• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.137-145
• /
• 2003

Object : The purpose of this study is to report vomiting patient with medullary infarction, who improved by additional Kwan-Won herbal acupuncture. Method : We have treated the patient with Kwan-Won acupuncture and other Oriental Medical treatment. The effect was and evaluated by progress of symtoms and Mcgill Nausea Question(MNQ) that consists of Nausea Rating Index(NRI), Overall Nausea Index(ONI) and Visual Anlogue Scale(VAS). Result : After 6th times of treatment, nausea and vomiting was disappeared. In the score of MNQ, NRI score changed from 19 to 1, ORI score from 5 to 1 and VAS score from 10 to 0. Conclusion : These results suggest that Kwan-Won herbal acupuncture and other Oriental Medical treatment have good effect on severe vomiting. But further studies are required.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.292-301
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of postoperative oral care using cold therapy on nausea, vomiting and oral discomfort after laparoscopic myomectomy. Method: The study was conducted with an experimental group (n=29) and a control group (n=35) sampled from patients admitted to a women's hospital in a metropolitan city in Korea. Data were collected between October 10, 2011 and January 31, 2012 and analyzed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, t-test, and repeated measure ANCOVA with SPSS/WIN 19.0. Results: After the intervention, postoperative nausea (p<.001) and oral discomfort for patients in the experimental group were significantly lower than in the control group. There were significant differences in the presence of vomiting between both groups at 12 hours (p<.001) and 24 hours (p=.003) after leaving the recovery room. Conclusion: Oral care using cold therapy was found to be an effective nursing intervention for reducing postoperative nausea, vomiting and oral discomfort up to 24 hours after recovery in patients with laparoscopic myomectomy.

• The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine
• /
• v.41 no.5
• /
• pp.806-810
• /
• 2020

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Korean medicine treatment on a patient suffering from nausea, vomiting, and headache. Methods: We applied herbal medicine (Oryeong-san, Wiryeong-tang) and acupuncture to the patient. Clinical symptoms were assessed with a numeral rating scale (NRS). Results: After treatment, the nausea, vomiting and headache symptoms were improved, and the NRS score showed improvement. Conclusion: This case shows that Korean medicine treatments are effective in alleviating the symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and headache.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
• /
• v.39 no.1
• /
• pp.44-52
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone on Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) and pain with ondansetron alone in patients with laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy under general anesthesia. Methods: Data were collected from April 1 through September 30, 2005 using a double blind method. Ondansetron 4 mg and dexamethasone 10 mg were administered to the experimental group (25 patients), and ondansetron 4 mg only to the control group (25 patients). The medications were administered through an intravenous line at the beginning peritoneum suture. PONV by Index of Nausea Vomiting and Retching (INVR), nausea by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and pain (VAS) were assessed at postoperative 1 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 24 hr, and 48 hr. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, and Bonferroni methods. Results: The experimental group that received ondansetron combined with dexamethasone had less PONV (p=.048), and nausea (p=.012) than control group that received ondansetron alone. However, there was no difference in pain (p=.557) between the patients in the two groups. Conclusion: We conclude that the administration of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone is more effective than the administration of ondansetron alone to reduce PONV in patients with laparoscopic hysterectomy.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• v.17 no.8
• /
• pp.3877-3880
• /
• 2016

Nausea and vomiting are among the most serious side effects of chemotherapy, in some cases leading to treatment interruption or chemotherapy dose reduction. Ginger has long been known as an antiemetic drug, used for conditions such as motion sickness, nausea-vomiting in pregnancy, and post-operation side effects. One hundred and fifty female patients with breast cancer entered this prospective study and were randomized to receive ginger (500 mg ginger powder, twice a day for 3 days) or placebo. One hundred and nineteen patients completed the study: 57 of them received ginger and 62 received ginger for the first 3 chemotherapy cycles. Mean age in all patients was 48.6 (25-79) years. After 1st chemotherapy, mean nausea in the ginger and control arms were 1.36 (${\pm}1.31$) and 1.46 (${\pm}1.28$) with no statistically significant difference. After the $2^{nd}$ chemotherapy session, nausea score was slightly more in the ginger group (1.36 versus 1.32). After $3^{rd}$ chemotherapy, mean nausea severity in control group was less than ginger group [1.37 (${\pm}1.14$), versus 1.42 (${\pm}1.30$)]. Considering all patients, nausea was slightly more severe in ginger arm. In ginger arm mean nausea score was 1.42 (${\pm}0.96$) and in control arm it was 1.40 (${\pm}0.92$). Mean vomiting scores after chemotherapy in ginger arm were 0.719 (${\pm}1.03$), 0.68 (${\pm}1.00$) and 0.77 (${\pm}1.18$). In control arm, mean vomiting was 0.983 (${\pm}1.23$), 1.03 (${\pm}1.22$) and 1.15 (${\pm}1.27$). In all sessions, ginger decreased vomiting severity from 1.4 (${\pm}1.04$) to 0.71 (${\pm}0.86$). None of the differences were significant. In those patients who received the AC regimen, vomiting was less severe ($0.64{\pm}0.87$) comparing to those who received placebo ($1.13{\pm}1.12$), which was statistically significant (p-Value <0.05). Further and larger studies are needed to draw conclusions.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.380-384
• /
• 1996

