• 제목/요약/키워드: Policy Hierarchy

검색결과 414건 처리시간 0.027초

농업분야 소규모 협동조합 유통체계 구축을 위한 우선순위 평가 (Evaluating Policy Priorities in Small Agricultural Cooperatives for Distribution Systems)

  • 김창환;황대용
    • 유통과학연구
    • /
    • 제13권12호
    • /
    • pp.65-71
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose - Domestic cooperatives tend to increase during the establishment of cooperatives and gradually through the basic law of social needs. However, only cooperatives' qualitative grow this secured without blessings, and their quantitative growth through government support is questionable. The purpose of this study is to analyze the agricultural cooperatives established through the Distribution System Cooperatives Basic Law, which was enacted in January 2012. Subsequently, establishing agricultural cooperatives was done briskly. However, cooperatives established rapidly after the founding of the Basic Law encountered problems. Research design, data, and methodology - To assess the performance of selected agricultural cooperatives, data were analyzed using the methodological Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. The AHP is a set of systematic procedures to hierarchically analyze the elements of any problem. Using a survey on expertise, a series of comparative determinations of each pair is performed to evaluate the relative strengths and the strengths of the impact between elements within the hierarchy. A survey was conducted on 10 small agricultural cooperatives using AHP analysis for the examination. The purpose of such research and analysis is to recommend a direction for future policies aimed at small agricultural cooperatives. Result - This study applied three types of policy evaluation criterion, including market expansions, organizations, and cooperative projects, and 12 types of small agricultural cooperative policy measures. Market expansion policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four categories: school meals, direct transactions, shopping malls, and wholesale markets. Organizational policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four types: existing sales channel management, education, preventing free riding, and enlarging members. Cooperative project policies in agricultural cooperatives are classified into four policy areas: cooperation between cooperatives, community contribution, joint businesses, and government links. In this paper, the growth priority in agricultural cooperative policies is analyzed by applying policy evaluation criteria on the basis of a survey on expertise. The priorities of the policy program are also analyzed using a decision analytic hierarchy process. The results indicate that market expansion is the most important policy evaluation criterion therefore, improving direct transactions, school meals, management of existing sales channels, and shopping malls are crucial policy measures. In contrast, the cooperation of cooperatives, expansion of union members, and cooperation with the government were found to have low priority. Conclusions - Agricultural cooperatives should develop plans as follows. Small agricultural cooperatives need to secure school meals and direct transactions for market expansion, restructure marketing strategies to manage existing sales channels, and, finally, increase education and training for sustainable organizational development. This study has the following limitations. Because the subject of the investigation is a new cooperative, determining its sustainable growth is difficult. Therefore, through analysis and a continuous study of cooperatives, future research is expected to show that modifying the direction of agriculture cooperatives is necessary.

계층화분석법(AHP)을 이용한 건강보험급여확대상병 우선순위 결정 (Priority setting for expanding health insurance benefit package using Analytic Hierarchy Process)

  • 최숙자;고수경;김정희;이상이
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제16권1호
    • /
    • pp.73-94
    • /
    • 2006
  • This study was carried out to show how the Analytic Hierarchy Process technique could be used in setting the priority among selected diseases to increase the range of health insurance benefit. Thirty experts, including doctors (group1), experts for preventive medicine or public health(group2), and representatives of the insured(group 3), participated in the study panel that is conducted for priority setting. They were asked to evaluate the priorities among 6 selected criteria and then 42 selected diseases. The results were as follows; First, representatives of the insured think that the magnitude of out-of-pocket payment should have high priority while doctors think that effectiveness of treatment should have high priority. Second, all experts think that catastrophic diseases such as malignant neoplasm, major heart disease, and cerebral vascular disease should have high priority in health insurance coverage even though there is little difference among groups. These results can be useful to establish a systematic strategy for expanding health insurance benefit package.

Analytic Hierarchy Process for Prioritizing Radiation Safety Measures in Medical Institutions

  • Hyun Suk Kim;Heejeong Jeong;Hyungbin Moon;Sang Hyun Park
    • Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
    • /
    • 제49권1호
    • /
    • pp.40-49
    • /
    • 2024
  • Background: This study aimed to prioritize policy measures to improve radiation safety management in medical institutions using the analytic hierarchy process. Materials and Methods: It adopted three policy options-engineering, education, and enforcement-to categorize safety management measures, the so-called Harvey's 3Es. Then, the radiation safety management measures obtained from the current system and other studies were organized into action plan categories. Using the derived model, this study surveyed 33 stakeholders of radiation safety management in medical institutions and analyzed the importance of each measure. Results and Discussion: As a result, these stakeholders generally identified enforcement as the most important factor for improving the safety management system. The study also found that radiation safety officers and medical physicists perceived different measures as important, indicating clear differences in opinions among stakeholders, especially in improving quality assurance in radiation therapy. Hence, the process of coordination and consensus is likely to be critical in improving the radiation safety management system. Conclusion: Stakeholders in the medical field consider enforcement as the most critical factor in improving their safety management systems. Specifically, the most crucial among the six specific action plans was the "reinforcement of the organization and workforce for safety management," with a relative importance of 25.7%.

