• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.25-39
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to develop a letter type rubric as a learning method for elementary school students to learn science writing easily and efficiently. For this study, five topics in science textbooks were chosen and modified in everyday life situation. The rubric evaluation criteria were composed of four steps. Two classes of 4th grade of an elementary school in Seoul were selected for applying the developed rubric. The experimental group consisted of 25 students and control group consisted of 28 students. The letter type rubric was treated to experimental group. The results showed that there was a significant difference between two groups in the science writing ability after application. From the survey results, we could conclude that the rubric helps elementary school students to develop the science writing ability and confidence in writing.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.263-280
• /
• 2016

본 연구에서는 Mason 외(2010)가 제시한 루브릭(RUBRIC) 쓰기를 교수-학습에 적용하였을때 학생들의 수학적 모델링을 분석함으로써 새로운 교수-학습 및 평가 방안으로서의 루브릭 쓰기의 가능성을 탐구해 보고자 한다. 고등학교 1학년 23명의 학생을 루브릭 쓰기를 실시한 그룹과 그렇지 않은 그룹으로 나누어 10회에 걸쳐 18문항을 해결하도록 하였고 이 중 수학적 모델링과 관련된 7문항에 대한 학생 답안을 분석하였다. 그 결과 루브릭 쓰기를 사용한 학생들이 그렇지 않은 학생들에 비해 문항의 정답률이 높았을 뿐 아니라 질적으로도 보다 더 다양한 표현과 모델을 사용하고 실재와 수학간의 원활한 번역과 해석을 할 수 있는 등 수학적 모델링 과정에 차이를 보였다. 더 나아가 학생들의 문제해결과 수학적 사고의 확장으로도 나타남을 알 수 있어 본 연구 결과는 루브릭 쓰기가 효과적인 교수-학습 및 평가 방안이 될 수 있음을 시사하고 있다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.147-166
• /
• 2006

This study investigates the effect of misplacement in a written Computer-delivered ESL Placement Test (CEPT) context. The study aims to address the following two research questions: a) which scoring rubric features cause the misplacement of ESL learner's writing scores? and b) which scoring rubric features improve ESL learner's writing scores? Thirty-four international examinees took the test and participated in surveys at the University of Illinois. Twelve examinees of them attended the CEPT workshop test. In the workshop test, they carried out self-evaluation on their first essays using a scoring rubric and compared with expert raters' results. After the workshop, the examinees responded to a survey and interview. For the first research question, the results of the survey and interview addressed that the majority disagreed with the raters' rating results. The self-evaluation results also indicated that their misunderstanding of organization feature caused the misplacement. For the second question, the CEPT workshop scores were improved due to the score improvement in the organization feature while the contribution of other features to the total scores was little. Most of the examinees pointed out that a lesson on the scoring rubric enhanced their understanding of the writing features of the rubric so that their placement scores were generally improved.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.163-197
• /
• 2018

The present study suggests ways to improve the Korean proficiency screening test through an analysis of WIDA tests. A review of WIDA Screener, WIDA MODEL, and W-APT reveals that each of these three tests consists of four or five tests, corresponding to grade-level clusters. In addition, the WIDA screening tests assess both English for social communication and academic English, according to WIDA's five English Language Development (ELD) standards. Thematic folders of the ELD standards have different ranges of item difficulty, and the WIDA screening tests are adaptive tests. Lastly, the writing tests consist of performance-based tasks, and the rubric is holistic. As suggestions for improvement for Korean screening tests of the KSL curriculum, this study proposes (a) to devise items to assess academic Korean, so as to evaluate students' overall proficiency more accurately, (b) to utilize an adaptive method to screen students' proficiency more efficiently, and (c) to revise the writing tasks and rubric of the current KSL screening tests.

• 인지과학
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.175-197
• /
• 2019

고차적 사고를 요구하는 글쓰기는 배운 지식을 활용하고 발전시키게 한다. 학습 장면에서 글쓰기를 더 많이 활용하기 위해서는 동료평가를 도입하는 동시에 동료평가의 정확도를 높일 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 동료평가의 정확도를 높이는 방안으로, 평가 기준에 대해 학생들끼리 토론하게 하거나 전문가의 평가를 참고하도록 하는 두 방안을 탐색하였다. 대학생 150명을 대상으로 한 실험 결과, 동료평가 후 전문가의 평가를 참고했던 집단이 평가했던 글을 다시 평가할 때는 평가 정확도가 향상되었지만, 새로운 글을 평가할 때는 향상되지 않았다. 반면에, 동료평가 후 평가 기준에 대하여 토론을 진행했던 집단은 평가했던 글을 다시 평가할 때는 평가 정확도가 향상되지 않았지만, 새로운 글을 평가할 때는 향상됨을 발견하였다. 또한 토론 집단의 경우 평가 기준에 대한 토론에서 총 발언 수가 많아질수록 평가 정확도가 높아졌다. 이상의 결과는 평가 기준에 대한 토론에서 적극적이고 자발적인 논의가 활발할수록 이후 동료평가의 정확도가 향상됨을 시사한다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.207-221
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to develop the assessment rubric of mathematical communication ability by each type: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and graphic. This rubric is qualified in the content-validity and reliability by professional educators' evaluation and correlation coefficient. 16 math educators judged that this involves the results of learning mathematical communication, the results of possible instruction, and the content of scoring mathematical communication by teachers. 170 middle school students were tested by the assessment task according to the types of mathematical communication. After two researchers and two teachers scored the tasks, correlation coefficient was calculated between evaluators. The coefficient is evaluated high in that it is more than 0.70.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.339-356
• /
• 2011

