• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.53-71
• /
• 2018

이 연구는 KCI 색인 학술논문들을 대상으로 피인용 최상위 수준의 논문들을 추출하여, 그들의 서지적 특성을 파악하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 피인용이나 상위 논문들에 대한 기존의 분석과 달리 논문들의 서지적 요소를 중심으로 그것의 특성을 분석하였다. KCI에서 수집한 사회과학의 17개 분야 3,453편의 논문을 대상으로 하였고, 분석을 위한 서지적 요소는 저자, 소속기관, 발행년, 학술지, 피인용수이다. 분석결과로 나타나는 주요한 서지적 특성은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 단독저자와 공동저자의 비율, 공동저자의 수에서 차이가 났다. 저자들은 주로 단독저자 또는 2인 공동저자였다. 대체로 1건의 논문 저자비율이 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 소속기관 유형의 대부분은 대학이며, 각 분야별 저자들을 보유한 기관의 수에 차이가 났다. 그리고 저자의 소속기관의 등장빈도에서는 불균등 현상이 나타났다. 분야별로 우수한 연구기관과 저자들의 수가 달랐다. 셋째, 2018년을 기준으로 해서 발행 후 피인용 최상위 논문이 되는 경과년수는 평균 11년으로 나타났다. 넷째, 수록 학술지의대부분은 KCI 등재학술지이며, 학술지의 영향력은 피인용 최상위 논문의 영향요인이 되지 않았다. 다섯째, 분야에 따라 피인용수에 차이가 나타났다. 이 연구는 사회과학 분야 피인용 최상위 논문들의 서지적 특성을 파악한 것에 의의가 있다.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2021

The aims of this study were to examine the causes and types of the most common and serious fraudulent authors among research misconduct, and to examine ways to reduce the mass production of unjust authors. In scientific research, it is universal and efficient to have multiple authors participate. This is because each author group consisting of a team has its own expertise, and most of them participate in research in a complementary way to maximize the research effect. However, the competition for achievements between researchers, the quantitative evaluation system of universities, and the social atmosphere of performance-oriented are tempting researchers to abandon research ethics. In this study, in relation to the research ethics of existing researchers, the contents of research ethics by a few countries such as United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia etc. and the situation in Korea was examined as well. In addition, the types and causes of domestic unfair authors in Korea were investigated intensively. In conclusion, in order to no longer produce unfair authors such as compulsory authors, honorary authors, mutually supported authors, and duplicate authors, which researchers unknowingly recognize as co-authors, reinforcement of research ethics education and national organization and system should be supported.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.73-94
• /
• 1988

국내(國內) 영양학문헌(營養學文獻)의 서지적(書誌的) 현상 속에 내포된 의미를 파악하기 위하여 20 명의 저자(著者)를 대상으로 저자동시인용분석(著者同時引用分析)을 시도하고 나아가서는 다차원공간(多次元空間)에서 지적구조(知的構造)를 규명하였다. 저자동시인용분석(著者同時引用分析)은 동시인용빈도(同時引用頻度)가 높은 저자(著者)들일수록 밀접한 관계를 형성한다는 가정을 가지고서, "한국영양학회지(韓國營養學會誌)" 1986년과 1987년도 발행분을 기초자료(基礎資料)로 하여 분석 처리하였다. 분석 결과는 (1) 영양학분야(營養學分野)의 저자(著者)그룹, (2) 저자(著者)그룹간(間)의 위치, (3) 그룹내(內)에서의 중심저자와 주변저자, (4) 국내저자(國內著者)와 해외저자(海外著者)들간의 관계를 파악하였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.269-284
• /
• 2022

Exploring research similarity of researchers offers insight on research communities and potential interactions among scholars. While co-authorship is a popular measure for studying research similarity of researchers, it cannot provide insight on authors who have not collaborated yet. In this work, we present novel approach to capture research similarity of authors using citation information. Extensive study is conducted on DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING (DKE) publications to demonstrate and compare suggested approach with co-authorship based approach. Analysis result shows that proposed approach distinguishes author relationships that is not shown in co-authorship network.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.311-331
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 2018년부터 2022년까지 5년간 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 주요 학술지 4종의 논문을 분석하여 지식 커뮤니케이션 특징을 탐구하고 중요한 연구 주제와 핵심 저자들을 분석하였다. 연구 방법으로 한국학술지인용색인(KCI)에서 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 핵심 학술지 4종의 5년간 발표된 논문을 수집하여 선별하여 논문의 저자 데이터와 참고문헌의 데이터를 추출하였다. Netminer를 사용하여 문헌동시인용 분석과 저자동시인용 분석을 실행하여 네트워크를 시각화하였다. 분석 결과, 저자 간의 동시인용 쌍을 도출할 수 있었으며, 연구자 간의 동시인용빈도 분석을 통해 학문 분야의 지적구조 분석에서 복수 저자를 분석 대상에 포함하는 것이 중요함을 확인하였다. 또한 키워드 분석을 통해 논문 주제 간의 상관성을 확인하였으며, 문헌정보학 관련 연구가 '도서관, 디지털, 이용자, 서비스, 데이터' 주제를 중심으로 이루어지고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.699-714
• /
• 2021

