• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.83-110
• /
• 2023

This study deals with the process by which 'Social problem-solving R&D model' is established in Korean society through the evolution of the government's R&D program. We will examine the process by which a 'Social problem-solving R&D model', which was not present in companies, science and technology communities, and civil society, is formed through government R&D programs. To this end, we present a conceptual framework to analyze the process of co-evolution of 'Social problem solving R&D model', the organizational community that supports and implements it, and the institutions that supports the new model. In the synthesis, policy measures to enhance 'Social problem-solving R&D model' are dealt with.

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.222-235
• /
• 2022

The Government provides a financial assistance to stimulate firm R&D and innovation activities. Previous papers on the impact of public subsidies on firm R&D investments mainly had a focus on an individual policy tool regardless of potential impacts of other policy instruments. This study addresses this gap by examining the effects of policy mix regarding a subsidy and a tax credit. The empirical analyses from fixed effect model using Survey on Technology of SMEs 2015-2017 revealed valuable points. First, policy mix induces more R&D investment of SMEs, which in turn, shows a complementary relationship between two instruments. Second, even if impact of tax credit controlled, subsidy is positively associated with SMEs R&D investment. These findings justify policy mix interventions to promote SME R&D activity. Moreover, grants can be applied as a more useful policy tool for SMEs that are constrained by resources and capabilities.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2012

This study makes an attempt to understand the changes in the National R&D policy by the comparative analysis in terms of R&D policy regime. We characterize the related issues on the National R&D policy, and analyze the direction of science and technology(S&T) policy using the method of scientometrics. The result shows that the policy regime can be categorized into three groups with respect to the R&D efficiency and the keywords; Regime 1: National S&T Innovation 5-year Plan(1999-2002) and National S&T Master plan of the previous adminstration(2003-2007), Regime 2: National S&T Master Plan(2002-2006) and National S&T Master Plan of the previous administration(2003-2007), Regime 3: National S&T Master Plan of the current administration (2008-present).

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.1281-1296
• /
• 2017

세계경제가 범국가적 경쟁에 접어면서 과거보다 지역R&D의 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 국내에서도 지역R&D의 경쟁력 향상을 통해 지역불균형 문제를 해소하고 지역경제발전을 이루고자 하는 노력이 지속되어 왔다. 이러한 문제인식을 바탕으로, 그동안 지역R&D의 효율성을 분석하고 개선점을 도출하기 위한 여러 정책적 학술적 노력이 있어왔다. 본 연구는 지역R&D 효율성을 지식창출과 가치창출의 두 가지 측면에서 진단하고 정책적 시사점을 도출하려는 목적에서 15개 국내 지역의 통계자료를 대상으로 자료포락분석(DEA)을 실시하였다. 본 연구에서 효율성 분석을 위해 사용한 R&D투입과 산출요소의 분포를 살펴본 결과 대부분 수도권과 대전에 양적으로 편중되어 있었다. DEA모형을 분석한 결과, 지식창출 부문의 효율성 점수는 평균 0.869 수준으로 나타났으며, 서울, 대구, 광주, 대전, 강원, 전남, 경북 지역이 효율적이었다. 반면 경남 지역은 0.630으로 지식창출에 있어 가장 비효율이 큰 지역이었다. 가치창출 부문의 효율성 점수는 평균 0.677 수준이며 지식창출보다 지역 간 점수 편차가 컸다. 광주, 대전, 울산, 강원 지역이 효율적인 것으로 나타난 반면 경기 지역은 0.198으로 가장 비효율적이었다. 종합하여 비교하면 광주, 대전, 강원 지역만 지식창출과 가치창출이 모두 1.000점으로 효율적이었고 이를 제외한 지역들은 효율성 개선이 필요하였다. 본 연구는 지역R&D 효율성의 개선방향에 대한 시사점을 제시함으로써 지역발전 정책수립에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다. 그러나 특정 시점에 한정되어 효율성을 분석하였으므로 생산성 변화에 대한 추가적인 분석과 분석자료에 대한 보완이 필요하다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.13 no.12
• /
• pp.974-985
• /
• 2013

This research aimed to propose policy alternatives on acquisition and retention of SME's R&D personnel through the analysis of the status and problems of SME's R&D personnel. As research methods, literature review, survey analysis, domestic and foreign R&D personnel support system and practices benchmarking, human capital corporate panel (HCCP) and integrated survey DB material analysis, and case investigation by interview were used. The occupational status and problems of SME R&D personnel concerned on the corporate size, HRM practices on satisfaction and HRD problems, talent personnel management and training system status, the core talent management system and R&D personnel management system, and its complaints were organized. As conclusion, we have proposed alternatives on acquisition and retention of R&D personnel focused on the talent management. Suggestions were such as supports on R&D personnel management system and its dissemination, systematic career development programs, and excellency promotion on SME's and R&D talent personnel.

