• 제목/요약/키워드: appropriateness study

검색결과 1,199건 처리시간 0.024초

국내 및 해외 유명 화장품 브랜드의 선호도와 성과에 미치는 영향요인 (Affecting variables on brand preference and performance of domestic and imported cosmetics brands)

  • 박혜선
    • 한국생활과학회지
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.523-534
    • /
    • 2009
  • The purposes of this study were to identify brand equity factors influencing on brand preference and to investigate the effects of preference, price acceptability, distribution proximity, and appropriateness on brand performance of domestic and imported cosmetics brands. A total of 300 women aged between 20 and 49 years were surveyed on two domestic brands and two imported brands that were well-known to consumers during the month of September, 2006, in Seoul, Daejeon, Gyeonggi-do, and Chungcheong-do. The data were analyzed with factorial analysis, multiple regression analysis, ANOVA, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$, etc., using the SPSS 12.0. The result of the study included: 1) Four factors of brand equity were identified: brand image, social reputation, quality, and brand awareness. 2) Brand image, quality, appropriateness, and brand performance of the domestic brands were higher than those of the imported brands. But brand awareness of the imported brands was higher than that of the domestic brands. 3) Brand preference of the domestic brands was affected by social reputation, quality, brand image, and brand awareness in order of significance. And brand performance of the domestic brands was affected by brand preference, appropriateness, price acceptability and distribution proximity in order of significance. 4) Brand preference of the imported brands was affected by brand image, social reputation, brand awareness, and quality in order of significance. And brand performance of the imported brands was affected by appropriateness, price acceptability, brand preference, and distribution proximity in order of significance.

커뮤니티케어를 위한 지역사회 재활 직무 지식과 교육의 적절성 조사연구 : 작업치료사 직무 중심으로 (A Study on the Appropriateness of Community Rehabilitation Job Knowledge and Education for Community Care : Focusing on the Job as an Occupational Therapist)

  • 배성환;조석민;백지영
    • 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
    • /
    • 제15권8호
    • /
    • pp.379-388
    • /
    • 2021
  • 본 연구는 지역사회 통합 돌봄을 위한 작업치료사들의 지역사회 재활 직무에 대한 지식과 교육의 적절성을 알아보기 위해 실시하였다. 지역사회에 종사하는 작업치료사의 직무 지식수준과 학교 교육 및 보수교육의 적절성을 알아보기 위해 설문지를 개발하였고, 예비조사를 통해 타당도와 신뢰도를 검증하였다. 검증된 설문지를 바탕으로 지역사회에 종사하는 작업치료사들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 전반적으로 지역사회에 종사하는 작업치료사의 직무에 관한 지식수준과 학교 교육 및 보수교육의 적절성이 낮은 평균점수를 보였다. 본 연구를 통해 지역사회 작업치료 실무에서 필요한 지식을 알 수 있었으며, 지역사회에 종사하는 작업치료사들의 지식 보유수준을 파악하고, 학교 교육 및 보수교육의 적절성에 대해 알 수 있었다. 본 연구 결과를 참고하여 기존 의료기관 중심의 교육에서 지역사회 작업치료 직무와 관련된 체계적인 교육 프로그램이 개발된다면, 지역사회에 종사하는 작업치료사들의 직무 지식수준을 높일 수 있을 것이다. 급변하는 시대와 감염병의 범유행 상황 가운데 지역사회의 재활 직무를 담당하는 다양한 직군들에 해당하는 직무 관련 지식수준과 교육에 관한 추가 연구가 필요하다.

부산시장래교통량의 추계수법에 관한 실증적 연구 (Actual Research on the Estimation Technique of the Future Trip in Pusan City.)

  • 오윤표
    • 대한교통학회지
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.97-112
    • /
    • 1987
  • The objective of this study is to construct not only trip production and attraction in Pusan but also to study and examine appropriateness of the model positively. Depending on the estimation models of trip production and attraction of each zone that have been constructed in this study, it has been proved that the formula of multiple regression by the explanation variables like the indices of total employees, total students, floor spaces of residentials and floor spaces of educational and cultural areas within the study areas have very high explanatory capacity and appropriateness. It si considered that a study of method on new division, integration or omission etc. of the existing zones preceeding for reduction of calculation quantity and a study of estimation error have to be done for future study, if these models are used actually.

  • PDF

적절성 평가지침과 이유목록의 적용 가능성 평가 (Applicability of Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol and Delay Tool)

