• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.109-125
• /
• 2005

본 연구의 목적은 지리과에서의 고급사고력 신장을 위한 교수-학습 모형 개발을 개발하고 현장에 적용해 보는 것이다. 논문의 목적을 달성하기 위해 고급사고력 신장과 관련된 문헌을 검토하고 고급사고력신장에 있어서 역할놀이의 교육적 의의와 활용에 대해 논의하였다. 고급사고력은 새로운 상황에 직면했을 때 독창적으로 문제를 해결하려고 하는 정신작용으로, 본고에서는 고급사고력을 문제해결과 의사결정능력, 창의적 사고, 비판적 사고, 메타인지로 구분하였다. 다양한 교수-학습 모형의 적용을 통하여 학생들은 창의적 사고, 비판적 사고, 문제해결과 의사결정능력, 메타인지 등 고급사고력을 신장시킬 수 있다. 본고에서는 고급사고력 신장을 위한 교수-학습 모형 중 하나로 역할놀이를 10학년 사회교과서 중 환경관련 단원 (IV. 환경문제와 지역문제)을 사례로 개발하였다. 개발한 역할놀이 교수-학습 모형을 서울시내 고등학교 1학년 학생을 대상으로 현장에 적용하였다. 역할놀이에 참여한 학생들은 주어진 지리적 문제 상황에 맞는 역할극을 실연해 보고 관찰한 것을 바탕으로 서로의 예측 결과를 공유하고 토론하고 일반화함으로써 문제해결과 의사결정, 창의적 사고, 비판적 사고, 메타인지 등 고급사고력을 신장시킬 수 있고 가치관, 태도 등 기능적$\cdot$정의적 영역도 향상시킬 수 있다.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.31-38
• /
• 2019

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of critical thinking and good communication skills on the problem-solving abilities of dental hygiene students. Methods: A total of 508 dental hygiene students were convenience-sampled from 3 universities. Results: The results revealed that critical thinking had the highest intellectual fairness score of 3.60, and systematicity was the lowest at 3.19. The values for communication skills were high in reaction, social adequacy, and concentration, with an average of 3.65. Problem-solving abilities were in the following order: clarification of the problem, seeking solutions, and decision making. According to general characteristics, more extroverted personalities possessed higher levels of critical thinking, communication skills, and problem-solving abilities (p<0.01). Critical thinking scores were high (p=0.016) in students who responded that peer relationship was difficult; however, their communication skills were the lowest (p<0.001). Additionally, problem-solving abilities were highest among students who reported a difficult peer relationship (p=0.001). The higher the satisfaction with dental hygiene academics, the higher the critical thinking, communication skill, and problem-solving ability (p<0.001). Critical thinking showed a high positive correlation with variables in the following order: clarification of the problem, performing the solutions, seeking solutions, decision making, and evaluation and reflection. The communication skills were also related to these variables listed above (p<0.01). With critical thinking, confidence, watchfulness, intellectual passion/curiosity, sound skepticism, objectivity, and systematicity all influenced the problem-solving ability. Conclusion: Communication skills were influenced by noise control, putting on the other's shoe, social tensions, and efficiency, which affected the problem-solving ability. Dental clinics require dental hygienists to have critical thinking to make analytical judgments and effective communication skills to solve human relation problems with patients and care-givers. Therefore, these skills should be developed in dental hygiene students to improve their problem-solving abilities.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.171-177
• /
• 2017

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyze the effects that Flipped Learning Method has on a college student's self directed learning ability, critical thinking disposition, learning motivation, and learning satisfaction, and determine its effectiveness as a new pedagogical approach. Methods: The survey was conducted on dental technology students. The collected data was analyzed by the statistical program SPSS 21.0. The results were analyzed by reliability, frequency, t-test. To test for significance on each item, p<0.05 has been decided as a standard. Results: According to the analysis, the student who attended a class that utilized Flipped Learning Method was found to have higher levels of self directed learning ability, critical thinking disposition, learning motivation, and learning satisfaction than a student who attended a class that did not utilize such a method. Conclusion: The study results show that, in order to enhance students' self directed learning ability, critical thinking disposition, learning motivation, and learning satisfaction and to improve the quality of class instruction, it may be necessary that Flipped Learning Method be adopted more widely and recommended more strongly. Such changes will promote a long term improvement in educational environments and play a major role in strengthening students' abilities.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.169-183
• /
• 2022

This study aimed to analyze the class effect of subjects to which Problem-Based Learning is applied to college students majoring in aviation service at university in Chungcheong. And we derive implications for continuously operating Problem-Based Learning classes. For the study, <Service Manners and Practice>, <Theory of Air Reservation Operation & Practice>, and <Introduction to In-flight Food & Beverage> were selected among the courses opened in the first semester of 2022. This study analyzes changes in communication competence, interpersonal skills, self-directed learning skills, higher-order thinking skills, information technology application skills, and problem-solving skills reflecting the core competencies of the universities to which the study students belonged. First, we analyzed the changes in communication competence, interpersonal skills, self-directed learning skills, higher-order thinking skills, information technology application skills, and problem-solving skills before and after classes by reflecting on the core competencies of the universities to which the study students belonged. As a result, all item except for interpersonal skills were improved. In addition, a qualitative analysis was conducted on the degree of learning improvement based on the contents of the reflection journal written during learning precess. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that it is effective for learning abilities such as communication, interpersonal relationships, self-directed learning skills, utilization of information, and problem-solving.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.318-330
• /
• 2023

This study aimed to verify the validity of a measurement tool for Vietnamese high school students' systems thinking abilities. Two quantitative assessment tools, the Systems Thinking Measuring Instrument (Lee et al., 2013) and the Systems Thinking Scale (Dolansky et al., 2020), were used to measure students' systems thinking after translation into Vietnamese. As a result, it was revealed that Cronbach-α for each tool (i.e., STMI and STS) was .917 and .950, respectively, indicating high reliability for both. To validate the construct validity of the translated questionnaire, exploratory factor analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed using AMOS 21.0. For concurrent validity, correlation analysis using structural equation modeling was performed to validate the translated questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that 10 items from the STMI and 12 items from the STS loaded on the intended factors and appropriate factor loading values were obtained. For confirmatory factor analysis, a structural equation model organized with 10 items from the STMI and 12 items from the STS was used. The result of this showed that the convergent validity values of the model were all appropriate, and the model fit indices were analyzed to be χ²/df of 1.892, CFI of .928, TLI of .919, SRMR of .047, and RMSEA of .063, indicating that the model consisting of the 22 items of the two questionnaires was appropriate. Analysis of the concurrent validity of the two tools indicated a high correlation coefficient (.903) and high correlation (.571-.846) among the subfactors. In conclusion, both the STMI and STS are valid quantitative measures of systems thinking, and it can be inferred that the systems thinking of Vietnamese high-school students can be quantitatively measured using the 22 items identified in our analysis. Using the tool validated in this study with other tools (e.g., qualitative assessment) can help accurately measure Vietnamese high school students' systems thinking abilities. Furthermore, these tools can be used to collect evidence and support effective education in ODA projects and volunteer programs.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.406-415
• /
• 2018

본 연구의 목적은 간호학생에게 캡스톤디자인 프로그램을 적용하여 창의적리더십, 문제해결능력, 비판적사고 성향에 미치는 효과를 파악하고자 시도되었다. 연구 대상자는 P시 U 대학교 간호 캡스톤디자인 교과목을 수강한 18명 실험군과 K 대학교 20명을 대조군으로 선정하였다. 자료는 자가보고식 설문지를 이용하여 간호 캡스톤디자인 수업 전 후에 수집되었다. 연구결과 창의적리더십, 문제해결능력, 비판적사고 성향이 통계적으로 유의하게 향상된 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 창의적리더십, 문제해결능력, 비판적 사고성향 에는 양의 상관관계가 나타나 창의적리더십이 높아지면 문제해결능력과 비판적 사고 성향이 향상되는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구를 바탕으로 캡스톤디자인 교육 실시 후 창의적리더십, 문제해결능력과 비판적사고 성향 등을 반복적으로 조사하여 이를 간호교육의 다양한 교수학습방법으로 활용할 것을 제언한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.11-21
• /
• 2023

