• 한국영양학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국영양학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회 초록
• /
• pp.110-110
• /
• 2000

• 한국환경보건학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.98-117
• /
• 1994

To provide data for the contents regarding environmental health (environmental hygiene, environmental pollution) in the textbooks of primary, middle and high schools, a total of 243 textbooks was analysed for two months from May, to July 31, 1993. Among the total 52844.50 pages, 1.65% was related to the environmental health, which account for 870.00 pages. In the textbooks by school level, the rate of the contents regarding environmental health in primary school was 1.63% (148.75 pages). that of middle school was 1.96% (243.25 pages) and that of high school was 1.53% (478.00 pages). The area of environmental hygiene was 0.24% (129.25 pages) and that of environmental pollution was 1.40% (740.75 pages) which is slightly high. In the field of environmental hygiene, the rate of the contents in the middle school textbooks was 0.53% which was the higher than that of the primary and high school textbooks. The rate of environmental pollution area was not significantly different by school level but the number of the pages was the higher at the high school than that of the primary and middle schools, which account for 428.8 pages. The contents related by the areas were as follows: 1. Contents related to environmental hygiene 1) Among environemtnal hygiene contents, the rate of housing sanitation was the highest as 0.14% (73.00 pages), that of air environment was 0.06% (33.00 pages) and that of water supply sanitation was 0.03% (17.25 pages). The portion of air environment was 5.00 pages in the primary school textbooks and that of housing sanitation at the middle and high schools was each 35.0 pages, 35.50 pages, which was the more than that of other fields. By school year, there was no contents related at the 1st and 2nd grades but were 4.75 pages at the 4th grade which were the more than those of other grades. At the 5th grade, water supply sanitation part was found but not air environment. Housing sanitation was found at the 3rd, 5th grades and insect or rodent control was at the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th grades. 2) In the middle school textbooks related to environmental health, 41.0 pages were included in the textbooks of pysical education, the highest number. The next was 19.5 pages in home economics, 2.8 pages in social studies and 3.00 pages in others. The contents of air environment were found in the textbooks of physical education and science, those of water supply and housing sanitation were in home economics and physical education and those of insect control were found 0.5 pages in home economics only. 3) In the high school textbooks, the highest number was 27.8 pages of home economics and the next was 11.5 pages of others, 7.8 pages of physical education, 2.0 pages of science and 0.3 pages of social studies. Air environment parts were included in the textbooks of science, physical education and home economics and water sanitation was in home economics, physical education and others. Housing sanitation was showed in home economics and social studies, on the other side the contents of insect or rodent control was found in home economics and physical education. 4) By the subjects related to environmental hygiene in the primary, middle and high school textbooks, 51.0 pages of home economics were the highest portion. It was also revealed that 49.5 pages of physical education, 14.5 pages of others, 13.5 pages of science and 0.8 pages of social studies were included. The number of 33.0 pages of air environment portion was distributed into 9.75 pages of science, 19.0 pages of physical education and 4.25 pages of others. Among 17.3 pages of water sanitation, 3.5 pages of home economics, 11.3 pages of physical education and 2.5 pages of others were included. Housing sanitation portions were 73.0 pages, which were distributed into 46.5 pages of home economics, 0.5 pages of social studies, 18.3 pages of physical education and 7.8 pages of others. 5) The number of photo, figure, illustration and table related in the primary school textbooks was 31. Among them, the number of photos was 21, that of figures or illustrations was 9 and that of table was 1. The number of 63 in the middle school textbooks was classified into 3 photos, 32 figures or illustrations and 28 tables. At the high school, the number of 56 was included 2 photos, 41 figures or illustrations and 13 tables.2. Contents related to environmental pollution 1) In the field of environmental pollution, the rate of water pollution was 0.39% (203.3 pages), that of air pollution was 0.31% (161.5 pages) that of soil pollution was 0.1% (57.3 pages), that of refuse disposal was 0.08% (40.3 pages) and others was 0.5% (278.5 pages) by school level, the rate of water pollution in the primary, middle and high schools was each 40.5, 48.0, 118.8 pages and that of air pollution was each 20.8, 38.3, 102.5 pages. 2) Environmental pollution areas were not inserted in the textbooks at the 1st grade of the primary school but foqnd 5.5 pages at the 2nd grade, 30.5 pages at the 4th grade, 36.3 pages at the 5th grade and a,9.5 pages at the 6th grade. Water pollution was included from the 2nd grade, air pollution and refuse disposal from the 3rd grade and soil pollution from the 5th grade. 3) In the middle school textbooks, environmental pollution was distributed into 90.25 pages of science, 42.8. pages of physical education, 20.5 pages of social studies, 19.5 pages of others and 4.0 pages of home economics. At the high school, the contents were found 191.3 pages in science, 119.3 pages in others, 88.5 pages in social studies, 28.5 pages in physical education and 1.3 pages in home economics. 4) By subjects of the primary, middle and high schools, the portion of environmental pollution was classified into 322.2 pages of science, 195.0 pages of social studies, 138.8 pages of others, 76.3 pages of physical education and 8.5 pages of home economics. Air and soil pollution parts were not found in the subjects of home economics. 5) The number of photo, figure or illustration and table related in the primary school textbooks was 218. Among them, the number of photos was 61, that of figures or illustrations was 149 and that of tables was 8. At the middike school, the number of 153 was distributed into 99 photos, 34 figures or illustrations and 20 tables. The number of 129 found in the high school textbooks was included 129 photos, 73 figures or illustrations and 100 tables.

