• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.54-63
• /
• 2013

This study aims to investigate relationships among self-directed learning readiness [SDLR], prerequisite mathematics test score and achievement level in college mathematics. For this purpose, the adjusted SDLRS (self-directed learning readiness scale) of Guglielmino's model, the score of mathematics diagnostic assesment and first semester college mathematics score among 424 freshmen students of engineering department of D university in 2011 were used and analyzed. Research results are as follows: Firstly, freshmen of engineering department had average level of SDLR, though they showed relative low level of self-direction, passion and time control ability. Secondly, considering SDLR with the mathematics diagnostic assesment score (3 groups: high, middle, low), there were no statistically significant differences. Thirdly, concerning SDLR according to the achievement level in college mathematics, a group which acquired good achievement showed higher level of SDLR compared with middle or lowachievement group. Differences among three groups were statistically significant. Lastly, there were affirmative relationships between SDLR, mathematics diagnostic assesment score and achievement in college mathematics. Furthermore, mathematics diagnostic assesment score and achievement level in college mathematics were found to be the most closely related. Based on the results, we suggest strategies to elevate SDLR of engineering department students and improve their achievement in college mathematics.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.129-150
• /
• 2024

This study utilized South Korean elementary and middle school student data to examine the longitudinal change trajectories of learning motivation types according to the longitudinal change trajectories of mathematics academic achievement. Growth mixture modeling, latent growth model, and multiple indicator latent growth model were used to examine various change trajectories for longitudinal data. As a result of the analysis, it was classified into 4 subgroups with similar longitudinal change trajectories of mathematics academic achievement, and the characteristics of the mathematics subject, which emphasize systematicity, appeared. Furthermore, higher mathematics academic achievement was associated with higher self-determination and higher academic motivation. And as the grade level increases, amotivation increases and self-determination decreases. This study suggests that teaching and learning support using this is necessary because the level of learning motivation according to self-determination is different depending on the level of mathematics academic achievement reflecting the characteristics of the student.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.157-166
• /
• 1999

Compared with other subjects, mathematics has great differences in achieve-ment. In hope of solving this problems, most schools try the level-movement learning. Although they say it may have some effect because of its homogeneous group, the level groups still have differences in achievement in their students abilities. So, this study aims to present an appropriate tasks for the advanced, intermediate and beginner groups and to help self-directed learning by selecting an appropriate tasks for the students' own level. To achieve thiese goals, a great deal of level tasks were developed and given to the students. After lettins them an select appropriate tasks for their own level and perform self-directed learning, the tasks were measured carefully for their interest, attitude and achievement in learning. Consequently, we tried a new method to improve uniformity and to turn teacher-centered learning into student-centered learning. The following is the conclusion to this study. First, self-directed learning based on the selection of level tasks has meaningful effects on learning achievement in mathematics, especially for the beginner group. Second, though the above method did not improve an interest for mathematics, but was very effective in the improvement of learning attitudes.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.133-144
• /
• 1999

This study aims at identifying the effect of problem posing on the academic achievement in high school mathematics. As subjects of the study, two classes of first grade in high school were selected. One of them was treated with problem posing learning, the other was treated with learning-in-a-body. Each has 40 students and was also divided into two groups(high- level and low-level) according to their learning-level. Two instruments were used for this study. One was the teaching-learning method developed by the researcher. The other was TTCT(Torrance Test of Creative Thinking). The 't-test' was used for this study and the significant level of test was within 5 percent. The results of this study are as follows: 1. The group with problem posing learning showed significantly higher academic achievement(learning-ability) than the one with learning-in-a-body. 2. There was no significant difference in the academic achievement(creativity) between the two groups. But there was significant difference in the creative factors. 3. There was no significant differences in the academic achievement between high-level-groups in each group. 4. There was significant difference in the academic achievement (learning-ability) between low-level groups in each group. And there was significant difference in the creative factors. On the basis of the results above, the following conclusions could be made. The problem posing learning method was more effective in the academic achievement in highschool mathematics than learning-in-a-body. Especially low-level group was more effective than high-level group. These facts implies that it is more effective for a teacher to adopt the problem posing learning considering the students' learning-levels.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2000

Compared with other subjects, mathematics has great differences in achievement. In hope of solving this problems, most schools the level-movement learning. Although they say it may have some effect because of its homogeneous group, the level groups still have differences in achievement in their students abilities. So, this study aims to present an appropriate tasks for the advanced intermediate and beginner groups and to help self-directed learning by selecting an appropriate tasks for the students' own level. To achieve thiese goals, a great deal of level tasks were developed and given to the students. After lettins them an select appropriate tasks for their own level and perform self-directed teaming, the tasks were measured carefully for their interest attitude and achievement in learning. Consequently, we tried a new method to improve uniformity and to turn teacher-centered learning into student-centered teaming. The following is the conclusion to this study. First self-directed teaming based on the selection of level tasks has meaningful effects on learning achievement in mathematics, especially for the beginner group. Second though the above method did not improve an interest for mathematics, but was very effective in the improvement of learning attitudes.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.143-159
• /
• 2018

