• 제목/요약/키워드: Quality Competitiveness

검색결과 945건 처리시간 0.03초

컨테이너터미널 운영사의 물류서비스 품질 평가에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Evaluation of the Logistics Service Quality of Container Terminal Operators)

  • 박은경;김현덕;이광배
    • 한국항만경제학회지
    • /
    • 제25권1호
    • /
    • pp.47-62
    • /
    • 2009
  • 본 연구는 SERVQUAL 모형을 근간으로 광양항 컨테이너터미널 운영사의 물류서비스 품질을 평가하기 위해 모형을 설정하고, AHP를 이용하여 상대적 중요도를 도출하였으며, 이를 바탕으로 FUZZY 기법을 이용하여 광양항 터미널 운영사의 경쟁력을 평가하였다. 연구결과, 물류서비스 품질요인 중에서는 확신성이, 하위수준에서는 안전설비가 가장 중요한 요인으로 추출되었다. 또한 이용자 집단(선사 및 운송사)과 운영자 집단(터미널 운영사)간 물류서비스 품질 속성 중요도 평가에 차이가 있음을 밝혔으며, 광양항 터미널 운영사의 물류서비스 품질 경쟁력을 비교 평가한 후, 향후 컨테이너터미널 운영사에 대한 개선 방안과 시사점을 제시하였다.

  • PDF

조직의 혁신방향과 인적자원관리의 기능별 전략 간의 적합성이 성과에 미치는 영향 (Effect of Fitness between Organizational Innovation and HRM Type on Performance)

  • 김진희
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.21-26
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 논문은 조직의 공정혁신과 마케팅혁신에 따른 혁신 방향과 내부적인 인적자원관리 전략유형 간의 매칭에 따라 기업의 성과(품질경쟁력, 영업이익)가 어떻게 달라지는지에 대해 분석하였다. 분석을 위한 자료는 한국노동연구원(KLI)의 2015년 6회차 사업체패널에 대한 조사로 수집된 3,431개 기업에 대한 자료를 활용하였다. 기업의 혁신은 군집분석을 통해 전체혁신, 부분혁신, 혁신부진의 집단으로 유형화 하였으며, 인적자원관리는 몰입형 인적자원관리와 통제형 인적자원관리의 유형으로 구분하였다. 분석방법은 혁신유형과 인적자원관리 전략유형 간의 매칭을 통해 총 6개의 집단으로 분류하였고, 6개 집단에 속한 기업들이 보이는 품질경쟁력과 영업이익의 평균 차이를 비교하는 분산분석(ANOVA)을 사용하였다. 분석결과 전체혁신-몰입형 인적자원관리 분면의 기업들이 부분적인 혁신이나 혁신부진 집단의 기업들보다 품질경쟁력과 영업이익이 유의하게 높은 결과를 보였으며, 모든 혁신이 부진한 혁신부진-통제형 인적자원관리 분면의 기업들이 그 이상의 기업들 보다 낮은 품질경쟁력과 영업이익을 보여 그 성과가 유의하게 낮은 것으로 나타났다.

정부 보조금의 노동생산성 향상 효과 비교 (Comparison of the Effects of Government Subsidies on Labor Productivity Improvement)

  • 서정석
    • 노동경제논집
    • /
    • 제43권2호
    • /
    • pp.135-159
    • /
    • 2020
  • 본 연구는 노동생산성 향상을 위해 다양한 방식으로 지급할 수 있는 정부 보조금의 효과를 분석하여 비교한다. 노동자들은 학습 능력에 차별화된 분포를 하고, 수요복점의 각 기업은 투입하는 노동의 질적 수준과 임금 수준을 완전정보 하의 두 단계 비협조게임 모형을 통해 순차적으로 결정한다. 이때 질적 수준 및 생산성 측면에서 앞서 있는 기업에 유리하도록 보조금을 지급하면, 이 기업은 노동시장에서의 경쟁력 강화로 임금경쟁 심화를 선호하게 되어, 차별화 정도의 축소를 위해 질적 수준 저하를 시도하고, 상대방 기업은 경쟁력 약화로 경쟁 회피를 위해 차별화를 확대하려고 역시 질적 수준을 낮추려는 유인을 가질 수 있다. 반대로 정부가 낮은 질적 수준이나 저생산성의 기업을 지원하면, 경쟁력 강화로 부터 심화한 임금경쟁을 하기 위해, 차별화 축소의 목적으로 질적 수준을 높일 동기를 갖게 되며, 상대 기업은 차별화 확대를 위한 질적 수준 향상의 유인이 있다. 그리고 지급 대상이 노동자인지 기업인지에 따라 결과에 유의미한 차이는 발생하지 않는다.

