• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제15권12호
• /
• pp.95-102
• /
• 2017

Purpose - This study aims to develop diagnostic indices for managerial performance of agro-food distribution corporations. In particular, weights of diagnostic indices were estimated using the AHP method. Management diagnosis on agro-food distribution corporations is expected to increase their competitiveness in the domestic market as well as in international markets. Research design, data, and methodology - It develops weights or importance of the diagnostic indices based upon the survey of 21 experts in food distribution management. The survey was carried out using e-mail. Management diagnostic indices were developed based upon four BSC(Balanced Scorecard) perspectives of finance, learning/growth/leadership, customer, and internal process/technology. Results - Diagnostic indices on financial perspective consist on profitability, productivity, growth, stability and activity. Learning and leadership perspective indices consist of management will, CEO leadership, level of learning, innovation, and level of management information system. Customer perspective indices are branding, customer and channel management and internal process/technology indices consist of fourteen sub-indices representing technologies, efficiency, and dynamics. It was estimated that the weight of financial perspective index was 0.3, internal process/technology perspective index 0.248, customer category index 0.247, and learning, growth and leadership perspective index 0.205. This study also estimates weights of sub-indices for managerial diagnosis by four different perspectives. Estimated weight of profitability (0.085) is the greatest among financial perspective indices, followed by stability (0.072), growth (0.053), productivity (0.051), and activity (0.038). While estimated weights of leadership, capability, and information indices are 0.100, 0.061, and 0.044 respectively, weights of marketing, customer management, and quality and service indices are 0.104, 0.093, and 0.051, respectively. Among internal process/technology perspective, estimated weights of efficiency, technology, and innovation indices are 0.106, 0.088, and 0.054, respectively. Conclusions - The diagnostic indices for managerial performance of agro-food distribution corporations would be utilized by agro-food distribution corporations themselves, extension service institutions, and consultants. It is also expected that central and local governments use diagnostic indices developed in this study for the purpose of evaluating the effects of governmental support programs for agro-food distribution corporations. Futhermore researchers and consultants would modify diagnostic indices developed in this study, reflecting characteristics and situation of types of agro-food distribution corporations.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.135-144
• /
• 2019

In this study, BSC model of center for teaching and learning was developed using balanced scorecard suitable for non-profit organization. Firstly, relevant literature surveys and evaluation indicators of various CTL and institution with similar characteristics were examined. Next, a draft BSC model was designed through interviews of specialists. Lastly, the BSC model was proposed by verifying the content validity of the evaluation model by conducting two Delphi surveys. The BSC model of CTL has 4 perspectives: resource, customer, internal process, learning and growth, 9 critical success factors: 2 factors in resource, customer and learning and growth perspectives, 3 factors in internal process perspective, and 23 key performance Indicators: 4 indicators in resource and learning and growth, 7 indicators in customer perspective, 8 indicators in internal process perspective. The implications of this study through the results were as follows: firstly, the proposed BSC model showed an evaluation model suitable for a non-profit organization. Second, the BSC model was linked to the organization's mission and vision. Third, it could contribute to the long-term development of CTL. Lastly, if it could be applied to management, and evaluated, it is expected to play a role of providing basic data for the budget support and spread of the university.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2009

