• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.57-73
• /
• 2020

The proportion of digital evidence in criminal cases has increased, while at the same time, the spread of the Internet has made it easy to delete information that is stored in another place and thus, the Internet is being used to delete online criminal evidence. To respond quickly and effectively to cybercrime, 29 countries signed the Convention on Cybercrime in 2001 through the Council of Europe. Article 16 of the Convention relates to the expedited preservation of stored computer data and requires signatories to adopt legislative measures to enable its competent authorities to order expeditious preservation of specified computer data where there are grounds to believe that the data is particularly vulnerable to loss or modification. More than 60 countries have joined the Convention since 2001 and have made efforts to improve their legal system in line with it. The United States legislated 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) to preserve electronic evidence pending the issuance of a court order. The German Code of Criminal Procedure §§ 94~95 allows prosecution authorities to seize evidence or issue production orders without court control in urgent circumstances. A custodian shall be obliged to surrender evidence upon a request that evidence be preserved, and non-compliance results in punishment. Japan legislated the Criminal Procedure Act § 197(3) and (4) to establish a legal base for requesting that electronic records that are stored by an ISP not be deleted. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act § 184 outlines procedures for the preservation of evidence but does not adequately address the expeditious preservation of digital evidence that may be vulnerable to deletion. This paper analyzes nine considerations, including request subjects, requirements, and cost reimbursement to establish directions to improve the legal system for the expedited preservation of digital evidence. A new method to preserve online digital evidence in urgent cases is necessary.

• 한국소프트웨어감정평가학회 논문지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.25-35
• /
• 2020

우리나라 소송 체계에서 증거 등의 구조적 편재문제는 여전히 해소되지 않는 난제로 남아있다. 과거 이를 해결하기 위하여 많은 방법론적 논란이 있었으나, 최근에는 미국의 디스커버리와 같은 제도의 도입이 필요하다는 점이 더 이상 논란이 되지는 않는다. 이에 지식재산권 분야에서는 특허법을 중심으로 한 다양한 입법적 시도를 통한 제도 개선이 도모하고 있는 상황이다. 반면 컴퓨터프로그램저작물 등에 대한 저작권 침해 소송이 점차 고도의 기술적 특징을 배경으로 하는 경우가 많아짐에도 불구하고 디스커버리에 관한 논의는 거의 발견되지 않는다. 특허법 등의 경우 디스커버리와 같은 제도를 나름의 형태로 도입함으로써 이 문제를 적극적으로 해결하려는 모습과 대비된다. 컴퓨터프로그램저작물을 중심으로 한 저작권법 체계 역시 침해 소송에서 증거 등의 확보는 매우 중요하나 현실적으로 많은 한계를 나타내고 있다. 그러다 보니 실무에서는 침해물을 적절히 확보하지 못한 상태에서 소송을 진행할 수 밖에 없는 모습도 나타난다. 이에 저작권 침해 소송에서도 디스커버리와 같은 제도 보완이 요구되며, 현재 활용되는 다양한 방법을 중심으로 어떠한 방법론으로 접근이 필요할 지 검토해 보았다. 구체적으로는 미국의 디스커버리 제도 직접 적용, 특허법의 자료제출명령 준용 및 저작권법에 별도 제도 마련 방안을 검토하였다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.413-459
• /
• 2008

The Law has intervened to define rare circumstances in which a person should choose continuing life in United States. On the one hand, the law has traditionally acted to preservelife and to respect the sanctity of life. On the other hand, one's control over one's own body, and the right to determine what kind of medical care one will receive, is equally well respected and historically grounded. The competent patients have the right to forgo life-sustaining treatment, courts in United States have left many unanswered questions about the nature of that right. The right to choose to forgo life-sustaining treatment is a manifestation of a patient's autonomy interest. In United States, The Karen Quilan case gave rise to legislative activity in the host of state capitals, and several states had adopted statutes that formally recognized some forms of written directives describing some circumstances in which certain kinds of medical care could be terminated. These statues were sometimes dominated 'living will' acts, sometimes 'right to die' acts and ocasionally 'natural death' acts. Today virtually every state has produced a living will statue. In Korea, courts do not permit a terminally ill person to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Living wills apply in case of terminal illness owing to a defect in legislation. Now In Korea, these lively dispute of legal policy on the preconditions and concrete procedure of living will act and natural death act. Through the legislation of living will act and natural death act, we should prepare some circumstances to respect patient's autonomy on the right to die. We should frame the cultural standard to make a decision of forgoing life-sustainin1g treatment under the discreet procedure.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.57-72
• /
• 2011

