationships between the variables were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis and structural model analysis using AMOS with the collected data. It was confirmed that the national situational animosity had a negative effect on quality evaluation, while personal situational animosity did not. Also, the positive relationship between quality evaluation and purchase intention was confirmed. In addition, it was found that internalization of individual culture moderates the effect of quality evaluation on purchase intention.

계층분석법을 이용한 강의평가 요인도출과 우선순위분석 (Factor Derivation of Course Evaluation and Priority Analysis Using Analytic Hierarchy Process)

  • 안수현;이상준
    • 실천공학교육논문지
    • /
    • 제14권3호
    • /
    • pp.513-522
    • /
    • 2022
  • 강의평가는 대학교육의 질을 향상시키고 수업을 개선하는데 유용한 정보로 활용된다. 본 연구는 강의평가를 구성하는 요인을 탐색하고자 선행연구와 FGI를 통해 구성요인을 도출하고 계층분석법(AHP: Analytic Hierarchy Process)을 통해 요인간 상대적 중요도 및 우선순위를 파악하였다. 이를 위해 5개의 구성요인과 15개의 평가항목을 도출하였다. 강의평가 요인개발의 전문성과 공정성을 확보하기 위해 학생과 교원을 대상으로 설문을 실시하여 총 20부의 유효한 자료를 수집하였고, 일치도 검증을 완료한 자료를 토대로 각 평가항목의 가중치를 산출하였다. 분석 결과 강의평가 요인구성에 있어서 학생은 수업 내용, 수업 방법, 수업 운영, 수업 평가, 수업 계획 순으로, 교원은 수업 내용, 수업 운영, 수업 방법, 수업 평가, 수업 계획 순으로 중요하다고 평가하였다. 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 대학교육의 질 관리 차원에서 강의평가의 효율성과 신뢰성 향상을 위해 다양한 분석과 연구가 있기를 기대한다.

출판사 생성 이용통계 데이터의 품질 평가에 대한 연구 (Evaluation on Quality of Publisher-Generated Usage Statistics)

  • 정영임
    • 정보관리연구
    • /
    • 제43권3호
    • /
    • pp.161-180
    • /
    • 2012
  • 본 논문에서는 최근 연구가 활성화되고 있는 전자저널 이용통계의 개념과 필요성에 대해 알아보고 COUNTER 그룹에 의해 진행 중인 이용 지수 프로젝트(Journal Usage Factor Project)의 동향을 파악하였다. 또 생성 주체별 이용통계 데이터가 가지는 장점 및 한계점을 살펴보았고, 31개 출판사의 실제 이용통계 데이터를 분석하여 다양한 오류와 문제 유형을 발견함으로써 출판사 생성 이용통계 데이터의 품질이 완전히 신뢰할만한 수준이 아님을 지적하였다.

국가연구개발사업의 과학적 성과분석을 위한 새로운 계량지표 개발에 관한 연구 (Developing Bibliometric Indicators for Analysis & Evaluation of National R&D Programs)

  • 허정은;김해도;조영돈;조석민;조순로
    • 기술혁신학회지
    • /
    • 제11권3호
    • /
    • pp.376-399
    • /
    • 2008
  • 최근 연구개발 투자규모가 급속히 증가함에 따라 정부는 R&D사업의 투자효율성을 높이기 위한 다양한 정책을 구사하고 있다. 구체적으로 R&D사업에 대한 성과평가를 강화하고 평가결과를 예산의 조정 및 배분에 반영하는 등 성과중심의 평가체계를 정착시키기 위해 노력하고 있다. 이처럼 국가연구개발사업에 대한 평가가 성과중심으로 체계화되기 위해서는 R&D 성과물을 과학적 객관적으로 분석할 수 있는 성과지표의 개발이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 전 부처 연구개발사업에 공통으로 적용할 수 있는 성과지표인 SCI논문지표를 바탕으로 교육과학기술부 3대 연구개발사업에 대한 구체적인 사례분석을 실시하여 이들 사업이 우리나라 전체 R&D에서 차지하는 질적 양적 위상을 파악하고자 하였다. 이러한 분석을 위해 SCI 관련 기존지표와 더불어 4개의 신규지표를 소개하였고 신규지표들의 타당성 조사를 위해 모의실험을 실시하였다. 그 결과 보완된 순위보정영향력지수(ordinal rank normalized impact factor, omIF)가 분야간 비교 시 가장 적절한 성과지표인 것으로 분석되었다.

  • PDF

전기전자 시험인증기관의 글로벌 경쟁력 요인 연구 (A Study on Global Competitiveness Factors of Electrical and Electronic Testing and Certification Bodies)

  • 박경환;이철규
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제49권3호
    • /
    • pp.281-297
    • /
    • 2021
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to select factors affecting the global competitiveness of testing and certification bodies and to develop evaluation indicator. Methods: Considering the industrial characteristics of Korea, the electrical and electronic test and certification field was selected as the research subject. As a research method, various factors were extracted through exploratory research such as theoretical considerations on the competitiveness of testing and certification bodies and analysis of the growth process of global testing and certification bodies, and focused interviews and surveys were conducted with conformity assessment experts. Results: The 16 factors affecting the global competitiveness of testing and certification institutions were identified. Among the 4 PEST factors, the technological factor had the highest importance, followed by the economic factor, the social factor, and the political factor. The average of the 16 factors was 0.0625, and the 8 factors above the average included 4 technological factors, 3 economic factors, and 1 social factor, but did not include political factors. The factor with the greatest weight was Standardization Capability for Testing & Certification 0.105. Conclusion: It can be used to evaluate the global competitiveness level of domestic testing and certification bodies using evaluation indicators and to establish strategies for strengthening global competitiveness.