계층분석을 활용한 창의적 SW인재양성 정책방향 도출 (Derivation of Creative SW HRD Policy Using Analytic Hierarchy Process)

  • 이중만;임명환
    • 디지털융복합연구
    • /
    • 제11권10호
    • /
    • pp.95-102
    • /
    • 2013
  • 최근 들어 SW산업이 모바일과 클라우드 기술환경으로 패러다임이 급격하게 변화하고 있는데, 국내 SW인력양성의 현황 및 문제점을 PEST-SWOT분석을 통해 PEST요인과 연계하여 내외부 환경요인을 도출하였다. 또한 산학연 전문가를 대상으로 AHP모형을 적용한 설문조사를 하여 실증 분석한 결과, 스마트 산업 생태계의 변화에 대응하기 위한 SW인재 양성정책 방향으로서 SW융합인재 양성, 창의성이 요구되는 SW분야 대학교육 내실화, 글로벌 인재양성 및 교류, 인프라인 SW벤처생태계 활성화 등을 도출하였다. 그리고 AHP모형으로 SW인재정책비전에 대한 정책우선순위를 분석한 결과, SW기술 활용증대에 따른 SW융합인재 양성, SW벤처 생태계 활성화, SW창업 활성화를 통한 일자리 창출, SW분야 대-중소기업 상생발전 조성, 창의적 SW인재양성, 글로벌 우수인재 확보 순으로 중요도가 높았다.

신종 감염병 환자의 효율적 처치를 위한대형병원 응급실 관리요소의 중요도 도출 (Deriving the Effective Improvement Elements of the Emergency Room in Large General Hospitals)

  • 윤송이
    • 중환자간호학회지
    • /
    • 제8권2호
    • /
    • pp.66-79
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: This study aimed to derive the elements for effectively improving the management of emerging infectious diseases in the emergency room in large general hospitals. Methods: This research involved an analytic hierarchy process analysis of 10 experienced nurses working in a large general hospital located in the Seoul metropolitan area. The weighted values of the criteria for evaluating the importance of the management elements of patients with emerging infectious diseases in the emergency room of large general hospitals were derived using an analytic hierarchy process survey. Results: The results of the analytic hierarchy process analysis showed that experts considers responsiveness (0.291) as most important with respect to the criteria for the policy for isolation and control of infectious patients. The order of importance of the criteria for the policy for isolation and control of infectious patients were as follows: responsiveness (0.291), economical efficiency (0.257), feasibility (0.242), and sustainability (0.209). Subsequently, the weighted values of the management of the policy elements were determined based on the derived importance of the criteria mentioned above. These were, in order of priority, the construction of communication channels with the government authorities when dealing with emerging infectious diseases (15.9%), the equipment and provision of personal protective equipment to protect nurses from infection and dissemination of material (14.6%), and the operation of the isolation room and patient separation systems (14.1%). Conclusion: This study suggests critical strategies for infection control during a pandemic of emerging infectious disease.

AHP기법을 이용한 공동주택 분양가 결정에 관한연구 (A study of the decision to standardize sale price of supplying apartment houses using Analytic Hierarchy Process)

  • 황규성;이찬호
    • 디지털융복합연구
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.121-129
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본 연구의 목적은 아파트 분양가격의 결정요인에 대하여 AHP 분석방법으로 신규공급 아파트의 가격 산정을 위한 기준을 마련하고자 한다. 아파트 분양가격의 분양가격 결정요인을 계층구조로 모델링한다. 모델링한 계층구조에 따라서 부동산전문가그룹의 설문으로 분양요소들의 상대적 중요도를 파악한다. 그리고 AHP 분석방법으로 단계별 분양가격 결정요인의 상대적 중요도 찾아내어서 신규공급 아파트의 경쟁력 있는 분양가격 산정을 위한 기준을 마련하고자 한다.