  • 신영수;김용익;김창엽;김윤;김은경;송윤미;이영성
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제1권1호
    • /
    • pp.96-108
    • /
    • 1994
  • Background: An appropriate use of hospital beds can improve productivity of hospital significantly. The authors' previous study revealed that approximately one third of Korean hospital bed days and one sixth of admissions were inappropriately used, when it was measured by Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol(AEP) and Delay Tool modified into Korean situation by the authors. This study aims to evaluate applicability of the instruments in a new hospital. More specifically the study aims to measure appropriateness of the instruments used by newly trained nurse reviewers at a new hospital setting. Methods: In order to evaluate applicability of these instruments, agreement rates of the scores recorded by newly trained nurse reviewers with by skilled nurse reviewer and also compared with the scores recorded by physician's implicit decision were assessed. Agreement rates were derived from concurrent application of AEP and Delay Tool to 52 admissions and 104 patient days from internal medicine, pediatrics, and general surgery of one university hospital. Overall agreement rate, specific nonacute agreement rate, and kappa statistics were used to indicate level of agreement. Results: Overall agreement rates on appropriateness between newly trained nurse reviewers and skilled nurse reviewer were 100% in admission and 98% in bed days. Overall agreement rates on reason for inappropriateness between newly trained nurse reviewers and skilled nurse reviewer were 96% in admission and 91% in bed days. Overall agreement rates between newly trained nurse reviewers and physician reviewer were 86% in admission and 87% in bed days. Conclusion: Results indicated that AEP and Delay Tool were applicable to a new hospital in detecting inappropriate utilization of beds and reasoning of the inappropriateness. These instruments could contribute to enhance efficiency of hospital use, through continuous monitoring of level of inappropriate hospital use at national or individual hospital level.

  • PDF

Consumer Acceptance Model of Smart Clothing according to Innovation

  • Chae, Jin-Mie
    • International Journal of Human Ecology
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.23-33
    • /
    • 2009
  • This study identified the appropriateness of acceptance models of smart clothing and differences in the hypothesis of the path to clothing acceptance by classifying consumers depending on the level of technology innovation and fashion innovation through the extended TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) presented by Chae (2009). 815 copies of data were collected from adults over twenty living in major South Korean cities and analyzed them using a SPSS 15.0 and AMOS 5.0 package. Based on the average value of technology innovation and fashion innovation, the respondents were classified into: Group 1 with high technology innovation and fashion innovation, Group 2 with high technology innovation but low fashion innovation, Group 3 with low technology innovation but high fashion innovation, and Group 4 with low technology innovation and fashion innovation. The appropriateness of models for the four classified groups was verified. The analysis proved that an extended TAM for each classified group explains the acceptance process of smart clothing; especially the appropriateness of model of Group 1 and Group 4 was comparatively higher than other groups. Perceived usefulness was revealed as the key variable that affects consumer attitudes to accept smart clothing. Perceived ease of use has indirect positive effects on consumer attitudes passing through perceived usefulness and clothing involvement partly exerted impacts on consumer attitudes and the intention of acceptance. The mediating role of attitudes to explain the intention of the acceptance of smart clothing is high and suggests that it is necessary to take a positive role to help the consumer perceive the functional and useful aspects of the clothing.

보건소 기능의 중요도에 따른 자원배분의 적절성 평가 (The evaluation of the appropriateness of resource allocation in a community health center)

  • 전기홍;송미숙;정지연;김찬호
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제7권2호
    • /
    • pp.19-45
    • /
    • 1997
  • This study was performed to evaluate the appropriateness of resource allocation based on the ranking of health center function. Through the Delphi processes, health center functions were ranked in order of importance as follows; planning and research, followed by health education, health promotion, management of chronic diseases, health screening tests, welfare activities, mental health services, medical personnel management, medical services, prevention of communicable diseases, maternal and infant health services, housekeeping, management of oral hygiene, nutrition services, surveillance for community health services, family planning, and administration of the health center. In relation to the above priorities, the allocation of manpower was not appropriate. Even though the expert groups emphasized on functions such as planning and research, health education, and health promotion, they inputted more personnel for administration of a health center, maternal and infant health services, and medical services which were evaluated with lower importance. The budget allocation showed the same trends as the above. Although the functions such as planning and research, health education, and health promotion, and management of chronic diseases were evaluated highly, the budget was allocated accordingo to the the results of the former fiscal year rather than on the importance of function. However the budget for nutrition services, surveillance for the community health services, family planning, and administration of a health center was allocated according to priority. Based upon the above findings, community health center should be given the opportunity to make their own ranking of health center function and to allocate their resources including personnel and budget in order to improve the responsibilities and roles of the community health center.

  • PDF

의무기록 완성도의 입원환자 진료적정성에 대한 예측도 평가 (Predictability of the completeness of medical recording of quality of care for inpatients)

  • 박운제;박일환
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제3권2호
    • /
    • pp.60-68
    • /
    • 1997
  • Background : Medical records are used to assess clinical performance of physicians and quality of care. The contents which are written in medical records are considered as the objective evidences to know what the doctors think about the patient's problems. But the problem to use medical records as the assessment tools is the incompleteness of medical recording. The purpose of this study is to know if the completeness of medical recording is correlated to quality of care for inpattients and it can predict physicians's quality of care. Method : 32 clinical physicians reviewed 200 patients' medical records who were selected randomly from the inpatients who were admitted to the university hospital during July, 1995 and June, 1996. The reviewers used the structured evaluation questionnaires which were composed of two part. One part evaluated the completeness of the medical recording and the other evaluating appropriateness of diagnosis and treatment processes. We summated the scores of each items and calculated percentile scores. Results : The mean percentile score of completeness of the medical recording was 67.9% in 1995 and 79.8% in 1996. The mean percentile score of appropriateness was 52.2% in 1995 and 69.5% in 1996. This change between 1995 and 1996 was statistically significant. In non-surgical patients, the percentile scores of the completeness and those of the appropriateness were correlated positively and this correlation was statistically significant(p<0.05). In surgical patients, the positve correlation between the completeness and the appropriateness was also statistically significant(p<0.05). Discussion : In conclusion, the completeness of medical recording is considered as the good predictor of the quality of care for inpatients.