  • PDF

Research on the Relationship Between the OHSAS 18000 System Implementation and Competitiveness in Taiwan's Industries

  • Chung, Yi-Chan;Chiu, Chung-Ching;Tsai, Chih-Hung;Hsu, Yau-Wen
    • International Journal of Quality Innovation
    • /
    • 제7권3호
    • /
    • pp.24-45
    • /
    • 2006
  • In recent years, the labor consciousness is gradually valued. During the process of pursuing sustainable operation, the enterprises treat occupational hazard risk as the waste of cost. The purpose of OHSAS 18000 occupational security and health management system is to systematically establish the business managerial measures in terms of occupational security and calamity prevention. This research proceeded with questionnaire analysis with respect to the relationship between the OHSAS 18000 system implementation and competitiveness in Taiwan's industries. The research result revealed that there was significant relationship between Taiwan firms' execution of OHSAS 18000 system and industry competitiveness. Thus, the enterprises can decide the proper managerial plans according to the result of their own risk evaluation to prevent the happening of accidents and reduce the operational cost. They can thus completely control business occupational hazard risk through "systematic" management.

디자인에 대한 객관적인 가치평가 요인이 디자인전문기업의 글로벌 경쟁력에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of Objective Value Evaluation Factors of Design on Global Competitiveness of Design-Specialized Company)

  • 안진호;이동희
    • 통상정보연구
    • /
    • 제17권3호
    • /
    • pp.279-298
    • /
    • 2015
  • 디자인산업은 국가 경쟁력의 근간이 되지만, 현재 그 성장 동력에는 한계가 나타나고 있다. 이러한 이유는 정성적 가치기반의 디자인산업의 특성으로 객관적이지 못한 평가방식이 원인이며, 이로 인하여 디자인산업의 근간이라 할 수 있는 디자인전문기업의 산업적 경쟁력을 약화시켰다. 그래서 본 연구에서는 디자인의 정성적 가치 체계를 보강하고, 디자인의 산업적 경쟁력 강화를 위하여, 디자인에 대한 객관적인 가치평가 요인을 도출하고 이러한 요인들이 디자인전문기업의 해외 경쟁력과 어떠한 관계를 가지는 지를 규명하여 우리나라 디자인산업의 독자적인 경쟁력 강화방향을 모색해 보고자 하였다. 먼저 본 연구에서는 디자인에 대한 객관적인 평가요인을 측정 평가의 계량화, 프로세스의 일관성, 프로젝트의 정합성, 논리적 설득성으로 정의하였고, 디자인전문기업의 경쟁력요인을 기업의 신뢰도와 서비스 품질로 정의하였고, 연구모형을 설정하였다. 검증 결과 대부분의 가설은 채택되었으나, 평가의 계량화는 디자인전문기업의 서비스품질에 직접적인 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 파악되었다.

  • PDF

한국 의류산업의 국제경쟁력 향상을 위한 결정요인 (The Determinants of International Competitiveness for the Korean Apparel Industry)

  • 백영하;박재옥
    • 한국의류학회지
    • /
    • 제32권3호
    • /
    • pp.474-485
    • /
    • 2008
  • The purpose of this study is to examine the determinants and elements to enhance Korean international competitiveness, employing Porter's(1998) Diamond Model. Half of the 500 leading apparel exporters that were members of the Korea Apparel Industry Association in 2003 were selected as the target of this research. From May to June of 2003, survey questionnaires were sent to executives of these 250 companies in person or by telephone, e-mail, or fax. Seventy questionnaires were used for the final data anlysis. The items used were Reliability, Categorical Regression, and Frequency, using SPSS 11.5. The results were as follows: First, as a result of analyzing the influence of international competitiveness in Korean apparel industry, the firm's strategy, structure, and rivalry was the most influential factor. Others were related and supporting industries, government, chance, demand conditions, and factor conditions. Also, the elements that affect Korean international competitiveness were listed as the level of price competition in foreign markets, the level of labor cost, export marketing capacity, and exchange fluctuation. The most important element to improve the international competitiveness of the Korean apparel industry was a demand growth rate of the overseas markets(Demand Conditions), followed by the level of the labor costs(Factor Conditions), the capability of internationalization(Firm Strategy, Structure, and Rivalry), the change of currency(Chance), the quality and management of products(Demand Conditions), the capability of planning products(Firm Strategy, Structure, and Rivalry), free trade from 2005(Chance), and global sourcing strategy(Firm Strategy, Structure, and Rivalry). Korea's main rival country in apparel related and supporting industry factors is China. However, Korea has a higher level of technology development, quality, and price level than China.

