• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.137-155
• /
• 2018

It has been reported that there is a significant positive relationship between the unexpected earnings on the earnings announcement date and the cumulative abnormal returns following the earnings announcement date. This study investigates whether the results of prior studies are because the public announcement of shareholders' meeting date was selected as the event date instead of either the preliminary earnings disclosure date or the profit/loss change announcement date. The results of this study are as follows. First, post-earnings-announcement drift(PEAD) occurs when unexpected earnings were computed based on the prior period earnings and the public announcement of the shareholders' meeting date as the profit disclosure date. Second, when analyzing the PEAD with the unexpected earnings calculated using the financial analysts' forecasts, no PEAD has been found both on the date of the shareholders' meeting and the earlier date of the preliminary earnings disclosure, profit/loss change announcement, or the public announcement of the shareholders' meeting. Foster et al. (1984) analyze the PEAD using time series model and earnings forecasting model and suggest that the PEAD appears only in the time series model. In this study, too, in the case of using analysts' profit forecasts, the lack of the PEAD shows that the PEAD can be changed according to the method of measuring the unexpected earnings.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.135-143
• /
• 2021

Information has an essential role in decision-making for investors who will invest in financial markets, especially regarding the policies on the condition of COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to determine the market reaction to the information published by the government regarding the policy changes to the provisions of Trading Halt on the IDX in an emergency using the event study method. The population in this study was companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in March 2020; the sample selection technique was purposive sampling. Data analysis used a normality test and one sample T-test. The results of the study found that there were significant abnormal returns on the announcement date, negative abnormal returns around the announcement date, and significant trading volume activity occurring three days after the announcement. The existence of a significant positive abnormal return on the announcement date indicates that the market responds quickly to information published by the government. The practical implication of this research can be taken into consideration for investors in making investment decisions to analyze and determine the right investment options so that investors can minimize the risk of their investment and maximize the profits they want to achieve.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.39-56
• /
• 2004

Mergers and Acquisitions(M&A) have long played an important role in the growth of firm. M&A has been considered a effective strategy for Korean government to restructure industry. Previous studies provided mixed results on the synergy effect of M&A This study provides investigation on 39 mergers occurred over the sample period from 2000 to 2001. In this study, event study methodology arc used to calculate abnormal return(AR) and cumulative abnormal return(CAR) based on mean-adjusted model. The testing period of this study from date -30 through date +30, where date zero is the date of the first public announcement of the merger. The empirical results in this study can be summarized as follows. First, the return rates of KOSDAQ registered firms with M&A appears higher than that of KSE listed firms. This means that public announcement of M&A is more influential on stock price for KOSDAQ registered firms than KSE listed firms. Second, The difference between actual merging price and fair value is significant in KSE listed firms and KOSDAQ registered firms. This means that the investors take M&A of KOSDAQ registered firms as a good news. Third, the impact on the market prices of merging firms take place after the first public announcement of the merger in KSE registered firms. But the impact on the market prices take place not only merging firms but also merged firms in KOSDAQ registered firms. This result shows that the investors recognize a M&A is a strategy of technology transfer in small & venture business.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.41-51
• /
• 2022

The research looks into the impact of stock split announcements on stock prices and market efficiency in the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE). This research uses a sample of 26 stock split announcements that occurred between 2020 and June 2021. According to the Global Industry Classification Standards, the stock split announcements covered in the study pertain to 26 businesses and 9 industries (GICS). To obtain the results, the usual event research methodology is used. The findings demonstrate significant average abnormal returns of 15.01 percent on the day the stock split news is made public and abnormal returns of 4.11 percent and -4.05 percent one day before and after the stock split announcement date, respectively. The study's findings revealed significant positive abnormal returns one day before the disclosure date, indicating information leakage, and significant negative abnormal returns the next day after the announcement date, indicating CSE informational efficiency. Because stock prices adapt so quickly to public information, these findings support the semi-strong form efficient market hypothesis, which states that investors cannot gain an abnormal return by trading in stocks on the day of the stock split announcement.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.101-114
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 우리나라 기업의 유상증자 공시효과는 경영성과에 영향을 받을 수 있다는 증거를 제시하고자 한다. 2000년 1월 1일부터 2007년 12월 31일까지 유상증자를 공시했던 308개의 표본기업들을 당기순이익 혹은 당기순손실에 따라 두 개의 표본 집단으로 분류하여 S.Brown and J.Warner(1985)의 사건연구 방법론에서 고안한 시장모형(ex-post market model)을 활용하여 유상증자 공시효과를 분석하였다. 당기순이익기업의 경우 유상증자공시효과가 긍정적이며 그리고 지속적으로 나타났다. 반면에, 당기순손실기업의 경우 유상증자 공시효과가 일시적으로 긍정적이었으나, 공시일 이후 +25일 전후에서 긍정적인 효과가 사라졌다. 이러한 결과는 통제변수들을 고려한 횡단면회귀분석에서도 일관되게 분석됨에 따라, 경영성과가 유상증자 공시효과에 영향을 미친다는 본 논문의 가설이 지지됨을 알 수 있다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2020년도 봄 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.204-205
• /
• 2020

