• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.29-36
• /
• 2003

본 연구의 목적은 제7차 교육과정에 의한 초등학교 과학 교과서(화학 영역)를 분석하여 6차 교육과정에 의한 교과서와 비교하는 것이다 수업 차시수, 교과서 쪽수, 학년별 학습 내용, 삭제된 내용이나 새로 도입된 내용에 대해 분석하였다. '혼합물의 분리' 단원의 일부 특징에 대해서도 분석하였다. 개정된 교육과정의 의도가 반영되었는지, 특히 학습량이 감소되었는지에 대한 교육학적' 함의를 논의하였다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.111-135
• /
• 2005

이 연구는 20세기 말 거의 같은 시기에 개정된 한국과 일본의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 및 그 해설서를 비교하여, 차후 한국의 교육과정과 해설서 개발에 도움을 얻기 위함이다. 첫째로, 한국의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정은 학문의 체계와 학습의 우열 및 발전 의지를, 일본은 수학의 일상생활에의 적용과 수학 학습의 즐거움을 중시한 것으로 나타나고 있다. 둘째로, 일본의 산수과 교육과정 해설서는 한국에 비해, 교육과정의 개정에 초점을 맞추어 산수과 목표를 세분하여 구체적으로 해설하고 있다. 각 내용 영역에 대한 전체적 목표를 진술하고 학년별 내용의 관련을 표로 만들어 제시한 것은 좋은 점으로 생각된다. 끝으로, 일본은 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 해설서의 학년별 목표에서, 교육과정에 제시된 $\lceil$산수과의 목표$\rfloor$를 일관성있게 반영하면서 큰 틀만을 개략하고 있는데. 이는 교과서 제작에서 융통성과 창작성 발휘를 기대하는 배려로 생각할 수 있다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.437-462
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this research is to analyze the textbook contents about the natural number concepts in the Korean National Elementary Mathematics Curriculum. Understanding a concept of natural number is crucial in school mathematics curriculum planning, since elementary students start their basic learning with natural number system. The concepts of natural number have various meaning from the perspectives of pedagogical research, and the philosophy of mathematics. The natural number concepts in the elementary math curriculum consist of four aspects; counting numbers, cardinal numbers, ordinal numbers, and measuring numbers. Two research questions are addressed; (1) How are the natural number concepts focusing on counting, cardinal, ordinal, measuring numbers are covered in the national math curriculum? ; (2) What suggestions can be made to enhance the teaching and learning about the natural number concepts? Findings reveal that (1) the national mathematics curriculum properly reflects four aspects of natural number concepts, as the curriculum covers 50% of the cardinal number system; (2) In the aspect of the counting number, we hope to add the meaning about 'one, two, three, ......, and so on' in the Korean Mathematics curriculum. In the ordinal number, we want to be rich the related meaning in a set. Further suggestions are made for future research to include them ensuing number in the curriculum.

• International journal of advanced smart convergence
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.147-156
• /
• 2020

ACM's CSTA has drafted standards for computing curricula and recommended them to schools in the United States. The five core concepts of the US elementary school computing curriculum are computing systems, network and the Internet, data and analysis, algorithms and programming, and impacts of computing. In 2005, Korea prepared ICT education guidelines, including five fields, their subfields, and achievement criteria for each subfield. In the 2015 revised curriculum, software education was introduced and five achievement standards were set. The ACM CSTA has 18 achievement criteria up to K-2 and 21 achievement criteria up to K-5. If we compare the 39 achievement standards of the US to Korea, Korea's 2005 ICT education guidelines include 25 of these, and the 2015 revised curriculum includes 5 of them. In this study, we aim to study the CSTA achievement criteria that second graders should know and the achievement criteria that fifth graders should know. This is compared and analyzed with Korea's 2005 ICT Guidelines and 2015 Software Curriculum. In comparison with the number of achievement standards, the US elementary school's computing achievement standards are much higher than in Korea. Comparing with each standard, there are many areas that are not covered in Korean curriculum, and we can see that the 2015 curriculum has rather receded from 2005.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.42-50
• /
• 2012

The Purpose of this study was to analyze STS contents in elementary school science textbooks according to 6th, 7th and revision 2007 national curriculum. The contents of STS were analyzed by the STS elements of Yager and the STS topics of Piel's standard. Major findings from the analyses are as follows: (1) The STS contents in the science textbooks of the 6th curriculum took up 13.7% and increased to 18.3% in the 7th and 19.0% in the revision 2007, which showed that the textbooks followed the goal of the national curriculum faithfully. (2) Based on the STS elements by Yager's standard, most of STS content is focused on 'Application of science', 'Social problems and issues' and 'Local and community relevance'. (3) Based on the STS topics by Piel's standard, most of STS contents are focused on 'Effect of technological development' and 'Society of science'. These results indicate that recent STS education trends are reflected on the 6th, 7th and revision 2007 textbooks well. However, it is suggested that some improvement is needed, such as diversification of topic.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.63-75
• /
• 2007

