• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.7-32
• /
• 2017

최근 들어 다양한 분야에서 딥러닝이 혁신적인 기계학습 기법으로 급속하게 확산되고 있다. 이 연구에서는 딥러닝 연구동향을 분석하기 위해서 자아 중심 주제 인용분석 기법을 변형하여 응용해보았다. 이를 위해 Web of Science에서 'deep learning'으로 탐색하여 검색된 문헌 중 소수의 씨앗 문헌으로부터 인용 관계를 통해 분석 대상 문헌을 확보하는 방법을 시도하였다. 씨앗 문헌을 인용하는 최근 논문들을 딥러닝 분야의 현행 연구를 반영하는 자아 문헌집합으로 설정하였다. 자아 문헌으로부터 빈번히 인용된 선행 연구들은 딥러닝 분야의 연구 주제를 나타내는 인용 정체성 문헌집합으로 설정하였다. 자아 문헌집합에 대해서는 공저 네트워크 분석을 비롯한 정량적 분석을 실시하여 주요 국가와 연구 기관을 파악하였다. 인용 정체성 문헌들에 대해서는 동시인용 분석을 실시하고, 도출된 문헌 군집을 인용하는 주요 키워드인 인용 이미지 키워드를 파악하여 주요 문헌과 주요 연구 주제를 밝혀내었다. 마지막으로 특정 주제에 대한 인용 영향력이 성장하는 추세를 반영하는 인용 성장지수 CGI를 제안하고 측정하여 딥러닝 분야의 선도 연구 주제가 변화하는 동향을 밝혔다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.77-106
• /
• 2015

한국학술지인용색인 KCI의 데이터를 사용한 문헌동시인용 분석을 통해 2004년부터 2013년까지 10년 동안의 한국 문헌정보학의 연구 전선을 구체적으로 파악해보았다. KCI 웹사이트로부터 문헌정보학 분야 핵심 논문 159개와 이를 인용한 논문 정보를 수작업으로 수집하였다. 군집 분석 및 네트워크 분석 결과 27개의 복수 논문 군집과 8개의 단일 논문 군집이 도출되었다. 27개의 복수 논문 군집 중에서 논문 수가 가장 많은 것은 '문헌정보학 교육' 주제 군집이었고, 인용 영향력이 가장 큰 것은 '인용분석 & 지적구조 분석' 주제 군집이었다. 핵심 문헌 집합에 대한 인용 중에서 67.5%는 문헌정보학 내부에서 이루어졌고, 나머지 32.5%는 타 학문 분야로부터 발생한 것이었다. 전반적으로 문헌정보학 분야 내 인용 비율과 인용 영향력 성장 지수를 모두 고려하였을 때, 문헌정보학 분야 내부에서 최근 연구가 가장 활발해지고 있는 연구 전선 주제로는 '지역 기록', '인용분석 & 지적구조 분석', '연구동향 분석'의 세 주제가 꼽혔다. 이 연구에서 사용된 분석 기법은 국내 학제적 연구 분야의 연구 전선 분석에 효과적일 것으로 기대된다.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제3권4호
• /
• pp.35-48
• /
• 2015

The aim of this study is to compare country output and citation impact as well as to assess the level of interdisciplinarity in the field of tribology research during the period 1998-2012, based on the SCOPUS database. Macro-level scientometric indicators such as growth rate, share of international collaborative papers, citation per paper, share of un-cited papers, and publication efficiency index were employed. Further, the Simpson Index of Diversity was used to measure the level of interdisciplinarity. The performance of top countries contributing more than 1000 papers during the study period was discussed. Contributions and share of continents and countries by income groups were examined. Further research contributions and citation impact of selected country groups were analyzed. This study reveals that high levels of interdisciplinarity exist in tribology research. Asia outperforms the other world regions and China contributes most of the papers (25%), while the United States receives most of the citations (22%).