• 대한가정학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한가정학회 1997년도 Program & Abstracts * The 7th Korea-Japan Home Economics Joint Syposium
• /
• pp.61-61
• /
• 1997

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.115-131
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 문헌을 통하여 실과 및 가정과교육의 철학적 이론과 사회적 배경을 고찰하고 본 교과교육의 미래 방향을 탐색하였다. 우리나라의 실과교육의 근거가 되는 교육론(교육사상)과 철학으로는 노작교육론, 실학사상 및 실용주의(pragmatism)를 들 수 있고, 가정과교육에 영향을 미쳤던 우리나라 사상으로는 유교사상, 철학으로는 Pragmatism과 비판이론을 들 수 있다. 우리나라 학교교육법 이전의 가정생활에 관한 교육은 주로 유교사상의 영향을 받아 여자가 교육받는 것을 꺼려하였고, 과거 학교교육에서도 가정과는 여자만의 교과라는 사회적 통념을 형성해왔다. 그러나 교육과정 성립 이후는 점차 미국 가정학의 영향을 받아 이론도 미국의 가정학에 기초하여 발전해왔다. 그러나 가정과의 모체가 되는 우리나라의 가정학은 미국과 다르게 Pragmatism과 비판이론과 같은 철학의 기반이 없는 상태에서 발전해왔기 때문에, 과학의 인식과 가치의 인식이 유리되어 학문으로서는 체재를 정비하여 발전해왔으나 변화하는 환경에 대응해서 생활의 가치를 지킨다는 사회적인 사명에 답을 할 수 없게 되었다. 그러므로 최근 이 문제를 가정교육학에서는 비판이론을 적용하여 해결하려고 하고 있다. 부분 개정된 제7차 교육과정의 기본 철학은 학습자의 능동적인 경험과 실제생활에의 적용을 중시함으로써 구성주의 입장을 취하고 있다고 할 수 있으며, 이는 실과 및 가정과의 성격과도 관련성을 찾을 수 있다. 미래 방향에 관한 탐색에서는 개정 교육과정의 내용분석, 일과 실천의 개념 변화, 기본생활교육 및 기초생활기술의 정착을 위한 실과 및 가정과교육의 필요성, 가정의 기능 강화에 대한 요구가 증대되고 있음을 제시하였고, 그 결과 학교교육에서 가정생활과 가족을 대상으로 하는 유일한 교과인 가정과의 역할은, 미래 저출산, 고령사회에는 더 커질 것으로 예측된다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.83-101
• /
• 1981

