• 경영과학
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.25-39
• /
• 2002

This study suggests a revised TAM (Technology Acceptance Model)-based performance evaluation model in MS (management science) education. Recently, many MS education programs are developed on the basis of computer and Internet communication technology. Previous researchers used TAM as an individual performance evaluation model, and proved that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are the substantive successful factors. This study provides a revised TAM-based conceptual framework for understanding what is involved in improving university MS education and what might be implied by conducting research on its improvement. It is argued in this research that three sets of forces and conditions have a direct and indirect impact on MS education ; first, each student has self efficacy and it is a critical determinant of behavior next, the use of Internet-based information system at MS education affects on the renewal of MS education : and finally, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have impacts on behavioral intention and actual system usage. This research concludes with suggestions for which direction this framework provides for future research on the premise and limits of efforts to renew MS education in university.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.387-398
• /
• 2008

In this paper, the mathematical knowledges in higher education which are capable of improving the ability of the problem, scientific techniques and creativity are pinpointed as crucial necessary conditions for the development of the Engineering and Natural Science Sections. It is stressed most of all that the mixed evaluation of mathematics in college entrance examination is the main culprit to the crisis of these sections and thus the strengthening of the mathematics education is vital to the section. Also, another role of mathematical education for these sections is introduced.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.75-92
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to point out the problems of the competency exam for college education, a new college entrance exam, and to suggest the improvement ideas for it For this purpose, the test items of science inquiry were taken from the first, the second and the third pilot studies of the competency exam for college education which National Institute of Educational Evaluation had done. These tests were administered to 1,223 students of the general high school(422 for the 1st 400 for the 2nd, and 401 for the 3rd test). Also, those students' and the high school science teacher's opinions about the tests and the new college entrance exam were surveyed. The evaluation objectives of those test items were analyzed and the test item analyses were done. The results were as follows; (1) The evaluation objective analysis showed that most of the test The purpose of this study was to point out the problems of the competency exam for college education, a new college entrance exam, and to suggest the improvement ideas for it For this purpose, the test items of science inquiry were taken from the first, the second and the third pilot studies of the competency exam for college education which National Institute of Educational Evaluation had done. These tests were administered to 1,223 students of the general high school(422 for the 1st, 400 for the 2nd, and 401 for the 3rd test). Also, those students' and the high school science teacher's opinions about the tests and the new college entrance exam were surveyed. The evaluation objectives of those test items were analyzed and the test item analyses were done. The results were as follows; (1) The evaluation objective analysis showed that most of the test items were constructed based on the evaluation framework which was composed of scientific inquiry thinking ability, science concept, and scientific inquiry context dimensions. But, those items were unevenly distributed into a few areas of the evaluation framework. (2) The boys had higher mean scores than the girls in all of the tests, but these differences were not statistically significant. The natural science course students had significantly higher mean than the humanities course students in all of the test:(1st, F=12.643, p=0.0004 ; 2nd, F=45.757, p=0.0001 ; 3rd, F=36.162, p=0.0001). A significant interaction of sex and course was found in only 1st test( F=11.352. p=0.0008). (3) Most students answered the test was difficult and they needed more time to finish it Also, they added they had to study in a different way from the traditional one in order to prepare the new college entrance exam. Science teachers answered that those evaluation objectives of the tests corresponded well with the educational objectives of high school science and that the tests were suitable as measuring instruments of the scientific thinking abilities. But they pointed out it would be very difficult for them to teach students for preparing the exam under the exsting educational conditions. To carry out successfully the competency exam for college education, the following improvements were suggested. (1) Good evaluation methodology should be developed. (2) In-service science teacher training models on evaluation should be put in force. (3) Effective teaching models and strategies should be developed.(4) The high school science curriculum should be revised.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.77-83
• /
• 2014

This paper deals with the practical experience and lessons to develop the criteria for evaluating projects in Computer Science & Information Engineering. In engineering education, project-based learning is different from problem-based learning. Project tasks are closer to professional reality. And self-direction is stronger in project work. In this paper, the development of project evaluation criteria is introduced with consideration of these differences. It is explained through running examples of basic project courses in Computer Science & Information Engineering.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.168-181
• /
• 2014

