• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.195-214
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to select more productive projects among various proposed projects in a particular company. To achieve this research objective, the characteristics of project evaluation and selection are first reviewed with respect to when, where, and how the decision is made. Then the theoretical basis of the AHP is briefly reviewed along with its mathematical underpinnings to construct the framework of project evaluation and selection. To be more specific, the evaluation and selection criteria were reorganized in the AHP-based framework to make the process of project evaluation and selection more productive. Project evaluation and selection is one of the most important activities for the most companies to be more advantageous in the market. Despite the importance of decision making process of project selection, not many of how to choose the best project were suggested as the reliable project selection methods in the industries. It may be because it involves various activities related to conflict resolution among different evaluation criteria, high uncertainties of market, and the unclear tradeoff among various project objectives. Furthermore, the decision, once made at this point, tends to be irrevocable until the whole process turns out to be a complete success or failure. As the result, the AHP method showed better financial performance rather than the traditional method in a case study.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권12호
• /
• pp.3645-3652
• /
• 2009

프로젝트식 교과과정인 협동프로젝트가 성공적으로 운영되기 위한 가장 중요한 요소는 체제적이고 합리적인 평가라 할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 단순한 결과 지향적인 평가를 벗어나 학습자에게 스스로 문제점에 대해 진단하고 개선할 수 있는 다차원 수행평가지원 시스템을 설계 및 구현한다. 이 시스템은 협동프로젝트를 이수하는 모든 과정을 평가함으로써 평가자와 피평가자 모두 평가 결과에 대해 만족할 수 있도록 구성하였다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2023년도 봄 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.379-380
• /
• 2023

The Post-Construction Evaluation and Management System has been operated over the past 20 years not only to analyze the performance of large-scale construction projects, and but also to provide useful reference data for future similar projects. Although the Post-Construction Evaluation and Management Center has been legally designated and operated since 2020, various problems have been occurring in the operation of the system. Accordingly, this study proposes strategies for facilitating Post-Construction Evaluation and Management System in terms of the following three aspects: (1) improving the implementation rate of post-construction evaluation; (2) improving the information management system related to post-construction evaluation; (3) improving the utilization of post-construction evaluation outcomes. Based on the results of this study, a specific action plan will be prepared, which is expected to contribute to the efficiency of construction project performance management in the future.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.75-88
• /
• 2015

This study presents a real-time impact evaluation of a human capacity-building health project in Laos, financed by a Korean aid agency and executed jointly by Laotian and Korean higher educational agencies. The project aims to improve the health status of Laotians by enhancing practicing doctors' clinical performance capacity, to be attained by advancing academic achievement at the University of Health Sciences (UHS) in Laos. Therefore, this real-time impact evaluation adopted the difference-in-differences regression analysis method, showing that the project improved the academic achievement of the UHS students who were taught by the project fellowship awardees more, compared to the UHS students who were taught by non-fellowship faculty members. It remains to be evaluated whether these UHS students taught by the project fellowship recipients would also perform better clinically in public hospitals in the future.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.403-408
• /
• 2010

본 논문에서는 산학협력 지원사업의 성과를 체계적이고 통합적으로 관리하는 위한 통합 프로젝트 관리 시스템(iPMS : Integrated Project Management System)을 설계하고 구현한다. 본 논문에서 구현된 iPMS 시스템은 수행된 과제에 대한 결과 및 현황에 대하여 손쉽고 다양한 형태로 검색하는 기능 및 보고서 출력 기능을 제공하고, 산학협력 지원사업에 대한 성능 평가 및 사후 관리의 방법을 제공해 준다. iPMS는 부산-울산 산학협의회를 통하여 운영 중이며, 산학연 과제 관리에 대하여 효과적으로 사용될 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.177-183
• /
• 2006

Risk-based estimation has been successfully introduced into the construction industry. By incorporating historical data associated with probability analysis, risk-based estimate is an effective decision support aid in considering whether to launch a particular project. The industry challenges, however, especially related with management issues, such as labor shortage, wage growth, and supply chain complexity, have often resulted in poor cost performance. The insufficient assessing the project characteristics (i.e., resource availability, project complexity, and project delivery method) can be the main reasons in the poor cost performance. Because the accuracy level of cost performance prediction can be enhanced by extensive evaluation of the subject project characteristics, a new approach for predicting cost performance in an earlier stage of a project can improve the Industry substantiality, in other words, value maximization. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new methodology in developing a risk-based estimate tool by incorporating extensive project characteristics. To do this, an extensive industry survey was conducted from both private and public sectors in building industry in Korea. In addition, significant project characteristics were identified in terms of cost performance indicator. Although the data collection is limited to Korean industry the suggested approach provides the industry with a straightforward methodology in risk management. As many researchers maintained that front-end planning efforts are crucial in achieving the successful outcome in building projects, the new method for risk-based estimation can Improve the cost performance as well as enhance the fulfillment in terms of business sustainability.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.342-362
• /
• 2022

