• 제목/요약/키워드: Right Not to Know

검색결과 160건 처리시간 0.03초

환자의 모를 권리와 의사의 배려의무 (Patient's 'Right Not to Know' and Physician's 'Duty to Consideration')

  • 석희태
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제17권2호
    • /
    • pp.145-173
    • /
    • 2016
  • 우리나라에서 전통적으로 환자의 자기결정권 내지 자율권은, 의사의 보고성 설명의무에 대응하는 알 권리 그리고 의사의 기여적 설명의무에 대응하는 수진 동의권 및 수진 거절권, 양자를 '중심'으로 해서 논의되어 왔다. 환자의 자율적 결정의 내용으로서 형성 피력되는, 자기 신체 및 의료 상황에 대해 알고 싶지 않은 희망과 그로 인한 이익에 관한 지위- 도덕적 법적 지위 - 는 환자로부터의 알 권리와 동의권의 포기 또는 (의사가 부담하는) 설명의무의 면제라는 소극적 지위 차원에서 인식되었다. 그리고 설명 동의 원칙 도그마의 적용에 의한 역기능 문제는 설명 동의 원칙의 적용 배제 및 그에 따른 의사의 책임 부인이라는 역시 소극적 접근법에 의해 '주로' 인식되었다. 즉 환자의 그러한 알고 싶지 않다는 '무지(無知)의 희망'을 실현시켜 줄 법적 수단이 환자의 '모를 권리' 및 의사의 '부작위 배려의무'라는 '적극적 지위'로 이해되고 인정되지 않았던 것이다. 이러한 당사자의 적극적 지위 설정이 전제되지 않으면 실제상 및 이론상 문제가 제기된다. 환자가 동의권을 포기한다고 선언하거나 의사의 설명의무를 면제한다고 표명했음에도 불구하고, 의사가 굳이 환자를 상대로 설명 내지 보고를 행하여 환자에게 큰 손해가 발생한 경우에, 의사의 그 행위를 규범적으로 어떻게 평가할 것인가가 문제인 것이다. 한편 의사가 설명의 역기능을 우려하여 설명을 행하지 않았고, 그 행태에 대해 적절한 것이란 평가가 가능한 경우에, 그 재량적 불설명의 적법성을 인정할 직접적 근거가 무엇인지를 밝히는 것 또한 문제이다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 근본적으로 환자에게 '모를 권리'라는 지위를, 의사에게 '배려의무'라는 지위를 인정할 필요가 있다. 요컨대 이 권리와 의무 개념은 환자의 자율성 관념의 충실화와 설명역기능 현상의 적정한 방지라는 법규범적 요구를 충족시키는 데에 매우 유용한 도구로서 수용할 수 있다.

  • PDF

노동자의 산업보건정보에 대한 알 권리의 비교법적 고찰 (A Comparative Study on the Right to Know Industrial Health Information among Workers)

  • 정진우
    • 한국산업보건학회지
    • /
    • 제32권2호
    • /
    • pp.89-101
    • /
    • 2022
  • Objectives: By comparing and examining how important issues concerning industrial health information for workers are viewed in other advanced countries, it is intended to ascertain problems in the approach found in Korean legislation and obtain legal and policy implications. Methods: The results of a survey were introduced and analyzed through a comparative method for each case after investigating in detail what and how important issues surrounding workers' right to know industrial health information are reflected in the legislation of Germany, the U.S., the U.K., and Japan. Based on the results of this comparative analysis, theoretical and policy implications and legal policy improvement tasks were drawn to strengthen workers' right to industrial health information for each case in Korea. Results: For access to industrial health information, most of the other advanced countries clearly stipulate a right to access for current and past workers and/or their representatives. As a result, workers or their representatives do not need to use the Information Disclosure Act to access exposure records, and there is no debate over the Information Disclosure Act. In other words, industrial health information is focused on ensuring free access to workers or their representatives and is not interested in reporting it to the government. Conclusions: In order to strengthen workers' right to know about industrial health, it is most important to address the legal issues related to this right, which is considered insufficient by comparative law. This should start with a concrete and effective definition of what and how to guarantee workers' rights to industrial health, such as the right to freely access industrial health information, including for retired workers and bereaved families of deceased workers.