The balanced scorecard(BSC) framework is a tool for strategic decision making and task support that aims for efficiency in performance management and strategy execution. BSC evolved from an old performance management practice, which tended to be limited to a finance-only perspective, to a new system of corporate management looking at corporate tasks from a multi-dimensional, future-inclined value perspective. This form of BSC amounts to a framework capable of driving management innovation and renewing the ways in which companies conceive their strategy and perform their operations. Since BSC draws integrally on user participation, it can be expected that users' satisfaction with BSC systems is an important factor in systems' success or failure. However, previous studies of the BSC system have not yet considered it as a theoretical model, specifically examining BSC system and task characteristics. To date, only a few studies have put forward plans for the implementation and use of BSC systems, and these studies have the common limitation of failing to consider the circumstances or theoretical structure of the companies for which a BSC system is being proposed. This paper then begins to fill some of this gap by characterizing the BSC system from the perspective of contingency theories. Contingency theories can be particularly useful in the Korean context in exploring how different companies use the BSC system in ways determined by their unique environmental characteristics, which may also determine the performance factors behind the application of a company's particular BSC system. In order to provide concrete suggestions for implanting and using the BSC system from a contingency theory perspective, this study sets out to determine the relationships between the contingency variables affecting BSC system performance and BSC system property variables(in given cases) through an empirical analysis. The study takes into account the perspective from which contingency theory is to be applied in individual cases, sets contingency and BSC property variables with reference to the BSC system user's environment and BSC system's character, and frames initial hypotheses concerning corporate structure and environmental variables and BSC system performance variables with reference to previous studies. A survey was then conducted on users in Korean companies that have implemented the BSC system in order to verify the research model and understand results.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.486-495
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether the perception of KPIs by restaurant managers from financial and non-financial perspectives was affected by BSC implementation. The perceptions that were examined were importance, adoption, performance, and utilization of KPIs. We surveyed managers from multinational restaurant chains that were adopting BSC and those that were not. From a non-financial perspective, the difference in perceived importance between BSC adopted firms and firms that did not adopt BSC was significant. The managers of BSC adopted firms perceived KPIs more seriously than the others. Secondly, according to the managers' working experiences, the difference of perceived utilization in the internal business process perspective was significant between BSC adopted firms and firms that did not adopt BSC. In addition, from the learning and growth perspective, the difference in perceived adoption and utilization between the two groups was significant. Finally, in the BSC adopted firms, the perceived importance of the managers affected the other perceptions like adoption and utilization from both the financial and non-financial perspectives.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.13-30
• /
• 2006

This study aims at exploring the relationships between knowledge activity, knowledge activity performance, and organizational performance. By adopting the balanced scorecard perspective, organizational performance was measured by product/service, customer and internal performances. Using data collected from the 36 Korean firms, this study found that knowledge creation activity was positively and significantly related to the organizational performance such as product/service performance, customer performance and internal performance. We also found that knowledge activity performance such as knowledge quality and user knowledge satisfaction mediated the positive relationship between knowledge sharing activity and internal performance.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.111-136
• /
• 2008

균형성과표(BSC) 모형은 기업의 경영성과를 비재무적 지표로서 학습 및 성장성과, 내부 경영프로세스 성과, 고객성과, 재무적 지표로서 재무적 성과를 중심으로 측정하고 평가하는 통합적 성과 측정 시스템이다. 이러한 균형성과표(BSC) 모형은 재무적 성과 지표를 중심으로 기업의 경영성과를 측정하고 평가하는데 있어서 나타나는 한계를 보완하고 종합적으로 측정하고 평가함으로써 합리적인 기업의 성과를 예측하고 측정하는 평가시스템이다. 본 연구에서는 기업이 균형성과표(BSC) 모형을 도입하여 활용하는 경우 도입전과 후의 성과에서 유의미한 차이가 있는지를 구명하고, 비재무적 성과 지표와 재무적 성과 지표, 그리고 전반적인 경영성과 간의 영향관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과 균형성과표(BSC) 모형을 도입하여 활용하는 경우 기업의 학습 및 성장성과에 유의미한 차이가 분석되었으며, 비재무적 성과 지표들은 재무적 성과를 개선하여 전반적인 기업의 경영성과를 향상시키는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.241-262
• /
• 2006