이 연구에서는 초 중 일반계 고등학교 과학과 평가의 실태를 고찰하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 초등학교 60개교, 중학교 40개교, 일반계 고등학교 20개교를 표집하여 설문지를 발송하였고, 초등학교 교사 292명, 중학교 교사 110명, 고등학교 교사 116명, 총 518명의 응답 결과를 얻었다. 설문 조사 결과, 학교급이 올라갈수록 지필평가의 비율이 늘고 수행평가의 비율이 줄어들고 있었다. 그리고 과학과 지필평가에서 서술형 문항의 비율이 선다형 문항에 비해 낮았고, 중 고등학교는 초등학교와 비교할 때 선다형 문항의 비율이 높았다. 또한 지필평가에서 지식 영역과 탐구 영역의 출제 비율을 살펴본 결과, 학교급, 성별, 교직 경력과 상관없이 모두 지식 영역이 탐구 영역보다 출제 비율이 더 높았다. 채점 시간을 고려하여 서술형 문항을 제한된 범위에서 실시하는 경우가 많은데, 이러한 경향은 초등학교보다 중 고등학교에서 더 많이 나타났다. 교사들은 서술형 문항을 개발하여 실시함으로써 학생들의 이해 수준을 파악할 수 있음을 잘 인식하고 있는 경우도 있지만, 서술형 문항에 대한 채점 결과를 신뢰하기 어려워서 서술형 문항을 제대로 개발하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 고등학교의 경우 수행평가를 실시 목적에 맞게 실시하는 비율이 가장 낮게 나타났다. 교사들은 학생들의 다양한 능력을 평가하기 위해 수행평가를 실시 목적에 맞게 실시하는 경우도 있지만, 수행과 관련되어서만 평가하고 시간과 노력이 많이 필요해서 수행평가를 형식적으로 실시하는 경우도 있었다. 학교 현장에서 수행평가가 실시 목적에 맞게 실시되고 서술형 평가가 정착되며 탐구 영역의 출제가 원활하게 이루어지도록 교사 연수, 실험과 평가 지원을 위한 조교 배치 등 행 재정적 지원이 필요하다.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제24권7호
• /
• pp.595-603
• /
• 2003

이 연구는 서울 지역 소재 3개 초등학교 103명의 4학년 학생들을 대상으로 사회적 구성주의 교수학습모형을 적용한 후 학생들이 가지는 개념의 변화를 분석하였다. 특히, 사회적 구성주의 교수학습모형의 개념원도 활용 수업 전후 학생들의 개념 변화를 지필고사로 평가, 조사하였다. 103명을 대상으로 개념원도를 도입한 수업을 1개월 동안 실시한 전후 지필고사를 실시하였다. 연구결과에 따르면, 개념원도를 적용한 수업은 유의미하게 학생들의 개념을 신장시킨 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로, 개념원도를 적용한 사회적 구성주의 교수-학습모형은 진단평가, 형성평가에 도입할 가치가있는 것으로 고찰되었다.

• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.13-26
• /
• 2010

As an effort to realize the results of last two years of study, this study had three distinguished purposes: 1) confirming whether some requests for corrections had been accepted or not 2) making a list of possible errors found in newly written textbooks and asking to fix them, and 3) classifying forest related contents identified in the textbooks according to the 150 topics included in information material, so called Forest IQ 200. Among 94 errors associated trees, forest or forest education, only thirteen of them were found to be fixed according to the request made in previous study of 2008. Especially, most of the fixed errors were identified to be in natural and social science subject textbooks and nothing was found in art and language areas. Total of 1,320 forest related items were found in the textbooks at the level of kindergarten to 10th grade(freshman in highschool). Korean student was expect to have a chance to learn forest related items 1.64 times a week for 10 years(First to 10th grade). Analyzing 1,109 contents in terms of four topic areas of forest education, the forest culture area was found to have most content of 348 including painting and recreation. Some suggestions were made to make school forest education better, and publishing the forest textbook for elementary schools was one of them.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.137-149
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to develop a descriptive paper test item which can evaluate elementary school students' HGA (scientific Hypothesis Generating Ability) and to propose a counting formula that can easily assess student's HGA objectively and quantitatively. To make the test item can possibly evaluate all the students from 6th graders to 3rd graders, the 'rabbit's ear' item is developed. Developed test item was distributed to four different elementary schools in Seoul. Total 280 students who were in the 6th grade solved the item. All the students' reponses to the item were analyzed. Based on the analyzed data evaluation factors and evaluation criteria are extracted to design a Hypothesis Generating ability Quotient (HGQ). As the result 'Explican's Degree of Likeness' and 'Hypothesis' Degree of Explanation' are chosen as evaluation factors. Also precedent evaluation criteria were renewed. At first, Explican's Degree of Likeness evaluation criterion was turned four levels into three levels and each content of evaluation criterion is also modified. Secondly, new evaluation factor 'Hypothesis' Degree of Explanation' was developed as combined three different evaluation criteria, 'level of explican', 'number of explican' and 'structure of explican'. This evaluation factor was designed to assess how the suggested hypothesis can elaborately explain the cause of one phenomenon. Newly designed evaluation factors and evaluation criteria can assess HGA more in detail and reduce the scoring discordant through the markers. Lastly, Developed counting formula is much more simple than precedent Kwon's equation for evaluating the Hypothesis Explanation Quotient. So it could help easily distinguish one student's scientific hypothesis generating ability.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.501-506
• /
• 1999

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.49-54
• /
• 2022

It is challenging to select appropriate technology in education to interact with students in today's digital world. Especially when the technologies used at home on smart devices like tablets and mobile phones are very advanced, on the other side, it may be more challenging to find sharing technology in the classroom. One of the ways is to use new technologies like Augmented Reality (AR). The current study aims to develop usability principles for the development and evaluation of education using AR technology applications. We develop usability principles for AR applications by analyzing existing research about heuristic evaluation methods, design principles for AR systems.