• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.76-106
• /
• 2021

The study analyzed bibliometric data of papers published in Korea Citation Index (KCI) and Web of Science (WoS) journals from 2002 to 2021. After examining size differences of KCI and WoS domains in the number of authors, institutions, and journals to put publication and citations counts in perspective, the study investigated co-authorship patterns over time to compare collaboration trends of Korean and international scholars and analyzed the data at author, institution, and journal levels to explore how the influences of authors, institutions, and journals on research output differ across domains. The study also conducted frequency-based analysis of keywords to identify key topics and visualized keyword clusters to examine topic trends. The result showed Korean LIS authors to be twice as productive as international authors but much less impactful and Korean institutions to be at comparable levels of productivity and impact in contrast to much of productivity and impact concentrated in top international institutions. Citations to journals exhibited initially increasing pattern followed by a decreasing trend though WoS journals showed far more variance than KCI journals. Co-authorship trends were much more pronounced among international publication, where larger collaboration groups suggested multi-disciplinary and complex nature of international LIS research. Keyword analysis found continuing diversification of topics in international research compared to relatively static topic trend in Korea. Keyword visualization showed WoS keyword clusters to be much denser and diverse than KCI clusters. In addition, key keyword clusters of WoS were quite different from each other unlike KCI clusters which were similar.

• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.111-133
• /
• 2009

To understand the research trend of environmental education(EE) during last two decades, we analyzed a total of 801 research papers published from 1990 to 2008, 418 research papers from "Hwankyungkyouk" and 393 research papers from "The Journal of Environmental Education(JEE)", respectively. The majority of the authors in both journals majored in EE, followed by authors of science education major in "Hwankyungkyouk" and authors of social science major in JEE. In both journals, more researches were data-collected by quantitative method rather than qualitative method. In particular, the ratio of researches by qualitative method have been dramatically increased since the mid 1990s. The significance test was less used in Korean EE researches than those in JEE. In both journals, more EE researches for elementary and secondary school students were accomplished, which tended to be more salient in Korea. The result of the analysis of 119 EE programs in both journals proposed that EE program needs to be developed more diversely in content as well as in educational method.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 2019

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status of various fusion research journals and its operational strategies, comparing them to those of IJIDB. Research design, data, and methodology - This study focused on the content analysis and strategies of operations for other convergence journals, comparing them to IJIDB in terms of the number of publication journals, publications, academic scope, and the impact factor. Results - IJIDB is relatively new and in its developmental stages compared to other convergence journals. But, IJIDB also shows much promise in that it came second in the field of economic publications of 54 journals in 2017. In order to To elevate IJIDB journal to the top in Korea Citation Index Journals, KODISA should host more international conferences to increase its international recognition levels, develop its managerial functions for increased stability, and open more opportunities for Candidates of Ph.D and Masters degree students to publish for fostering and building potential leaders and innovators. Conclusions - IJIDB is a newly born academic journal. In the future, IJIDB will be able to develop exponentially and be one of the leading journals in the Korea Citation Index by continually learning and developing its operational strategies.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.637-643
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 학술지의 질적인 수준을 평가할 수 있는 도구인 상호인용 빈도를 활용하여 의류학 관련 학술지의 영향력을 파악하고, 나아가 연결망 그래프를 활용하여 학술지 간의 관계도를 연구하여 연구자들에게 국내 의류 관련 학술지에 대한 정보를 제공함으로써 영향력 있는 학술지를 보다 쉽게 파악하고자 한다. 분석대상은 한국연구재단에 등재되어 있는 의류학관련 10개 학술지로 하였으며, 상호인용 빈도는 2008년부터 2011년까지의 논문으로 KCI 데이터베이스로부터 재정리된 별도의 자료를 이용하였다. 연결망분석에 활용한 소프트웨어는 R ver. 2.15이다. 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 자기인용비율에 대해서는 패션과 니트가 압도적으로 높고 한국의상디자인학회지가 다음 순이었다. 둘째, 중분류 생활과학에 속하는 23개 학술지의 영향력지수 평균이 1.00임에 비추어 볼 때, 의류학 관련 학술지들의 영향력지수 평균은 0.681로 다소 낮은 편이다. 한국생활과학회지는 1.24의 영향력 지수를 보여 중분류 생활과학에 속하는 학술지 평균보다 높았다. 한국생활과학회지는 근접중심성 및 중개중심성도 한국의류학회지와 함께 높아 의식주 관련 학술지들의 상호인용에 있어 중심적인 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.47-63
• /
• 2012

This research aims to demonstrate the sociocultural significance of architectural journals produced in the 1970s during which a fundamental reconsideration of architectural discipline has been made. To this end, we established a method of analysis adapted to the characteristics of architectural journals of that period. In this formulation, the relative autonomy of architectural journal with regard to various actors and institutions involved in its production emerged as a major criterion for the analysis of a journal. From this methodological reflection, we analyzed two French architectural journals, AMC published between 1973 and 1981 and l'Architecture d'Aujourd'hui between 1974 and 1977, which were produced both in close relation with parisian architectural schools (UPA) in the context of reestablishment of architectural education and beginning of architectural research in France after the events of May 1968. If these journals reflected and strengthened the architectural reality and especially the social network of their protagonists, it is equally important to note that they have transformed it into cultural network, and this by the mechanism proper to their preparation and their textual organization.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권spc1호
• /
• pp.337-359
• /
• 2005