  • PDF

비소세포폐암에 사용되는 항암화학요법의 요양급여기준 적절성 평가 (Assessment of Appropriateness of Standard for Insurance Coverage on Chemotherapy used in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC))

  • 김정연;박은지;배민경;윤정현
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제21권3호
    • /
    • pp.193-207
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess appropriateness of current standard for insurance coverage by Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) on chemotherapy used in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), by reviewing a variety of clinical evidences, and thereby, if needed, to propose an updated evidence-based recommendations. Methods: We collected data from HIRA regarding on the insurance standard which includes the scope and conditions for coverage on systemic chemotherapy of NSCLC. We performed a search for clinical databases and examined the most current clinical evidence from clinical literature including various clinical practice guidelines. Based on the collected data the appropriateness of HIRA standard for insurance coverage of chemotherapy of NSCLC was assessed. Results: Collected data demonstrated that HIRA standard did not reflect the most current clinical practice and evidence. Some were inappropriately listed in HIRA formulary and accepted as a chemotherapy being covered by insurance, despite the lack of evidences of clinical efficacy or superiority over other chemotherapeutic agents or regimens. In addition, there seems to be a need for a modification on the standard for insurance coverage of certain newer chemotherapeutic agents based on the current accumulated data showing their clinical efficacy and benefits in the selected group of NSCLC patients. Therefore, we concluded that current HIRA standard for insurance coverage on chemotherapy of NSCLC needs to be revised and we proposed an updated recommendation based on these latest clinical evidences. Conclusion: The standard for insurance coverage of chemotherapy should be continually examined its appropriateness based on the most recent clinical evidences in a timely manner so as to provide the most effective and safe therapy to cancer patients.

건강보험심사평가원 환자 표본 자료를 활용한 mupirocin 외래처방 패턴 분석 및 처방적절성 평가 (Prescription Patterns and Appropriateness of Topical Mupirocin in Ambulatory Care using the Korean National Health Insurance Claims Database)

  • 서진욱;정경혜;김은영
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제26권3호
    • /
    • pp.238-244
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: Mupirocin, a topical antimicrobial agent has been used for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and recently mupirocin resistance was issued in some studies. The objective of this study was to analyze prescription patterns of topical mupirocin, to evaluate appropriateness of prescriptions in the ambulatory setting, and to compare frequency of mupirocin usage in South Korea with that in United States. Methods: Topical mupirocin prescription patterns (the number of prescription and a prescription period), and appropriateness of prescription (including a prescription rate over 10 days, a repeat prescription rate within 30 days and a prescription rate within labeled indications) were analyzed using the 2012 Health Insurance and Review and Assessment service-National Patient Sample dataset of South Korea. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey dataset was used to quantify topical mupirocin prescription in United States for comparison. Results: In South Korea, the prescriptions rate for use over 10 days was 3%, the repeat prescription rate within 30 days was 8.87% and the prescription proportion within labeled indications was 33.84%. The most frequent diagnostic code was nonbacterial infection. The prescription rate per 1000 population of topical mupirocin in South Korea was calculated to be 46.07, whereas in United States was calculated to be 13.10. Conclusion: Topical mupirocin has been used frequently and inappropriately, so further studies are required to investigate the rationale behind such prescribing mupirocin patterns.

병상 이용의 적절성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 -한 대학병원 자료를 중심으로- (Appropriateness of Bed Utilization in One University Hospital)

  • 이상일;김용익;신영수
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제3권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-24
    • /
    • 1993
  • This study is designed to find clues to make a plan for efficient hospital bed utilization. Author has tried to estimate the level of appropriateness and to find out factors affecting intra-hospital variation of inappropriate bed utilization using modified Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol of which criteria are based on service intensity and patients' conditions. Systematic random sampling was done from the population of inpatients during one month in on university hospital. Data were collected by concurrent and retrospective medical record review and analysed by multiple logistic regression. In medical services, 83.5% of admission reveals appropriate and the level of inappropriate admission shows significant differences by patients' residence, type of department admitted to, admission 개\ulcorner, and length of stay. In surgical services, 97.3% and 34.7% are appropriate in location and timing of surgery respectively. Inappropriate timing of surgery differs significantly depending on patients' age, type of department admitted to, admission route, and length of stay. Sixty two percent of hospital days shows appropriate and the level of inappropriateness show marked differences by patients'age, type of services, admission routes, part of the month, part of the stay, and length of stay. Inappropriate hospital days are due to inappropriate level of care, premature admission, improper scheduling of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, and problems in scheduling surgery in sequence. In conclusion, substantially high proportion of inappropriate hospital bed utilization was confirmed. To reduce it, it is necessary to develop alternative services with which can replace inpatient services, and to introduce utilization management system which may include internal peer review.

  • PDF