• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.246-251
• /
• 2018

Compared to single row repair, use of lateral row anchors in suture bridge rotator cuff repair enhances repair strength and increases footprint contact area. If a lateral knotless anchor (push-in design) is inserted into osteoporotic bone, pull-out of the lateral row anchor can developed. However, failures of lateral row anchors have been reported at several months after surgery. In our cases, even though complete cuff healing occurred, delayed pull-out of the lateral row anchor in the suture bridge repair occurred. In comparison to a conventional medial anchor, further biomechanical evaluation of the pull-out force, design, and insertion angle of the lateral anchor is needed in future studies. We report three cases with delayed pull-out of lateral row anchor in suture bridge rotator cuff repair with a literature review.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.178-182
• /
• 2020

Background: The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes and radiological findings of cyst formation in the glenoid around suture anchors after arthroscopic Bankart repair with either biocomposite suture anchor or all-suture anchor in traumatic anterior shoulder instability. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in clinical and radiological outcomes between the two suture materials. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 162 patients (69 in group A, biocomposite anchor; 93 in group B, all-suture anchor) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with less than 20% glenoid defect on preoperative en-face view three-dimensional computed tomography. Patient assignment was not randomized. Results: At final follow-up, the mean subjective shoulder value, Rowe score, and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score improved significantly in both groups. However, there were no significant differences in functional shoulder scores and recurrence rate (6%, 4/69 in group A; 5%, 5/93 in group B) between the two groups. On follow-up magnetic resonance arthrography/computed tomography arthrography, the incidence of peri-anchor cyst formation was 5.7% (4/69) in group A and 3.2% (3/93) in group B, which was not a significant difference. Conclusions: Considering the low incidence of peri-anchor cyst formation in the glenoid after Bankart repair with one of two anchor systems and the lack of association with recurrence instability, biocomposite and all-suture anchors in Bankart repair yield satisfactory outcomes with no significant difference.

• 대한견주관절학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한견주관절학회 2009년도 제17차 학술대회
• /
• pp.159-159
• /
• 2009

Repeated pulling-out of a suture anchor in the lateral row despite repeated attempts at insertion during a rotator cuff repair is not uncommon with the suture-bridge technique, especially in patients with osteoporosis. We describe a simple procedure for dealing with the pull-out of a PushLock anchor in the lateral row using a suture anchor with a suture eyelet during rotator cuff repair applying the suture-bridge technique.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.254-260
• /
• 2015

With the advancement of shoulder arthroscopy, use of biodegradable suture anchors in the surgical repair of rotator cuff tears has increased. Because of the radiolucency of these anchors, radiography is not appropriate for early detection of anchor failure. Ultrasonography is an advantageous modality in visualizing biodegradable, radiolucent anchors on a real-time basis without risk of radiation exposure. We report on two cases of displacement of a biodegradable suture anchor diagnosed on ultrasonography during the postoperative follow- up, which has not been previously reported. Because this displacement could be missed in the postoperative follow up ultrasonography, we describe the ultrasonographic features of the displaced biodegradable anchors. Surgeons and radiologists should pay special attention to the possibility of displacement of the suture anchor in patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs using suture anchors.

• 대한견주관절학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한견주관절학회 2005년도 제3차 연수강좌
• /
• pp.198-205
• /
• 2005

1. Many design features including suture type, anchor size and geometry, and anchor material, play a role in the overall strength of the anchor. In addition, technical considerations such as implant orientation, pattern, and location may affect the ultimate success of the repair. 2. Multiple fixation points provide a biomechanically sounder construct in Bankart repair. The size of the glenoid and its rim make anchor size a critical consideration in implant selection and implementation.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.22-29
• /
• 2018

Background: This study is performed to evaluate anchor-related outcomes and complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 30% ${\beta}$-tricalcium phosphate (${\beta}$-TCP) with 70% poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) biocomposite suture anchors. Methods: A total of 78 patients (mean age, $61.3{\pm}6.9years$) who underwent arthroscopic medium-to-large full-thickness rotator cuff tear repair were enrolled. The technique employed 30% ${\beta}$-TCP with 70% PLGA biocomposite suture anchors at the medial row (38 patients, Healix $BR^{TM}$ anchor [Healix group]; 40 patients, Fixone anchor B [Fixone group]). The radiologic outcomes (including perianchor cyst formation or bone substitution) and anatomical outcomes of the healing failure rate were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after surgery, the pain visual analogue scale at 3, 6 months, and final follow-up visit, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores at least 1 year postoperatively. Anchor-related complications were also evaluated. Results: The perianchor cyst formation incidence was similar for both groups (60.5%, Healix group; 60.0%, Fixone group; p=0.967), although severe perianchor cyst incidence was slightly lower in the Fixone group (15.0%) than in the Healix group (21.1%). There was no occurrence of anchor absorption and bone substitution. No differences were observed in the healing failure rate (13.2%, Healix group; 15.0%, Fixone group; p=0.815) and functional outcome between groups (all p>0.05). Anchor breakage occurred in 5 patients (2 Healix anchors and 3 Fixone anchors); however, there were no major anchor-related complications in either group. Conclusions: No differences were observed in the clinical outcomes of the Healix and Fixone groups, neither were there any accompanying major anchor-related complications.