Under the full consideration of the growing need and importance of population education in the field of home economics in Korea, the study was carried out to verify and assess the following facts on the current issues of population education of home economists who are presently engaging in teaching professions as the teachers of middle and high school and professors of college and universities by setting its primary objectives of the study as followings; 1) to assess the degree of general knowledge and attitudes of home economists toward population education in the field of home economics, 2) to verify the problems encountered in implementing population education by home economists in its field, 3) to find an existing status of previous trainings received and other activities of population education of home economists aimed at utilizing these findings as a part of reference materials when the population education is conducted in the field of home economics. In order to attain these objectives described above, the questionnaire was carefully designed to house a total of 40 questions with good combination of multiple-choice and the simple answer questions. The mail questionnaire survey was conducted by establishing teachers of home economics at middle/high schools and college/universities as Senior Home Economists(SHE) who are from public, private liberal arts and vocational schools. The rate of response observed during the survey was 45.6 percent and the findings of the survey research are as follows: 1) Examining the status of the respondents by residence and religion, it was found that 45 percent of middle & high school teachers ar.d 59. 1 percent of college professors are residing in Seoul city area and that the largest percent of them are christian in their religion. Analyzing respondents by their ages, 56 percent of middle/high school teachers are in their 30s, 45 percent of college professors are in their 40s, and 37 percent of college teachers are in their 30s. In addition, 13 percent of the total respondents are found to be unmarried. The study also revealed that 71 percent of the college professors finished Master Degree course and 82 percent of middle/high school teachers are graduated from college level lasting 4 years. Looking over the status cf major fields of respondents, 68.4 percent of middle/high school teachers are specialized in home economic education and the college professors, on the other hand, show relatively even prortion by specializing in the order of food & nutrition science, clothes & textile science and home managerial science. As far as the length of teaching experience is concerned, a relatively longer period of teaching experience is observed in the college professors in comparison with that of middle/high school teachers. In other words, 33.3 percent of middle/high school teachers are experienced in teaching from 6 to 10 years on average while 43.9 percent of college professors show more than 16 years of experience. 2) Examining the status of existing number of children cf the respondents, one boy and one daughter pattern is predominant, showing 28.5 percent in middle/high school teachers and 21.1 percent in college professors. As for the desired number of children of unmarried respondents, it is observed that 43.8 percent of middle/high school teachers desire to have one boy and one girl, and 31.3 percent of college professors want to have one child regardless of the sex. By assessing the degree of awareness of the population education through their students, it is observed that 53 percent of middle/high school teachers and 50 percent of college professors are aware of population education in some extent and that a majority of respondents took the positive attitudes toward an inclusion of family planning components into the formal school education. Another noteworthy to observe is that a total of 84.8 percent out of middle/high school teachers pointed that the population education currently conducted at schools as a part of home economics are less sufficient than it should be. 3) Analyzing the tendency as to whether the respondents were experienced in receiving population education during the time when they were students, 75 percent of college professors and 59 percent of middle/high school teachers responded negative answers in the survey. In the mean time, a total of 50 percent of the respondents replied that they began to acknowledge the importance of population education mainly through the participation of some sort of population-education orientend seminars, experienced by 40 percent of college professors and 80 percent of middle/high school teachers. 4) What it calls attention in this study was to find that 96.5 percent of middle/high school teachers and 72 percent of college professors conduct population education to some extent during their lecture hours and that more than 80 percent of them are never experienced in teaching population and family planning contents in their regular classes. It is, on the other hand, found that no more than once was the response of those who believe themselves that they are experienced in teaching these relevant components to their students. Analyzing the contents of the subjects being taught in the class, a large percent of them are found to be consisted of population and family planning contents. According to this study, the current population education through the formal school is quite inactive. Analyzing the facts, 44.9 percent of the college professors responded that the population and family planning components are quite apart from their specialization which eventually generates lack of interest in the field. 