Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.3.263

An Analysis of Students' Mathematical Modeling in the RUBRIC Writing  

Kim, Hye Young (Graduate School, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Rae Young (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.30, no.3, 2016 , pp. 263-280 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impact of RUBRIC writing on students' mathematical modeling. By analyzing 23 tenth grade students' responses to seven problems related to mathematical modeling, we found that the students who used RUBRIC writing could not only get more correct answers but also could use more various representations and mathematical models than the students who did not use it. The students with RUBRIC writing also could translate between reality and mathematics more appropriately, and better explain the process to solve the problem than the counterpart. It implies that RUBRIC writing can help improve students' mathematical modeling and problem solving as an alternative instruction and assessment.
Keywords
Mathematical modeling; RUBRIC writing; Problem solving;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Stacey, K. (2006). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important. Progress report of the APEC project: Collaborative studies on innovations for teaching and learning mathematics in different cultures(II): Lesson study focusing on mathematical thinking.
2 김혜영 (2015). 학생들의 문제해결 과정의 변화를 통한 루브릭 쓰기의 효과 분석: 고등학교 1학년 학생을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.(Kim, H. Y. (2015). An analysis of RUBRIC writing effects on students' changes of problem solving process: Focusing on 1st grade high school students. Ewha Womans University, Graduate School of Education. Master's thesis.)
3 교육부(2015). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호.(The Ministry of Education (2015). Curriculum of mathematics department, The Ministry of Education Guidelines, 2015-74.)
4 김선희 (2005). 문제 중심 학습의 방법으로서 수학적 모델링에 관한 고찰, 대한수학교육학회지 <학교수학>, 7(3), 303-318.(Kim, S. H. (2005). Consideration of mathematical modeling as a problem-based learning method. School Mathematics, 7(3), 303-318.)
5 김영국 (2008). 수학적 표현의 교수학적 의의, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 47(2), 155-168.(Kim, Y. K. (2008). On the pedagogical significance of mathematical representations. Mathematical Education, 47(2), 155-168.)
6 남윤정.송영무 (2008). 고등학교 학생들의 수학 본질과 수학 학습에 대한 신념 연구, 대한수학교육학회지 <학교수학>, 10(4), 649-669.(Nam, Y. J., & Song, Y. M. (2008). An analytic study of beliefs about mathematics and mathematics education of high school students'. School Mathematics, 10(4), 649-669.)
7 노선숙.김민경.우현주.차인숙 (2001). 창조적 지식기반사회의 수학교육과정 개발을 위한 기초조사연구: 수학교육목표에 대한 교사, 학생의 인식, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 40(2), 161-177.(Noh, S. S., Kim, M. K., Yu, H. J. & Cha, I. S. (2001), Students and teachers' perceptions on the goals of mathematics education: A foundational research for the development of mathematics curriculum model for a creative knowledge-based society. Mathematical Education, 40(2), 161-177.)
8 신은주.이종희 (2005). 구체와 추상을 연결하는 모델의 중재기능 분석, 대한수학교육학회지 <수학교육학연구>, 15(1), 1-19.(Shin, E. J. & Lee, C. H. (2005). An analysis of mediation function between concrete and abstract of the model. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 15(1). 1-19.)
9 방정숙.이지영.이상미.박영은.김수경.최인영.선우진 (2015). 한국, 중국, 일본, 미국 초등 수학과 교육과정에서 강조하는 수학과 과정 요소에 대한 분석. 대한수학교육학회지 <학교수학>, 17(2), 289-308.(Pang, J. S., Lee, J. Y., Lee, S. M., Park, Y. E., Kim,, S. K., Choi, I. Y. & Sunwoo, J. (2015). An analysis of mathematical processes in elementary mathematics curricula of Korea, China, Japan, and the US. School Mathematics, 17(2), 289-308.)
10 박석순.김구연 (2013). 수학.논술형 문항에 대한 중학생들의 인식 및 수학적 숙련도, 한국학교수학회논문집, 16(1), 63-86.(Park, S. S. & Kim, G. Y. (2013). Middle school students' perceptions about and mathematical proficiency in constructed-response items. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 16(1), 63-86.)
11 이미경.곽영순.민경석.채선희.최성연.최미숙.나귀수 (2004). PISA 2003 결과 분석 연구. 연구보고 RRE 2004-2-1. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.(Lee, M. K., Kwak, Y. S., Min, K. S., Chae, S. H., Choi, S. Y., Choi, M. S. & Na, G. S. (2004). The results from PISA 2003. Research report, RRE 2004-2-1. Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education.)
12 Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
13 Blum, W. (1993). Mathematical modelling in mathematics education and instruction. In T. Breiteig, I. Huntley, & G. Kaiser-messmer (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in context (pp. 3 - 14). Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
14 Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling(pp. 15-30). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
15 Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical Thinking: The Struggle for Meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), .35-49.   DOI
16 Cornell, C. (1999). "I hate math! I couldn't learn it, and I can't teach it!" Childhood Education, 75(4), 225-231.   DOI
17 Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). Foundations of a models and modelling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3-34). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
18 English, L. D. (2003). Reconciling theory, research, and practice: A models and modelling perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(2/3), 225-248.   DOI
19 Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
20 Kehle, P. E., & Lester, F. K. (2003). A semiotic look at modeling behavior. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 97-122). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
21 Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and modeling perspectives on the development of students and teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2), 109-129.   DOI
22 Mason, J., Stacey, K., & Burton, L. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.
23 Maki, D. P., & Thompson, M. (1973). Mathematical models and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24 Montgomery, K. (2000). Classroom rubrics: Systemizing what teachers do naturally. Clearing House, 73(6), 324-328.   DOI
25 Murata, A., & Kattubadi, S. (2012). Grade 3 students' mathematization through modeling: Situation models and solution models with mutli-digit subtraction problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 15-28.   DOI
26 Popham, J. W. (1997). What's wrong-and what's right-with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 72-75.
27 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
28 Osborne, J., Black, P., Boaler, J., Brown, M., Driver, R., & Murray, R. (1997). Attitudes to science, mathematics and technology: A review of research. London, UK: King's College, University of London.