• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.68-95
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this paper is to provide the comprehensive review of empirical investigations in strategy content in healthcare organizations. Given the absence of relevant reviews in assessing an external validity of strategy content research in the healthcare industry, the paper, by taking convergent view, discern two main streams of research in the school of content: (1) the strategy-structure-performance (SSP) contingent, and (2) competitive strategies which test the propositions that business strategy, industry structure (IO economics). Finally, the paper suggests some future direction for research in this area.

• 임상간호연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.354-367
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This study was done to verify validity and reliability of a neonatal patient classification system (NeoPCS-1). Methods: An expert group of 8 nurse managers and 40 nurses from 8 Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Korea, verified content validity of the measurement using item level content validity index (I-CVI). The participants were nurses caring for 469 neonates. Data were collected from November 11 to December 14, 2011 and analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficient, and K-cluster analysis with PASW 18.0 program. Results: Nursing domains and activities included 8 items with 91 activities. I-CVI was above .80 in all areas. Interrater reliability was significant between two raters (r=.95, p<.001). Classification scores for participants according to patient types and nurses' intuition were significantly higher for the following patients; gestational age (${\leq}29$ weeks), body weight (<1,000 gm), and transfer from hospital. Six groups were classified using cluster analysis method based on nursing needs. Patient classification scores were significantly different for the groups. Conclusion: These results show adequate validity and reliability for the NeoPCS-1 based on nursing needs. Study is needed to refine the measurement and develop index scores to estimate number of nurses needed for adequate neonatal care.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 학동기 미술영재성의 동기요인 검사도구를 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 연구는 문헌연구를 통해 미술영재성의 특성을 추출하여 유목화한 후 측정변인으로 규정하였으며, 각각의 측정변인별로 문항을 개발하여 예비검사 과정을 통하여 최종적으로 27문항으로 구성된 검사도구를 제작하였다. 담임교사의 지명을 받은 초등학교 1학년에서 6학년 679명을 연구대상으로 본 검사를 실시하였다. 검사도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 경험적으로 검증한 결과 .93의 높은 신뢰도를 확보하였다. 한편 초등교육학 전문가, 영재교육 전문가, 미술전문가, 교육통계전문가 4인의 내용타당도를 확보하였으며, 주성분 요인 추출방법으로 요인을 추출하여 Varimax방법으로 직각회전을 한 구인타당도 검증에서는 흥미/태도/취미 요인, 인내/열중 요인, 호기심/상상력/민감성 요인, 심미적 요인이 추출되었다. 공인타당도면에서는 Barren-Welsh 검사와의 상관에서 76의 상관을 나타냄으로써 공인타당도가 검증되었다 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 학동기 미술영재성 동기요인 검사도구는 신뢰도와 타당도가 양호하게 검증되었다고 볼 수 있다.

• 한국영재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국영재학회 2003년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.109-126
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 학동기 시각예술영재성의 구성요인으로서 동기요인을 측정하는데 사용할 수 있는 검사도구를 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 연구는 문헌연구를 통해 시각예술영재성의 특성을 추출하여 유목화한 후 측정변인으로 규정하였으며, 각각의 측정변인별로 문항을 개발하여 예비검사 과정을 통하여 최종적으로 27문항으로 구성된 검사도구를 제작하였다. 무작위로 표집된 초등학교 1학년에서 6학년 679명을 연구대상으로 본 검사를 실시하였다. 검사도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 경험적으로 검증한 결과 .93의 높은 신뢰도를 확보하였다. 한편 초등교육학 전문가, 영재교육 전문가, 시각예술전문가, 교육통계전문가 4인의 내용 타당도를 확보하였으며, 주성분 요인 추출방법으로 요인을 추출하여 Varimax방법으로 직각회전을 한 구인타탕도 검증에서는 흥미/태도/취미 요인, 인내/열중 요인, 호기심/상상력/민감성 요인, 심미적 요인이 추출되었다. 공인타당도면에서는 Barren-Welsh 검사와의 상관에서 .76의 상관을 나타냄으로써 공인타당도가 검증되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 학동기 시각예술영재성 동기요인 검사도구는 신뢰도와 타당도가 양호하게 검증되었다고 볼 수 있다.

• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.258-273
• /
• 2014

Objectives: The purposes of the study were to develop a questionnaire for dietary habit survey for Korean adults, and unify the terms related to dietary habits. Methods: The Delphi method by 43 professionals on dietary habit research was applied to unify the terms. Results: With regard to results on terms related to dietary habit, the respondents recorded the highest percentage (90.7%) of selecting the term "dietary habits" and also the highest percentage (76.7%) of choosing "dietary habits" for English. The biggest percentage of the respondents chose "individual dietary behaviors repeatedly formed and habitualized under the social, cultural, and psychological influence in the group" as the concept of dietary habits. The Delphi survey for the development of a questionnaire resulted in the first questionnaire of 31 items, the second one of 27 items, and the third one of 25 items. The validity of questionnaire items was tested with content validity ratios (CVR). The items whose CVR value was 0.29 or lower were eliminated or revised, because the minimum CVR value needed to test validity was 0.29. To test the reliability of questionnaire items, test-retest method was performed in 163 adults. According to the Kappa coefficient in the range of 0.314-0.716, all of the 25 items were in the reliability scope. A survey was taken with 702 adults to finally revise and supplement the third questionnaire whose validity and reliability were tested. Conclusions: Through those processes, a questionnaire for adults' dietary habit survey was finally completed. The significance of the study lies in the development of the first questionnaire on dietary habits equipped with both validity and reliability in South Korea.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.171-182
• /
• 2021