5) It is also noticed through the study that the degree of frequency of commenting on population and family planning contents during the classes was depending significantly on their specializations which means that the degree of frequency varies from a major to another. Those who majored in home managerial science was the first one, as compared to others who majored in different specializations. Glancing over the status of correlations between ages of the respondents and numbers of seminar paticipation, it is quite clear that the aged group participated more than the younger group did, and that the most highest number of participations made by college professors were those who are in 50s. In addition, it is also found that those who are aged 20s and 60s of the respondents were the group who comments least on the contents of population and family planning at their classes. The suggestions and recommendation made through this survey research are as follows. 1) No one denies that the rapid increase of population, as compared to the limited size of land and resources, will certainly affect adversly to an enhancement of individual life quality which will, eventually, bring forth the poverty of the nation. This is the reasson why we are insisting that the world population be controlled up to an optimum level with a matter of global concerns. It is our understading that the primary aim for reducing number of population is believed to be attained only by conducting the systematic and comprehensive population education through the formal schools. Therefore, the role of home economists in the field of population/family planning education is considered very importment due to the fact that an ultimate goal of population education is placed in elevating the quality of family life by having optimum number of children through family planning program. 2) It is quite clear that home economists as teachers of formal school in all level are invited to pay their attention on redefining the ultimate goal of education and that of population education. We also understant that the primary objective of population education is to change the norm and value of the clients by replenishing the students with pertinent knowledge and attitudes on population and its related problems through a sort of education in order to attain the ultimate goal for enhancing the quality of life. There is no exception in the theory of home economics. An altimate goal of home economics is to elevate the general quality of life through an establishment of value existed in daily life. Considering the relations between population education and home economics, it is quite indespensable to bandle population components as an integral part in the field of home economics. We believe, therefore, that the senior home economists positive participation in the effort population control is more needed than it has been. 3) It is also strongly urged that population education should be a part of instructor training course for home economics. In other words, the teacher of home economics should be well aware of population and its problems by teaching interrelationship between population education and home economics, needs, contents and methods of population education during the instructor training courese for home economics. In addition, the senior home economists should be encouraged through positive participation on the short term training by types of domestic and international seminar, workshop, etc. 4) We certainly believe that the population education can not sustain itself without any backing-up of information and findings' of various and comprehensive researches of natural and social sciences. Accordingly, every senior home economist is invited to exert their maximum effort to conduct systematic study with an aim to utilize these findings and information at best in population education in the field of home economics. Therefore, we consider that the development of training material is imminent in order to provide effective and efficient population education through the for training of home economies. It should be noted that these training materials must be carefully designed, tailored and developed to meet the different classes of trainees under the considerations as to whether it is easily adaptable and infusable into the curricula of every field of home economics, and it is acceptable in the degree of difficulty and quality in its contents. 5) It is true that there are many domestic and international research rapers, reports and findings in the field of population education and family planning. However, there is a tendency that the most of research papers are heavily relying on the authors intension and preferences in its expression and publication. Under these circumstances, it is urged that the home economists should aware of the growing need of the technical training in order to keep these available information and research findings reprocessed and redesigned to insure the practical application into the population education in the field of home economics in Korea.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.49-60
• /
• 2000

