Browse > Article

Global Tribology Research Output (1998 - 2012): A Macro Level Scientometric Study  

Elango, B. (Library, IFET College of EngineeringVillupuram - 605108, India)
Rajendran, P. (University Library, SRM UniversityKattangulathur - 603203, India)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.3, no.4, 2015 , pp. 35-48 More about this Journal
The aim of this study is to compare country output and citation impact as well as to assess the level of interdisciplinarity in the field of tribology research during the period 1998-2012, based on the SCOPUS database. Macro-level scientometric indicators such as growth rate, share of international collaborative papers, citation per paper, share of un-cited papers, and publication efficiency index were employed. Further, the Simpson Index of Diversity was used to measure the level of interdisciplinarity. The performance of top countries contributing more than 1000 papers during the study period was discussed. Contributions and share of continents and countries by income groups were examined. Further research contributions and citation impact of selected country groups were analyzed. This study reveals that high levels of interdisciplinarity exist in tribology research. Asia outperforms the other world regions and China contributes most of the papers (25%), while the United States receives most of the citations (22%).
Bibliometrics; Tribology; Macro Level Study; Interdisciplinarity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 UNESCO (2001). The state of science and technology in the world, 1996-1997. Retrieved from
2 Wiysonge, C. S. et al. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of childhood immunization research productivity in Africa since the onset of the Expanded Program on Immunization in 1974. BMC Medicine, 11:66. Retrieved from
3 Sorenko A, Bontis N., & Grant, J. (2009). A scientometric analysis of the proceedings of the McMaster of world congress on the management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996-2008 period. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 8-21.   DOI
4 Soteriades, E. S., et al. (2005). Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995-2002). FASEB Journal, 20, 29-34.
5 Tan, K. C., Goudarzlou, A., & Chakrabarty, A. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of service research from ASIA. Managing Service Quality, 20(1), 89-101.   DOI
6 Tocha, E. A. (2006). Bridging length and time scales by AFM-based nanotribology: Applications to nanostructured ceramics and polymer surfaces (Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente).
7 Wang, H. et al. (2013). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of GPS research from 1991-2010. Scientometrics, 95(1), 35-44.   DOI
8 van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung, 1, 20-29.
9 van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis measurement. Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3, 50-62.   DOI
10 Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics, 13(5-6), 239-259.   DOI
11 Sombatsompop, N., et al. (2011). Research productivity and impact of ASEAN countries and universities in the field of energy and fuel. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 16(1), 35-46.
12 Gupta, B. M., & Bala, A. (2011). A scientometric analysis of Indian research output in medicine during 1999-2008. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 2(1), 87-100.   DOI
13 Huffman, M. D. et al. (2013). Global cardiovascular research output, citations, and collaborations: A time-trend, bibliometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e83440.   DOI
14 Igami, M., & Saka, A. (2007). Capturing the evolving nature of science, the development of new scientific indicators and the mapping of science. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2007/1. Retrieved from
15 Ivancheva, L. (2008). Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 47-56.   DOI
16 Jost, P. (1966). Lubrication (tribology) – A report on the present position and industry’s needs. Dept. of Education and Science (H.M. Stationary Office).
17 Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Bornmann, L. (2013). Global nanotribology research output (1996-2010): A scientometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e81094.   DOI
18 Kademani, B. S. et al. (2013). Publication trends in materials science: A global perspective. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1275-1295.   DOI
19 Kalz, M., & Specht, M. (2013). Assessing the crossdisciplinarity of technology-enhanced learning with science overlay maps and diversity measures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 415-427.   DOI
20 Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.   DOI
21 Al, U., & Taskin, Z. (2015). Relationship between economic development and intellectual production. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(1), 25-35.   DOI
22 Asplund, K., Eriksson, M., & Persson, O. (2012). Country comparisons of human stroke research since 2001: A bibliometric study. Stroke, 43, 830-837.   DOI
23 Bojović, S. et al. (2014). An overview of forestry journals in the period 2006–2010 as basis for ascertaining research trends. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1331-1346.   DOI
24 Borsi, B., & Schubert, A. (2011). Agrifood research in Europe: A global perspective. Scientometrics, 86(1), 133-154.   DOI
25 Leta, J., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2013). A macro-level study of science in Brazil: Seven years later. EncontrosBibli, 18(36), 51-66.
26 Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2013). Citation analysis with medical subject headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge: A new routine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1076-1080.   DOI
27 Luo, J., & Matthews, K. R. W. (2013). Globalization of stem cell science: An examination of current and past collaborative research networks. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e73598.   DOI
28 Mang, T., Bobzin, K., & Bartel, T. (2011). Industrial tribology: Tribosystems, friction, wear and surface engineering, lubrication. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
29 Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (Eds.) (2004). Editors’ introduction. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (pp. 1-15). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30 Patra, S. K., & Chand, P. (2009). Library and information science research in SAARC and ASEAN countries as reflected through LISA. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 56(1), 41-51.
31 Guan, J., & Ma, M. (2007). A bibliometric study of China’s semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics, 70(1), 107-124.   DOI
32 Plotnikova, T., & Rake, B. (2014). Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: exploration of country-level determinants. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1173-1202.   DOI
33 Rajendran, P., Elango, B., & Manicakraj, J. (2014). Publication trends and citation impact of tribology research in India: A scientometric study. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 2(1), 22-34.   DOI
34 Farris, T.N. (1997). Tribology. In J.E. Pope (Ed.), Rules of thumb for mechanical engineers (pp. 226-237). Texas: Gulf Professional Publishing.
35 Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ramesh Babu, B. (2011). Publication trend on nanotechnology among G15 countries: A bibliometric study. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 5(1), 61-80.   DOI
36 Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Bornmann, L. (2015). A scientometric analysis of international collaboration and literature growth at the macro level. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 20(2), 41-50.
37 Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Manickaraj, J. (2013). Tribology research output in BRIC countries: A scientometric dimension. Library Philosophy and Practice, Paper 935.
38 Fiala, D. (2013). Suborganizations of institutions in library and information science journals. Information, 4, 351-366.   DOI
39 Garg, K. C. et al. (2010). Scientometric profile of genetics and heredity research in India. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57(3), 196-206.
40 Glänzel, W. (2000). A bibliometric analysis of co-authorship patterns of Eleven East Central European Countries in the 90s. Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Berlin.
41 Adams, J., & Pendlebury, D. (2011). Global research report: Materials science & technology. Retrieved from
42 Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.   DOI
43 Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Retrieved from
44 Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z. et al. (2012). International collaboration in medical research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003-2007). Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2223-2238.   DOI
45 Choi, D. G., Lee, H., & Sung, T. K. (2011). Research profiling for ‘standardization and innovation.’ Scientometrics, 88(1), 259-278.   DOI
46 Clarke, A. et al. (2007). A bibliometric overview of public health research in Europe. European Journal of Public Health, 17(Sup.1), 43-49.   DOI