• 한국전산구조공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전산구조공학회 2004년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.118-125
• /
• 2004

The assessment of fatigue property is one of the most indispensable factors to design mechanical structures or parts. For accurately assessing fatigue property, it is necessary to precisely identify the loading condition and material property of the objective structure. However, there are many kind of problems in conducting predictive activity for a design concerned with variable factor such as fatigue phenomenons and environments. Therefore, most of the fatigue problems have been assessed from exiting experiment data and prediction method. In this study, expert system is developed for simply conducting performance assessment of weldments based on Finite element Analysis carrying out performance improvement and safety assessment of welded structures.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2020년도 가을 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.107-108
• /
• 2020

There is a need to analyze various factors in evacuation safety assessment of building in fire. In the current performance based design, evacuation safety assessment in case of fire is being conducted through the simulation as FDS and Pathfinder. However, the location and size of the door, the location of evacuation in the event of a fire are not considered when design. Accordingly, it is difficult to determine the worst case scenario considering the actual fire. Therefore in this study, in this study, we will propose an appropriate evaluation plan through simulation considering the worst-case scenario that may occur in case of fire.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제43권6호
• /
• pp.801-809
• /
• 2023

대규모로 진행되는 도로건설사업에서 비용 초과와 공기 지연이 지속적으로 발생하고 있지만 이를 사전에 관리하고 대비할 수 있는 성과평가 체계 연구는 미흡한 실정이다. 또한 긴 공기를 가진 도로건설사업은 시공과정에서 많은 요인들에 영향을 받기 때문에 도로만의 특성을 고려한 성과 평가를 실시하고, 추후 유사한 사업에 대비할 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 도로건설사업의 시공단계 성과평가 프레임워크를 개발하여 도로건설사업의 성과관리 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 본 연구는 각종 유관기관에서 도로건설사업 시공단계의 정보를 수집하고 속성정보에 따라 데이터베이스를 구축하였다. 또한 사업의 착공·준공시점 간 시간차에 대해 비용 표준화를 실시하였고, 성과평가를 위한 지표를 도출하여 분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구는 도로건설사업 시공과정의 절대적, 상대적 비용·일정 성과를 정량적으로 분석함으로써 성과평가 연구의 고도화 가능성과 신규 도로건설사업 계획 시 활용방안을 보여준다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.367-376
• /
• 2009

This paper proposes an application methodology of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision making theory for improvement priority by assessment of various risk factors affecting on deterioration of water supply systems, as major social infrastructure. AHP method is organized with three level of hierarchy which is introduced for multi-criteria decision making in this study. In the first level, assessment outputs are calculated by AHP for each affecting factor. In the second level, criteria are estimated by using assessment results with respect to structural and environmental factors. Consequently, ranking decision is performed in the third level. In order to present the effectiveness, a proposed method is compared with FCP(Fuzzy Composite Programming) for decision making. Since the results of the proposed method show better performance with consistent results, it can be applied as an efficient information for the determination for improvement priority of the study infrastructure.

• 한국원자력학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국원자력학회 1999년도 춘계학술발표회요약집
• /
• pp.193-193
• /
• 1999

• International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.175-182
• /
• 2013

A damage-based approach for the performance-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures is proposed. A new methodology for structural damage assessment is developed that utilizes response information at the material level in each section fiber. The concept of the damage evolution is analyzed at the section level and the computed damage is calibrated with observed experimental data. The material level damage parameter is combined at the element, story and structural level through the use of weighting factors. The damage model is used to compare the performance of two typical 12-story frames that have been designed for different seismic requirements. A series of nonlinear time history analyses is carried out to extract demand measures which are then expressed as damage indices using the proposed model. A probabilistic approach is finally used to quantify the expected seismic performance of the building.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.127-141
• /
• 2006