기록정보공개 제도 개선 추진 현황과 방안 (The Promotion State and Measures to Improve the Record Information Disclosure System)

  • 조영삼
    • 기록학연구
    • /
    • 제22호
    • /
    • pp.77-114
    • /
    • 2009
  • 알권리(right to know)는 법 제도를 만들거나 개선하는 것만으로는 충족될 수 없다. 알권리는 제도보다 문화의 문제이기 때문이다. 그럼에도 불구하고 지속적인 제도개선요구가 필요하다. 알권리와 관련해서는 여러 법령이 있을 것이다. 특히 정보공개법, 공공기록관리법, 대통령기록관리법 등이 핵심이라고 할 수 있다. 공공기록관리와 대통령기록관리와 관련한 제도가 알권리가 깊은 관련이 있다는 것은 2004년 이후 기록관리혁신을 추진하면서 공유되었고, 그 결과 '국가기록관리혁신로드맵'이 채택되었다. 또, 2007년 '참여정부'의 '취재지원시스템선진화방안' 발표 이후 정부와 언론단체 등이 참여하여 구성한 '정보공개제도개선T/F'의 다수 의견이 반영된 정보공개법 개정안에는 그동안 제기된 문제들에 대한 제도 개선안을 마련하였다. 이런 개선방안이 제도를 개선하는 데에는 이르지 못하였다. 이 글에서는 그동안 제기되었으나 논의에 반영되지 않은 것들을 중심으로 몇 가지 제도 개선 사항을 제안하였다. 정보 비공개의 개념을 공개유예의 개념으로 전환, 정보공개기준을 구체적으로 비치하고 공개, 비공개대상 개인정보의 구체화, 내부검토를 이유로 비공개하는 정보의 구체화와 엄밀한 적용, 사유없는 속기록의 비공개 조항삭제, 비공개 상한 기한 설정 등이 그것이다. 그동안의 제도 개선 추진의 가장 큰 성과는 알권리가 정보공개제도에 한정하는 것이 아니고 기록관리라는 '원인'이 체계적 과학적이어야 한다는 것을 인식하게 된 것이다. 이것은 알권리가 내부고발과 같은 우연적 요소가 아닌 기록의 생산, 유통, 보존, 활용의 체계화라는 필연적 요소로 확보됨을 공유하게 되었다는 것이다. 기록정보의 공개와 관련해서는 더 많은 연구가 필요하다. 특히 국가기록원 등 영구기록관리기관에서의 기록 열람 문제, 그 과정에서 발생하는 저작권 문제 등 여전히 해결해야 할 난제들에 대해 학계와 해당 기관의 지속적인 연구가 필요하다.

한국의 속담에 표현된 복식양상 연구 (A Study on a Phase of Clothing in Korean Proverb)

  • 김재임;박춘순
    • 복식
    • /
    • 제54권4호
    • /
    • pp.85-95
    • /
    • 2004
  • The Purpose of this study was to find a phase of clothing in Korean proverb. The results of the analysis of this research was as follows: In the case of headgear, was expose that symbolize handsomeness, conduct of life, personality that display charm and position which is not usage as only head protection. Upper wear was expressing aspect and person's similarity, and was symbolizing conduct of life by meaning of dress and its ornaments according to a person that dress displays that change. Trousers(bottom wear) was expose that it means aspect or conduct of life(a 4 case, 40%) through site. Overcoat showed that overcoat that is clothes that is symbolizing wearer's situation, aspect and wear most on face because is involved with behavior that is not right in clothes usage is used by standard that foretell personality. Underwear can know that expressed being involved with right behavior, nature by the basic clothes. I was able to know that I express an attitude of a life or a form through shoe, and the accessories won an minor order but that I have a large influence on a character or the appearance of a person. Silk fabrics expresses Position, and hemp cloth expressed by symbol that display ability. Also, silk fabrics had meaning that hint person's background. Dress and its ornaments that is used in proverb by these result can know that have function as symbolic symbol that display Person's nature or situation, aspect that is wearing clothes that is not function as only simple clothes.