수학 문제해결 교육 연구에 있어서 문제해결 과정에 나타나는 인지적, 정의적 요소의 상호작용 및 메타정의적 측면에 대한 연구의 비중이 점차 증가하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 수학 학습 성취 수준에 따라 초등학생의 문제해결 과정에 작용하는 메타정의의 기능적 특성을 파악하기 위하여 빈도 분석과 사례 분석을 병행하였다. 수학 학습 성취 수준에 따라 협업적 문제해결 활동에서 나타나는 메타정의 출현 빈도, 메타정의 유형별 빈도, 메타정의의 메타적 기능 유형별 빈도를 비교 분석하였다. 또한, 수학 학습 성취 수준별 메타정의의 메타적 기능 유형별 사례의 분석을 통하여 메타정의의 실제적인 작용 메카니즘을 파악하였다. 그 결과, 수학 학습 성취 하 수준 집단의 문제해결 과정에서 상 수준 집단에 비해 메타정의의 출현 비율이 상대적으로 높았으며, 상 수준 집단의 메타정의는 하 수준 집단에 비해 상대적으로 다양한 유형의 메타적 기능으로 작용하였다. 이와 같은 연구 결과로부터 수학 문제해결 수업에 적용해 볼 수 있는 메타정의의 기능적 특성과 관련한 교육적 시사점을 도출하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.395-422
• /
• 2014

인문계 ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$고등학교 1학년 1개 반 35명을 실험집단으로 다른 1개 반 35명을 비교집단으로 선정하였다. 실험집단은 수준별 학습지를 활용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형을 한반이고 비교집단은 일반적인 수업인 교과서 중심의 수업을 한 반이다. 본 연구에서는 고등학교 수학 수업에서 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형을 위해서 수준별 학습지를 개발한다. 그리고 개발한 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 고등학생의 학습능력을 향상시키는 것에 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 연구문제를 구체적으로 다음과 같이 설정하였다. 첫째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 학업성취도를 향상시킬 수 있는가? 둘째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 수학 학습태도를 향상시킬 수 있는가? 셋째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형에 대한 학생들의 반응은 어떠한가? 이다. 본 연구의 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 학업성취도가 향상되었다. 둘째, 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 수학 학습태도의 변화에 도움이 됨을 알 수 있었다. 셋째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형에 대하여 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 의미 있는 반응을 나타냄을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.197-205
• /
• 1998

This study aims to examine how cooperative teaming of small ability level groups influences the enhancement of their scholastic achievement in mathematics. The conclusions are as follows; 1. The students which participate in cooperative learning in small ability level groups demonstrate academic improvement over those that participate in non-cooperative learning groups. 2. In particular, this method is more effective for high-level classes, than for middle or low-level students. 3. The learners' perception, interest and attitude towards mathematics has not changed through their placement in small ability groups involved in cooperative activities.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.145-165
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 집단구성 방법이 수학성취도와 수학에 대한 태도에 미치는 효과를 조사하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 수학 성취도에서, TL-LS 집단 I과 TL-LS 집단 II는 일반학습 집단III보다 향상을 보였으나(p<.05), TL-LS 집단 I과 TL-LS 집단II간에는 유의한 차이가 없었다(p>.05). 수학 성취수준(상, 중 하위수준)에 따라서는, TL-LS 집단II은 일반학습 집단III보다 중, 하위 수준에서 향상을 보였으며, TL-LS 집단 I은 일반학습 집단III보다 하위 수준에서 향상을 보였다. 수학에 대한 태도에서, TL-LS 집단 I과 TL-LS 집단II는 일반학습 집단III보다 향상을 보였으나(p<.05), TL-LS 집단 I과 TL-LS 집단II간에는 유의한 차이가 없었다(p>.05).

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제53권2호
• /
• pp.219-237
• /
• 2014

In this study we desire to deduce implications for mathematics curriculum, teaching- learning, and evaluation from the data of Nation Assessment of Educational Achievement. For this, first we extracted the items written by the same achievement standard over two years from 2010 to 2012. Next we investigated whether the items are the representative items of a certain proficiency level and classified into the case of the items of the same proficiency level and the case of the items of different proficiency levels. Based on these we analysed learning characteristic of the each proficiency level. From the results of the above, we proposed what should be changed in mathematics curriculum, what should be considered in teaching-learning, and what should be paid attention to test item development.