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.143-149
• /
• 2014

현재 국내학술지의 경우 급격한 양적 성장에도 불구하고 학술지의 내용과 질적 수준을 평가할 수 있는 객관적이고 계량적인 기준이 미비한 상태이며, 국내 연구 성과 측정 시 SCI 등 해외인용지수에 의존함으로써 우수논문의 해외 유출 및 우리말 논문 등한 시 등의 문제가 발생하고 있다. 이에 한국학술지인용색인(KCI)에서는 국내 학술단체가 발간하는 학술지를 대상으로 학술지 정보, 게재논문 정보 및 참고문헌을 DB화하여 논문 간 인용관계분석 등을 실시하고, KCI 홈페이지를 통해 논문 및 학술지의 기본정보 및 각종 인용지수 등을 공개하고 있다. 본 연구는 회계학 관련 국내 학술지들이 어떠한 수준의 영향력을 가지고 있는지를 다양한 KCI 인용지수를 이용하여 비교해보고, 상호인용 빈도를 활용하여 학술지 간 연결망을 사회네트워크분석 관점에서 조망해 보았다. 그 결과 회계학 관련 학술지들이 지금보다 더욱 발전적인 위치를 갖기 위해서는 다양한 학제적 연구를 관련 학회차원에서 장려할 필요가 있으며, 이를 통하여 타 학문분야와 활발하게 교류가 이루어진다면, 이는 분명 회계학 관련 학술지의 위상이 크게 강화될 것으로 기대해 본다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제27권
• /
• pp.137-169
• /
• 1997

The Annual Editions of SCI(Science Citation Index) CD-ROM over the last five years ('92-'96) were studied to investigate: 1) the status of domestic research activity in science & technology, in comparison with other countries, 2) research activity by universities and research institutes in Korea. Because the selection of journals in SCI is based on the criteria of citation sources, the journals registered in SCI are recognized as the Core Journals in each area of research. Therefore, the analysis result of SCI data is a quite reliable measurement to evaluate the research activities in science and technology. In 1996 a total of 6, 227 papers were listed on SCI, ranking the 21st up from the 29th in 1992. Over the last five years, the number had grown rapidly at an average of 29% per annum. This fast growth is expected to continue in the future.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.35-47
• /
• 2014

Korean researchers' scientific outputs are increasing rapidly with the growth of both Korea's economy and industry size. This is the time to analyze the scientific output (STEM area) of Korea over the last 40 years. For this analysis, this study used the SCIE database of Web of Science (WoS), which is a representative global Citation Index Service. The objects of analysis are every Korean document published in the SCIE journal, and the research scopes are (1) analysis of citation and subject categories and (2) analysis of co-authorship. Through this study, characteristics such as cited trend and research trend by subject, and the status of collaboration between Korea and other countries including the 50 states of the USA were revealed.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 2019

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status of various fusion research journals and its operational strategies, comparing them to those of IJIDB. Research design, data, and methodology - This study focused on the content analysis and strategies of operations for other convergence journals, comparing them to IJIDB in terms of the number of publication journals, publications, academic scope, and the impact factor. Results - IJIDB is relatively new and in its developmental stages compared to other convergence journals. But, IJIDB also shows much promise in that it came second in the field of economic publications of 54 journals in 2017. In order to To elevate IJIDB journal to the top in Korea Citation Index Journals, KODISA should host more international conferences to increase its international recognition levels, develop its managerial functions for increased stability, and open more opportunities for Candidates of Ph.D and Masters degree students to publish for fostering and building potential leaders and innovators. Conclusions - IJIDB is a newly born academic journal. In the future, IJIDB will be able to develop exponentially and be one of the leading journals in the Korea Citation Index by continually learning and developing its operational strategies.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.62-74
• /
• 2017