물질안전보건자료 및 표시 제도의 개선 방향 제안 - 미국 유해정보소통기준(HCS)의 비판적 고찰에 기초하여 (How to improve the reliability of MSDS and labels?: A critical review on the U.S. Standard 29 CFR Part 1910 Hazard Communication)

  • 김신범;이윤근;최영은
    • 한국산업보건학회지
    • /
    • 제25권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-12
    • /
    • 2015
  • Objectives: The major objectives of this study are to review the U.S. Standard which affected Korean worker's Right-to-Know Standard and to propose the way of improving the reliability of MSDS and labels. Methods: To review the U.S. Standard historically, we used the Federal Register, other criteria documentation and peer-reviewed literatures. Then we analysed major issues in the historical debatement on the worker's Right-to-Know Standard. Results: Korean MSDS Standard benchmarked the U.S. Hazard Communication Standard which finally established by President Reagan in 1983. Reagan's Hazard Communication Standard was aimed to preempt States Right-to-Know Acts for chemical industry and not to improve the awareness of workers on chemical hazards. Too much protection on trade secrets and low reliability of hazard information were key problems of the U.S. Standard. Conclusions: We recommend some ways to improve Korean MSDS and Label Standard. First, A new analysis frame is needed to understand the U.S Standard. Second, hazard identification is the key element of reliable information and chemical name and CAS number should be on the label of the container. Third, trade secrets should be limited to low hazardous substances and be permitted by government before the chemical product is on the market.

정부간행물의 출판현황과 도서관의 정부간행물 운영실태분석 (An empirical analysis on the present situation of government publications and the operation of the publications in library)

  • 강미혜
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제23권
    • /
    • pp.79-108
    • /
    • 1995
  • Government Publications are published to keep records of governmental activities and performances. In a rapidly changing information-oriented society, it is badly required for the operation system of government publications and a library to be effectively managed with government publications for satisfying 'right to know' of people and improving the obligation of government to 'let people know.' Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to analyze such five research items as the situation of the publication and distribution of, government publications, the operation system of the publications in library, the number of publications regarding secondary information sources for the publications, and the legal deposit of the publications in the National Library, in order to proceed with a subject as to how much the government publication is satisfying 'right to know' of people. The research findings were suggested as follow : 1) Despite the fact that the publication of government publications has been gradually increased every year in numbers and kinds, it is unfortunately pointed out that the publications, distributions and sellings of them were not well organized and systematic. That is, the government publications had not been published more than 1.47% of all publications in number. Moreover, more than the half of the publications were non-periodically or annually published. To make the matter worse, it was not easy to get an access to the publications because of the publications not to be sold. 2) It a n.0, ppears that people could not use the publications efficiently because the library and administrative document office did not pay sufficient attention to public relations for all sorts of government publications. Not only that, there were not enough numbers of publications regarding such secondary information sources as bibliography, index and catalog. A speedy searching capacity for the information gave rise to another serious problem which the government publications could not be effectively used. 3) It is legally stated that all sorts of government publication should be deposited to the National Libraries. However, the law was not properly put into force because of lack of understanding of government agencies about the law.