청국장 분말을 첨가한 쿠키의 품질 특성 (Quality Characteristics of Cookies added with Chungkukjang Powder)

  • 방병호;김관필;김민정;정은자
    • 한국식품영양학회지
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.210-216
    • /
    • 2011
  • We investigated the quality characteristics of cookies made with Chungkukjang powder. Chungkukjang is a well-known nutritional supplement. Cookie samples were made by adding differrent quantities of Chungkukjang powder(0%, 4%, 8% and 12%). We examined the resulting, moisture, pH, color, spread factor, hardness and sensory evaluation of the cookies. While the moisture and, a and b value of the cookies significantly increased when more Chungkukjang powder was added (p<0.01), the pH, L value, spread factor and hardness of the cookies significantly decreased(p<0.01). Cookies containing 0% and 4% Chungkukjang powder had similar sensory evaluation score in terms of color, taste and flavor cookies made with 4% Chungkukjang powder had the highest texture and overall consumer acceptability scores.

국방핵심기술 연구개발의 제안서 평가를 위한 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Proposals of National Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects)

  • 김찬수;조규갑
    • 산업공학
    • /
    • 제21권1호
    • /
    • pp.96-108
    • /
    • 2008
  • This paper proposes the systematic design approach for developing the evaluation indicators that evaluate the candidate proposals in the national defense core-technology R&D projects. To improve the validity and fairness of the evaluation indicators, the existing evaluation process in a military and a public sector are surveyed and also the existing evaluation system of the core-technology R&D programs for the national defense is analysed and discussed. A new system for the evaluation indicators is designed by using the axiomatic design, factor analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. It is expected that the proposed evaluation indicators contribute to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the evaluation process for the proposal of the national defense core-technology R&D projects.

정보시스템 평가지표 개발에 관한 실증적 연구 : 공공부문을 중심으로 (An Empirical Study on Development of IS Evaluation Indices : In Case of Public Sectors)

  • 정해용;김상훈
    • 한국경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제28권4호
    • /
    • pp.155-189
    • /
    • 2003
  • In this research, the comprehensive evaluation model of IS(information systems) for public sectors is theoretically constructed through reviewing and integrating previous IS evaluation-related research. This model is hypothesized to consist of five sectors(System Sector, User Sector, Organization and Management Sector, Resource Management Sector and Strategic Contribution Sector), ten evaluation items belonging to these five evaluation sectors, and sixty two evaluation indices for these ten evaluation items. The results of empirical analyses to test the validity of the research model show that the evaluation sectors turn out to be the same ones as proposed in the hypothetical model. The evaluation items(System Quality, Information Quality, Service Quality) in System Sector proves to be consistent with the hypothetical model. However, in case of User Sector, two evaluation items(Perceived Usefulness and User Satisfaction) which are included in the hypothetical model are found to be merged into one item(User Satisfaction). And, it is shown that four evaluation items such as the Efficiency of Internal Process, Customer Satisfaction, Organizational Innovation, and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement are included in Organization and Management Sector, differently from the research model in which the items, Organizational innovation and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement, are not divided. As a final result, sixty two evaluation indices that comprise all the evaluation items belonging to five sectors are found to be reduced to fifty seven ones through factor analyses, criterion-related validity tests and reliability analyses.

컴퓨터 지원시스템을 활용한 품질경영 성과측정 (Quality Management Performance Evaluation Using A Computer Support System)

  • 신완선;강은경
    • 대한산업공학회지
    • /
    • 제24권4호
    • /
    • pp.529-537
    • /
    • 1998
  • Appropriate performance evaluation is a key successful factor for continuous improvement and systematic management support in the implementation of quality management. This research deals with the development of a computer support system for performance evaluation of quality management and its application to a real world problem. It, first, investigates existing performance evaluation methods and classifies them into three styles. A number of key factors for designing computer support systems are then elicited by analyzing the characteristics of the existing methods in terms of the requirements needed for a successful evaluation tool. The computer support system is designed by incorporating the key factors in the system design process and it is implemented as a network version. Finally, a case study is performed in order to verify the proposed support system. The pros and cons of the system are also discussed.

  • PDF

정보보호제품 품질 평가 모델에 관한 연구 (Quality Evaluation Model on Information Protection Product)

  • 윤형득;이경호
    • 정보보호학회논문지
    • /
    • 제27권6호
    • /
    • pp.1535-1547
    • /
    • 2017
  • 기업의 정보보호활동 예산 중 정보보호제품 구매가 가장 큰 비중을 차지하고 있다. 그러나 정보보호제품을 객관적으로 비교하기 위해 적용되어야 하는 평가요소와 평가모델이 없어 제품 선택에 어려움을 겪고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 정보보호제품 고유의 품질 특성을 연구하고 그에 따른 평가 요소들을 선정한다. 선정된 평가 요소들을 분석하여 중요도에 따른 가중치를 부여한 품질 결정 모델을 제시한다. 대상은 네트워크 정보보호제품으로 제한하여 분석하였고 모든 정보보호제품으로 확대하여 적용할 수 있다.