Browse > Article

Assessment of Mechanical Engineering Research Output using Scientometric Indicators: A Comparative Study of India, Japan, and South Korea  

Pattanashetti, D.M. (Dept. of Library & Information Science University of Mysore)
Harinarayana, N.S. (Dept. of Library & Information Science University of Mysore)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.5, no.2, 2017 , pp. 62-74 More about this Journal
This study examined the mechanical engineering research output from India, Japan, and South Korea on different parameters including growth, collaboration indices, and activity index. The purpose of the study is to understand the overall development of mechanical engineering through analytical approaches applied on the scholarly outcome of the countries considered for the study. The study focuses on analysing the articles published by India, Japan, and South Korea, and is restricted to articles indexed in the Science Citation Index - Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2014. The ratios of number of paper to citations for India, Japan, and Korea are 20,836: 1,97,679; 24,494: 2,04,393; and 30,578: 2,66,902 respectively for the period 2000-2014. The findings show that there is a decline in Japanese publications in mechanical engineering, whereas other two countries have recorded an increasing trend. While India has tripled its publications in a span of 15 years, South Korea, on the other hand, has doubled its publications in the same span of time. There has been an increasing trend towards collaboration in almost all fields of science and technology. However, the extent of collaboration and their rate of growth varied for one subject to another, one branch to another branch of the same subject, and from one country to another country. The present study analyses the growth of research publications of the mechanical engineering domain including authorship distribution, collaboration indices, prominent journals, and activity index.
Scientometrics; Mechanical Engineering; Doubling Time; Activity Index; Growth Rate for Scientific Publication; India; Japan; South Korea; Authorship Distribution; Collaboration Indices; Bradford's Law;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2(3), 143-148.
2 Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (1999). Scientometrics of laser research literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstracts. Scientometrics, 45(2), 251-268. Retrieved from   DOI
3 Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 51(2), 415-427.   DOI
4 Gupta, B. M., & Gupta, P. (2004). Analysis of India's S&T research capabilities and international collaborative strength, particularly in context of Indo-German collaboration. New Delhi: DFG India.
5 Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2011). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999-2008. Scientometrics, 86(2), 261-283. Retrieved from   DOI
6 Hadagali, G. S., & Anandhalli, G. (2015). Modeling the growth of neurology literature. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(3), 45-63. Retrieved from   DOI
7 Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., Hurtado, M., Rajendran, P., & Sangam, D. (2011). Mapping global trends in engineering education research, 2005-2008. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 77-90.
8 Karamourzov, R. (2012). The development trends of science in the CIS countries on the basis of some scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 91(1), 1-14. Retrieved from   DOI
9 Karki, M. M. S., & Garg, K. C. (1997). Alkaloid chemistry research in India. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 37(2), 157-161.   DOI
10 Kaur, H., & Gupta, B. (2009). Indian contribution in immunology and microbiology 1999-2008: A scientometric analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information, 29(5), 36-43.
11 Kim, M. J. (2002). Citation patterns of Korean physicists and mechanical engineers: Differences by type of publication source and type of authorship. Scientometrics, 55(3), 421-436.   DOI
12 Kumari, L. (2006). Trends in synthetic organic chemistry research. Cross-country comparison of Activity Index. Scientometrics, 67(3), 467-476.   DOI
13 Lawani, S. M. (1980). Quality, collaboration, and citations in cancer research: A bibliometric study (PhD thesis). Florida State University.
14 Heilig, L., & Vob, S. (2014). A scientometric analysis of cloud computing literature. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2(3), 266-278.   DOI
15 Liu, F., Lin, A., Wang, H., Peng, Y., & Hong, S. (2016). Global research trends of geographical information system from 1961 to 2010: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 106(2), 751-768. Retrieved from   DOI
16 Panat, R. (2014). On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China. Scientometrics, 100(2), 471-481. Retrieved from   DOI
17 Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.   DOI
18 Nagpaul, P. S. (1995). Contribution of Indian universities to the mainstream scientific literature: A bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 32(1), 11-36.   DOI
19 National Science Foundation. (2014). Research and development: National trends and international comparisons. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, 1-600.
20 Nobre, G. C., & Tavares, E. (2017). Scientific literature analysis on big data and internet of things applications on circular economy: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 111(1), 463-492. Retrieved from   DOI
21 Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
22 Ravichandra Rao, I. K., & Suma, M. P. (1999). A quantitative study of Indian engineering literature. Scientometrics, 46(3), 605-619.   DOI
23 Sagar, A., & Kademani, B. S. (2011). Growth and impact of S & T in Madhya Pradesh during 2000-2009. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 31(1), 3-18.   DOI
24 Sangam, S. L., Keshava, & Agadi, A. B. (2010). Growth pattern of marine engineering literature. Information Studies, 16(2), 113-120.
25 Lyu, Q.-J., Pu, Q.-H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in endocrinology and metabolism from China, Japan, and South Korea. Scientometrics, 110(1), 105-112. Retrieved from   DOI
26 Schoepflin, U., & Glanzel, W. (2001). Two decades of "Scientometrics." An interdisciplinary field represented by its leading journal. Scientometrics, 50(2), 301-312.   DOI
27 Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5-6), 281-291.   DOI
28 Singh, V. K., Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K., & Uddin, A. (2015). Scientometric mapping of research on "Big Data." Scientometrics, 105(2), 727-741.   DOI
29 Singhal, K., Banshal, S. K., Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2015). A Scientometric analysis of computer science research in India. In 2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3) (pp. 177-182).
30 Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33-38.   DOI
31 UNESCO. (2010). Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development. UNESCO.
32 Wankat, P. C. (2012). Cross-fertilization of engineering education research and development. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 138(2), 104-106.   DOI
33 Zou, Y., & Laubichler, M. D. (2017). Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems biology from 2005 to 2013. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1615-1631.   DOI
34 Borrego, M. (2007). Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 5-18.   DOI
35 Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5-6), 421-433.   DOI
36 Balog, C. (1980). Multiple authorship and author collaboration in agricultural research publications. Journal of Research Communication Studies, 2(3), 159-169.
37 Banshal, S. K., Muhuri, P. K., Singh, V. K., & Basu, A. (2017). Research performance of Indian Institutes of Technology. Current Science, 112(5), 923-932.   DOI
38 Barrot, J. S. (2017). Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics. Scientometrics, 110(1), 1-15. Retrieved from   DOI
39 Bhattacharya, S., Shilpa, & Bhati, M. (2012). China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race. Scientometrics, 93(1), 59-87. Retrieved from   DOI
40 Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, S. T. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.   DOI
41 Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137(3550), 85-86.
42 Elango, B., & Rajendran, P. (2015). Global tribology research output (1998 - 2012): A macro level scientometric study. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(4), 35-48.   DOI
43 Chetri, I. S., Saini, A. K., & Luthra, R. (2009). CSIR-UGC National Eligibility Test: A performance indicator of basic science education in Indian universities. Current Science, 97(4), 490-499.
44 Coursaris, C. K., & Van Osch, W. (2014). A scientometric analysis of social media research (2004-2011). Scientometrics, 101(1), 357-380. Retrieved from   DOI