• 만화애니메이션 연구
• /
• 통권22호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2011

한국의 입시에 관한 첨예한 문제제기는 어제 오늘의 일은 아니다. 만화 관련 학과에서도 예외가 없다. 창의성 부재와 패턴화, 각 학교별 자율적 실기고사 유형에 따른 문제점, 평가의 문제점이 지적되는데, 이에 대한 대안으로 실기시간의 확충, 창의성 평가를 위한 별도의 실기도입, 그리고 창의성 평가를 공교육이 장기간에 걸쳐 전담해 주는 방식 등이 거론된다. 따라서 가장 중요한 전제는 대학은 학생들에게 대학에서 가르치고자 하는 것이 무엇인가에 대한 설정이 우선되어야 하며, 무엇을 가르칠 것이기 때문에 어떠한 능력을 가진 학생이 선발되도록 입시의 문제가 출제 되어야 한다. 진학 후에도 지속적인 모니터링이 필요하며 예상과 다르게 나타날 경우 평가의 기준을 다시 살펴 볼 수 있어야 한다. 이처럼 대학에 많은 것이 요구 되는 것은 학생선발의 주체가 대학이기 때문에 학생들에게 갖추어야할 능력을 요구하는 것도 대학이고 이를 평가하는 것도 대학이기 때문이며, 이러한 선발과정을 거쳐 좋은 인재를 확보하고 교육을 통해 성장시켜야만 본연의 목적을 달성할 수 있기 때문이다.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.167-175
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The present study aimed to develop and examine the effectiveness of a pediatric nursing competency-building program for nursing students. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study with a nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design conducted between October and December 2021. The participants included 40 nursing students (20 each in the experimental and control groups) at a university in a South Korean city. The pediatric nursing competency-building program integrated problem-based learning and simulation into clinical field practice. The experimental group participated in the program, while the control group did not. Data were analyzed using the 𝑥² test, the independent t-test, and repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Pediatric nursing competency and clinical performance showed a greater increase in the experimental group than in the control group. However, the change in problem-solving ability in the experimental group was not significantly different from that in the control group. Conclusion: The pediatric nursing competency-building program effectively improved students' pediatric nursing competency and clinical performance.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.120-124
• /
• 2013

The clinical clerkship focuses students on developing their ability to perform comprehensive diagnosis and management of patients with common undifferentiated problems by the integration of knowledge and clinical reasoning. Therefore, the clerkship evaluation system should assess their actual problem solving and professional behavior. However, concern remains that clerkship evaluations are imprecise and highly variable. This review is designed to provide faculty members with concepts, options, and a methodology to actively teach and evaluate the clinical clerkship, as well as offer encouragement and inspiration to medical students. We reviewed past and current clinical clerkship evaluations and discuss several tips to improve clinical excellence such as continuity, transparency of the evaluation process, a faculty development program, practical examination of clinical skills, implementation of a checklist for recording exposure and skills, providing prompt and constructive feedback to students, self-evaluation of professional performance, varying multi-faceted assessment combinations, being outpatient clinic-centered, and having dedicated faculty members who give students one-on-one contact with a preceptor.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.83-91
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the validity of a modified clinical performance examination (CPX) for preclinical students in nursing. Method: 70 nursing students in their second semester of the junior year at C University participated in CPX. Scenarios and checklists were developed by our research team from September to October 2005. Six stations were organized. Evaluation included physical examination of a patient with lung cancer, education on usage of a metered dosage inhaler, and lobectomy postoperative care. Students were randomly assigned to a station. Result: There was a difference in the CPX scores according to stations. The agreement of scoring between trained faculty members and SPs was more than moderate (r=.647). The correlation between the CPX score and the average grade in the previous semester and between the CPX score and the average grade of a paper and pen test of the pulmonary system of adults was low (r=.276; r=.048). Conclusion: Traditional CPX is generally recommended, however, modified CPX is appropriate for preclinical students in the current Korean Nursing school setting if there are additional scoring systems to balance the testing level at each station.

• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.86-98
• /
• 2021

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the impact of patient-physician communication curriculum on students of Korean medical school in terms of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor level of communication skills. Methods: A communication curriculum was developed considering COVID-19 pandemic situation. Lectures, peer role-play, open interview with standardized patient (SP), discussion and feedback were conducted by online, and face-to-face 1:1 SP-interview was performed. Scores of written test, peer role-play of medical communication, SP-interview, self-evaluation on one's interview with real patients in clinical clerkship, and questionnaire of importance were collected and analyzed. Results: Converted to 100 point scale, the mean score of written test (cognitive level) was 91.2 while that of importance questionnaire (affective level) was 77.5. The mean scores of psychomotor level were 72.5, 77.5, and 62.5 for peer role-play, SP-interview, and real patient interview in clerkship, respectively. Conclusions: Students' performance is lower in higher level of competence. Curriculums should provide more opportunities of practices to students, and include evaluation focusing on performance skills.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.344-351
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The aim of this study was to testify whether clinical performance examination (CPX) was useful to evaluate comprehensive performance for nursing students just prior to graduation. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to examine the usefulness. A total of 61 nursing students whose requirement credits were completed for graduation from a C University in G-city, at December, 5, 2007. Data were analyzed by Pearson's Correlation Coefficient and Spearman's rank Correlation Coefficient. Results: This study showed that both of the finals scores with paper and pens and the clinical practicum scores were not correlated with the CPX scores (r=-.031, p=.811; r=.028, p=.831). Consistency of scores between faculties and standardized patients was moderate (r=.752, p=.000). Conclusion: CPX was considered as a different and innovative evaluation from previous testing systems to test the various aspects of performance including knowledge, skill and attitude. Therefore, CPX under high raters' consistency was useful to test nursing students's final performance. Further study would be needed to develop the standard of CPX system.

• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 2016

University dorm basically provides basic housing functions to students, however, it is very important in a sense that it provides students with various functions such as information exchange, cultural experience and learning environments as well. Additionally, continuous effort to improve users' satisfaction and living environments are needed due to the fact that physical environments of dorm facilities have higher impact on students. However, Many students are not satisfied with the physical environment of university dorms and also there is lack of systematic information whereas various functions are required by students. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to suggest the direction of FM services in order for improving students' satisfaction on the university dorm facilities in Korea. Precedent studies regarding the satisfaction or performance evaluation of dorm facilities have been extensively analyzed to extract the dissatisfaction factors that scored below the middle 50%. Secondly, for satisfaction improvement, Korean Standard for Facility Management(KS_FM) have been matched with those extracted dissatisfaction factors to suggest the direction of FM services by rules and regulations review and best practice studies. This research will be useful for university dorm facility managers in planning strategic FM and providing effective FM services to students.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.137-148
• /
• 2023

Purpose: We developed a virtual reality (VR) program for use in pediatric nursing practicums to help nursing students learn to measure vital signs in children. Methods: The analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation model was employed between July 2021 and December 2021 at a university in South Korea. In the analysis phase, in-depth interviews were conducted with four nursing students, two nursing school graduates, and four experts. The topic and contents of the VR program were settled in the design phase. The VR program was developed and subsequently used and evaluated by 20 nursing students and four experts. Results: The contents of the VR program for pediatric nursing practicums included the measurement of vital signs in a newborn baby and a young child, as well as an evaluation system. The mean score for the nursing students' satisfaction with practice was 4.02 out of 5 points. The mean scores for overall satisfaction with the VR program were 4.15 and 4.79 out of 5 points for nursing students and experts, respectively. Conclusion: The VR program developed in this study allows nursing students to practice measuring vital signs in children, thus improving the students' clinical performance in pediatric nursing.

• 실천공학교육논문지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2014

한국기술교육대학교(이하 한기대)는 학부교육과 전일제 근무를 병행하는 기업 연계형 장기실습제도(IPP)를 마련하여 2012년 8월부터 12월까지 시범사업을 운영하였고, 2013년 봄부터 본 사업을 추진하였다. 또한 IPP 프로그램의 실효성을 평가하고 프로그램 운영체계 및 과정에 대한 개선방안을 찾기 위해 Kirkpatrick의 4단계 평가모형에 기반 하여 IPP 성과평가모형을 개발하였다. 본 연구는 IPP 성과평가모형을 2013년 본 사업에 적용하여 참여학생들을 대상으로 기업체 파견 전과 후에 실시한 설문조사 결과를 분석하여 IPP 프로그램의 효과성을 평가하고, 향후 평가체계의 개선방향을 모색하고자 하였다. 설문조사 분석결과에 따르면, IPP 프로그램이 학생들의 비전공역량과 직업에 대한 태도를 개선하는데 어느 정도 효과적이었고, 학생들의 기업체 및 업무에 대한 만족도가 매우 높았던 반면, 전공역량과 IPP에 대한 인식 측면에서는 의미 있는 향상이 발견되지 않았다. 이러한 분석결과에 기반 하여 한기대 IPP 프로그램의 개선방향을 제시하였다.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.574-584
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a simulation based clinical reasoning practice program on clinical competence in nursing students. The program was based on the theoretical frameworks of simulation models and experiential learning theory. Methods: The program consisted of eight scenarios which includes three main symptoms (abdominal pain, changes in mental status, dyspnea), for improvement of clinical competencies in nursing students. A nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used for evaluation of the effects of the program. Fifty-two junior nursing students in Y University participated in the experimental group (n=25) or control group (n=27). Critical thinking was measured using a self-administered questionnaire. Clinical judgment and clinical performance were measured by a rater using the Rubric. Descriptive analysis, t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for data analyses. Results: Clinical judgment and clinical performance increased in the experimental group, but there were no significant differences in critical thinking. Conclusion: Results indicate that the program developed in this study is a useful strategy to enhance clinical judgment and clinical performance in nursing students. However, the program did not significantly enhance critical thinking disposition, and further study is needed to measure integrated clinical competence including critical thinking skills.