• 대한관절경학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.71-75
• /
• 2013

내측 반월상 연골 뿌리 파열은 외상이나 퇴행성으로 생길 수 있으며, 이로 인해 반월상 연골의 돌출, 관절 연골의 손상, 골극의 생성, 내측 관절 간격의 협소를 유발 할 수 있다. 이는 중년이상의 나이에서 주로 발생하며, 외상을 동반하거나 외상없이 생길 수 있다. 본 저자는 13세 청소년에서 야구 경기 도중 발생한 내측 반월상 연골 후각부 뿌리 파열 1예를 경험하였고, 관절경하에 suture anchor를 이용한 직접적 봉합술을 시행하였기에 이를 보고하고자 한다.

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.135-141
• /
• 2008

목적: 비매듭 금속 봉합 나사못(knotless metal suture anchor)을 이용한 관절경적 방카트(Bankart) 복원술의 임상적 및 방사선학적 결과를 비교하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2001년 2월부터 2005년 1월까지 비매듭 봉합 나사못을 이용하여 관절경적 방카트 복원술을 시행하였고 1년 이상 추시 가능했던 68예를 대상으로 하였다. 술 후 평균 추시 기간은 34개월이었다. 평가는 Rowe score, 관절 운동 범위, 주관적 시각 척도(VAS)에 의한 통증 정도를 측정하였으며 수술 전 후 방사선학적 결과와 비교하였다. 결과: Rowe scoring system에서 술 전 43.3에서 술 후 95.6로 평가되었다. 관절운동범위는 최종 추시시 정상 팔에 비해서 거의 차이는 없었다. 주관적 시각 척도에 의한 통증의 정도는 술 전 3.3에서 술 후 0.5로 측정되었다. 방사성 저음영선은 약 15예에서 관찰되었다. 15예 중 2예에서 재탈구 및 나사못 관절병증으로 재수술을 시행하였고 Odds Ratio상 2.6배의 견관절 불안정성을 호소하였다. 결론: 비매듭 봉합 나사못을 이용한 방카트 복원술은 유용한 방법이나 외래 추시 중 나타나는 나사못 주위의 방사성 저음영선은 불량한 예후를 암시할 수 있기 때문에 주의가 필요하겠다.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.23-30
• /
• 2005

Purpose: This paper analyzes the results of arthroscopic bankart repair for anterior recurrent dislocation following a trauma on shoulder. Material and Methods: The subjects were twenty-three (23) cases that were available to follow up for more than eighteen months during the period from November 2001 to June 2003 and were chosen from patients to whom arthroscopic bankart repair was applied using a knotless suture anchor for their traumatic anterior recurrent dislocation on the shoulder. Their average age was 28 (ranging from 15 to 60) with 20 males and 3 females. The injury from sports activities accounted for the most cases with 14 subjects. The average follow-up period was 27 months (ranging from 18 months to 35 months). There were 19 cases of bankart lesions, 4 cases of ALPSA lesions and associated with 5 cases of partial tear in the rotator cuff. The anchors employed were knotless anchor (Mitek) for all the cases. Rowe scoring scale was adopted to judge the results after operations. Patients' subjective satisfaction and range of motion of external rotation were addressed together. Results: Rowe scores showed that 20 cases (87%) reaches the level of 'good' and hinger. The average patients' satisfaction accounted for 90 points out of 100. It was also found that external rotations averagely decreased by 6.5 degree when the range of motion was in at the side. Conclusion: There were satisfactory results of arthroscopic bankart repair using knotless suture anchors as an operative treatment for traumatic anterior recurrent dislocation on shoulder.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.65-69
• /
• 2004

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short-term clinical outcome of the capsulolabral repair using absorbable suture anchor in traumatic anterior instability of shoulder. Materials and Methods: From June 2000 to September 2001, 15 shoulders with recurrent anterior instability were operated with arthroscopic Bankart repair using absorbable suture-anchor 'PANALOK' (Mitek, westwood, MA), and were followed up over 1 year (average; 13 months). The mean age was 23-years. There were fourteen males and one female. The mean duration from the initial symptoms to the operation was 24 months. Associated pathologies were Hill-Sachs defect in 12 cases, SLAP in 6 cases, and partial rotator cuff tear in 2 cases. The results were evaluated by patien's satisfaction, Modified Rowe Score in regard to joint stability, mobility, pain and function in comparison with the preoperative ones, and other complications. Results: At the last follow-up, the total Rowe Score increased from 38 points to 92 points. There were no recurrence and 14 patients among 15 patients gained pre-operative level of sports activity and no other complications. Conclusion: Effective capsulolabral repair could be obtained by the absorbable anchoring without any untoward complications. This procedure is simple and safe one and this system can be a good substitute for the metallic anchor.