This study investigated how the contents of biology domains that were dealt with in the 7th national elementary-school science curriculum were in turn dealt with in the other subject matter areas. Through this, it was hoped that the place and identity of biology as a subject could be more clearly established and defined and additionally, more basic data for developing the new national science curriculum could be acquired at the same time. Subject matter areas that overlapped with biology in the 7th national elementary-school curriculum were practical arts, social studies and physical education. The structure and composition of specific components that were dealt with by these subject matter areas were very different from those of science, and the analysis showed that they failed to correspond across grades. Moreover, topics such as 'natural calamities and the environment' and 'human reproduction' that were dealt with by other subject matter areas, but not in science must be included for developing the new national science curriculum. Accordingly, when it comes to composing the contents of each subject matter area during creation of the new national curriculum, the relevant experts in related subject matter areas should be mobilized to conduct in-depth analysis of the following areas: viability, the most appropriate level of difficulty, and appropriateness of any hierarchy of relative importance between subjects. Additionally, efforts to reflect any improvements in the way the new national curriculum is developed which come about through this research are needed.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.356-370
• /
• 2008

The study aims to explore sequence of earth science content in elementary school science curriculum in Korea and the U.S.. The analysis is focused on a) general content structure of earth science part; b) concept relationship between grades in the specific field of 'geology'; c) longitudinal connection of concepts and content in 'geology.' The findings are as follows. First, earth science curriculum content in Korea is structured according to sub-scientific disciplines centering on not science concepts but topics or inquiry activities whereas the U.S. curricular content is organized through integrative earth science topics with basic concepts and sub-concepts. Second, it is a common feature that basic concepts are interrelated to sub-concepts in all grades in both countries. However, basic concepts are scattered all over the grades, presented in a linear pattern in Korea while those are provided together in 3rd grade and repeated with extended concepts in a spiral structure in the U.S.. Last, it is not clear how concepts and content are longitudinally connected between grades in Korean curriculum. On the contrary, concepts and content in the U.S. curriculum have a strong longitudinal connection between grades with conceptual hierarchy. Such results indicate that Korean elementary school science curriculum would limit students' comprehensive understanding of science concepts through grades. The study suggests Korean science content should strengthen interrelationship among concepts as well as longitudinal connection between grades, in order to achieve the ultimate goal of science education, 'scientific literacy'.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.613-627
• /
• 2014

2009 초등학교 교육과정에 따라 2014년에 처음으로 출간된 교과서 ${\ll}$수학 4-2${\gg}$에서는 이전 교육과정에 따른 교과서에서는 취급하지 않았던 오목다각형을 새롭게 취급하고 있다. 그러나 본 논문에서는 오목다각형의 취급을 재고할 필요가 있음을 보이기 위해, 먼저 다각형에 관해 논의한 후에, 2009 초등학교 교육과정은 오목다각형의 취급을 허용하고 있는가와 오목다각형의 취급에서 논리적 비약은 없는가의 두 관점에서 오목다각형 취급과 관련한 문제점에 관하여 논의했다. 그리고 다음과 같은 이유에서 오목다각형을 취급하는 것을 재고할 필요가 있다는 것을 결론으로 제시했다. 첫째, 오목다각형의 취급에 관한 공론화 과정이 없었다. 둘째, 2009 초등학교 교육과정에서 오목다각형의 취급을 정당화해 주는 근거를 찾을 수 없다. 셋째, 오목다각형의 취급에 논리적 비약이 있다. 넷째, 오목다각형의 취급에서 일관성이 없다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2001

In this paper, contents related to problem solving in 7th elementary mathematics curriculum analyzed in five aspects: problem solving stages, problem solving strategies, problems, problem posing, and assessment on problem solving abilities. From the results and processes of analysis, following conclusions are obtained: First, it is difficult to say the contents related to problem solving in 7th elementary mathematics curriculum are prepared organically. Second, it is difficult to say that contents related to problem solving in 7th elementary mathematics curriculum reflect results of recent researches.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.239-254
• /
• 2015

이 연구에서는 제7차, 2007 개정, 2009 개정 교육과정의 초등학교 및 중학교 과학과 내용 진술에 사용된 서술어를 분석하고 교육과정에 따른 특징을 알아보고자 하였다. 성취기준 및 탐구 활동 진술에 사용된 문장의 마지막 서술어 1383개를 대상으로 종류 및 빈도 등을 조사한 결과, 초등학교에서는 평균적으로 '안다'(15.0 %)가, 중학교에서는 '이해한다'(24.2 %)가 가장 많이 사용되었다. 교육과정별로 살펴보면, 제7차 교육과정에서는 '이해한다'의 비중이 가장 높았지만 초등학교에서 관찰, 조사와 같은 탐구 활동을 뜻하는 동사가 상대적으로 자주 등장하였다. 2007 개정 과학과 교육과정을 살펴보면 초 중학교를 합쳐 '설명한다'가 최빈 동사로 나타났다. 2009 개정 교육과정에서는 '안다'와 '이해한다'가 각각 1, 2 순위를 차지하였다. 세 교육과정을 비교하면, '이해한다'와 '관찰한다'는 비교적 고르게 사용된 반면에 '안다'는 교육과정이 개정되면서 빈도가 점점 증가하는 경향이 나타났다. 아울러 이러한 결과들이 지니는 의미와 시사점을 논의하고, 차기 교육과정 개정과 관련하여 후속 연구의 필요성을 제안하였다.