This paper is to analyze the current status and interdependence of knowledge regarding innovation related research in Korea, based on the four academic journals such as Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Journal of Technology Innovation, The Korean Venture Management Review, and Research Policy. The major contributions of this research are as follows: First, we tried to see the general picture of the innovation research community by extending the boundary of analysis, not limiting to a specific journal. Second, instead of subjective and qualitative analysis relying on an expert review, we quantitatively analyzed various basic statistics on innovation area and confirmed that there exist differences for using key words across the journals. Third, we derived a set of influential papers in terms of the authoritative and hub indexes employing link analysis techniques. Finally we provided some recommendations for facilitating knowledge creation activities of academic journals in this area.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.237-258
• /
• 2013

대학소속 연구자들의 연구 분야가 다변화되면서 대학도서관에서는 서비스 운영을 위하여 학과별 주제 분야를 파악하는 것이 중요한 과제로 인식되고 있다. 이 연구는 대학 학과 소속구성원들의 학술지 논문 서지사항을 분석하여 학과별 주제특성을 다차원적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 게재한 학술논문을 분석하여 1차적으로 해당 학과의 주제영역을 파악하고자 하였으며 심층적으로 주제영역을 분석하기 위하여 해당 논문들이 인용한 학술지를 조사하여 확장된 주제영역을 조사하였다. 또한 상위 인용된 학술지를 대상으로 네트워크 분석을 하여 학술지간 관계를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 학과별 주제 분야별 학술지 이용현황에 차이가 있는 것으로 조사되었으며 특정 주제 분야의 경우 학술지 종수와 논문 수에 따라 주제 분야의 중요도가 비례하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 특정분야의 경우 소수의 학술지에서 많은 논문이 인용되고 있는 현상이 있으며 게재하는 주제 분야와 인용하는 주제 분야의 중요도가 일치하지 않는 것으로 나타났다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.49-65
• /
• 2000

본 연구에서는 대한 의학학술지 편집인협의회가 1997년 11월부터 1999년 11월까지 7차에 걸쳐 평가한 한국 의학학술지 82종의 평가결과 중에서 서지정보를 이용한 평가항목의 데이터를 분석하여 한국 의학학술지의 국내외 이용도 (인용도)및 이용가능성을 측정하였다. 한국 의학학술지는 국내 의학도서관의 약 절반 정도에만 소장되어 있으며, DIALOG에서 검색 가능한 의학 및 의학관련 색인ㆍ초록 데이터베이스 36종에 등재되고 있는 것은 10종 (12.2%)뿐이다. 자체학술지 인용도는 3.402%이며, 1.092%의 논문만이 출판된지 3년 이내에 SCISearch에 1회 이상 인용되었을 뿐이다. 한국 의학학술지의 평균영향력지표는 0.011이다. 그러나, MEDLINE이나 SCISearch에 등재되고 있는 학술지의 영향력지표는 10배정도 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같이, 국내 의학학술지에 발표된 한국 의학논문들은 그 존재가 국내외적으로 알려지고 이용될 가능성이 원천적으로 봉쇄되어 있는 실정이며, 같은 분야의 동료 한국학자들에 의해서도 별로 인용되지 못하고 있으며, 특히 SCISearch 학술지에 게재된 논문들에 의해서는 거의 인용되지 못하고 있다.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.127-154
• /
• 2020

Objective: This study aimed to show and analyze the flow, content, and meaning of (prospective) early childhood educators reflective thoughts entailed in the process of planning, implementing and evaluating storybook reading by analyzing reflective journals written by technical college students enrolled in an advanced major curriculum after they completed a storybook reading assignment. Methods: The subjects of this study were 39 technical college students enrolled in an advanced major curriculum that participated in a 15-week-long 'storybook seminar' course. This study analyzed journals on storybook reading written by the students as an assignment for the storybook seminar course. Results: As a result, four categories of selecting a storybook, planning the reading of the selected storybook, actual reading of the storybook and subsequent activities were extracted according to the implementation process of storybook reading. Through this series of experiences, (prospective) early childhood educators had a childt-centered view of reading picture books, changed the method of reading picture books, re-recognized the importance of early childhood literature education, and developed a will to develop professionalism through reflective thinking. Conclusion/Implications: This study finds its meaning in showing the reflective thinking that occur within early childhood educators that plan, implement and evaluate storybook reading.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국컴퓨터정보학회 2021년도 제64차 하계학술대회논문집 29권2호
• /
• pp.117-122
• /
• 2021

In order to reveal the co-research relationship with key research institutes in the computer field in Korea, which have high competitiveness in the ICT field, this paper analyzes the co-author network of research institutes based on the papers of Korean journals. For this study, 15 computer journals published in Korea were selected and collected for the past 5 years. In addition, authors, affiliated institutions, and country information were extracted from the papers, and experimental data were produced using institutional identification data and SNA analysis techniques. Through this, statistical analysis was performed on researchers, research institutes, and countries, and the centrality of research institutes was measured through co-authored network analysis and visualized as a map. The results of the research that analyzed the co-author relationship based on the papers in computer science journals published in Korea are as follows. First, the status of co-author relations among researchers was statistically analyzed in detail. The number of authors, the number of co-authors, and statistics by co-authoring countries, as well as the ratio of co-authored research by institution and the ratio of co-authored by country were revealed. The co-authoring status of papers in English journals was analyzed separately to compare and analyze characteristics. Second, the centrality of each individual was measured through the co-authored network analysis of the identified researchers, institutions and countries affiliated with the institution, and the frequency of connection between data by level was identified. In addition, the co-authorization network between research institutes was visualized and presented as a map so that the overall view of the co-authoring network was presented, and the connection frequency between the institutes was checked. It is possible to recommend a research partner based on the co-authoring behavior of Korean computer researchers and the co-authoring relationship between major research institutes. For this, additional research is needed to analyze the subject areas of each institution.