• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제55권10호
• /
• pp.733-737
• /
• 2017

Successful osseo-integration of dental implants that Dr. Bronemak reported in 1965 had been ground-breaking research in the restorative dentistry for the missing dentition. Clinical application of dental implants in the restorative dentistry has begun with the role of retention and support for the complete denture, beyond the functional recovery in partially missing area, and succeeds in the cosmetic recovery for anterior missing area. Recently, immediate implantation and loading after the extraction have been preferred by many excellent clinicians especially on maxillary anterior missing area, because they want to prevent from the absorption of residual alveolar bone. But it is hard to decide immediate loading for common clinicians also, because it is difficult for them to convict proper osseo-integration. In this article, immediate implantation and delayed loading case on maxillay anterior region have been introduced and predictable prosthetic procedure for the esthetic result has suggested.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.258-265
• /
• 2008

Purpose. This multicenter retrospective study was performed to evaluate the survival and success rates of immediate placement of USII and SSII Osstem implant (Osstem implant Co, Korea) on the maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar areas. Materials and methods. Dental records were obtained in 37 patients who were treated with immediate implantation on the maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar areas in 6 different clinics. The 98 implants were evaluated both clinically and radiographically using predefined success criteria. Results. There was no failed implant in all patients. The mean follow up period was 24.7 months (ranged from 12 to 58 months), and 25.1 months (ranged from 16 to 35 months) in USII and SSII implants, respectively. The crestal bone loss was 3 mm in 3 USII implants during 41 months, and in 1 SSII implant during 22 months. The overall success rate was 94.2% and 97.7% in USII and SSII implants, respectively. The age, gender, diameter, or length of implants, and type of surgery were not influenced to the success rate of immediate implantation. Conclusion. These results suggest that USII and SSII Osstem implant can be used successfully in immediate implantation on the maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar areas.

• 대한심미치과학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.49-54
• /
• 2007

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제50권3호
• /
• pp.191-197
• /
• 2012

상악 전치부는 심미적 회복이 강조되는 부위다. 발치 후 치유될 때까지 기다린다면 치조골 흡수와 치간 유두 수축을 방지할 수 없다. 일단 흡수된 조직을 재생하기 위해서는 추가적인 외과적 술식이 필요하고 치료 기간도 많이 소요된다. 발치 전 치조골과 치은 조직이 건강하다면 치주 조직을 보존 유지하기 위해 발치와 동시에 즉시 임플란트 식립을 고려할 수 있다. 특히 건전한 발치와에서의 즉시 임플란트 식립은 여러 논문에서 성공적인 결과를 보였다. 치근단 병소가 존재하는 치아의 발치 후 즉시 임플란트 식립에 대해서는 부정적인 반응을 보이는 연구가 많았으나, 최근에는 확실한 발치와의 육아조직제거와 전신적 항생제 투여 시 성공률이 높다는 결과도 보고되고 있다. 본 증례는 73세 여환으로 상악 좌측 중절치의 포스트-코어와 금속도재관이 탈락되었으며 임플란트 치료를 받고 싶다는 주소로 내원하였다. 치근단 병소와 수직적 치근 파절이 존재하였으나 치근단 병소가 있는 치아에서도 즉시 임플란트 식립의 성공사례가 여러 차례 보고되어 발치 및 즉시 임플란트 식립을 계획하였다. 발치 후 발치와 육아조직제거와 클로르헥시딘 용액 소독 및 tetracycline 용액으로 soaking을 시행한 후 임플란트를 식립하였으며 식립 전 후로 전신적 항생제를 투여하였다. 임플란트를 식립하면서 인상채득하여 2일 뒤 임시 보철물을 장착하였다. 약 6개월 뒤 치경부 형태를 재연하여 최종 인상 채득하였으며 최종 보철물을 장착하였다. 보철물 장착 후 2년까지 치은선이 인접치아와 조화를 이루고 변연골 흡수없이 심미적으로 만족할만한 결과를 얻었기에 보고하는 바이다.

• 대한심미치과학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.74-85
• /
• 2019

상악전치부에서 치아 임플란트의 심미적 회복은 경조직, 연조직, 심미적 보철물이 조화를 이루어야 하며 임상의에게 도전적인 과제이다. VIP-CT graft와 같은 새로운 기법이 많은 볼륨의 연조직 이식을 위해서 소개되어졌다. VIP-CT graft의 장점은 많은 연조직의 결손부위를 회복할 수 있고 술후 수축이 적다는 것이다. 게다가 그것은 부가적인 혈행공급을 통해 경조직의 증대도 촉진실킬 수 있다. 이 기법은 환자분의 불편감을 줄여주고 치료시간을 단축시킨다. 이 논문에서는 순면 결손부위가 있는 상악전치부에서 즉시 임플란트 식립을 할때 골이식과 VIP-CT graft 술식을 하는 과정에 대해 설명드리고자 한다.

• 대한심미치과학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.40-46
• /
• 2022

상악전치부는 심미적 회복이 가장 중요한 부위이지만 구치에 비해 좁은 협설측 치조골 폭 및 발치시의 치조골 흡수로 인하여, 그만큼 심미적인 결과를 얻기가 어려운 부위이다. 본 증례 보고를 통해 외상으로 인한 상악전치부의 발치 즉시 임플란트 식립을 통해 치조골 및 연조직 소실을 최소화 하며 심미성을 확보하기 위한 고려 사항에 대해 살펴 보고자 한다.