Construction Standard Unit Price is the unit price calculated based on the market price for work items in construction projects that have already been conducted. It is used as basic data for calculating the budget price of public construction projects. In the Construction Standard Unit Price Book implemented in the second half of 2020, there are 1,810 types of unit prices. Since 2017, 100-150 construction standard unit prices have been revised semiannually (on January 1 and July 1 of each year) through Construction Site Surveys. Other work items have been set based on the rate of inflation during the corresponding period. Later in 2020, this procedure was changed, with on-site survey period extended to one year to strengthen the construction standard unit price investigation. The revisions previous announced during the second half of the year were changed only to reflect the price inflation rates. With such changes in the revisions to construction standard unit prices, one important issue that was raised: The timing of announcing the revisions during the second half of the year (reflecting the price inflation rates). The market unit wage, which is the unit price standard of labor cost that takes up a large part of the construction cost, is announced in January and September. The figures announced in September is reflected on the construction standard unit price four months later in January, but the market unit wage announced in January is reflected only six months after in July, which causes a timing issue. As such, the current study analyzed problems rising from the changed timing of the announcements of the construction standard unit price during the second half of the year, in addition to analyzing their impact on public construction projects.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.337-346
• /
• 2022

This study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the stock prices of state-owned enterprises listed on the Indonesia Stock exchange. The impact of the pandemic is analyzed based on different pandemic phases and the corresponding government pandemic interventions to curb the disease. This study analyzes 6 pandemic event dates, covering the time period from January 2020 to February 2021. A total of 20 state-owned enterprises are included as the sample of this study. Test of difference is employed to compare the stock prices of the state-owned enterprises before and after each pandemic event date. In general, this study confirms the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the stock prices, especially the event in 2020, although some variations do exist. The results of the study reveal a significant decrease in the stock prices of the state-owned enterprises after the announcement of the first confirmed COVID-19 cases, the announcement of COVID-19 as a global pandemic, the imposing of Large Scale Social Restriction (PSBB I and PSBB II). In contrast, the stock prices increase after the imposing of a new normal policy and the imposing of Public Activity Restriction (PPKM). This study also documents that the effect of the pandemic may vary based on the pandemic phase.

• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 선행연구인 김성민(1997, 2003)의 단기차익가능성 및 그에 따른 시장의 비효율성에 관한 실증결과가 투자자가 주총에서 확정될 배당금에 대해 완전예측할 수 있다는 가정을 전제로 하였다는 한계점을 인식하여 배당락일 이전 현금배당을 사전공시한 기업만을 대상으로 배당락일의 주가행태를 분석하여 배당금의 불확실성을 제거함으로써 보다 명확히 시장의 효율성을 검증하였다는데 이전의 연구와 차별성이 있다. 본 연구는 국내 기업의 현금배당의 사전공시효과를 실증적으로 연구함에 있어 국내에서는 처음으로 현금배당사전공시일을 파악해 정확한 배당공시시점을 사용하여 정보효과를 분석하고, 또한 표본을 하위그룹별로 구체적으로 분석하여 최근에 이르러서야 주주중시경영차원에서 배당에 신경을 쓰게 된 국내 기업 및 투자자에게 배당락일의 주식수익률에 관한 흥미로운 결과를 보여 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대한다. 실증분석결과 현금배당 및 주식배당의 정보효과가 사전공시일 전후 유의적으로 나타났으며, 현금배당락 조치 폐지이후인 $1998{\sim}2000$ 회계년도의 표본을 실증분석한 결과 현금배당을 사전공시한 기업의 경우 배당락일의 주식수익률은 가설과 일관되게 음(-)으로 나타났다. 현금배당에 대한 사전공시정보를 이용한 투자자들의 단기차익거래 가능성을 분석한 결과 현금배당을 주식배당과 함께 사전공시한 경우 배당부종가에 매수하여 배당락일 시가(종가)에 매도할 경우 단기차익은 -1.5%(+3.96%)이며, 현금과 동시에 주식배당을 실시하였지만 주식배당만 사전공시한 경우는 0.78%(5.0%)로 나타나 현금배당을 사전공시하지 않을 경우 시장의 금기현금배당금에 대한 예측력이 떨어지는 것으로 나타났다.

• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.219-247
• /
• 1997

우리나라에서는 그 동안 유상증자(有償增資)시 주주배정(株主配定)(right offer)방식에 의하고 기업공개시의 발행가격도 일률적으로 산정(算定)되어 증권인수(證券引受)에 따른 인수기관(引受機關)(underwriter)의 역할이 제한되어 왔으나 앞으로는 증권발행방식이 다양화되어 발행가격의 결정을 포함한 인수기관의 역할이 강조될 것이다. 대부분 총액인수(總額引受)(firm commitment underwriting)방식을 택하는 미국자본시장에서 인수기관을 선정하고 발행조건들을 결정하는 방법에는 투자은행과의 협의(協議)(negotiation)에 의하는 방식과 비공개경쟁입찰(非公開競爭入札)(sealed bidding)에 의하는 방식이 있는데 많은 기업들은 상대적으로 비용이 많이 드는 협의발행을 선택한다. 본 연구에서는 이에 대한 가설들을 뉴욕증권거래소나 아메리칸증권거래소에서 거래되는 공익기업의 신주발행자료를 통해 실증 검정했다. 인수 스프레드(underwriting spread)는 발행금액에 관계없이 협의발행(協議發行)이 경쟁발행(競爭發行)보다 평균적으로 1.16% 높았으며 발행비용(發行費用)도 협의발행이 유의적인 수준에서 0.341% 정도 높았다. 비대칭정보하에서 신호균형(信號均衡)(signaling equilibrium)으로 설명할 수 없지만 협의발행에 의한 통합균형(統合均衡)(pooling equilibrium)의 가능성은 배제하지 못했다. 주식발행 발표일(發表日)(announcement date)을 전후해 인수방식에 따른 주가변동의 차이를 분석한 결과 대리인가설(代理人假說)은 부분적으로 지지했다. 발행일(發行日)(offering date)을 전후한 주가변동에 의하면 인수기관의 사전매각노력(事前賣却努力)이 협의발행하에서 더 높았으나 발행일 직후의 주가회복은 보이지 않아 인수방식에 따른 가격안정화(價格安定化) 노력의 차이는 없었다. 발행기업들간의 주가차별화의 정도를 분석한 결과 협의발행에서 인회활동(認淮活動) (certification effects)을 더 잘 할 수 있다는 사실을 지지하지 못했다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.73-91
• /
• 2023

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to re-examine the disclosure effect of stock splits and long-term performance after stock splits using stock split data over the past 10 years, and infer the motivation (signal or opportunism) of stock splits. In addition, we focus on exploring the determinants of the short- and long-term market response to stock splits. Design/methodology/approach - We measure the short-term market response to a stock split and the long-term stock performance after the stock split announcement using the event study method. We analyze whether there is a difference in the long-term and short-term market response to a stock split according to various company characteristics through univariate analysis and regression analysis. Findings - In the case of the entire sample, a statistically significant positive excess return is observed on the stock split announcement date, and the excess return during the 24-month holding period after the stock split do not show a difference from zero. In particular, the difference between short-term and long-term returns on stock splits is larger in companies with a large stock split ratio, small companies, large growth potential, and companies with a combination of financial events after a stock split. Research implications or Originality - The results of this study suggest that at least the signal hypothesis for a stock split does not hold in the Korean stock market. On the other hand, it suggests that there is a possibility that a stock split can be abused by the manager's opportunistic motive, and that this opportunism can be discriminated depending on the size of the stock split, corporate characteristics, and financing plan.