• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2003.11a
• /
• pp.125-128
• /
• 2003

현대에는 모든 기업 활동과 사회활동에 있어서 인터넷의 사용은 필수조건이 되고 있다. 20세기 후반에 들어서면서부터는, 과거의 전통기업과 비교되는 인터넷 쇼핑몰이 급속하게 생겨나기 시작했다. 인터넷 쇼핑몰은 기업의 기반을 가상의 인터넷 상에 두고 있기 때문에, 전통기업과는 기업 활동의 수행 방법에 있어서 큰 차이가 있다. 인터넷 쇼핑몰은 인터넷이라는 새로운 매체를 이용하기 때문에 전통기업 평가에 이용되었던 재무적 지표뿐 아니라, 새로운 다양한 지표(웹 접속률, 페이지 뷰 등)를 통해서 기업의 장점을 파악 할 수 있게 되었다［14］. 따라서 인터넷 쇼핑몰을 평가하기 위해서는 기존의 전통기업 평가방법을 그대로 이용하기에는 무리가 있고, 새로운 가치평가 지표가 필요하게 되었다. 기업을 평가하는 여러 가지 방법 중, 하나인 balanced-scorecard(BSC)［9］는 균형적이고 체계화된 평가 틀을 제시해주고 있다는 장점을 갖고 있다. 그러나 기존의 BSC는 전통기업을 대상으로 했기 때문에, 인터넷 쇼핑몰의 평가에 곧바로 적용하기에는 적합하지 못하다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 balanced-scorecard 방법을 인터넷 쇼핑몰 평가에 적합하게 수정하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.11 no.6 s.44
• /
• pp.237-248
• /
• 2006

Nowadays, the administration is strongly driving self-innovation including public sector to solve problems continuously pointed out as issues of public sector such as the low management achievement, the low productivity and costliness structure, the low ability coping with market changes and ineffectiveness in managing organization. The core of such renovation is the systematic performance management. Provincial public enterprises are also required to furnish system that can measure management results accurately and make payment according to measured results under autonomous management system to raise management efficiency and strengthen competitive power. In this paper, we design framework for measuring management results of provincial public enterprises based on Balanced Scorecard and show the example applied to Gwangiu Metropolitan City Environmental Installations Corp (GEIC).

• Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.143-151
• /
• 2005

Information technology(IT) investment evaluation requires measurements from many perspectives. Except for the case of financial performance, these measurements mostly belong to the qualitative or intangible domain. The problem with IT investment evaluation lies in the fact that it is very difficult to define the qualitative properties against which to measure the performances. This paper addresses the issue of developing the set of performance indices, and defining the structural relationships between them, such that the IT investment evaluation can be done in a systematic, objective and comprehensive manner. We introduce the balanced scorecard strategy map as the backbone reference frame for the generation of performance indices and for the description of the relationships between them. Sample indices for evaluating projects from strategic perspectives are provided with a case example. A step by step follow through of the index generation process has been presented along with the case.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.1065-1071
• /
• 2021

This study seeks to analyze the impact, and provides more empirical evidence on the effect, of the responsible accounting model combined with scorecards on the organizational performance of pharmaceutical companies. The research methodology uses questionnaires survey distributed to pharmaceutical companies. Quantitative research was done with SPSS 25 software. After excluding invalid questionnaires due to many blank boxes, 306 questionnaires could be used by the author. Research results show that seven elements of the responsible accounting model combined with the balance scorecard all positively affect the organizational performance of enterprises in the pharmaceutical industry including: (1) dividing organizational structure into centers of responsibility according to strategy; (2) assigning management to management according to vision; (3) allocating costs and revenue; (4) making budget estimates according to balanced scorecard (BSC); (5) evaluating estimates with reality by BSC; (6) making BSC analysis reports; and (7) rewarding based on BSC. Cost allocation and revenue are the factors that have the strongest impact on the organizational efficiency of pharmaceutical enterprises. Based on the research results, the author has proposed recommendations to improve the good application of the responsible accounting model combined with the balance scorecard, thereby contributing to improving the organizational efficiency of pharmaceutical enterprises.