Supercritical CO₂ (S-CO₂) Brayton cycle has been applied to various heat sources in recent decades, owing to the characteristics of compact structure and high efficiency. Understanding the research development in this emerging research field is crucial for future study. Thus, a bibliometric approach is employed to analyze the scientific publications of S-CO₂ cycle field from 2000 to 2019. In Scopus database, there were totally 724 publications from 1378 authors and 543 institutes, which were distributed over 55 countries. Based on the software-BibExcel, these publications were analyzed from various aspects, such as major research areas, affiliations and keyword occurrence frequency. Furthermore, parameters such as citations, hot articles were also employed to evaluate the research output of productive countries, institutes and authors. The analysis showed that each paper has been cited 13.39 times averagely. United States was identified as the leading country in S-CO₂ research followed by China and South Korea. Based on the contents of publications, existing researches on S-CO₂ are briefly reviewed from the five aspects, namely application, cycle configurations and modeling, CO₂-based mixtures, system components, and experiments. Future development is suggested to accelerate the commercialization of S-CO₂ power system.

• Journal of Animal Science and Technology
• /
• 제48권4호
• /
• pp.623-636
• /
• 2006

생명과학분야 65개의 국내 학술지에 게재된 2004년도 논문 6,161편의 연구 형태 및 특성을 서지학적 방법으로 분석하였다. 조사분석 대상 논문의 전체 공저자수는 29,759명이었으며 논문 1편당 평균 공저자수는 4.8명으로 나타났다. 이들 국내 학술지 게재 논문중에서 4인 이상이 참여하여 수행된 공동연구 논문은 전체 63.4%이었으나 CNS에 게재된 생명과학분야 4인 이상 공저자 논문비중 88.9%보다 25.5% 포인트 이상 공동연구 비율이 낮은 것으로 분석되었다. 국내 학술지 게재논문의 공동연구 유형은 대학－대학간 공동연구논문이 19.9%로 가장 비중이 큰 것으로 분석되었으나, CNS 게재논문은 대학－연구소간 공동연구 비율이 48.2%로 가장 비중이 큰 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.93-107
• /
• 2014

Interests on collaborative research and academic relationship among researchers have been increased. Collaborative researchers can maximize productivity, time and cost savings, and reduce the risk of research. An empirical study on the research productivity of co-authors' network and review efficiency of the reviewer network was conducted based on co-author networks and reviewer networks in Korea Society of IT Service. This study aims to find the characteristics of the co-author and reviewer networks, and to analyze research productivity and review efficiency in order to draw some implications. The meaning of interactions among professional groups was analyzed. Research productivity index was calculated using 728 authors' papers submitted to the society. In order to verify the effects of indicators of social network analysis on research productivity and review efficiency, correlation and regression analyses were used. As a result, the indicators of network centrality did not affect the review efficiency, but affect the research productivity.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.159-179
• /
• 2020

Purpose: We present a scientometric review of the literature on platform government to serve three primary purposes: First, to cluster researches on platform government based on the research issues; second, to identify the major papers, authors, and keywords in the domain; and third, to explore the promising research areas of platform government. Design/methodology/approach: We collected the platform government research from Web of Science, and analyzed 1,536 articles that was published during time span of 1998-2019. Next, co-citation networks are constructed and analyzed by using CiteSpace to visualize the domain clusters and dynamic research trends in the platform government domain. Findings: We identified 13 sub areas of the platform government research: global investigation, consumer product quality, digital agora, civic crowd funding, and open data use etc. We also visualize the top 20 references with the strongest citation bursts, co-authors network, co-occurring keyword network, and timeline of co-citation clusters.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제49권3호
• /
• pp.273-289
• /
• 2015

This study examined changes in citation index scores and rankings of thirty-five chemistry faculty members at Seoul National University using different co-authorship credit allocation models. Using 1,436 Web of Science papers published between 2007 and 2013, we applied the inflated, fractional, harmonic, network-based allocation, and harmonic+ models to calculate faculty's h-, R-, and normalization of h- and R- index scores and rankings. The harmonic+ model, which is based on our belief that contribution of primary authors should be the same regardless of collaboration, is designed to minimize the penalty for research collaboration imposed by harmonic and NBA models by boosting the contribution of collaborating primary authors to be on the equal footing with single authors. Although citation rankings by different models are correlated with each other within the same type of citation indicator, rankings of many faculty members changed across models, suggesting the importance of an accurate and relevant authorship credit allocation model in the citation assessment of researchers. The study also found that authorship patterns in conjunction with citation counts are important factors for robust authorship models such as harmonic and NBA, and harmonic+ model may be beneficial for collaborating primary authors. Future research that reexamines the models with updated empirical data would provide further insights into the robustness of the models.