Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.10.045

A Study on the Evaluation Scale of Simulation based Government Exercise for Emergency  

Joo, Choong-Geun ((주)심네트 경영전략본부)
Lee, Sung-Lyong ((주)심네트 경영전략본부)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.20, no.10, 2020 , pp. 45-56 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is about the scale to evaluate the data of the countermeasures in the 'simulation based government exercise' (tentative name). The criteria and weighting of the scale is a standard for evaluating the data of each agency input. This maintains the objectivity and consistency of the evaluation, which complements the subjective evaluation of the observer. Therefore, the criteria should accommodate the purpose of the government exercise evaluation, the possibility of measurement in the simulation environment, the objectivity, no-duplication and causality between criteria, and the grade applying the evaluation results, and the weighting should be set. In this study, three major criteria of timeliness, accuracy, and appropriateness is set up for the evaluation scale and it consists of sub-criteria classified into three classes below respectively and the concept of it was defined. The weighting was calculated by AHP analysis considering the hierarchical structure of it. When this evaluation scale is applied to the 'simulation based government exercise' in the future, it will be possible to secure consistency and objectivity of the evaluation of measures by integrating the quantified evaluation into the observation evaluation and to conduct AAR by scientific techniques.
Keywords
Government Exercise Simulation; Evaluation Scale; Criteria; Weighting;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 국립재난안전연구원, 시뮬레이션 기반 조직단위 비상대비 훈련기술 개발 모의논리서, pp.4-17, 2018.
2 국립재난안전연구원, 시뮬레이션 기반 조직단위 비상대비 훈련기술 개발 모의논리서, pp.14-123, 2018.
3 김열수, 민진, 이광섭, 비상대비업무 평가체제구축연구:비상대비 훈련 평가체제를 중심으로, 국가비상기획위원회, pp.9-35, 2006.
4 행정안전부, 2019을지태극연습 평가지침서, pp.33-34, 78-79, 2019.
5 정덕훈, 심형섭, 정민화, 국가재난대응 종합훈련 평가지표 개발연구, 소방방재청, pp.33-35, 2006.
6 은종화, 민금영, 함승희, 김영희, 재난관리평가 핵심역량진단지표 개발, 행정안전부, pp.46-48, 2018.
7 US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Commander's Handbook for Assessment Planning and Execution, Version 1.0: V-1-8. 2011.
8 이종철, 합참지, 합동연습.훈련평가체계 고찰, 제51호, pp.49-52, 2012.
9 J. Lagsten and G. Goldkuhl, "Interpretative IS Evaluation: Results and Uses," The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, Vol.11, No.2, p.98, 2012.
10 권오정, 다기준 의사결정방법론 : 이론과 실제, 북스힐, 2018.
11 ODM 1.0.1 64bit.JVM:https://open-decisionmakersoft112.com/, 2020.05.27.
12 강병서, 의사결정을 위한 현대통계학, 무역경영사, 1993.
13 FEMA, Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program Doctrine, Revision, pp.2-2-25, 5-4-5. 2020.
14 국가민방위재난안전교육원. 2016비상대비 중점관리업체 간부과정, 2016.
15 행정안전부, 2019을지태극연습 평가지침서, 2019.
16 최상영, 국방모델링 및 시뮬레이션 총론, 북코리아, 2011.
17 국립재난안전연구원, 시뮬레이션 기반 조직단위 비상대비훈련기술개발 모의논리서(평가모델), pp.2-17, 2018.
18 고성호, 김광기, 김상욱, 사회조사방법론 제11판, Cengage Learning Korea, 2011.
19 C. Avgerou, "Evaluating information systems by consultation and negotiation," International Journal of Information Management, Vol.15, No.6, pp.427-436, Dec. 1995.   DOI
20 G. T. Doran, "There's a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management's Goals and Objectives," Management Review (AMA Forum), pp.35-36, Nov. 1981.
21 T. L. Saaty, "Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process," Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol.1, No.1, pp.83-98, 2008.   DOI
22 국립재난안전연구원, 시뮬레이션 기반 조직단위 비상 대비 훈련기술 개발 모의논리서, pp.2-3, 2018.