• Korean Business Review
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.77-101
• /
• 2009

The main purpose of this study is to assess the effect of using Balanced Scorecard, and relationship among learning and growth performance, internal business performance, customer performance, financial performance, and business performance. To achieve this study, theoretical and empirical studies related to Balanced Scorecard were carried out simultaneously. A field survey was undertaken through questionnaire sampling a population of construction firms. The established hypotheses related to Balanced Scorecard and organizational performance were verified by the paired-t test analysis using SPSS. The result of this research are as follows : First, BSC firm's learning and growth performance are higher than those of before BSC adopting firms significantly. Second, BSC firm's internal business performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. Third, BSC firm's customer performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. Fourth, BSC firm's financial performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. Fifth, BSC firm's Business performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. This study contributes to the BSC research by being the study focus on the BSC at the general indicators and provides evidence that may help understanding the possible relationship between BSC adoption and improvement of organizational performance. There are some limitations, however, of this study. The result are based on a cross sectional sample of construction firms, which may not be reflective of the entire population.

• Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 2008

IT investment is usually very costly and takes a long time to get the results out of investment. However, most of currently available evaluation methods for IT investment are based upon short-term effects, hence their results are not fully trustworthy. In addition, those methods commonly consider only financial aspects such as ROI. For more reliable evaluation, it is necessary to consider non-financial factors such as system utilization, customer satisfaction, public relations, and so on, as well as financial factors. In this research, we propose an evaluation method that can evaluate both financial and non-financial aspects on a long-term base. For this purpose, we employed the research results developed in System dynamics and Balanced scorecard. System dynamics is useful in analyzing long term behavior of a given system, and Balanced scorecard is useful for evaluating both financial and non-financial aspects. We demonstrated the usefulness of our method by applying it to the evaluation of RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) investment in a distribution and retail industry. From this application, we found that RFID investment may not be rewarding in the short term, but is sure to be returning the income relative to its investment in the long run.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.105-118
• /
• 2019

In order for a strategy established by a company to be implemented efficiently, it must be supported by an appropriate organizational culture. This means that if a firm has an organizational culture suitable for strategy implementation, performance can be enhanced. This study divides competitive strategy into cost leadership strategy and product differentiation strategy, and organizational culture into hierarchical/rational culture and consensual/development culture. Based on 122 questionnaires collected through KOSPI listed manufacturing companies, the results of the empirical analysis on the effect of suitability between competitive strategy and organizational culture on performance by balanced scorecard perspective are summarized as follows. First, it shows that the cost leadership strategy and the hierarchical/rational culture are more fit. Specifically, The high suitability between the cost leadership strategy and the hierarchical/rational culture has a positive effect on the performance of the balanced scorecard perspective(excluding performance by learning and growth perspective). Second, The high suitability between the product differentiation strategy and the consensual/development culture has a positive effect on the performance of the balanced scorecard perspective. The results of this study suggest that it is important to form a corporate culture that can lead to changes in the beliefs and behaviors of organizational members in accordance with the competitive strategy in order to successfully implement the strategies established by the company.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2006

Many Swedish health care organizations have during the last decade started implementing the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a systematic way of following-up and analyzing their activities. However, the knowledge of its use and contribution in a health care context is insufficient. Based on a multiple case study the authors explore the use of the BSC in the Swedish health care services. The authors conclude that the concept in a health care context is used as a quality management tool that make new demands on management. In addition, the authors bring out important factors for a long-term use of the BSC.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 1999.04a
• /
• pp.354-355
• /
• 1999

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.50 no.3
• /
• pp.533-563
• /
• 2016

The aim of this study is to develop a plan for university library evaluation with factors and their systems, and an evaluation process, based on the Korean University Library Promotion Act. This study adopts a consensus based method including open-ended interviews with various stakeholders around university libraries, a questionnaire survey, a public hearing, and numerous discussions with the stakeholders. Balanced Scorecard is adopted as a basic framework for the development of evaluation system, provides a balanced perspective on the whole aspects in the university library management, including factors and performances in the management, The proposed plan in this study is expected to help to examine whether the resources are used for reaching the goals in the libraries, and to contribute the growth of the university libraries.