Quantifying Risk Factors on Cost Performance By Characterizing Capital Facility Projects


초록

Risk-based estimation has been successfully introduced into the construction industry. By incorporating historical data associated with probability analysis, risk-based estimate is an effective decision support aid in considering whether to launch a particular project. The industry challenges, however, especially related with management issues, such as labor shortage, wage growth, and supply chain complexity, have often resulted in poor cost performance. The insufficient assessing the project characteristics (i.e., resource availability, project complexity, and project delivery method) can be the main reasons in the poor cost performance. Because the accuracy level of cost performance prediction can be enhanced by extensive evaluation of the subject project characteristics, a new approach for predicting cost performance in an earlier stage of a project can improve the Industry substantiality, in other words, value maximization. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new methodology in developing a risk-based estimate tool by incorporating extensive project characteristics. To do this, an extensive industry survey was conducted from both private and public sectors in building industry in Korea. In addition, significant project characteristics were identified in terms of cost performance indicator. Although the data collection is limited to Korean industry the suggested approach provides the industry with a straightforward methodology in risk management. As many researchers maintained that front-end planning efforts are crucial in achieving the successful outcome in building projects, the new method for risk-based estimation can Improve the cost performance as well as enhance the fulfillment in terms of business sustainability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cha, H., and O'Connor, J. T. (2005). 'Optimizing Implementation of Value Management Processes for Capital Projects,' J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, ASCE, 131(2), 239-251 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:2(239)
  2. Choi, H., Cho, H., Seo, J. (2004). 'Risk Assessment Methodology for Underground Construction Projects,' J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, ASCE, 130(2), 258-272 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:2(258)
  3. Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2001). CII Benchmarking and Metrics Data Report 2001, CII, Austin, Tex
  4. Fang, D., Fong, P. S., and Li, M. (2004). 'Risk Assessment Model of Tendering for Chinese Building Projects,' J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, ASCE, 130(6), 862-868 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(862)
  5. Fang, D., Li, M., Fong, P. S., and Shen, L. (2004). 'Risks in Chinese Construction Market-Contractors' Perspective,' J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, ASCE, 130(6), 853-861 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(853)
  6. Jannadi, O. A., and Almishari, S. (2003). 'Risk Assessment in Construction,' J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, ASCE, 129(5), 492-500 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(492)
  7. Gibson, G. E. and Dumont, P. R. (1996). 'Project Definition Rating Index,' Research Report 113-11, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex
  8. Smith, N. J. (1999). Managing Risk in Construction Projects, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK