• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.437-452
• /
• 2019

소규모 식육포장처리장은 일반규모 작업장에 비해 종업원의 숫자가 적기 때문에 전반적인 위생상태 개선 및 HACCP System의 적용을 위해서 일반 규모 작업장에 비해 간단히 적용할 수 있도록 해야 할 필요가 있는 것은 사실이다. 하지만 여전히 축산식품 안전사고가 많이 나타나고 있는 시점에 국민건강 안전을 위해서라도 식육포장처리장에서 많이 발생하는 문제점, 그리고 그 위해의 심각도가 커서 사회·경제적으로 파급 여파가 큰 중요 관리항목에 대해서는 규모가 작은 업소에서도 철저히 준수해야 할 필요가 있다고 판단되며, 이는 HACCP 심사에도 연계하여 그에 대한 평가를 진행할 필요가 있다고 사료된다. 본 연구결과 도출을 위해 지난 3년간의 HACCP 심사 시 지적사항 발생빈도를 분석하고, 기존 논문자료 등을 참고하여 중요도를 결정하여 새로운 소규모 HACCP 평가항목을 도출하였다. 다만, 본 연구에서 개발된 소규모 식육포장처리업 HACCP 평가항목은 통계적, 문헌적 자료를 검토하여 도출한 것으로 실제 소규모 식육포장처리장 작업 현장에서 꼭 평가가 필요한 항목인지에 대해서는 추후 현장적용을 통해 추가적인 검토가 필요할 것으로 사료되고, 현행 『식품 및 축산물 안전관리인증기준』 고시에 따른 일반규모 축산물 HACCP 평가는 업종별 특성에 맞추어 평가항목이 다르게 적용되어 있으나, 소규모의 경우에는 식육판매업 및 식용란수집 판매업을 제외한 다른 업종은 전부 동일한 평가표를 이용하여 평가를 하도록 되어 있어 해당 업종의 특성에 맞도록 평가항목을 분리하는 등의 연구도 필요할 것으로 판단된다. 아울러 인력 부족 등으로 인하여 소규모 식육포장처리장에서 쉽게 적용하기 어려운 위해분석 등 HACCP 관리 평가항목에 대해서는 정부에서 쉽게 적용할 수 있는 모델 개발 등을 통해 소규모 식육포장처리장에서 무리 없이 HACCP을 적용할 수 있도록 유도하는 것이 중요한 것으로 판단된다.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to propose a framework and system for an advanced evaluation scale for the Multicultural Family Support Center and its services. For this study, we used the Meta-Evaluation method, which is also known as an 'evaluation of the evaluation.' The data were collected from 134 surveys of individuals working in the Multicultural Family Support Center. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: a) general opinions regarding the present evaluation scale; and b) concrete opinions about the details of the scale. The results indicated several problems and issues for improvement. In light of these results, we suggest that not only do the detailed scales have to be modified to incorporate workers' opinions, but also that the management of the evaluation system itself has to be improved in order to achieve more effective evaluation procedures.