According to Japanese Patent Act, the Japanese Patent Office, administrative organization, was authorized to decide validation of patent. However, Supreme Court of Japan held that a court is able to decide the invalidation of patent in 11th April, 2000, which caused the reform of Japanese Patent Act in June 2004. Reformed Patent Act established the article 104-3 and makes it for a court to decide the patentability where there are grounds for a patent invalidation. Through this amendment to the Patent Act, the legislative system to decide the patent validation has been reorganized and furthermore alleged infringer is allowed to argue against the patent validation by making use of infringement litigation procedure through defenses against patent invalidation as well as invalidation trial procedure for to file a request for a trial for patent invalidation to the Japanese Patent Office. That is to say, the article 104-3 was established in the Japanese Patent Act in the wake of Kilby, and thus a court, which is judicial authority, not administrative disposition agency is also able to decide the patent validation. Thus this article discuss how a court, the authority of which only patent infringement cases fell under, has been authorized to arbitrate cases about the patent validation and the decision of the patent validation in a court.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.119-164
• /
• 2007

Improving the formal objection system regarding reviewing medical expenses requires authority and confidence in the aspect of well-functioning the health insurance review and assessment system, legally and appropriately. The purposes of improvement of the formal objection system should aim for protecting the people's right of health. On handling the formal objections, the disputes of the rights should be settled economically and promptly by fairness, specialty, and objectivity in the health insurance review and assessment administration. Therefore, in order to promote the administrative specialty of health insurance, the formal objection committee needs to be organized independently and guaranteed expertly. Under the current formal objection system, however, the organization of committee lacks right-relief function, recognition and public relation as a health insurance appeal system, and related professional man powers. It is also analyzed that there are several controversial points, such as mass deliberation to the formal objection committee and its conference procedure. As a measure of improvement, it is analyzed that the committee needs to be organized independently with a proper number of professional man powers. The strict deliberation procedures and the prohibition of the decision-making by non-conference are also required to be empowered. The formal objection procedure provides the beneficiaries and the claims legitimately, so that it secures the legal relations on the health insurance system. Therefore, on the conference process of formal objection, the expert and guaranteed protection should be provided promptly, and its procedures to the appellants should also be assisted kindly.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권8호
• /
• pp.299-303
• /
• 2022

The article examines the stage of verification of a crime report from the standpoint of the need for its legislative regulation. Moreover, it investigates the international experience in this field. The existing procedural models are described in detail on the example of the neighboring and faraway countries. An analysis of the provisions of the current criminal procedure law of Russia and foreign experience allowed the authors to identify existing problems in the implementation of departmental control and prosecutorial supervision at the stage of verifying a crime report. The aim of the study is to develop theoretical provisions and recommendations regarding the implementation of departmental procedural control and prosecutorial supervision over the activities of the investigator during the verification of reports of crimes, based on the study of experience, both in Russia and in a number of countries of the near and far abroad, which could find their reflection in law enforcement practice, as well as aimed at improving the current criminal procedure legislation. The authors substantiated the theory that a detailed examination of the foreign procedural foundations of checking a crime report will allow us to form the most suitable model for checking a crime report for our state, taking into account all possible features and successfully implement it into the current criminal procedural law of the Russian Federation.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.99-143
• /
• 2016

General aviation and air transport are two wings of the civil aviation industry. Chinese air transport is developing rapidly, and has become the world second air transport system only second to US since 2005. However, Chinese civil aviation is far behind the world average level, and cannot meet requirements of economic construction and social development. The transition and structural adjustment of Chinese economy provide the general aviation with a unprecedented broad market. The prospect of general aviation is promising and anticipated. The development of general aviation industry needs the legislative supports, and the current legislative conditions of Chinese general aviation are undoubtedly far behind the realistic requirements. Accelerating the legislation in Chinese general aviation industry requires scientific legislation concept. First, Legislation must promote development of general aviation industry. The general aviation will serves as a Chinese emerging industry that boosts domestic demand, promotes employment and expedite domestic economic development. We should, based on both the concept of promoting the industrial development of general aviation and national industrial planning, enact and rectify relative laws and regulations. And we should also straighten out the relationship between aviation security and industrial development and promote the revolution of low-altitude airspace management in an all-round way, in order to improve the utilization rate of airspace resources, classify and establish airspace, simplify examination and approval procedure and intensify operation management. In addition, what we should do is to expedite the infrastructure layout construction, guide the differentiated but coordinated development of general aviation industries in various areas, establish a united supervision mechanism of general aviation, redistrict the responsibilities of Chinese Air Control Agency and set up legislation, law enforcement and judicial systems with clarified institutions, clear positioning and classified responsibilities, so as to usher in a new era of the legislative management of Chinese general aviation industry. Second, shift the focus from regulations to both regulations and services. Considering the particularity of the general aviation, we should use American practices for reference and take into account both regulation and service functions when enacting general aviation laws. For example, we should reduce administrative licensing and market supervision, and adopt "criteria" and "approval" management systems for non-commercial and commercial aviation. Furthermore, pay attention to social benefits. Complete social rescuing mechanism through legislation. It should be clarified in legislation that general aviation operators should take the responsibilities of, and ensure to realize social benefits of environmental protection and ecological balance .Finally, rise in line with international standards. Modify Chinese regulations which is inconsistent with international ones to remove barriers to international cooperation. Specify basic legislative principles. One is the principle of coordination. Realize coordination between the civil aviation and general aviation, between military aviation and civil aviation, and among departments. Two is the principle of pertinence. The general aviation has its own rules and specialties, needing to be standardized using specialized laws and regulations. Three is the principle of efficiency. To realize time and space values of general aviation, we should complete rules in aerospace openness, general aviation airport construction, general aviation operations, and regulation enforcement. Four is the principle of security. Balance the maximum use of resources of Chinese airspace and the according potential threats to Chinese national interests and social security, and establish a complete insurance system which functions as security defense and indemnificatory measure. Establish a unified legal system. Currently, the system of Chinese general aviation laws consists of national legislation, administrative laws and regulations and civil aviation regulations (CAR). Some problems exist in three components of the system, including too general content, unclear guarantee measures, incomplete implementation details, and lacking corresponding pertinence and flexibility required by general aviation regulations, stringency of operation management and standards, and uniformity of standards. A law and regulation system, centered on laws and consisting of administrative laws regulations, industrial regulations, implementation details, industrial policies and local laws and regulations, should be established. It is suggested to modify the Civil Aviation Law to make general aviation laws complete, enact the Regulations of General Aviation Development, and accelerate the establishment, modification and abolition of Chinese general aviation laws to intensify the coordination and uniformity of regulations.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.91-124
• /
• 2021

2019년 5월 식약처는 원료의약품 등록 및 자체 생동성 시험 요건 충족 여부에 따라 제네릭 의약품의 가격을 차등 산정하는 것을 내용으로 하는 「약제의 결정 및 조정 기준」 고시를 개정하였다. 이는 기허가 제네릭 의약품에 대해서조차 자체 생동성 시험을 시행하지 않는 경우 기존 약가를 인하하는 것으로서 과연 그 입법목적과 수단에 관한 충분한 공법적 고려 하에 도입된 것인가 하는 의문이 든다. 이 글은 실질적으로는 위탁·공동 생동 시험을 제한하고자 자체 생동성 여부를 기준으로 제네릭 의약품의 약가를 결정·조정하는 개정 고시의 배경을 소개한 후 입법목적의 정당성 및 비례원칙의 관점에서 이를 비판적으로 검토하였다. 첫째, 목적의 정당성 측면에서 제네릭 의약품 난립 방지라는 목적이 과연 그 입법목적으로서 정당한 것인지에 대한 검토가 부족하였다는 점을 지적하였다. 둘째, '자체 생동 요건 미충족시 약가 인하'라는 내용의 개정 고시가 적합성 원칙에 부합하려면 위탁·공동 생동으로는 안전성·유효성을 인정하기 어렵다거나 적어도 위탁·공동 생동이 자체 생동에 비해 안전성·유효성 검증에 있어서 불충분하다는 전제가 성립해야 한다. 그럼에도 이에 대한 검토가 이루어지지 않은 것으로 보이는바, 안전성·유효성 확보라는 목적 달성을 위해서는 자체 생동이냐 위탁·공동 생동이냐보다 '생동성 인정 기준 및 생동성 시험자체의 관리 강화'에 초점이 맞추어져야 한다. 셋째, 필요성 및 상당성 판단에 있어서 품목허가 후 상당한 기간이 지나 충분히 안전성·유효성에 대한 검증이 이루어졌다고 볼 수 있는 제품에 대해서까지 일률적으로 개정된 고시 기준을 적용하는 것은 필요성 및 상당성 원칙에 반할 소지가 있다고 판단하였다. 개정 고시와 같은 행정입법은 많은 경우 법리적 검토나 공감대 형성이 부족한 상태에서 제·개정이 이루어지는 반면, 그에 따른 규제 효과는 피규제자에게 상당히 직접적이고 구체적이다. 이러한 점에서 행정입법 과정에 대해서도 규제목적과 수단에 대한 실질적인 검토가 요구되면, 사전통제로서 이해관계인 등의 절차참여제도가 보완되어야 함을 강조하였다.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제49호
• /
• pp.39-63
• /
• 2016