Background: To determine the effectiveness of continuous epidural infusion of droperidol, combined with epidural morphine, in reducing nausea or vomiting associated with epidural morphine and minimizing the side effects of droperidol, 48 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. Methods: Patients received continuous infusion of epidural morphine(6.0 mg/day) following a bolus loading dose of 3.0 mg(Group A), or epidural mixture of morphine(6.0 mg/day) plus droperidol(5.0 mg/day) following a bolus loading dose(morphine 3.0mg, droperidol 1.5 mg)(Group B). For the first 48 postoperative hours, the incidence of nausea or vomiting, the need for antiemetic therapy, level of sedation, and adverse effects associated with droperidol were evaluated. Results: The incidence of nausea or vomiting and the number of patients who required antiemetic therapy were significantly less in Group B than in Group A(P<0.05). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to the adverse effects associated with droperidol such as mental depression, respiratory depression and abnormal movements(P=NS). Conclusion: We conclude that simultaneous titration of morphine and droperidol via epidural continuous infusion following epidural bolus injection of the mixture reduces nausea or vomiting associated with epidural morphine while it prevents the side effects of droperidol.

• Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.43-52
• /
• 2004

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to find effects of early oral water intake on thirsty feeling, nausea, and vomiting after ambulatory surgery. Method : Sixty patients who received PET(Pressure Equalizing Tube) insertion surgery under general anesthesia were conveniently sampled and divided into two groups. Experimental group was instructed to drink water after two hours and control group was directed to intake water after three hours postoperatively. Data were collected from May 1, 2002 to August 31, 2002 at ambulatory surgery center of Asan Medical Center. The thirsty feeling, nausea and vomiting score between experimental and control group were compared at the time of recovery, recovering consciousness, 2hr, 3hr, right before discharge and/or 24hr(telephone interview) postoperatively. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS 8.0 statistic program. Result : Result of this study are as follows. 1) There was a statistically significant difference(t=-10.31, p=0.00) in the occurrence of thirsty feeling at the 3hr postoperatively between experimental and control groups. 2) There was a statistically significant difference($x^2=6.66$, p=0.02) in the incidence of nausea during the 2hr postoperatively between experimental and control groups. 3) There was no difference($x^2=0.35$, p=0.55) between groups in vomiting scores. Conclusion : It was generally known that the delay of oral water intake decreases post operative complications. But, this study shows that early oral water intake decreases discomfort of thirsty and there was no adverse effects on the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

• Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.6 no.1 s.10
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2006

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the preventive effect of propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following general anesthesia to the patients having oral and maxillofacial surgery. Methods: In a prospective, randomized. case-controlled study. 200 patients were divided into two groups (n = 100 in each). In propofol (P) group, patients received 0.5 mg/kg of propofol intravenously at the end of anesthesia. In control (C) group, no antiemetics was given. Emetic symptoms like nausea, retching and vomiting were assessed by a blind nurse at 1 hour and at 24 hours after anesthesia respectively. Also level of sedation was checked by a blind anesthesiologist at 1 hour after anesthesia. Results: There were no significant differences in frequencies of nausea, retching and vomiting between C group and P group at 1 hour after anesthesia. However, nausea, retching and vomiting were all decreased in P group compared with C group at 24 hours after anesthesia (P < 0.05). Also there was no significant difference in level of sedation at 1 hour after anesthesia between C group and P group (P > 0.05). Conclusions: From the results, prophylactic use of subhypnotic dose of propofol could be effective for preventing PONV without change in level of sedation to the patients undergoing general anesthesia for oral and maxillofaical surgery.

• The Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2015

Objectives The purpose of this study is to report the effect of Gamihachul-tang-gagam-bang on two patients with Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) and Radiotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting (RINV). respectively. Methods Two patients with CINV and RINV who admitted KyungHee University Hospital at Gangdong were treated by oriental medical treatments such as acupuncture, moxibustion, cupping treatment and herbal medicine ( Gamihachul-tang-gagam-bang ). Results After treatments, patients' nausea and vomiting improved and patients' amount of intake also increased. Conclusions According to this case report, Gamihachul-tang-gagam-bang is effective for treating CINV and RINV.

• Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.71 no.6
• /
• pp.440-446
• /
• 2018

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate aprepitant in combination with palonosetron as compared to palonosetron alone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in female patients receiving fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Methods: In this randomized single-blinded study, 100 female patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized to two groups: Group AP (80 mg aprepitant plus 0.075 mg palonosetron, n = 50) and Group P (0.075 mg palonosetron, n = 50). The patients in group AP received 80 mg aprepitant per oral 1-3 h before surgery, while all patients received 0.075 mg palonosetron after induction of standardized anesthesia. All patients had postoperative access to fentanyl-based IV-PCA. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, use of rescue medication, and severity of nausea were evaluated at 6 and 24 h after surgery. Results: The incidence of nausea (54%) and vomiting (2%) in group AP did not differ significantly from that in group P (48% and 14%, respectively) during the first 24 h after surgery (P > 0.05). Patient requirements for rescue medication in group AP (29%) were similar to those in group P (32%) at 24 h after surgery (P > 0.05). There was no difference between the groups in severity of nausea during the first 24 h after surgery (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Aprepitant combined with palonosetron did not reduce the incidence of PONV as compared to palonosetron alone within 24 h of surgery in women receiving fentanyl-based IV-PCA.