  • PDF

목적인지를 반영한 협업 분류 모델 제안 (Proposing Collaboration Classification Model considering Collaboration Purpose Recognition)

  • 주정은;구상회
    • 디지털산업정보학회논문지
    • /
    • 제10권2호
    • /
    • pp.203-211
    • /
    • 2014
  • In recent highly competitive business environment, collaboration has become one of the important business strategies for companies to survive and/or prosper. There are many different types of collaboration strategies, and it is crucial for companies to select the right ones according to the types of collaboration they require. To select the right type of collaboration options for business, in the past research, there have been two important criteria to classify collaboration types, namely governance (who makes key decisions - one kingpin participant or all players?) and membership (can anyone participate, or just select players?). In this research, we add a new classification criterion, recognition of collaboration purpose, which means whether collaborators know or do not know the purpose of collaboration in advance. Recently, we see many cases in which social media data are used in many unknown purposes a priori. In this research, we add such cases to develop new classification model.

피타고라스의 세 수 (On the Pythagorean triple)

  • 박웅배;박혜숙
    • 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
    • /
    • 제41권2호
    • /
    • pp.227-231
    • /
    • 2002
  • The Pythagorean theorem and Pythagorean triple are well known. We know some Pythagorean triples, however we don't Cow well that every natural number can belong to some Pythagorean triple. In this paper, we show that every natural number, which is not less than 2, can be a length of a leg(a side opposite the acute angle in a right triangle) in some right triangle, and list some Pythagorean triples.

  • PDF

선택진료제를 위반한 의료행위의 민사책임에 관한 고찰 (A Study on Civil Liability as to Medical Practices Against the Premium Medical Treatment System)

  • 백경희;장연화;이인재;박도현
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.227-251
    • /
    • 2014
  • In current law, the premium medical treatment system gives patients the right of choice between normal medical treatment service and premium medical treatment service. Only the doctors having a career more than a certain period of time fixed in the law are eligible for providing the premium medical treatment service. So, the premium medical treatment system is highly related to the patients' right to know and the right of self-determination. The system is also relevant to the so-called 'economic explanation' notion because patients should pay additional fee when they want to use this system. Meanwhile, the situation as follows is problematic as to this system. Although a patient applied for using the premium medical treatment system and the patient also chose his or her own doctor specifically, another doctor who was not selected as premium doctor could make a medical accident. Then, is the another doctor liable for damages because the accident was a medical malpractice or a breach of medical contract? In this study, we are going to examine the problems related with the premium medical treatment system. First, we examine the current law related to the system. Second, we look into the economic explanation duty and its application to the premium medical treatment system. Finally, we examine a real judgment case about a medical practice against the premium medical treatment system and we propose our solution to this case.

  • PDF

환자의 소비자로서 권리 (The Rights of Patients as Consumers)

  • 권용진;손상식;임영덕
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제22권3호
    • /
    • pp.315-346
    • /
    • 2012
  • The legal relationship between patient and physician is legally equal relationship. But, in times past, patients be compelled to sign an unequal contract, substantially. Because of the imbalance between supply and demand in the health care market. Today, the law of supply and demand in the health care market is running well. And as the cognition of citizens' rights grows, the relationship between patient and physician can also get a lot of changes. Patients have the right to know the information about medical care, and to decide whether or not to get treatment including invasions against their own bodies. In other words, Doctors have an obligation to explain to their patients. If doctors did not provide patients sufficient explanation or information, it violates the right of patients. This is a tort, or a breach of contract. To improve the remedy for violation of patient's right, patient is able to be protected by status as consumer. If patient is a kind of consumer in terms of medical consumption, he/she as consumer can enjoy supplementally the consumer's right. The patient as a consumer can exercise now a consumer's right as a constitutional right. In addition, with respect to consumer's rights, Framework Act on Consumers was enacted. This Act is based on constitutional provisions of Article 124 and the Act can be seen as a law that embodies consumer right because the provision of the constitutional law delegates specific contents. In the health care field, patients need to win recognition the statue of the consumer to hold the sovereignty of the consumer. In particular, if patients are consumers, they may be able to make good use of the quickly and efficiently collective dispute resolution and association lawsuit to rescue their damage, the Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR) of Framework Act on Consumers.