사물인터넷(IoT) 산업 진흥을 위한 정부의 역할에 관한 연구 -AHP를 활용한 정책 중요도 분석을 중심으로- (Searching Role of Government for Promoting IoT Industry -Utilizing Importance of Individual Sub-Policies using AHP-)

  • 이용규;윤구홍
    • 디지털융복합연구
    • /
    • 제14권5호
    • /
    • pp.47-55
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본 연구는 IoT 분야의 다양한 정부정책을 파악하고, 이들 간 상대적 중요성을 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 전문가를 대상으로 Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)분석방법을 활용하였다. 그 결과, 첫째, IoT 관련 정책범위가 광범위함에도 불구하고, 학계, 산업계 등의 정책 전문가가 매우 제한적이었고, 둘째, 만족도관점에서 해외진출정책, R&D지원 정책, 벤처지원정책, 인력양성정책, 규제정책의 순이었으나 전반적인 만족도 수준은 낮았으며, 셋째, 중요성 관점에서 벤처지원이 가장 높았으며, 그 다음으로 R&D지원, 인력양성, 규제정립, 해외진출의 순으로 높았다. 종합하면 연구활동 지원, 해외시장 개척지원, 벤처제품우선구매, 산학협동 대학교육 강화 등의 선도자적 정부역할에 높은 중요성을 부여하고 있었던 반면에 조정자적 역할에 대한 중요도 인식은 상대적으로 낮았다. 그러나 전문가집단도 정부가 중요한 프로젝트에서는 기본적으로 시범사업이나 실태조사 등을 수행해 와서, 이의 중요성에도 불구하고 제대로 인식하지 못하였을 수 있다.

부산 금융중심지의 선박금융특화를 위한 정책 선호도 분석 (A Study on Policy Preference to Specialize in Ship Finance for Busan's Financial Hub Function)

  • 이재민;양종서;이기환
    • 한국항만경제학회지
    • /
    • 제29권4호
    • /
    • pp.97-117
    • /
    • 2013
  • 한국은 세계 제 1위의 조선산업 국가이면서도 국내 선박금융의 공급은 한계를 보여 왔다. 이 때문에 선박금융 확대 요구가 증대되었으며, 이에 대처하기 위해 정치권을 중심으로 선박금융지원정책에 대한 논의가 활발히 진행되어 왔다. 한편 부산시는 정부로부터 지정받은 금융중심지의 특화금융 분야 중 하나로 선박금융을 꼽고, 선박금융활성화에 많은 관심과 노력을 기울이고 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 점을 감안하여 선박금융지원정책에 대한 부산시의 선호도를 조사함에 목적이 있다. 연구를 위해 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)방식이 활용되었고, 인터뷰와 설문조사에는 부산시의 해운정책담당 공무원, 금융기관 종사자, 경제연구소 직원 등이 참여하였다. 정책대안으로는 (1) 선박금융공사 설립 (2) 해운보증기금 설치 (3) Tonnage Bank 설립 (4) 기존 국책금융기관의 선박금융업무 통폐합 (5) 기존 기관의 관련부서 부산으로의 이전 등이 제시되었다. 분석결과 부산시는 이 중 선박금융공사 설립을 가장 선호하는 안으로 꼽고 있는데 이는 정부나 선박금융시장에서의 선호도와는 차이가 큰 결과이다.

간호서비스 연구개발 분야에서의 우선순위과제 도출 (Development of Agenda Priority for Nursing Service Research and Development)

  • 오의금;장연수;공새롬;이윤주
    • 간호행정학회지
    • /
    • 제21권1호
    • /
    • pp.99-110
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to suggest agenda priorities for nursing service R&D (Research and Development) related policies development. Methods: Two steps in developing the agendas and priorities were performed in this descriptive study. First, nursing service R&D agendas were extracted through needs assessment of nursing researchers and practitioners. Then, the priority of agendas was set by Analytic Hierarchy Process by ten experts who were representatives of nursing and other healthcare professionals. Results: Six core areas and forty-six nursing service R&D agendas were developed. The priority of agendas was different according to the evaluation criteria depending on weight value of nursing services. Conclusion: In order to select and promote nursing service R&D projects within national healthcare policy, nursing service R&D policy should be proposed with consideration to the importance of the criteria in reflecting characteristics of nursing care. By strengthening R&D capabilities for quality improvement and sensitive awareness of national directions for healthcare R&D policies, nursing service R&D can be appropriately promoted.

기후기술 융·복합 사업모델 평가를 위한 지표 개발 (Development of Indicators for Assessment of Technology Integrated Business Models in Climate Change Responses)

  • 오상진;성민규;김형주
    • 한국기후변화학회지
    • /
    • 제9권4호
    • /
    • pp.435-443
    • /
    • 2018
  • Climate technology applied to address climate change requires a comprehensive review such as environmental and social acceptability in addition to economic feasibility. Not only mitigation and adaptation technologies, but also integration of climate technologies into a business model with other relevant technologies including ICT, finance, and policy instruments could enhance technical, economic, and environmental performances to respond to climate changes. However, many climate projects (and business models) are currently not designed to consider adequately complex climate?related issues. In addition, there is a lack of research on assessment systems that can comprehensively evaluate business feasibility of such models. In this study, we developed a system consisting of nine major indicators in four fields to assess climate technology-based business models. Each indicator was weighed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for systematic assessment of business models. The process can be utilized as a tool to guide improvement of climate technology business models.