• Journal of Technologic Dentistry
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.17-21
• /
• 2015

Purpose: In this study, Spreadability of denture adhesive in accordance with the saturation level of saliva, respectively, by using the resin plate and the glass was measured thickness and Spreadability. Methods: Examine the spreadability of denture adhesive in accordance with the saturation level of saliva, respectively, by using the resin plate and the glass was measured thickness and Spreadability. Also, by measuring the adhesive strength according to the amount of saliva, and the edentulous patients using denture adhesive and dry mouth patients attempt to provide clinical information of the denture adhesive. Therefore, by using the relatively low shrinkage cold curing resin, after fabricating specimen of plate form, for 7 days, it was immersed in water. Results: For the control group only denture adhesive, an artificial saliva for the experimental group were injected in $0.1m{\ell}$, $0.2m{\ell}$ and $0.3m{\ell}$ of the denture adhesive on the surface, experimental results of the investigation of the 10 times the tensile bond strength of the specimens in each group was obtained the following results. Conclusion: As the time to pressure increase in the same amount of saliva was found that the amount coming out of the denture adhesive, as the amount of saliva in the same pressure increase coming out of many denture adhesives. And the greater the pressure came out a lot of denture adhesives. Spreadability in measuring saliva contact with $0.1m{\ell}$ and $2m{\ell}$ and $3m{\ell}$ group pressured the diameter of the circular was the denture adhesive is small when compared to the group without adding the pressure of 2kg and 3kg put the saliva. The size of the circle is the same amount of saliva denture adhesive spread more pressure showed a greater increase.

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 1998.04b
• /
• pp.627-632
• /
• 1998

This study deals with the effect on adhesive strength properties of waterproofing and reinforcing layer and mortar or concrete substrate applicated by epoxy resin anticorrosive and bonding materials. Properties of adhesive strength change condition of concrete substrate, temperature, moisture, curing and cleaning and so on. The purpose of this study is that it makes the estimation value of bond strength of concrete wall and epoxy resin layer when coated epoxy resin as anticorrosive materials for durability performance estimation depend on concrete watertightness, and when penetrated epoxy resin for the reinforcement of concrete used the carbon fiber sheet.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2020.11a
• /
• pp.163-164
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shrinkage properties of a tile reinforced with epoxy resin, which has the advantages of high adhesion and low shrinkage, and causes a hardening reaction by chemical bonding with cement mortar. As a result, since the epoxy resin adhesive suppresses the moisture evaporation of the mortar, the drying shrinkage of the mortar itself is reduced, accordingly, the shrinkage of the tile itself is greatly reduced, and it is thought that it is possible to prevent a decrease in adhesion due to shear stress.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• v.9 no.6
• /
• pp.439-446
• /
• 2017

PURPOSE. To evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement by four point bending test. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The CAD/CAM materials under investigation were e.max CAD, Mark II, Lava Ultimate, and Enamic. A total of 400 bar specimens ($4{\times}1.2{\times}12mm$) (n=10) milled from the CAD/CAM blocks underwent various pretreatments (no pretreatment (C), hydrofluoric acid (A), hydrofluoric acid + universal adhesive (Scotchbond) (AS), sandblasting (Sb), and sandblasting + universal adhesive (SbS)). The bars were luted end-to-end on the prepared surfaces with a dual curing adhesive resin cement (Variolink N, Ivoclar Vivadent) on the custom-made stainless steel mold. Ten test specimens for each treatment and material combination were performed with four point bending test method. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS. The surface treatment and type of CAD/CAM restorative material showed a significant effect on the four point bending strength (FPBS) (P<.001). For LDC, AS surface treatment showed the highest FPBS results ($100.31{\pm}10.7MPa$) and the lowest values were obtained in RNC ($23.63{\pm}9.0MPa$) for control group. SEM analyses showed that the surface topography of CAD/CAM restorative materials was modified after treatments. CONCLUSION. The surface treatment of sandblasting or HF acid etching in combination with a universal adhesive containing MDP can be suggested for the adhesive cementation of the novel CAD/CAM restorative materials.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.143-152
• /
• 2003

The aims of the present study was to observe resin tag of the resin/enamel, dentin interface produced by self-etching adhesive systems and evaluate effect of additional acid etching on resin tag formation. Three self-etching primer(SE bond, AQ bond and L Pop) and an one bottle adhesive(Single bond) were used. Flat occlusal enamel and dentin disks were obtained from extracted human molars. A total of 20 surfaces were collected and divided into four groups of 5 samples. One-half of each specimen in each group was etched with 35% phosphoric acid prior to the application of each adhesive system, with the second half being kept unetched. Subsequently, resin composite was placed and polymerized. The samples were sliced and immersed into HCl and NaOCl solutions, followed by drying and sputter coating for examination with a SEM. The results were as follows; 1. Additional etching side of dentin displayed longer and thicker resin tag than unetched side in all self-etching adhesive groups. 2. In enamel, additional etching side displayed deeper and more distinct etching pattern than unetched side except L Pop. There is no difference between etched and unetched enamel in L Pop. The results obtained suggest the self-etching adhesive did not etch enamel and penetrate into dentinal tubule as deeply as did additional etching. Further research should include the evaluation of the relationship of boding strength, microleakage and resin tag morphology.

• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.30 no.4
• /
• pp.593-599
• /
• 2003

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the microleakage of class V composite resin restorations utilizing the different curing lights, to assess the flowable resin, $Filtek^{TM}Flow$(3M Dental Products, USA) and composite resin, $Filtek^{TM}Z250$(3M Dental Products, USA) which need 20s curing time for halogen light could replace $Z100^{TM}$ Restorative(3M Dental Products, USA) for the microleakage, and to evaluate the effect of adhesive resin on marginal microleakage. Light curing units used in this study were conventional halogen light, XL3000(3M Dental Products, USA) and plasma arc light, Flipo(Lokki, France). Class V cavities were prepared and each cavity was filled with each composite resin. After being filled, the teeth were stored in distilled water, polished, thermocycled and soaked in 1% methylene blue solution. Following results were obtained from evaluation of the sectioned surface. 1. There was no statistically significant difference in microleakage of $Filtek^{TM}Flow$ and $Filk^{TM}Z250$ between two kinds of curing units(p>0.05). 2. Flowable resin, $Filtek^{TM}Flow$ showed more microleakage than Z100 and $Filtek^{TM}Z250$ regardless of curing units(p<0.05). 3. Adhesive resin reduced the microleakage of composite resin in both halogen light and plasma arc light(p<0.05).

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.175-176
• /
• 2010

• Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
• /
• v.96 no.1
• /
• pp.54-57
• /
• 2007

Urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin was formulated similarly to plywood resin in the laboratory. The synthesized UF resin adhesive was mixed with extender, filler and acid catalyst. The mixture contained 56.1% total solids and 43.9% water. The mixes was used to bond five Com-Ply types using Korean wood species. The Com-Ply made were tested for shear strength and wood failure according to KS F 3101 ordinary plywood as well as for bending strength per KS F 3104 particleboard. The performance test results showed good strength properties for all Com-Ply types made in this study. This result represented that the UF resin adhesive mix was adequate for bonding Com-Ply with domestic wood species.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 1987

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of dentin bonding agents on marginal leakage. V-shaped cavities were prepared on the faciocervical area of 140 extracted human teeth. In Groups of twenty cavities, they were restored as follow: Group 1 with enamel bonding resin and Silux, Group 2 Scotchbond and Silux, Group 3 enamel bonding resin and Heliomolar, Group 4 Dentin Adhesit and Heliomolar, Group 5 enamel bonding resin and Durafill, Group 6 Dentin Adhesive and Durafill, Group 7 Chembond. All specimens were thermocycled alternatively at $4^{\circ}C$ and $60^{\circ}C$ of 2% methylene blue dye solution, and sectioned faciolingually with diamond disk under water spray. The sectioned specimens observed with stereo microscope. Following results were obtained: 1. The groups filled with Scotchbond-Silux or Dentin Adhesit-Heliomolar had appeared lesser marginal leakage compared with the groups with enamel bonding resin-Silux or enamel bonding resin-Helimolar. 2. The group filled with Dentin Adhesive-Durafill did not show the reduction of the marginal leakage compared with the group with enamel bonding resin-Durafill. 3. There was significant difference among the four dentin bonding agents. Scotchbond showed the greatest marginal sealing ability, and Dentin Adhesit was the next. The marginal sealing ability of Dentin Adhesive was the worst.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.113-119
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strength of several self-adhesive resin cements bonded to dentin surfaces with different wet conditions. Three self-adhesive resin cements: Rely-X Unicem (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN. USA). Embrace Wetbond (Pulpdent. Oakland. MA. USA). Maxcem (Kerr. Orange. CA. USA) were used. Extracted sixty human molars were used. Each self-adhesive resin cement was adhered to the dentin specimens (two rectangular sticks from each molar) in different wet conditions. Tensile bond strength were measured using universal testing machine (EZ Test. Shimadzu corporation. Kyoto. Japan) at a crosshead speed of 1.0mm/min. After the testing. bonding failures of specimens were observed by Operative microscope (OPMI pro, Carl Zeiss. Oberkochen, Germany). T-test was used to evaluate the effect of dentin surface wetness. One-way ANOVA test was used to evaluate the tensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements in the same condition. Scheffe's test was used for statistical analyzing at the 95% level of confidence. The result showed that wetness of dentin surface didn't affect tensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements and Maxcem showed the lowest tensile bond strength.