In engineering education, stimulating students' questions and encouraging learning participation are crucial for achieving higher-order thinking abilities. This study aims to investigate the use and effect of an online communication channel in fostering engineering students' questioning abilities. Consequently, in this research, we gauged students' satisfaction with an engineering class that implemented a communication channel, and scrutinized the changes in their perceptions regarding the significance of questions, their engagement in learning, and their academic self-efficacy. In addition, we interviewed the students who participated in the class. The outcomes are as follows: Firstly, student satisfaction improved compared to the previous semester's class where the communication channel was not utilized. Secondly, learners' understanding of the importance of asking questions positively escalated, alongside their actual frequency of posing questions. Thirdly, there was an improvement in learners' active engagement in their studies and their academic self-confidence. The findings of this research suggest that communication channels should be employed to motivate learners to pose questions and involve students in effective learning.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.643-650
• /
• 1998

본 연구의 3단계 선다형 평가 문항은 과학적 결과와 그 결과가 나온 과정 또 그러한 과정에 관계된 과학적 개념을 함께 물어 봄으로써 과학적 탐구 사고력을 의미있게 평가할 수 있고 객관식 문항형태이지만 객관식 평가의 단점인 추측의 요인을 주관식 응답에 준하여 거의 제거할 수 있다고 판단된다. 오랜 기간동안 1단계 4지선다형 또는 5지 선다형 시험에 익숙해 있던 학생들은 3단계 선다형 문항에 매우 적용하기 어렵겠고 교사들 또한 문항을 제작하는데 많은 시간과 노력이 필요하겠지만 평가가 학생들의 학습에 미치는 영향을 고려한다면 3단계 선다형 문항의 현장 도입은 절실히 필요하다. 이의 도입은 학생들의 탐구사고력의 신장에 큰 기여를 할 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.309-318
• /
• 2003

Scientific reasoning is one of the main concerns in current science education. This study have tried to answer on the question whether Korean science education has the potential to help improve of students' ability to think scientifically. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between reasoning patterns evident in science textbook and science examination items, and students' scientific reasoning skills across grades in Korea. 1975 subjects (1022 females and 953 males) were administered in the Lawson's Test of Scientific Reasoning skills. Forty seven science textbooks and 240 assessment instrument were analyzed by several scientific reasoning keys. Scientific reasoning patterns were adopted from Lawson's classification which characterized the patterns as the empirical-inductive and the hypothetical-deductive. This study found that reasoning patterns evident in textbook analyses and assessment instrumental items do not evidentce the potential to stimulate the development of students' reasoning skill. In order to improve the students' abilities to think and achieve, higher levels of reasoning must be included in the science textbook and examination. Further, some of scientific reasoning processes, such as generating hypotheses, designing experiments, and logical prediction, were not found in science textbooks and test items in Korean secondary schools. This study also discussed the educational implication of these results and further studies about to develop student's reasoning ability.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.11-21
• /
• 2018

4차 산업혁명이라는 시대적 배경에 따라 컴퓨팅 사고력을 가진 인재를 양성하기 위해 각 대학에서 비전공자 컴퓨팅 교육을 진행하고 있다. 현장에서 여러 교육이 실행되고 있지만, 그 교육이 비전공자의 컴퓨팅 사고력 관점에서 효과가 있는지를 살펴보는 연구는 매우 제한적이다. 본 연구는 비전공자 대상 컴퓨팅 수업이 컴퓨팅 사고력 관점에서 효과가 있는지 살펴보는 것을 목표로 진행되었다. 고등교육 수준의 AP Computer Science Principle을 기반으로 컴퓨팅 사고력 관점의 평가 프레임워크와 그에 따른 문항을 개발하여 수업 참가자들에게 적용하였다. 그 결과, 수업 이후 역량이 수업 전 보다 유의미하게 향상되었다. 수업 전 역량은 전공 영역별로 유의미하게 차이가 있었지만 수업 이후에는 차이가 없어졌다. 즉, 본 수업은 학생의 컴퓨팅 사고력 측면의 역량 향상에 효과가 있으며, 특히 비전공자 그룹에서 더 큰 효과를 보이는 것으로 나타났다.