• International Journal of Oral Biology
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.200-207
• /
• 2021

In case of gingival recession and alveolar bone defects due to tooth loss for a long period of time in a single tooth in the maxillary anterior region, it is not easy to obtain aesthetic results with a single implant prosthesis. For aesthetic restoration, it is important to preserve hard and soft tissues through alveolar bone augmentation as well as restore harmony with adjacent teeth and soft tissues by placing the implant in an ideal location. In this case, an implant was placed using guided bone regeneration and a connective tissue graft simultaneously with immediate implantation after extraction from the maxillary anterior region where only residual root was left for a long period of time.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.552-560
• /
• 2000

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to determine proper position and angulation of an implant for immediate implantation. Materials and Method : From the years 1997 to 2000. 52 Denta $scan^R$ views, 22 upper and 32 lower jaw with an average age of 43 and 40 respectively, were investigated, which comprise intact upper and lower 6 anterior teeth and premolars. On the Denta $scan^R$, the optimal placement for the immediated implantation was simulated. The measuring methods included 1) Angulation difference between tooth long axis and alveolar bone process. 2) Angulation difference of long axis between tooth and installing fixture 3) Distance between center of tooth at cervical area and center of fixture. 4) Distance from root apex to the bone limit of vital structure. One sample t-test was used for statistical analysis. Result : The results were as follows. 1) At the maxillary central incisor and lateral incisor, angulation difference of long axis between tooth and installing fixture was respectively 0.5 and 3.2 degrees with the fixture center's palatally positioned 2mm apart from tooth center. 2) At the lower anterior 6 teeth, that was about $-2.8^{\circ}\;to\;-4.6^{\circ}$ with the fixture center's lingually positioned 1mm apart from tooth center. 3) At the maxillary canine and premolar, that was respectively $11.8^{\circ}\;and \;7.2^{\circ}$ with the fixture center palatally positioned $2\sim2.4mm$ apart from tooth center. 4) At the lower premolar area, that was about $0^{\circ}\;to\;2^{\circ}$ with the fixture center's lingually positioned $0.5{\sim}1mm$ apart from tooth center. 5) Distance from root apex to the bone limit of vital structure, at the maxillary anterior and premolars. was the range of 10 to 12mm, and at the mandibular anterior teeth and the 1st premolar, that was the range of 18 to 20mm. Conclusion : The proper implant position of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth is as paralleled as or more buccally angulated than long axis of tooth with the fixture center's palatally positioned. In mandiblular anterior region, long axis of implants is lingully angulated compared with long axis of tooth and in premolar, almost parelleled with long axis of tooth and alveolar process.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.494-501
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to provide an actual guideline in determining the shape, diameter, and position of the implant in immediate implantation by the measurement of the thickness of facial and palatal plate, the thickness of cortical bone on the facial and palatal plate, the diameter of the root, and the distance between the roots in the cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The horizontal sections of 20 maxillae were measured and analyzed to obtain the average values. Resin blocks were produced and cut serially at 1 mm intervals from the cervical line to the root apex. Images of each section were obtained and the following measurements were performed: The thickness of the facial and palatal residual bone at each root surface, the thickness of the facial and palatal cortical bone at the interdental region, the diameter of all roots of each section on the faciopalatal and mesiodistal diameter, and the interroot distance. Three specimens with measurements close to the average values were chosen and 3-dimensional images were reconstructed. RESULTS. The thickness of the facial and palatal cortical bone at the interdental region in the maxilla, the buccal cortical bone was thicker in the posterior region compared to the anterior region. The interroot distance of the alveolar bone thickness between the roots increased from anterior to posterior region and from coronal to apical in the maxilla. CONCLUSION. In this study, the limited results of the morphometric analysis of the alveolar ridge using the sections of maxilla in the cadavers may offer the useful information when planning and selecting optimal implant for immediate implantation in the maxilla.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.637-646
• /
• 2007

Implants placed immediately after tooth extraction have been shown to be a successfully predictable treatment modality. Several clinical papers suggest that placing implants immediately after tooth extraction may provide some advantages: reduction of the number of surgical procedures or patient visits, preservation of the dimensions of alveolar ridge, and shortening of the interval between the removal of the tooth and the insertion of the implant supported restoration. In this case report, three patients received single immediate implant placements to replace a maxillary anterior tooth at the time of extraction. As the three cases were somewhat different, treatment protocols had to be modified as follows: Case 1. Immediate implant placement with healing abutment connection. Case 2. Immediate implant placement with immediate provisionalization. Case 3. Immediate implant placement with Guided Bone Regeneration(GBR). Every implant of these cases was placed in proper position buccolingually, mesiodistally and apicocoronally, The procedures following implantation such as immediate provisionalization and GBR were free of problem. Healing of each case was uneventful. In all cases, treatment outcomes were mostly satisfactory and the results maintained during follow-up periods. However, one case (Case 3) showed some papilla loss due to failure in delicate soft tissue handling during surgery. This papilla loss was compromised by prosthetic means. In conclusion, immediate implant placement in the fresh extraction socket can be a valid and successful option of treatment in aesthetic area. Moreover, this treatment protocol seems to maintain the preexisting architecture of soft and hard tissues in most cases.