In Korea, consumer researches have been accomplished in the field of family economics or business management individually. The field of consumer studies progressed in both sides of quantity and quality since the establishment of the Korean Society of Consumer Studies(KSCS). The field of consumer studies is moving toward an uni-disciplinary stage from an interdisciplinary stage. In this time, it is very meaningful to review the research trend in consumer science and to look out the future prospect. This study reviewed and analyzed all of the papers published in Journal of Korean Home Economics Association from 1980 to 1999, Journal of Korean Home Management Association from 1984 to 1999 and Journal of Consumer Studies from 1990 to 1999.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.45-90
• /
• 1990

This study aims finding a desirable practical skill evaluation practice evaluation method and then improving student’s learning effect by analyzing the present state and the methods of practical skill evaluation in middle-high schools home economics education. Investigated persons are 250 of high schools home economics thachers(125) and middle schools home economics teacher(125) in Seoul, who are choosen by means of random sampling. The items analysis of questionnaires was performed by means of SPSS(Statistical Package for Social Science). The investigator analyzed their responses to the questionnaires according to teachers’ages, school careers, majors, places of employment, school years in charge. The results are marked with percentage and the significance level is verified by means of Chi-square(X$\^$2/) analysis method, when necessary. This thesis handles practical skill evaluation of general practice units, of clothing and textile unit, and of nutrient and food unit. The results obtained from the items analysis are as follows; I. Results of the items analysis. A. Practical skill evaluation of general units. 1. The motivation and accomplishment feeling of students are most frequently considered as the aims of practical skill evaluation, but the results of practical skill evaluation are, by contraries, most infrequently considered as improvement materials. 2. A greatest number of teachers make together with their colleagues an annual plan for practical skill evaluation an inform students of the concrete information of the test, but perform respectively practical skill evaluation, using 5 steps method. 3. The percentage that teachers majoring in home economics education as compared with others lay the similar stresses on the preparation processes, attitudes, and results of students is very high.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.77-93
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is two-fold. One is to provide the teachers of Home Economics with the basic reference data of the relevance between Home Economics and other subjects taught in the middle schools for the purpose of bringing out more efficient classroom teaching. The other is to help the teachers, the textbook writers, and the curriculum reformers improve the curricula of the middle school on the basis of this research. The conclusions drawn from this study are as follows: 1) The units of Human Development and Family Relationship should be taught with reference to Korean Language, Ethics, and Music. 2) The unit of Adolescence Development is dealt with in Physical Education and in Ethics as well, which seems to indicate that there was no interdisciplinary consideration and cooperation before/when the curricula were made. 3) The unit of Nutrition which appears in the first grade in Home Economics has a close relationship with the unit of Morphology and Physiology of Animals which appears in the second grade in Natural Science. It is thought that the interdisciplinary themes ought to be organized cooperatively among subjects for efficiency of study. 4) Since the unit of Clothing is not dealt with in the other subjects, ti can be developed in Home Economics on its own. 5) As the unit of Housing is closely related to Technology, it should be taught on the basis of Technology. 6) The textbooks of all subjects should be written based on the interdisciplinary research and cooperation. They should be organized in order not to overlap or repeat the same topic in the same level if it is not necessary.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.63-80
• /
• 2005

This study examines the family concept and family-related values among pre-service home economics teachers. Questionnaires are completed by 242 pre-service home economics teachers. The results indicate that the respondents defined the family as a blood ties, a resting place, affection, and warmth. They tend to regard divorced, remarried, and adopted members as families, while classifying homosexual couples, members living together in a communal fashion, and great-great grandparents into nonfamily groups. Majority of them agree that it had better to get married or it depends on personal circumstances. In terms of cohabitation, they think it can be an opportunity to check the compatibility before marriage. Also, they perceive parenthood as a personal lifestyles, statement of social maturation, sound mind, and realization of morality. They agreed to divorce relatively high in case of unfaithfulness and relative troubles, but agreement of divorce was relatively low because of instrumental reason and psychological factors, The group majoring clothing and textile perceives the most negatively the influence of divorce to children. Further discussion and implications are discussed.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.117-139
• /
• 2020

이 연구의 목적은 세 가지 행동체계를 융합한 초·중·고등학교 가정교과 식생활 교육과정의 내용체계를 개발하여 가정교과에서의 융합교육 방안을 마련하는 데 목적이 있다. 이러한 목적을 이루기 위해서 문헌 고찰을 통해 세 행동체계를 융합한 초·중·고등학교 식생활 교육과정의 특징, 개발의 중점사항, 핵심역량, 목표를 도출하였고, 국내외 식생활교육 문헌, 국내외 가정과교육과정과 교과서를 고찰하여 항구적 문제와 하위 실천적 문제를 설정하고, 내용 요소를 선정하였다. 개발된 교육과정의 내용체계가 타당한지 전문가 타당도 검사를 하여 수정·보완하였고, 세 행동체계를 융합한 중학교 가정교과 식생활 교육과정의 성취기준을 개발하였다. 세 행동체계를 융합한 초·중·고 가정교과 식생활 교육과정의 내용 체계는 실천적 문제를 중심으로 되어있으며, 항구적 문제는 '건강한 식생활을 실천하기 위해 무엇을 해야 하는가?'이다. 이 교육과정의 영역은 5가지로 '건강과 식생활', '식단계획', '식품 구매와 관리', '조리', '식사'이며, 이 영역이 '개인과 가족', '사회'로 교육과정의 범위가 반복적으로 확장되어 있다. 이에 따라 5개 영역의 실천적 문제는 초·중·고등학교 급별, 두 차원(개인과 가족, 사회)으로 10개씩의 실천적 문제로 구성되어 있으며, 계열화의 원리가 적용되어 실천적 문제와 내용 요소가 나선형적 계열화가 되어있다. 이 교육과정의 내용 체계를 우리나라 2015 초등학교 실과와 중·고등학교 기술·가정과, 가정과학 교육과정의 식생활 영역 성취기준 및 학습 요소와 비교한 결과, 2015 개정 교육과정의 내용을 모두 포함하면서 더 추가된 내용이 있었다.