The national R&D project is a major strategy for the development of science and technology in the country. This is promoted for the purpose of improving the welfare of the people, such as creating jobs and fostering small and medium-sized enterprises, through the results of science and technology research conducted with support from the national budget. Therefore, analysis of the performance evaluation and budgeting system of the current national R&D project is one of the essential parts of preparing a system improvement plan. This study derived improvement plans through a comparative analysis of national R&D project performance evaluation and budget systems in Korea and leading countries such as the United States and Japan. As a result, it was confirmed that it may be difficult to derive innovative research results due to the lack of sustainability and a short period of time to require quantitative performance. To overcome these difficulties, the need for system improvement as follows was suggested. First, it is necessary to enlarge and prolong national R&D projects. Second, a plan for securing sustainability is needed in consideration of the main characteristics of each research field. Finally, it is necessary to strengthen the linkage between organizations in charge of national R&D projects. And also, there is a need for a system that can continuously identify problems and improve the system. In addition, the constitutional amendment will be necessary to separate science and technology from economic development, which states that Article 127, Paragraph 1, "Science and technology should be subordinated to economic development," which is the science and technology article of the current constitution.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회 1부
• /
• pp.207-209
• /
• 2011

Numerous reports show that alternative project delivery systems (PDSs) such as design-build (DB), construction management at risk (CMR), and design-build-maintain (DBM) are increasingly used in many countries. This study compared characteristics of each PDS (design-bid-build (DBB), DB, CMR, or DBM) by analyzing quantitative data from 9 research articles. In order to compare characteristics between DBB and alternative PDSs, the study is based on principal 3 factors - Time, Cost, and Quality. DB shows the best performance in the time part and also the cost performance depending on facility type and project size. The performance of quality has minor difference among different PDSs. These results support the fact that using an appropriate PDS by the characteristic of a project makes high value of efficiency and productivity.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.1528-1533
• /
• 2009

Infrastructure is provided to the user through long-term project period and large-scale working expenses. Existing facilities are getting old as time goes by. Accordingly, proper maintenance is required and generally more maintenance cost than initial invested cost is needed during life cycle. Therefore, a specific plan that just increases the value of facilities is required by evaluating performance of facilities and inputting minimum maintenance cost. Value engineering that increases the value of object by systemically analyzing Life Cycle Costs and function is actively promoted at the design phase of construction. These efforts can increase the performance of facilities at the maintenance phase of infrastructure. This study is to search how to evaluate the performance of Roadway by utilizing function analysis, as a core part of VE in the maintenance phase. In order to this a new evaluation criteria were proposed by adding an evaluation items to the existing criteria through the research of old documents, status of roadway maintenance and function analysis of VE. The results of this study may promote the effective performance evaluation to determine a resolution of roadway congestion in future. A succeeding study using the proposed evaluation criteria will be required.

• 정보화정책
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.23-40
• /
• 2023

1997년 정보화평가 시작 이후 평가 주관부처 및 평가방식 등의 많은 변화를 겪으며 현재 중앙행정기관 정보화사업에 대한 성과평가는 기획재정부의 재정사업자율평가가 시행되고 있다. 최근 정보화사업은 디지털뉴딜을 거쳐 디지털플랫폼정부 구현을 위해 예산이 큰 폭으로 증가하고 있으며 이에 따라 성과에 대한 관심도 높아지고 있다. 본 연구는 선행연구를 통해 성과 관련 특성을 선정하여 이에 따라 실제로 정보화사업 성과 차이가 있는지 실증 분석하였다. 분석 결과 신규사업, 처나 청에서 수행하는 사업은 최종평가점수에 통계적으로 유의미한 양의 영향을 미쳤다. 반면, 정보화지원사업과 기금사업은 최종평가점수에 통계적으로 유의미한 음의 영향을 미쳤다. 본 연구는 향후 새 정부의 디지털정부플랫폼 정부 구현, 공공데이터 개방 사업 등 정보화사업을 추진하고 이에 대한 성과를 평가할 때 사업의 고유한 특성에 따라 성과 차이가 발생할 수 있다는 점을 시사한다.