오늘날과 같이 급변하는 환경 하에서 대학도서관이 유기적 조직으로써 다양한 변화에 신축적으로 적응하면서 조직의 총체적인 성과를 측정하기 위해서는 자원을 중심으로 한 양적평가와 서비스를 중심으로 한 질적평가 이외에도 자원 활용의 효율성이나 효과성, 서비스의 제공 능력이나 조직구성원의 잠재능력 등 경영전반에 걸친 균형적인 성과측정표의 개발이 필요하다. 본 연구는 Kaplan과 Norton이 개발한 BSC 모형을 비영리조직인 대학도서관에 적합하게 수정하여 고객, 자원, 내부 프로세스, 학습 성장의 네 관점으로 그 모형을 개발하고, 각 관점별 전략에 대한 전략지도와 측정지표를 개발하였다. 궁극적으로 본 연구는 대학도서관에 전략적 계획과 균형성과표를 연계하여 적용함으로써 대학도서관 조직의 전략적 계획에서 성과까지의 전체적이고 포괄적인 그림을 제시하는 전략적 통합 경영지표를 제시하고자 하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.85-91
• /
• 2011

The objective of this research is to analyze the effects of quality management system constructed by ISO 9001 certificates through BSC perspectives. Evaluation of quality management system based on BSC framework can consider short-term financial performance as well as nonfinancial performance characteristics, which will derive future financial results. This results show that QMS has an indirect effect on business performance through quality performance and customer satisfaction, which are internal business process and customer perspective, rather than have direct effects on financial performance. Finally we suggest implications of this study and future research direction.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.1087-1116
• /
• 2005

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRI). Research methodology is as follows: first, four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton (1992) Balanced Scorecard Model are revised into six perspectives suitable to GRI's characteristics. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI evaluation groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRI's evaluatees are asked to allocate ideal weights on the performance measures. The evaluatees' weights are compared with the weights of current performance measures, and the characteristics of evaluatees' opinions about current performance evaluation systems are analyzed. Results are as follows; first, six perspectives for Korean GRIs are financial, long-term outcome, short-term outcome, strategic direction, project management, human resources perspectives. second, GRI evaluation systems put the most weights on the long- and short-term outcome perspectives and the least weights on the financial perspective. This result complies with theoretical model: in performance evaluation of GRIs, the customer perspective is the most important one while the financial perspective is the least important one. Third, evaluatees think that the long-term outcome perspective of the Basic-technology GRI group and the short-term outcome perspective of the Applied-technology GRI Group needs more weight. Fourth, it is found that the current systems have more weights on the project management and strategic direction perspectives than evaluatees think. The possible explanation of this result would be that since the measures of these perspectives are relatively easier to set up than those of other perspectives, the current systems contains larger number of measures and, accordingly more weights.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.229-252
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 국내 기업에 있어서 지식경영 기반구조가 지식경영활동과 기업의 경영성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 균형성과표(BSC) 모형을 통해 실증적으로 규명하고자 하였다. 그 결과, 조직구조 요인을 제외하고 조직문화, 조직관리, 정보기술 등의 지식경영 기반구조 요인은 지식경영활동에 유의적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 지식경영활동은 재무성과를 제외하고 고객, 내부프로세스, 학습 및 성장관점의 경영성과에 유의적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 본 연구의 시사점 및 기여점을 정리하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기존 연구의 지식경영 평가는 재무적인 성과에 주안점을 두고 이루어짐에 따라 전사적 차원에서의 경영성과 측정에 한계가 있었다. 이에 본 연구는 지식경영의 도입과 추진을 통하여 나타나는 기업의 경영성과를 장기적 목표와 단기적 목표 간의 균형을 통한 객관적 측정을 도모하는 경영성과 평가도구인 BSC를 활용하여 비재무적 및 재무적 성과를 4가지 관점에서 분석함으로써 실질적이고 구체적인 지식경영 효과측정이 가능하게 되었다. 그 결과 지식경영활동이 경영성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으므로 우리나라 기업들이 지식경영을 도입 추진하여 지속적으로 운영해야 할 당위성과 필요성을 제시해 준 연구라고 할 수 있다. 둘째, 본 연구의 실증분석에서 도출된 지식경영 기반구조와 지식경영활동과의 관계, 성과측정 지표는 기업들이 더욱 체계적이고 효율적인 지식경영 도입 및 실천이 이루어질 수 있도록 가이드라인 역할과, 동종 경쟁기업간 비교할 수 있는 기본 틀을 제시할 것으로 기대된다.