신발 산업 현황과 경쟁력 분석 (Industrial review and competitiveness analysis of footwear market)

  • 이지연;어미경;박명자
    • 한국의상디자인학회지
    • /
    • 제21권1호
    • /
    • pp.59-72
    • /
    • 2019
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the present condition of the Korean footwear industry, and its competitiveness through related precedent research. Research was done by analyzing data from the Korean Statistical Information Service, the Korea International Trade Association and advanced research about the footwear industry. Footwear markets all over the world are growing continuously. The main consumers are China, America and India. World footwear trade is showing a growth trend on the basis of cost and amount. The main exporting countries are China, Vietnam and Italy, while main importing countries are America, Germany and France. The domestic market and the export market of footwear in Korea are decreasing. The scale of exporting footwear is gradually decreasing, however the scale of importing footwear is increasing. Korea exports footwear to China, Vietnam and Japan and imports them from China, Vietnam and Indonesia. Studies concening the footwear industry implied that the competitiveness of Korea has been weakened both in the domestic and the export markets. To enhance the competitiveness of Korean footwear corporations, long-term support at the national level is needed. Especially, cultivating competitive experts is crucial to improve the competitiveness of designs and the quality of products. Furthermore, branding strategies using the Korean wave, Korean culture and the national image of Korea, as well as platform strategies to communicate with consumers globally and selling high-quality products are significant.

A Study on the Identification of Key Role Players in Enhancing Port Competitiveness - Focused on Busan Port -

  • Kim, Gil-Soo
    • 한국항해항만학회지
    • /
    • 제31권9호
    • /
    • pp.801-806
    • /
    • 2007
  • The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) enables decision makers to represent the interaction of multiple factors in complex and unstructured situations. The process requires the decision maker to develop a hierarchical structure of the factors in the given problem and to provide judgments about the relative importance of each of these factors and ultimately to specify a preference for each decision alternative with respect to each factor. The research presented in this paper applies the AHP to identify key players in promoting port competitiveness. The literature survey revealed four major criteria and 15 sub-criteria. The four factors are cost, service quality, facility/capacity and economic-social variable. 150 questionnaires suitable for AHP analysis were made and 77 were returned. It is found that in terms of cost, the first key player is terminal operator and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port; in terms of service quality, the first key player is terminal operator, and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port; in terms of facility/capacity, the first key player is port authority and the second key player is terminal operator; in terms of economic-social variable, the first key player is terminal operator, and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port.

맥주보리 품질평가 현황과 전망 (Current Status and Prospect of Quality Evaluation in Malting Barley)

  • 손영구;서세정;백성범;이춘우;박문웅;한상익
    • 한국작물학회지
    • /
    • 제47권
    • /
    • pp.55-62
    • /
    • 2002
  • With lower quality and three to four times higher price than those of imported malting barley, the competitiveness of domestic malting barley is decreasing. Although the causes can be found in that the domestic environments are much unfavorable to cultivate the malting barley compared with those of USA or Canada, it is mainly reasoned from poorer developments in variety of high quality malting barley as well as in cultivation technology. For assuring the competitiveness of domestic malting barley, therefore, not only the development of high quality malting barley suitable to the climatic environment of this country but also the political supports of the government are required. Also, in addition to the breeding of the good quality malting barley haying higher germinative energy, and heavier and larger kernels of good plumpness as well as lower protein content, the modification of quality inspection standards from the system relying only on the visual characteristics such as kernel size distribution rate, shrimped kernel rate, foreign materials and so on, to such system as those of developed countries haying quality criteria such as protein content for inspection is absolutely required for the quality improvement of domestic malting barley.

Research on the Evaluation and Promotion Plan of Competitiveness of Chinese Cultural and Creative Industries - Taking Provinces and Cities Along the "Belt and Road" As an Example

  • Chen, Lu;He, Jia;Bae, Ki-Hyung
    • International Journal of Contents
    • /
    • 제16권3호
    • /
    • pp.66-86
    • /
    • 2020
  • With the rapid growth of high-tech, the development of cultural and creative industries has gradually become the focus of national industrial development. With the proposal of China's "Belt and Road" strategy, the role of cultural and creative industries in the provinces and cities along the "Belt and Road" in the entire international trade is becoming increasingly critical. It is necessary to explore solutions to improve the competitiveness of China's cultural and creative industries, factoring the surrounding cities of the "Belt and Road" as an example. Thus, this paper proposes the six-element diamond model based on innovation capability and government support to render a comprehensive evaluation of the competitiveness of the cultural and creative industries in the 31 provinces and cities across the country. The results show that the overall competitiveness of the 18 provinces and cities along the "Belt and Road" cultural and creative industries is weak. Focusing on the 18 provinces and cities along the "Belt and Road", using the linear regression measurement model quantitative analysis, the four types of influencing factors affecting the development of the competitiveness of cultural and creative industries along the "Belt and Road" were obtained. Finally, according to the four types of influence, the competitiveness improvement plan is proposed from the four aspects: government role, consumption preference, industrial innovation ability, and the introduction of high-quality talent.