• 재활치료과학
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2022

목적 : 본 연구는 정신장애인의 직업재활 평가도구를 확인하고 분석함으로써 작업치료 영역에서 임상적으로 유용하게 활용할 수 있는 정신장애인 직업재활 평가도구의 개발을 위한 기초자료로 활용하는 것이다. 연구방법 : 문헌 검색은 Pubmed 데이터베이스를 사용하였으며, 분석 내용은 개발연도, 평가방식, 문항 수, 척도, 평가 문항을 분석하였다. 분석 방법은 각 평가 항목을 기능, 내적요인, 환경, 정신증상의 4가지 범주로 구분하여 각 평가도구의 평가 요소에 대해 파악하였다. 결과 : 검색어를 통한 Pubmed 검색 시 161개의 문헌이 검색되었고, 선정 방법에 따라 Griffiths Work Behavior Scale (GWBS), Occupational Functioning Scale (OFS), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Work Ability Index (WAI), Work Behaviour Inventory (WBI), Work Environment Impact Scale (WEIS), Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)의 7개 평가도구가 선별되었다. 모든 평가도구의 평가항목은 직무와 관련된 기능평가를 포함하였으며, 각 평가도구의 목적에 따라 내적요인, 환경, 정신증상에 대한 측정이 이루어지는 것으로 나타났다. 결론 : 직업 기술은 신체, 인지, 사회기술, 대처능력 등 다양한 기능이 복합적으로 작용하는 기술이다. 따라서 본 연구에서 분석한 기능, 내적요인, 환경, 정신증상의 4가지 요소가 포함될 필요가 있으며, 평가과정에서 발생하는 물리적 제약을 보완하기 위해 ICT 융합 평가도구의 개발함으로써 보다 효율적인 정신장애인 직업재활 평가가 이루어져야 할 것이다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.13-22
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to development and validation of the 'course evaluation' scale for learner-centered in university. The research collected preliminary data from 1,567 university students's responses for item and scale quality analyses, and collected 2,539 university students's for item and scale quality analyses, and 300 university professors's responses for validation. Data were analyzed to obtain item quality, reliability, and validity analysis. The results of the study were as follows; The 'course evaluation' scale for learner-centered in university was defined by 5 factors. The 5 factors were structure and sincerity of lecture, suitability of report and test, level of consulting for student, application of educational media, communication. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirmed five sub-scales in the 'course evaluation' scale for learner-centered in university scale. Criterion-related validity evidence was obtained from the correlation analysis as the criterion measures. Cross validity evidence was obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis in university professors.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.235-242
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to develop a scale for the evaluation of the subjective fabric hand. In order to find out the appropriate method for the evaluation, bipolar adjectives were compared to unipolar adjectives. One hundred female university students we.e selected as judges. They assessed 9 fabrics using the 9 point scale system for both bipolar and unipolar adjectives. When using the bipola. scale, judges responded more consistently showing smaller deviation among their responses. The Judges seemed to understand the meanings of adjectives in the bipolar scale more clearly than in the unipolar scale. Unipolar scale has twice the number of questions than bipolar scale does. Therefore. judges often felt bored responding to the questions using unipolar adjectives. If the appropriate antonym can be found through verified method, bipolar scale seems to have more advantages than unipolar scale.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.32-39
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a behaviorally anchored rating scale for peer evaluation in group projects based on social interdependence theory. A mixed method involving a qualitative and quantitative approach was used in this study. In the qualitative study, both the individual and group interviews were conducted to college students regarding their cooperative learning experiences. Data from this qualitative research was analyzed based on 5 elements of cooperative learning and 'critical incidents' were extracted from students' own voices that would serve as specific rating criteria in the scale. Once the 'critical incidents' have been incorporated into the scale, validation from 3 independent experts was conducted. In the quantitative study, correlations with relevant variables were analyzed to examine the criteria-referenced validity. Findings suggest that the behaviorally anchored rating scale for peer evaluation in group projects can be used in various team-based learning contexts.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제20권10호
• /
• pp.45-56
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 '시뮬레이션 정부연습'(가칭)에서 연습 실시자의 조치사항을 평가하기 위한 척도에 관한 연구이다. 평가척도의 지표와 지표별 가중치는 조치사항으로 입력한 기관별 data를 평가하는 기준이 된다. 이것은 평가의 객관성과 일관성을 유지하여 관찰평가관의 주관적인 평가를 보완하게 된다. 그래서 평가지표는 정부연습 평가 목적, 시뮬레이션 환경에서의 측정 가능성, 객관성, 지표간의 중복성과 인과성, 평가결과를 적용하는 등급 등을 검토하여 선정하고, 각 지표는 상대적 중요도가 설정돼야 한다. 본 연구에서는 적시성·정확성·적절성의 3개 주요 지표와 주요 지표별로 각 3개의 등급 지표를 설정하고 지표별 개념을 구분하였다. 지표의 가중치는 지표의 계층구조를 고려하여 AHP 분석으로 산정하였다. 향후 연구서의 평가척도가 '시뮬레이션 정부연습'에 적용되면 정량적인 평가를 통하여 조치 평가의 일관성과 객관성을 확보할 수 있을 것이고 과학적인 기법에 의한 사후검토(AAR)가 가능할 것이다.

