• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.2 no.3
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2016

As a large portal sites are beginning to replace the function of the mass media, new risks began to raise. It remained without being deleted that data written to the internet was a serious privacy problem occurs. The sensitive information was inferred based on the personal data recorded in the past and also another personal information leakage itself. Witch-hunt through the personally identifiable rob has emerged as a serious social problem and damage to the parties not be able to live a normal life. In this paper, we propose the study on the need for a 'right to be forgotten' to delete the personal information relating to on-line through international case studies and activation measures. At the same time, we proposed improvement measures, such as encryption management, ownership inheritance, and blind treatment.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.1073-1084
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to present the correct direction of research in related fields by analyzing the trends in the domestic study right to be forgotten. In this study, the final selection of 80 pieces of research papers in various disciplines to search for the study and were analyzed by setting the seven criteria and three research questions. Results, notice that significantly increase the amount of research around the social sciences, starting with the EU rules(draft) has been published in 2012, and around the problem navigating the Law oriented research actively done through a literature review and legal research methods can. Intensive study of the protected rights and the conflict in time towards the latter subject was also increased. The right to be forgotten when considering that big data, digital information such diverse and complex technical issues (service), which still lacks support the implementation of the rights ithil research is desperately needed to know the future with the realization that the scope and research methods. The purpose of this study is to present the research direction of the limits intended for domestic research, but realize effective right to be forgotten by future foreign comparative analysis.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.837-852
• /
• 2016

This study examined the life-log related ICT in terms of both positive effects and adverse effects. As results, from the perspective of positive effects, experience of using life-log related ICT affects the usefulness of ICT, whereas usefulness of ICT affects satisfaction of ICT. From the perspective of adverse effects, experience of using life-log related ICT affects concern over privacy, whereas concern over privacy affects the awareness of the right to be forgotten. And, Internet privacy efficacy moderates the impact of experience of using life-log related ICT and the impact of concern over privacy.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.76
• /
• pp.151-182
• /
• 2016

The right to be forgotten (RTBF) has been a population notion to address privacy issues associated with the digitalization of information and the dissemination of such information over the global digital network. In May 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) laid down a landmark RTBF decision to grant individuals the right to be de-listed from search results. ECJ's RTBF decision sparked an increased interest in RTBF in South Korea. Academic and non-academic commentators have provided a mistaken or outstretched interpretation of RTBF in claiming that removal of news articles should be read into RTBF in Korean law. Moreover, the Press Arbitration Commission of Korea (PAC) has proposed revising the Press Arbitration Act (PAA) to allow the alleged victims of news reporting to request the deletion of news stories. This article examines the notion of RTBF from its origin to the latest development abroad and also critically explores Korean laws regulation freedom of expression to evaluate if Korea needs the proposed PAA revision.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2024.01a
• /
• pp.101-103
• /
• 2024

본 논문에서는 잊혀질 권리에 대한 법제도 및 법정책적 검토를 논하고자 한다. 잊혀질 권리는 알권리, 표현의 자유 등 다른 기본권과 충돌할 수밖에 없기 때문에 이 권리를 법률로 구체화하는데 다각적인 학제 간 연구가 선결문제로써 검토되어야 한다. 정보 주체에게 잊혀질 권리를 법제화하는 것은 그 정보를 사용하려는 사람의 표현의 자유를 제한하는 결과를 초래하기 때문에 일정한 한계를 노출할 수밖에 없다. 현행 개인정보 보호법, 정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률 등에서 개인정보의 파기제도를 신설하여 부분적으로 잊혀질 권리를 반영하고 있지만 헌법상 중요한 가치인 잊혀질 권리와 알권리 및 표현의 자유에 대해 조화롭게 균형을 찾는 것이 선행과제인 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2015.07a
• /
• pp.121-123
• /
• 2015

본 논문에서는 잊혀질 권리에 대한 법정책적 검토를 논하고자 한다. 잊혀질 권리는 다른 기본권과 충돌할 수밖에 없기 때문에 이 권리를 법률로 구체화하는데 다각적인 학제 간 연구가 선결문제로써 검토되어야 한다. 정보 주체에게 잊혀질 권리를 법제화하는 것은 그 정보를 사용하려는 사람의 표현의 자유 및 국민의 알권리를 제한하는 결과를 초래하기 때문에 일정한 한계를 노출할 수밖에 없다. 비록 현행 개인정보보호법 및 정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률 제44조의 2는 개인정보의 파기제도를 신설하여 부분적으로 잊혀질 권리를 반영하고 있지만 헌법상 중요한 가치인 프라이버시권과 표현의 자유 및 알권리의 조화롭게 균형을 찾는 것이 선행과제인 것이다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.45-105
• /
• 2016

The purposes of this study is to debate the duty to share and right to be forgotten of human materials and human genome information in modern personalized medicine. This study debates the use of human materials and human genome information in modern personalized medicine from the perspectives of the duty to share and right to be forgotten. The arguments are based on personal and community aspects. In general, human genome information is considered the personal property of an individual. Nevertheless, on thinking carefully, we can understand that human materials and human genome information have both personal and community aspects. In this study, cases are examined including a HeLa cell, Guaymi woman cell strain, and Hagahai man cell, to support various debates an genetic information for database construction in personalized medicine. Finally, using moral theories, this study attempts to synthesize the dialectics of the duty to share and right to forget regarding the use of human materials and human genome information in medicine.

• Journal of Internet Computing and Services
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.77-85
• /
• 2016

Internet cookie technology is designed for solving unreliable problem of HTTP's inherent property and notifying user's previous activity to web site's server, so it is useful to provide suitable service for individual user. However, the cookie techniques are becoming more sophisticated such as the third cookie and super cookie. And its included information is applied for advertisement and target marketing strategy, so the problem occurs that user's personal information is collected excessively. However, our law does not recognize the internet cookie as personal information so user cannot know where own internet cookie is stored and applicable. Therefore, in this paper, we explain the internet cookie technology, the privacy invasion and right to be forgotten for solving problem due to the internet cookie. And we analysis the relationship between the information of internet cookie and personal information, and then present the improvement requirement on the law and technology to use internet cookie securely and conveniently.

• Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
• /
• v.30 no.10
• /
• pp.34-41
• /
• 2012

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• v.22 no.5
• /
• pp.320-326
• /
• 2022

The use of the Internet has become commonplace for billions of people on the planet. The rapid development of technology, in particular, mobile gadgets, has provided access to communication anywhere, anytime. At the same time, there are growing concerns about the behavior of people on the Internet, in particular, towards each other and social groups in general. This raises the issue of human rights in today's information society. In this study, we focused on human rights such as the right to privacy, confidentiality, freedom of expression, the right to be forgotten, etc. We point to some differences in this regard, in particular between the EU, etc. In addition, we describe the latest legal regulation in this aspect in European countries. Such methods as systemic, factual, formal and legal, to show the factors of formation and development of human rights in the context of digitalization were used. The authors indicate which of them deserve the most attention due to their prevalence and relevance. Thus, we concluded that the technological development of social communications has laid the groundwork for a legal settlement of privacy and opinion issues on the Internet. Simultaneously, jurisdictions address issues on every aspect of human rights on the Internet, based on previous norms, case law, and principles of law. It is concluded that human rights legislation on the Internet will continue to be actively developed to ensure a balance of private and public interests, safe online access and unimpeded access to it.