2009년 9월 24일 헌법재판소는 야간집회에 대해 '헌법불합치' 결정 후, 2014년 3월 27일 "야간 시위에 대해서도 자정까지는 허용해야한다"며 '한정위헌' 결정을 했다. 이후, 집시법에 대한 개정은 이루어지지 않고 2016년 10월에 이르고 있다. '입법불비' 논란 속에서, 2016년 유령집회에 대해 과태료 부과 및 집회 개최 사실통지 의무, 경찰관서장의 집회 개최장소 및 시간대 분할 개최 권유 등 일부 항목이 개정 또는 신설되면서 국민의 기본권 편익을 도모하였다. 그러나, 이번 개정 집시법에는 철회신고서를 중복 집회에 한정하고 있고, 경찰관서장에게 장소 시간의 분할에 대한 권유만 할 수 있을 뿐 일정한 권한이 없어 형식적인 절차로 끝날 것으로 예상된다. 또, 집회개최 1시간 전 통지 의무에 대해서는 처벌조항이 없어 이를 강제할 수 없는 문제점을 내포하고 있다. 본 연구에서는, 2016년 개정된 집시법을 중심으로 분석 후 보완 수정되어야 할 부분에 대해 정책적 제언을 하였다. 집시법은 2009년 이후 '입법불비' 상태로 있는 야간집회 시위를 포함하여 앞으로도 계속 수정 보완 되어야 하는 문제점을 안고 있다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.86-97
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 조경분야의 모법인 가칭 조경기본법의 필요성을 법적, 산업적, 학술적 등 다양한 차원에서 분석하고, 조경기본법이 가져야 할 적정한 법적 체계 및 입법 절차 등을 제시함으로써, 조경기본법 작성을 위한 기초 자료를 제공하고자 수행되었다. 본 연구를 통해 도출된 결과는 다음과 같이 요약할 수 있다. 첫째, 조경기본법의 기본방향을 설정해 보면, 그 필요성과 근거 및 타 기본법 관련 형식에 따라 이념형과 정책형을 혼합한 절충 형태가 가장 적절할 것으로 예상되며, 내용적으로는 선언적인 성격을 드러내기 위한 사항들을 제시하고, 법 제정 시의 고려사항으로서 조경의 현안들과 미래에 필요한 사항들을 항목화하여 제시하는 것이 바람직할 것이다. 둘째, 조경기본법 입법의 절차로서 가장 타당한 과정은 정부 발의의 입법보다는 의원 발의를 통한 진행이 보다 순조로울 것으로 예상된다. 즉, 의원발의를 통한 법률안의 제출과 법률안의 국회 상임위원회 의결을 통해, 정부이송과 기본법의 필요성을 각인시키는 과정이 꾸준히 진행되어야 할 것이며, 대통령의 국정수행 원칙과 부합하는 점을 강조함으로써 대통령의 거부권 행사를 제어하고, 이를 통해 최종 승인된 법률을 공포하는 과정이 가장 바람직한 입법 시나리오로 기대할 수 있다. 셋째, 형식적 내용적 방향을 토대로 조경기본법의 기본적인 틀을 제시하면, 총 7장 34조의 형태로 기본적인 시안의 틀을 제시할 수 있으며, 이는 조경관련 기본법들의 형식적 내용적 요건에 최대한 상충되지 않고, 부합할 수 있도록 의도한 것이다. 일반적인 기본법의 기능을 토대로 조경기본법이 가져야할 기능을 살펴보면, 국가정책의 방향 제시와 그 추진, 제도 정책의 체계화 및 종합화, 정책의 계속성 일관성 확보, 행정의 통제기능, 국민에 대한 정책메시지 발신기능, 지방분권의 추진기능과 같은 요건들이 필수적이다. 이상의 연구 결과는 조경기본법 제정의 필요성에 대하여 조경계 전체의 공감대를 형성하는데 기여할 수 있을 것이며, 나아가 타 분야에 조경기본법의 필요성을 알리는 계기가 될 것이다.