Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bibliometric Analysis to Analyze Topic Areas of Faculty for Academic Library Service

대학도서관 서비스를 위한 서지분석기반 학과의 주제적 특성 분석 연구

  • 최상희 (대구가톨릭대학교 도서관학과)
  • Received : 2013.02.20
  • Accepted : 2013.03.16
  • Published : 2013.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As topics of researchers become diverse horizontally or vertically, academic libraries have difficulties to identify the dynamic change of researchers' needs for academic publications. This research aims to illustrate the topic areas of researchers in a department of university by analyzing bibliographies of their publications. First, researchers' publications were used to discover the topic areas where the researchers had published. Second, the cited publications in those papers were analysed to identify the expanded topic areas of these researchers. Finally, highly cited journals were analyzed by network analysis method. The major finding is that the importance of topic areas by the number of journals was not necessarily proportional to that by the number of papers. Researchers have a tendency to use many papers in a small number of journals in a certain topic area. Furthermore, the importance of topic areas discovered by researchers' publications was not the same as that discovered by researchers' citations.

대학소속 연구자들의 연구 분야가 다변화되면서 대학도서관에서는 서비스 운영을 위하여 학과별 주제 분야를 파악하는 것이 중요한 과제로 인식되고 있다. 이 연구는 대학 학과 소속구성원들의 학술지 논문 서지사항을 분석하여 학과별 주제특성을 다차원적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 게재한 학술논문을 분석하여 1차적으로 해당 학과의 주제영역을 파악하고자 하였으며 심층적으로 주제영역을 분석하기 위하여 해당 논문들이 인용한 학술지를 조사하여 확장된 주제영역을 조사하였다. 또한 상위 인용된 학술지를 대상으로 네트워크 분석을 하여 학술지간 관계를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 학과별 주제 분야별 학술지 이용현황에 차이가 있는 것으로 조사되었으며 특정 주제 분야의 경우 학술지 종수와 논문 수에 따라 주제 분야의 중요도가 비례하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 특정분야의 경우 소수의 학술지에서 많은 논문이 인용되고 있는 현상이 있으며 게재하는 주제 분야와 인용하는 주제 분야의 중요도가 일치하지 않는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 대구가톨릭대학교

