• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.34-42
• /
• 2024

This study investigated the academic achievement of science and high school students according to the characteristics of R&E activities in mathematics and science. In addition, based on the survey results, the correlation between R&E activity characteristics and mathematics and science academic achievement was studied through correlation analysis and factor analysis between subjects. There was a difference in academic achievement in mathematics and science according to the characteristics of the R&E activity area, and the experience of R&E activity was found to be closely related to the academic achievement of related subjects. Depending on the area of R&E activity, mathematical and scientific academic achievement was found to be two factors: mathematical logic and natural understanding. Natural understanding factors significantly influenced students' academic achievement in mathematics, physics, and life sciences, and mathematical logic factors significantly influenced the academic achievement of students in chemistry and earth science subjects. In particular, mathematical logic ability was concentrated in excellent physics class students, and natural understanding ability was concentrated in excellent life science class students. Since the characteristics of the R & E activity area greatly influence the academic achievement of mathematics and science, it will significantly contribute to the selection and operation of the R & E activity area of science high school students.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.372-381
• /
• 2015

Mathematics and science are very closely related. Among the science areas, physic is strongly linked with mathematics. As the related mathematics skills were alloted later than the science contents in the national curriculum, students often suffer from science classes. Accordingly, an opinion have been claimed to teach the related mathematics skills prior to the science classes. However, it would be hard to arrange all science and mathematics contents in order. Instead of that, in this research, we taught students mathematics contents that are crucial for learning speed through science classes. We called that teaching strategy an integrated science and mathematics class. Then, we examined students' achievement in science as well as skills of mathematics to know the effectiveness of the strategy. We found that the average mathematics score of the whole class went up meaningfully. We also found that their science achievement was above than basic level. Moreover, the homeroom teacher of the students observed 3 aspects which showed the students were better than previous students. Finally, we divided the students into 4 groups by their science and mathematics achievement score and interviewed each group. As a result, we knew that interesting and confidence in science and mathematics quite exerted influence on their achievement.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.217-238
• /
• 2016

본 연구에서는 중학교 2학년의 수학 학업성취도에 대한 교사와 부모의 성취압력과 수학 내재적 동기의 영향력과 조절효과를 검증하였다. 연구 결과, 수학 내재적 동기의 수준에 따라, 수학 내재적 동기가 높은 집단에서 교사의 성취압력은 수학 학업성취도에 부적인 영향을 미치는 반면, 수학 내재적 동기 중 하집단에서는 교사의 성취압력이 수학 학업성취도에 정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 부모의 성취압력은 수학 내재적 동기가 높은 집단과 낮은 집단 모두 수학 학업성취도에 정적인 영향을 미치고, 특히 수학 내재적 동기가 중 상인집단이 하집단에 비해 수학 학업성취도에 더 큰 효과를 나타냈다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 교사와 부모의 성취압력을 통해 수학 학업성취도를 높일 수 있는 방안이 논의되었으며, 후속 연구를 위한 연구의 제한점을 제시하였다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.47-57
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a mathematics basis underachiever program on a mathematics achievement and mathematics attitudes. For this investigation, twenty eight-grade students as an experimental group were trained in a mathematics basis underachiever program by trained teachers in a middle school classroom for a period of 8 weeks. Twenty eight-grade students in another middle school, serving as a control group. Both groups were given a pretest and a posttest to check the mathematics achievement inspection tool(Likert-type Mathematics Attitude Survey; LTMAS) and a mathematics attitude inspection tool(KEDI, 2001). In the analysis of data Frequencies, percentiles, t-test were used. The results of the study are summarized as follows; First, the results showed that the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher differences than the control group in the mathematics achievement components of inequality equation, figure area and the whole in a mathematical achievement(p<.05). Second the results showed that the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher differences than the control group in the mathematics attitude components of positive mathematics attitude, negative mathematics attitude and the whole in a mathematical attitude(p<.05).

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.333-351
• /
• 2017

Schools are expected to ultimately moderate the difference of inequality issues among social groups and reduce the achievement gaps. This study investigates this expectation, in particular, how students' mathematics achievements are influenced by their parents' education at the individual level and by collective responsibility for teaching at the school level as well as the interaction of the two. Using a two-level hierarchical linear model, this study indicates that a school collective responsibility has a larger positive effect on students' mathematics achievement when their parents' education level is high. This means that school's collective responsibility accelerates inequity in students' mathematics achievement. Knowing that collective responsibility has less of an effect on students whose parents' education is not high, researchers, schools, and school districts should continue to search for school effects that have more of a positive impact on the relationship between mathematics achievement for students whose parents' education is not high in order to have more equitable results for all students.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.233-245
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to analyse the effects on the academic achievement and learning motive in mathematics class by use of Cornell-note method at an elementary school. Thus, Cornell-mathematic note is designed for the experiment in order to recognize the effects how the Cornell-note influences students' mathematics academic achievement and learning motive. This experiment was carried out for 13 weeks and the target was 28 students. The group was consisted of 6rd grade students in elementary school located in Busan. To see the effects of Cornell-note method after experiment, post-test was carried out about mathematics academic achievement and learning motive. The results of this study are as follows: There was meaningful difference before and after test about mathematics academic achievement and learning motive. The academic achievement and learning motive in mathematics were improved after Cornell-note applied. Improvement of learning motive caused progress of academic achievement in mathematics class. The Cornell-note way is not appropriate, however, to reinforce mathematical communication ability and to attract students' interest. Therefore, systematic symbol is necessary and consider about adoption of story-telling way.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.299-308
• /
• 2010