This study aims to create assessment tools for the development fund for women, and to assess the business performance of the organizations using this development fund for women on the basis of such tools. A total of 57 projects by 58 organizations were assessed for a period of eight months. The assessment was carried out by using five tools: 1) examining the weight of the assessment tools, 2) visiting and inspecting project sites, 3) visiting and inspecting the offices of the participating organizations, 4) cooperating with the Seoul Metropolitan Government for municipal administration, and 5) assessing the final project report. Each tool was comprised of three elements: ability of relevant organizations, operational procedure, and projects results. The assessment results are summarized below: 1. According to the examination of the general trends in assessing the organizations that received the Development Fund for Women, it was found that the assessment emphasized performance more than the process involved in the project. Thus, the result suggested that the projects should be carried out more aggressively. 2. Regression analysis was conducted to identify the capability of the organizations in performing the projects with the development fund for women and the capability of the subjects as an independent variable. It was observed that such capabilities were affected by the degree of role sharing and the utilization of internal organizations. It suggested the importance of human resources. 3. To motivate the subjects involved in executing the projects with the use of the Development Fund for Women, the requirements and the satisfaction factors suggested strengthening the scope of financial support and activating the project environment. In conclusion, it is considered that the findings would provide practical ways to improve the system in using the Development Fund for Women, and in setting relevant policies in the future.

• 서비스연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.70-92
• /
• 2022

프로젝트에 대한 리스크 평가는 프로젝트의 성과를 사전에 판단할 수 있기 때문에 프로젝트를 수행하는 기업의 입장에서 사업수행 이전에 진행하는 활동 중 가장 중요한 활동이다. 본 연구는 이러한 프로젝트 리스크 평가가 사업 수행 성과 및 고객만족도에 어떠한 영향관계를 가지는 지 분석하기 위해 기술 및 일정 등과 같은 전통적인 리스크 요인과 재무적, 전략적, 특별 리스크 등과 같이 기업에서 활용하는 리스크 요인을 종합하여 리스크 평가를 위한 요인을 마련하였다. 분석을 위해 전체 134개 공공 및 민간 프로젝트에 대한 사전 리스크 평가 결과와 사업 수행성과 및 고객만족도 등 프로젝트 수행 결과에 대한 정보를 수집하였다. 분석 결과 도출된 리스크 요인들은 비즈니스 성과 및 고객 만족도에 어느정도 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 리스크가 반드시 성과에 부(-)의 영향을 미치지는 않다는 결과도 나타났다. 이는 리스크에 대한 관리 수준에 따라 프로젝트 성과가 영향 받는다는 것을 의미하는 것으로, 향후 연구에서는 리스크에 대한 관리 수준과 프로젝트 성과와의 관계에 대한 실증적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제29권6호
• /
• pp.444-450
• /
• 1997

The current ASME code for reinforced concrete containment structures are not based on probability concepts. The stochastic nature of natural hazard or accidental loads and the variations of material properties require a probabilistic approach for a rational assessment of structural safety and performance. The paper develops design load factors for the serviceability limit state of reinforced concrete containment structures. The target limit state probability is determined and the load factors are calculated by the numerical analysis. Design load factors are proposed and carried out the reliability assessments.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.125-130
• /
• 2014

Background: Construction industry is among the most hazardous industries, and needs a comprehensive and simple-to-administer tool to continuously assess and promote its health and safety performance. Methods: Through the study of various standard systems (mainly Health, Safety, and Environment Management System; Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series 180001; and British Standard, occupational health and safety management systems-Guide 8800), seven main elements were determined for the desired framework, and then, by reviewing literature, factors affecting these main elements were determined. The relative importance of each element and its related factors was calculated at organizational and project levels. The provided framework was then implemented in three construction companies, and results were compared together. Results: The results of the study show that the relative importance of the main elements and their related factors differ between organizational and project levels: leadership and commitment are the most important elements at the organization level, whereas risk assessment and management are most important at the project level. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the framework is easy to administer, and by interpreting the results, the main factors leading to the present condition of companies can be determined.