Objectives: Recently, subjective career success has been used as a criterion for evaluating career success. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a simplified subjective career success inventory for dental hygienists. Methods: Subfactors of the subjective career success inventory consisted of career satisfaction, employability, and job satisfaction. The validity and reliability of the existing tools were evaluated through the basic items composition, content validity index (CVI), preliminary survey, and main survey process according to dental hygienists. The preliminary survey was composed of 35 questions by verifying the content validity twice from the existing 63 questions, and the main survey was conducted with a total of 12 questions. Samples were conveniently extracted from dental hygienists with a clinical career of ≥3 years and surveyed online from March 12, 2020 to June 30, 2020. Data of 320 people were collected, of which 284 were finally analyzed. The validity and reliability were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0 (p<0.05). Results: The subjective career success was a shortened inventory composed of nine questions, and the overall reliability was Cronbach's α=0.841. Using exploratory factor analysis, three factors were extracted. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, each measurement variable significantly explained the latent factor, and the fit of the model was appropriate. The fit of the model was appropriate for the structural equation model. Among the sub-factors of subjective career success, career satisfaction and job satisfaction had a significant effect on intention to stay (p<0.05). Conclusions: The simplified subjective career success inventory developed for dental hygienists was found was found to be a useful tool in terms of reliability and validity.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.175-182
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 노인운전자용 자가 보고식 평가 SAFE-DR 개발 프로젝트의 일환으로 운전위험성 선별을 위한 기준점수를 확인하고 평가의 타당성을 검증하기 위해 수행되었다. Driver 65 Plus평가를 통해 노인운전자 132명을 58명의 위험성 운전자와 74명의 안전성 운전자로 구분하고, 이를 기준으로 SAFE-DR 평가의 위험성 예측 기준을 분석하였다. 또한 SAFE-DR 평가의 구성 타당도, 내용 타당도, 예측 타당도를 검증하였다. SAFE-DR 평가의 운전위험성 예측을 위한 기준점수는 74.5점으로 분석되었으며, 이 기준의 양성 예측도는 88.6%, 음성 예측도는 86.3%로 판별력은 훌륭한(excellent) 수준으로 확인되었다. 또한 집중타당성, 법칙타당성, 내용타당성이 적절한 것으로 판정되었다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해 SAFE-DR은 위험한 노인운전자를 선별하는 용도로 활용할 수 있는 적절한 평가임을 확인하였다.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.652-660
• /
• 2010

The aim of this study was to develop a KDPS (Korean dietary pattern score) to assess dietary patterns and diet quality of Koreans from a food culture perspective. The KDPS was applied to dietary data collected during the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 2007, and the validity and reliability of the KDPS were evaluated. The targets of the study included 2,278 Korean adults aged 20n89 years. The KDPS was developed using the sum of the scores of 13 components. Each component scored up to 10 points and there was a total of 130 points. The first seven components were for the KSMS (Korean-style meal score) and assessed the dietary balance based on the 3-Chup Bansang daily basic table setting. The components numbered 8 to 13 were for the FGS (food group score), which measured the degree of compliance with the six major food groups based on the Korean recommendation for one serving size of grains, meats, vegetables, fruits, milk, and oils. This KDPS was verified through content validity, concurrent-criterion validity, principal components analysis, and a reliability analysis. The results showed that content validity and construct validity were high. The KDPS developed in this study adhered to the Korean dietary pattern and a healthy diet intake. Furthermore, this study presented an integrated index by scoring the Korean style table setting in addition to evaluating meals from a nutrition perspective. This study can be extended to develop a score for assessing.

• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.246-255
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire of pattern identification (PI) in traditional chinese medicine (TCM), through the systematic review of china national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) database. We searched the articles related with reliability and validity of the questionnaire of PI and published from January 1994 to December 2013. Seventeen questionnaires were analyzed in this study. The twelve (70.6%) questionnaires were developed on the base of specific disease, and five (29.4%) ones were developed on the base of non-specific disease. Three of PI questionnaires showed low inter-item consistency reliability. Exploratory factor analysis of construct validity, content validity, and criterion validity analysis were commonly used on the assessment of validity, but none of them was analysed at the same study. There was only one questionnaire of the ischemic stroke that examined the sensitivity and specificity of both training and test groups in spite of the absence of a gold standard.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한예방의학회 1994년도 교수 연수회(역학)
• /
• pp.137-141
• /
• 1994

The purpose of this paper is to examine what is meant by a ralid measure of health. Guyatt, Kirshner and Jaeschke propose that health tests should be designed so as to have one of several kinds of validity: 'longitudinal construct validity' for those which are used for longitudinal research designs, and 'cross-sectional construct validity' for those which are used for cross-sectional designs. Williams and Naylor argue that this approach to test classification and validation confuses what a test purports to measure with the purpose for which it is used, and that some tests have multiple uses. A review of the meanings of validity in the psychologica test literature shows that both sets of authors use the term validity in an idiosyncratic way. Although the use of a test (evaluated by content validity) should not be conflated with whether the test actually measures a specified construct (evaluated by construct validity);' if health is actually made up of several constructs (as suggested in Hyland's interactional model) then there may be an association between types of construct and types of purpose. Evidence is reviewed that people make several, independent judgements about their health: cognitive perceptions of health problems are likely to be more sensitive to change in a longitudinal research design. whereas emotional evaluations of health provide less bias in cross-sectional designs. Thus. a classification of health measures in terms of the purpose of the test may parallel a classification in terms of what tests purport to measure.