The gender differences of mathematics achievement exists in many counties in the world. Some Chinese scholars think that the differences also exist in China. The researchers explain the gender differences of mathematics learning mainly from the individual psychology and education. This paper, firstly, introduces an investigation of the gender differences of mathematics achievement in grade 1-9 in three areas (Hefei urban area, Cuozhen area, and Chenji area) of Hefei in China. The investigation found that the gender differences of mathematics achievement exist but are different in these areas. Then, the results are explained from the theory of the gender socialization.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제50권1호
• /
• pp.103-118
• /
• 2011

The study examined whether the relation between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement was partially mediated by the learning strategies, using latent growth model analyses. It was also examined the auto-regressive, cross-lagged (ARCL) panel model for testing the stability and change in the relation of mathematics self-efficacy and learning strategy over time. The study analyzed the first-year to the third-year data of the Korean Educational Longitudinal Survey (KELS). The result of ARCL panel model analysis showed that earlier mathematics self-efficacy could predict later learning strategy use. There were linear trends in mathematics self-efficacy, learning strategy, and mathematics achievement. Specifically, mathematics achievement was increased over the three time points, whereas mathematics self-efficacy and learning strategies were significantly decreased. In the analyses of latent growth models, the mediating effects of learning strategies were overall supported. That is, both of initial status and change rate of rehearsal strategy partially mediated the relation of mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement. However, in elaboration and meta-cognitive strategies, only the initial status of each variable showed the indirect relationship.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.135-156
• /
• 2021

수학 학업성취도에 영향을 미치고 있는 교사의 성취압력과 열의는 끊임없이 변화하면서 수학 학업성취도 영향을 미치므로 그 변화양상이 학업성취도의 변화양상에 미치는 영향력을 살펴볼 수 있는 종단연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 한국교육종단연구2013의 초등학교 5학년(2013년)부터 중학교 3학년(2017년)까지의 학생 데이터를 활용하여 수학 학업성취도에 대한 종단적인 변화양상이 유사한 하위 그룹으로 분류하여 그룹별 교사의 성취압력과 열의에 대한 종단적인 변화양상이 수학 학업성취도의 종단적인 변화양상에 미치는 영향력과 그 경로를 비교·분석하였다. 분석결과 수학 학업성취도의 종단적인 변화가 유사한 4개의 하위그룹 모두 교사의 성취압력은 초등학교 5학년부터 변화가 적은 반면에 교사의 열의는 초등학교 5학년부터 지속적으로 떨어지는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 그룹별 학생들이 인지하는 교사의 성취압력과 열의가 수학 학업성취도에 미치는 영향력은 다르게 나타났다. 이것은 수학 학업성취도의 향상을 위해서는 학생들의 특성과 성향을 반영한 교수 학습의 지원이 필요하다는 것을 시사한다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.187-205
• /
• 2004

이 연구의 목적은 제3차 국제 수학 과학 연구(Third International Mathematics and Science Study. TIMSS) database를 이용하여 수학태도와 수학활동이 학생들의 수학성적에 미치는 효과를 검정하고 그 결과를 미국과 한국간에 비교하는데 있다. TIMSS의 연구 결과에 따르면 한국 학생들의 수학성적은 연구에 참가한 약 45개국 중에서 거의 최상위권이었지만 미국 학생들의 수학성적은 중위권이었다. 많은 선행연구에 따르면 수학태도와 수학활동은 학생들의 수학성적에 영향을 미치는 요인들이므로 이들 두 요인들이 이들 두 나라에서 어떻게 달리 학생들의 수학성적에 영향을 미치는 가를 검정해봄으로써 두 나라간의 수학성적의 차이를 설명할 수 있을 것이다. 이 연구를 위한 주요 연구문제는 첫째, 수학태도와 수학활동을 구성하는 하위 요인들은 무엇인가와 둘째, 수학태도와 수학활동이 미국과 한국에서 어떻게 달리 수학성적에 영향을 미치는가 이다. 연구 결과에 의하면 학생들의 수학태도와 수학 활동은 수학성적에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 선행연구의 결과와 일치하였다. 수학활동과 수학성적간의 관계는 두 나라에서 유의미한 차이가 없었지만, 수학태도와 수학성적 간의 관계는 한국 학생들이 미국학생들보다 훨씬 강한 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 학생들의 수학태도가 긍정적으로 높을 때 높은 수학성적을 기대할 수 있다는 것을 의미한다.