• 동아시아식생활학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.363-371
• /
• 2015

This study investigated the effect and interrelationship of evaluation system in employee's job satisfaction at deluxe hotel kitchen in the Seoul area. The questionnaires developed for this study were distributed to 400 chefs during June to August, 2012. A total of 364 questionnaires were used for analysis (91.0%) and the statistical analysis was completed using PASW (SPSS) 18. The status of operating menu evaluation and menu development was analyzed by dividing the questionnaires into three categories: 'menu idea', 'menu evaluator' and 'menu evaluation system'. The 'menu idea' category showed the highest concern for 'Is the selected idea differentiated from competitors' menu?' (3.10 Likert scale), the 'menu evaluator' category showed the highest concern for 'Do the evaluator's individual factors affect menu evaluation?' ($3.88{\pm}0.96$), and the 'menu evaluation system' showed the highest concern for 'Is the menu commercialized by the menu evaluation system?' (3.32 Likert scale). Overall job satisfaction was studied into three categories: 'human field', 'material field' and 'evaluation field'. Overall satisfaction about one's job was 3.24 Likert scale. For satisfaction in each category, satisfaction for 'human field' was the highest with 3.30 Likert scale compared to 'material field' and 'evaluation field' with 2.76 Likert scale and 3.27 Likert scale, respectively. In conclusion, establishment of a unified evaluation system to improve employee's job satisfaction related to menu development is needed.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.601-605
• /
• 1999

This study has been performed to evaluate mineral water quality by using four parameters [Mg]/[Ca], [Na]/[K], [Mg]+[Ca]/[Na]+[K] and total hardness(as CaCO3 mg/ℓ). The four parameters has been ploted in a general scale and logarithmic scale, respectively. The method of general scale is not applicable for evaluation on several parameters. Therefore, the logarithmic scale is applied instead to settle the problem. The evaluation of the water quality is based on standard sample S, and the results of the 6 domestics and 5 overseas sample evaluation are as follow. At present, evaluation of the water quality on the mineral water can be done by using four parameters calculated from only cation concentration printed on the bottle's marking.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.75-90
• /
• 2000

This study suggests the methods of the assessment and creation of biotopes in small and medium sized cities, in Korea. For this purpose, Chonju city was selected to classify and asses the biotope types. Moreover, relevant legislations to conserve and enhance urban biotopes were examined. The results of this study are as follows: 1) There were two approaches to asses the potential of urban biotopes in medium-sized cities. One was the urban scale evaluation for urban green spaces and the other was the biotope scale evaluation for the classification and evaluation of biotopes. 2) The urban scale evaluation was developed through overlaping analysis of landuse and vegetation factors. This study also included the conception of watershed. In this conception, three watersheds in Chonju city were characterized. According to these characteristics, individual programs for conservation and enhancement of urban green space were suggested. 3) For the biotope scale evaluation, Selected site was inclusively mapped and field investigation actually was carried. There were total 9 types of bitopes. Especially landuse was appeared in various evaluation items were vegetation structure, area of green space, condition of vegetation and vegetation profile. Mt, Gonji and Dukjin park, Chonbuk national University and fields were evaluated highly I the potential. 4) The biotope programs were based on the results of assessment and physical characteristics of biotopes. The uniform and simple levels on vegetation must be modified with various levels of vegetation structure and vernacular plants. And the physical characteristics like Points, Corridors and Patches can be organized by the conception of biotope networking theory. 5) The proper legislative environment was the clue elements for the biotope programs. Until now, only five types of parks and two types of green space are defined and the minimum size of green space has been proposed by the law. So, it is necessary to enlarge the conception of green space in legislation and improve the quality of green space by amending the related regulations. This study has limitation because it was selected only in Chonju. Through the continuous studies, we need to apply this other small and medium sized cities, South Korea. Also the data collection and management of theme maps such as actual vegetation, landuse and a soil must be done preliminary.