Browse > Article

The Development of Motivation Scale in the Visual Artistic Giftedness of the Elementary School Children  

이용애 (한국교원대학교)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.13, no.2, 2003 , pp. 23-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop the instruments which can measure motivation as a component of Visual Artistic Giftedness with in elementary school period. This study prescribed the variable factors of measurement after abstract and classify the characteristics of Visual Artistic Giftedness through literature studies. And it produced instruments those are finally composed of 27 items through the preliminary test. They were evaluated in terms of content validity, construct validity, and reliability by implementing them to 679 elementary school children from the first to sixth grades. Statistical analyses were carried out to verify the validities and reliability. Content validity was found to be satisfactory by experts' evaluation on the test items. Construct validity was also found to be satisfactory through factor analyses which showed the four factors which the identification instruments were intended to measure such as, interest/ attitude/ taste, endurance/ concentration, curiosity/ imagination! sensitiveness, aesthetic. Concurrent validity was also found to be satisfactory with high coeffients of Barron- Welsh which were calculated as .76 in motivation. In conclusion, the instruments about motivation of Visual Artistic Giftedness during elementary school period developed by this study are highly reliable on its reliability and validity.
Keywords
motivation; instrument;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이용애(2002). 미술영재성의 개념 정의 모델 탐색. 초등교육학연구 19(1)
2 Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R E. (1986). Culture, time, and development of talent, InR. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson, Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 264-284), Cambridge:Cambridge University Rress
3 Doob, H. S. (1975). Gifted students: Identification, techniques and program organization.Arlington, VA: Education Research Service
4 Eisner, E. W. (1972). Eduoating artistic vision New York: The Macmillan Company
5 Feldman, D. H. (1994). Beyond universaIs in cognitive development New Jersey, Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation
6 Fritz, H. E. (1930). A search for and conservation of the gifted. BulIetin. of High points.12(8), 19-2
7 Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: the significance of children's drawings. New York:Basic Books Inc
8 Getzds, J., & Csikszenthmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study ofproblem finding in art New York: John Wiley and Sons
9 Hildreth, G. H. (1966). Introduction to the gifted New York: McGraw-Hill
10 Klar, W. H., & Winslow, L. L. (1933). Art education in principle and practice. Spring field,MA: C. Valentine Kirby
11 Lark-Hortvitz, B., Lewis, H., & Luca, M (1967, 1973). Understanding children's art forbetter teaching: Columbus, OH: Charles E
12 Parker, J. P. (1989). Instructional strategies for teaching the gifted. Massachusetts: Allynand Bacon, Inc
13 Swassing, R. H. (1985). Teaching gifted children and adolescents. Colurnbus, OH: CharlesE. Merrill
14 Ziegfeld, E. (Ed.). (1961). Art for the academically talented studented in the secondaryschool, Washington, DC: NEA/NAEA
15 Cane, F. (1936). The gifted child in art. Journal of Educational Sociology, 10(2), 67-73   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and. talented, VoI. 1. Report to the Congressof the United States by US Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC USGovernment Printing Office
17 Parke, B., & Ness, T. (1988). Curricular decdsion making for the education of youngchildren. The Gifted ChiId QuarterIy, 32(1), 196-199   DOI
18 Peterson, N. (1977). Project success in art Introductory packet Poulsho, WA: NorthKitsap School District, Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education
19 Feldman, D. H., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1986). Nature's gambit New York: Basic Books
20 Lark-Horovitz, B, & Norton, J. A. (1959, 1960). Children's art abilities: The interrelationsand factorial structure of ten characteristics. Chitd Deuetopment, 30(4), 433-452;31(1), 453-462
21 Salome, R A. (1974). Identifying and instructing the gifted in art, Art Education, 27, 16-19
22 Vinache, W. E. (1952). The psychology of thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill
23 Tannenbaum, A. J. (1963, 1986). Gifted Children. Psychological and educationalperspectives. New York: Macmillan
24 Conant, H., & Randall, A. (1959). Art in education. Peoria, IL: Charles A. Bennett
25 Hurwitz, A. (1983). The gifted and talented in. art: a guide to program planning.Worcester, MA: Davis Publications
26 Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity, In R. J.Stemberg, Handbock of Creativity(pp. 273-296), Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress
27 Luca, M., & Allen, B. (1974). Teaching gifted children art in. grades one through three.Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education
28 Kough, Jr., & DeHaan, R. (1955). Teacher' guidance handbook, elementary school editionVoluume I: Identifying children with special needs. Chicago: Science ResearchAssociates
29 Walberg, H. J. (1993). Creativity and talent as learning, In R. J. Stemberg(1989). Thenature of creativity(pp. 340-361), NY : Press Stndicate of the University ofCambridge
30 김춘미(2001). 창조적 문화인프라 구축을 위한 영재 및 고급인재 양성. 2001년도 한국영재학회 춘계학술세미나 자료집(pp. 191-215). 서울: 한국영재학회
31 Lark-Horovitz, B. (1941). On learning abilities in children recorded in a drawingexperiment: I, subject matter and 2, aesthetic and representational qualities. Joural ofExperimental Eduoation, 9(4), 332-360
32 Lindstrom, M. (1957). Children's art: Berkeley: University of California Press
33 Lowenfeld, V., & Britain, W. L. (1964, 1987). Creative and mental growth. New York:Macmillan
34 Whipple, G. M. (1919). classes for gifted children Bloornington, IL Public SchoolPublishing Company
35 김재은(1995). 그림에 의한 아동의 심리진단. 서울: 교육과학사
36 Gaitskell, C. D., Hurwitz, A., & Day, M. (1982, 2001). children and their art: methods forthe elementary school(4th, 8th eds.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc
37 Munro, T. (1956). Art education; Its philosophy and psychoIogy. New York: The LiberalArts Press
38 이용애(2001). 미술영재성의 구성요인 추출에 관한 이론전 고찰, 초등교육학연구, 8(1). 149-168
39 Harris, D. B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures cf intellectual maturity: A revisionand extension of Goodenough draw-a-man. test New Yoik: Harcourt, Brace andWorld
40 Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1977). An iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in thedrawings of young people. Art Education, 30(1), 5-12   DOI
41 Jellen, H. G., & Venduin. J. R (1986). Handbook for differential eduoation of the gifted: Ataxonomy of 32 key concepts. Carbondale, IL Southem Illinois University Press