This study explored pre-service English teachers' participation in the development of a rubric and examined evaluation of their own English poetry. The current study would investigate: 1) the pre-service English teachers' perception as a rubric developer and self-evaluator, 2) the number of analytic area that the participants included in their rubrics and the scoring scheme that they designed in their rubrics, and 3) the inter-rater differences between self-assessemnt and expert-assessment across analytic areas. Twenty-four EFL learners participated in the current study. The researchers analyzed the learners' own English poetry, their field notes which contained the process of their writing, their rubrics, scores of self-assessment, and expert raters' scores. The results revealed that learners showed positive responses on learner-directed assessment, that 'content' is the most important area, and that inter-rater difference is small across all analytic areas.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.53-61
• /
• 2021

Critical thinking ability based on a sound sense of logic is essential for analyzing a given engineering design problem and assessing it to arrive at the most plausible conclusion. Engineering design classes require students to organize their engineering design experiences through reports, and engineering design reports require detailed specifications of their tasks at each stage. Given the nature of these curriculums, design classes provide writing courses focusing on science and engineering within specialized fields, but there still lies many obstacles for communication education that embraces both general education and major subjects. This study proposes a specified step-by-step writing model for engineering design reports that encompasses critical thinking for the objective of systemizing design experiences from engineering design report writing. For the purpose of the study, the concepts and relationship between critical thinking and creative problem solving have been examined, followed by a proposal of application methods for critical thinking criteria and elements from a case example on engineering design. Furthermore, the study proposes a critical thinking-based assessment rubric for logical decision making at each stage of engineering design as well as a resulting model for engineering design report writing.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.325-354
• /
• 2001

The study aims to develop balanced performance assessment tasks for primary school mathematics which can be implemented in the primary school easily. In order to these purposes, I suggest the types of performance assessment tasks and the framework of assessment standards for the balanced performance assessment with describing the procedures of developing tasks and rubrics. The types of task are journal writing, problem posing, constructed task, and descriptive task. In the framework of assessment standards, I suggest holistic scoring which are classified as four levels according to the degree of excellence which students perform totally concerning about the criterion of implication, reasoning, accuracy, and communication. Also I analyse the responses of children to the task “make a beautiful pattern” and suggest its assessment rubric and anchor papers for each level for illustrating the process of developing a rubric in holistic scoring. In order to reflect the viewpoints of children and their Parents concerning about the tasks, the responses in self assessment and parent assessment are analysed. Finally, methods of implementing the assessment tasks and considerations are discussed.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제34권8호
• /
• pp.787-794
• /
• 2014

본 연구에서는 논의를 강조한 주장과 증거 글쓰기 교수 학습 적용 후 학생들의 주제 글쓰기를 분석하였고 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식을 알아보았다. 서울 소재 C여자 고등학교 2학년 3개 학급의 학생 108명을 실험집단으로 하여 5개 주제에 대하여 논의를 강조한 주장과 증거 글쓰기 교수 학습 프로그램을 적용하였고 같은 학교 3학년 3개 학급의 학생 99명을 비교집단으로 하여 전통적 강의식 수업을 적용하였다. 논의를 강조한 주장과 증거 글쓰기 교수 학습을 적용한 실험집단의 주제 글쓰기는 '친환경 에너지'의 big idea 요소를 제외한 다른 모든 요소에서 비교집단보다 통계적으로 유의미하게 높은 점수를 나타났다(p<.05). '친환경 에너지'의 경우, 8개의 개념 중 6개의 개념, '판구조론'의 경우 8개의 개념 중 4개의 개념에 대하여 실험집단 학생들이 비교집단보다 주제 글쓰기에서 더 많이 서술하였다. 논의를 강조한 주장과 증거 글쓰기 수업에서 학생들은 의문을 만들고 실험 설계와 수행, 자료해석, 주장과 증거를 만드는 동안 끊임없이 동료들과 논의를 하도록 안내된다. 또한 실험 결과나 주어진 자료의 해석을 통해 주장을 뒷받침하는 증거의 정확성, 충분성, 타당성을 높이기 위해 노력하면서 자신의 추론 과정을 돌아보고 개념을 정교화, 명료화한다. 이러한 논의를 강조한 주장과 증거 글쓰기의 과정이 학생들의 주제 글쓰기의 big idea, 개념, 다중 표상, 논리적 구조 형성과 포함된 개념의 형성에 도움이 된 것으로 보인다. 본 연구의 결과는 과학 교육 현장에서 향후 논의를 강조한 주장과 증거 글쓰기와 같은 수업을 지속적으로 적용해야 함을 시사한다.