References

  1. 김영수, 고종남, 도만승 (2011). 국내 기업가정신의 연구동향에 관한 탐색적 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(3), 295-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.295 (Kim, Young-Su, Ko, Jong-Nam, & Do, Man-Seung (2011). An exploratory study on the study trend of domestic entrepreneurship using co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3), 295-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.295)
  2. 유소영, 이재윤 (2008). 학제적 분야의 정보서비스를 위한 학술지 인용 분석에 관한 연구: Y대학교 생명공학과를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 283-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.283 (Yu, So Young, & Lee, Jae Yun (2008). Journal citation analysis for library services on interdisciplinary domains: A case study of department of biotechnology, Y university. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 283-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.283)
  3. 유종덕, 최은주 (2011). 저자프로파일링분석과 저자동시인용분석의 유용성 비교 검증. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 123-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.123 (Ryoo, Jong-Duk, & Choi, Eun-Ju (2011). A comparison test on the potential utility between author profiling analysis (APA) and author co-citation analysis (ACA). Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 123-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.123)
  4. 이재윤 (2006a). 국내 최신 동향 파악을 위한 새로운 지적 구조 분석법. 제13회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 145-152. (Lee, Jae Yun (2006a). Towards a new method for examining current domestic intellectual structure of knowledge domains. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 145-152.)
  5. 이재윤 (2006b). 지적구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.215 (Lee, Jae Yun (2006b). A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4), 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.215)
  6. 이재윤 (2008a). 서지적 저자결합분석: 연구동향 분석을 위한 새로운 접근. 정보관리학회지 25(1), 173-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.1.173 (Lee, Jae Yun (2008a). Bibliographic author coupling analysis: A new methodological approach for identifying research trends. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management,25(1), 173-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.1.173)
  7. 이재윤 (2008b). 연구자의 투고 학술지 현황에 근거한 국내 학문분야 네트워크 분석. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 327-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.327 (Lee, Jae Yun (2008b). Analyzing the network of academic disciplines with journal contributors of Korean researchers. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 327-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.327)
  8. 이재윤 (2012). 자기 인용 네트워크와 인용 정체성을 이용한 연구자의 연구 이력 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 157-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.157 (Lee, Jae Yun (2012). Exploring a researcher's personal research history through self-citation network and citation identity. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1), 157-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.157)
  9. 조재인 (2011). 네트워크 텍스트 분석을 통한 문헌정보학 최근 연구 경향 분석. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 65-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.065 (Cho, Jane (2011). A study for research area of library and information science by network text analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 65-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.065)
  10. Ananiadou, S., & McNaught, J. (Eds.). (2006). Text mining for biology and biomedicine. Norwood: Artech House Publishers.
  11. Astrom, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20567
  12. Chen, H., Fuller, S. S., Friedman, C., & Hersh, W. (Eds.). (2005). Medical informatics: Knowledge management and data mining in biomedicine. London: Springer-Verlag.
  13. Edwards, S. (1999). Citation analysis as a collection development tool: A bibliometric study of polymer science theses and dissertations. Serials Review, 25(1), 11-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-7913(99)80133-6
  14. Enger, K. B. (2009) Using citation analysis to develop core book collections in academic libraries. Library and Information Science Research, 31(2), 107-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.12.003
  15. Fattori, M., Padrazzi, G., & Turra, R. (2003). Text mining applied to patent mapping: A practical business cases. World Patent Information, 25(4), 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00113-3
  16. Glanzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093621
  17. Huang, M., Chiang, L., & Chen, D. (2003). Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies. Scientometrics, 58(3), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006876.29052.bf
  18. Jacobs, N. (2002). Co-term network analysis as a means of describing the information landscapes of knowledge communities across sectors. Journal of Documentation, 58(5), 548-562. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210441577
  19. Janerving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for the mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7
  20. Kessler, M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
  21. Kim, H., & Choi, S. (2009). An analysis of research topic areas of medical school researchers. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(2), 105-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.25.2.105
  22. Kim, H., & Lee, J. Y. (2009). Archiving research trends in LIS domain using profiling analysis. Scientometrics, 80(1), 75-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1998-z
  23. Kostoff, R. N., Eberhart, H. J., & Toothman, D. R. (1998). Database tomography for technical intelligence: A roadmap of the near-earth space science and technology literature. Information Processing & Management, 34(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00066-6
  24. Kostoff, R. N., & Block, J. A. (2005). Factor matrix text filtering and clustering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 946-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20187
  25. Kostoff, R. N., del Rio, A. J., Humenik, J. A., & Ramirez, A. M. (2001). Citation mining: Integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1148-1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1181
  26. Kumar, H. A., & Dora, M. (2011). Citation analysis of doctoral dissertations at IIMA: A review of the local use of journals. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 35(1), 32-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2011.03.002
  27. McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<290::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-9
  28. McCain, K. W. (1995). R&D themes in information science: A preliminary co-descriptor analysis. Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Pine Forest, Il. June 7-10, 275-282.
  29. McCain, K. W., Verner, J. M., Hislop, G. W., Evanco, W., & Cole, V. (2005). The use of bibliometric and knowledge elicitation techniques to map a knowledge domain: Software engineering in the 1990s. Scientometrics, 65(1), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0262-7
  30. Miller, T. W. (2004). Data and text mining: A business applications approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  31. Pancheshnikov, Y. (2007). A comparison of literature citations in faculty publications and student theses as indicators of collection use and a background for collection management at a university library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 674-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.011
  32. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-G
  33. Reid, E., & Chen, H. (2007). Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(1), 42-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.006
  34. Rip, A., & Courtial, J. P. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 15(6), 381-400.
  35. Seglen, P. O., & Aksnes, D. W. (2000). Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005665309719
  36. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  37. Sullivan, D. (2001). Document warehousing and text mining: Techniques for improving business operations, marketing, and sales. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  38. Swygart-Hobaugh, A. J. (2004). A citation analysis of the quantitative/qualitative methods debate's reflection in sociology research: Implications for library collection development. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 28(2), 180-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2004.02.003
  39. Todorov, R. (1992). Displaying content of scientific journals: A co-heading analysis. Scientometrics, 23(2), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017044
  40. Tseng, Y., Lin, C., & Lin, Y. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1216-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.011
  41. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
  42. Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tools for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.003

Cited by

  1. A Comparison Study on the Weighted Network Centrality Measures of tnet and WNET vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241