• Economic and Environmental Geology
• /
• v.52 no.3
• /
• pp.243-250
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to pro-actively respond to changes in government R&D policy and start to supplement the limitations of previous KIGAM R&D planning process. We looked out through the existing literature for a variety of R&D planning process, and analyzed the R&D planning process characteristics of each institution through the interview. As a result, we can be derived conclusions and implications from three sides, environmental analysis, demand excavation methods, R&D project configuration and selection method. In the case of environmental analysis and the overall need to enhance the skills and mega trend analysis by market trend analysis. And in the demand side, the institute need to establish challenging and specific R&D goals. In addition, in case of configuration and selection of R&D projects we derived several implications, such as convergence, SME support, resource analysis, selection of long-term project.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.75-98
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this paper is to give policy implications for relevant policy-makers by analyzing factors affecting performance of industrial R&D programs of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy. The independent variables are type of project leader organization(Big Enterprises, SMEs, Ventures Businesses, Public Research Institutions, Universities), cooperative or noncooperative R&D among industry-university-research institution, total number of project participant organization, total R&D investment, and the ratio of private investment to total R&D investment. The dependent variables are domestic or foreign patents granted and domestic or foreign papers accepted. The method of analysis is Poisson Regression analysis operated by STATA. The results of this research are follows ; Universities show higher R&D performance compared to enterprises or public research institutions in terms of patents and papers as well. Venture businesses show higher patent performance compared to SMEs. Inverted U-shaped relationship between total number of project participant organization and R&D performance is not supported. The higher total R&D investment, the higher R&D performance. The higher the ratio of private investment to total R&D investment, the higher R&D performance.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.197-218
• /
• 2012

Technological competitiveness of SMEs is an important factor of the country's industrial competitiveness. And technological competitiveness of SMEs in South Korea has been a long-term congestion. Through the study, we analyzed the correlation between SMEs technical support policy and technological competitiveness. As a result, the technological competitiveness of SMEs is positively related to R&D policy of funding, taxation and infrastructure. And on the other hand, R&D support policy positively effected the technological competitiveness of subcontractors, 5~49 people of small enterprises and innovation SMEs. We suggest that technology fund should be increased by expanding policy funds, investments and loans. Also, allocation of strategic R&D resources and supportive researching staffs are needed to strengthen high-growth innovative SMEs.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study was to derive policy priorities for fostering the biopharmaceutical industry. In this study, the urgency and importance of the policy to foster the biopharmaceutical industry in Gyeonggi-do was investigated, and the priorities of the policy in the biopharmaceutical industry were analyzed through IPA analysis. As a result of the study, the top priority support tasks for the biopharmaceutical industry promotion policy were 'R&D support', 'Expert training', and 'commercialization support'. As a result of deriving policy priorities for each biopharmaceutical sector, 'R&D support' and 'Expert training' were found to be high in common, and differences in policy priorities for each industry such as cell therapy products and advanced bio-convergence products were confirmed. Also, as for the policy demand, R&D funding support, clinical trial support, and commercialization funding support were found to be high. Based on these results, the government's policy to foster the biopharmaceutical industry was supported with a focus on 'R&D support' and 'Expert training', and policy implications were drawn that customized support is needed in consideration of the characteristics of each industry field.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.319-333
• /
• 2008

Government R&D policies generate diverse intended and unintended effects including innovator-specific and spatial effects. The Korean government has promoted R&D policies throughout the industrializing period, resulting in R&D networks focused on government research institutes geographically concentrated in the Capital region and Daedeok. This research aims to review the development of the Korean national R&D projects and analyze the recent composition of participants and spatial effects of the Korean national R&D projects. The results show that, in terms of the participants, the R&D networks generated from the Korean national R&D projects have been diversified from dominance of the government research institutes to strategic collaboration between the Korean private firms, universities, and government research institutes. Spatially, the R&D networks are not regionalized, and many private firms in most of the regions have nationwide R&D networks or still rely on the R&D networks in the Capital region.