This study examined the mechanical engineering research output from India, Japan, and South Korea on different parameters including growth, collaboration indices, and activity index. The purpose of the study is to understand the overall development of mechanical engineering through analytical approaches applied on the scholarly outcome of the countries considered for the study. The study focuses on analysing the articles published by India, Japan, and South Korea, and is restricted to articles indexed in the Science Citation Index - Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2014. The ratios of number of paper to citations for India, Japan, and Korea are 20,836: 1,97,679; 24,494: 2,04,393; and 30,578: 2,66,902 respectively for the period 2000-2014. The findings show that there is a decline in Japanese publications in mechanical engineering, whereas other two countries have recorded an increasing trend. While India has tripled its publications in a span of 15 years, South Korea, on the other hand, has doubled its publications in the same span of time. There has been an increasing trend towards collaboration in almost all fields of science and technology. However, the extent of collaboration and their rate of growth varied for one subject to another, one branch to another branch of the same subject, and from one country to another country. The present study analyses the growth of research publications of the mechanical engineering domain including authorship distribution, collaboration indices, prominent journals, and activity index.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.5-11
• /
• 2016

Purpose - The Education Ministry has plans to select top 10 percent academic journals among the domestic registration journals in NRF(National Research Foundation of Korea), and designate them as outstanding academic journals. To reflect this trend, KODISA has set its sights on paper publication rate and citation index with pushing forward globalism. First, this study will arrange the process of globalism and the current state of paper submission, and propose the direction of improvement in academic journals through understanding the characteristics of each major field. Research design, data, and methodology - KODISA has preceeded in examining and publishing research papers related to distribution field through indirectly or stimulating academic advancement. KODISA covers the whole fields in social science as well as in business administration and economics that associated with distribution field not limiting only within the range of distribution field. That is, the new subject that contributes to the progress in distribution field with original research can be a priority criteria in KODISA journal publication. Results - The major fields in papers published in KODISA can be categorized broadly as distribution field with economic and business administration point of view. Therefore, the distribution field with economic point of view includes the issues such as regulations, system, industry, market environment, distribution system, trade, and macroeconomics, etc. The business administration point of view in distribution includes distribution strategy, distribution organization, and distribution channel from the perspectives of the firm, etc. Conclusions - The aim of KODISA in 2020 is to be a global academic journal as SCI level of each journal in KODISA, JDS(Registration journal), IJIDB(Registration candidate), EAJBM(Registration candidate), JAFEB(Cabell's Registration journal). The KODISA journals have already settled as the largest academic society and journals of Korea in 2016 currently from humanities and social sciences area by the most gross in publication circulation, volumes, and types. Hereafter, KODISA will focus on the improvement for the objective indicators such as Impact Factor and Centrality index as qualitative growth as well as quantitative expansion. By doing so, KODISA will be a forum for developmental academic debate with attracting the world's greatest scholars' papers. Furthermore, they will be recognized journals and grow as the first-rate academic journals inside and outside of Korea.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.51-69
• /
• 2020

This paper describes global research in the field of augmented reality (22078) as indexed in Scopus database during 1992-2019, using a series of bibliometric indicators. The augmented reality (AR) research registered high 54.23% growth, averaged citation impact of 8.90 citations per paper. Nearly 1% of global output in the subject (226 papers) registered high-end citations (100+) per paper. The top 15 countries accounted for 87.05% of global publications output in the subject. The USA is in leadership position for its highest publications productivity (19.25% global share). The U.K. leads the world on relative citation index (2.05). International collaboration has been a major driver of AR research pursuits; between 11.89% and 44.04% of national share of top 15 countries in AR research appeared as international collaborative publications. AR research productivity by application types was the largest across sectors, such as education, industry and medical. Computer science has emerged as the most popular areas in AR research pursuits. Technical University of Munich, Germany and Osaka University, Japan have been the most productive organizations and Nara Institute of S&T, Japan (66.55 and 7.48) and Imperial College, London, U.K. (57.14 and 6.42) have been the most impactful organizations. M. Billinghurst and N. Navab have been the most productive authors and S. Feiner and B. MacIntyre have been the most impactful authors. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, Multimedia Tools & Applications and Virtual Reality topped the list of most productive journals.