• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.131-151
• /
• 2005

As student-centered learning grows, formative peer assessment practices have been universally used in various fields. According to the review of traditional peer assessment practices, the formative peer assessment has five common stages: planning, assessing (giving feedback), receiving feedback, reflection, and revising. As the each stage of traditional formative peer assessment has some weaknesses, the study discusses solutions that are recommended for dealing with the problems by introducing the potential benefits of web-based peer assessment. Then, desirable future trends of web-based peer assessment are suggested. The author hopes that understanding the potential benefits of web-based formative peer assessment will promote the proper use of peer assessment and render positive effect on student learning.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.129-141
• /
• 2004

A peer assessment method was implemented as part of an action research project where the primary goal was to create constructivist science classrooms. Student reflective writings, which had been created in the process of action research, were analyzed to examine the perceptions of the students concerning the peer assessment method employed in their earth science classrooms. Five perception categories and thirteen statements were developed from the student writings. These indicated that the students appreciated the positive nature of peer assessment and the effects of it as an alternative method for promoting learning. It was also revealed, however, that some students displayed inappropriate behaviors toward peer assessment which led to negative perceptions of the new assessment method. Implications for future use of peer assessment in science classrooms are discussed. Limitations founded in the present study as well as possible solutions are provided.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.439-452
• /
• 2019

This study aims to compare self- and peer-assessments of science-gifted elementary students' scientific creativity. A science-gifted program on the Pascal's principle was implemented to 40 fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center for two weeks. After that, students presented their results from a scientific creativity task using the principle in class. The task was to devise a new and useful tool using the principle, and it included the students' self-assessment about their idea. During presentation, students were asked to assess the works of peers and write down the reasons that they gave the scores they gave. Shortly, student self- and peer-assessments about students' scientific creativity outcomes were compared. Based on two essential components of creativity, ideas that satisfy both originality and usefulness can be counted as scientifically creative. The main results of this study are as follows: First, the average scores of student self- and peer-assessments were 71.5 and 61.9. Second, the standard deviations of student self- and peer-assessments were 14.47 and 5.79. Third, among scientific creativity, originality, usefulness scores, only originality had a significant correlation between student self- and peer-assessment (r=.42). Fourth, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scores by student self- and peer-assessment. And the frequencies of peer-assessment group had a significant difference at p<0.05 level, according to self-assessment group (Chi Square=4.0000, df=1, p=0.0455). Fifth, through a case study by group, the results suggesting that self-assessment could be affected by the students' self-efficacy and perfectionism and such effect could also influence peer-assessment have been found. The result showed that how the student self- and peer-assessment of scientific creativity are different and what the students' thoughts on the evaluation of scientific creativity are. The findings suggested that there are several things to consider for the educators to make efforts to construct consistent assessment methods for scientific creativity.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.443-450
• /
• 2008

Peer assessment is the process of assessment of students by other students and one form of innovative assessment. It actively involves students in the assessment process and is generally agreed that such involvement enhances the quality and effectiveness of the learning process, since assessing something and benchmarking process is a powerful aid to mastering it themselves. It is more effective on the hard courses for them to understand. In this article we present a peer assessment technique which was applied to students enrolled in a mathematical statistics course and a historical course. In order to measure the effectiveness of the technique, students had to evaluate their colleagues based on predefined criteria and a comparison is presented between the instructor assessments and the peer assessment.

• 인지과학
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.85-104
• /
• 2018

동료평가란 학생들이 다른 학생의 글, 발표, 집단 활동과 같은 평가 대상이 될 수 있는 모든 결과물이나 수행 과정에 대해 점수를 매기거나 의견을 제공하는 활동을 가리킨다. 동료평가는 채점부담으로 인해 잘 활용되지 않는 글쓰기 기회를 늘릴 수 있을 뿐만 아니라, 평가를 하는 과정을 통해 학습도 향상시킬 수 있다는 장점이 있다. 본 개관 논문에서는, 주요 동료평가 시스템과 동료평가를 사용한 경험적 연구 결과를 소개한 다음, 동료평가 확산의 장애 요인을 살펴보고, 앞으로의 연구에서 해결되어야 할 과제가 논의되었다. 이 논의를 통해 동료평가에 대한 후속 연구가 활성화되고 동료평가가 실제 교육 장면에서 활용되어, 우리나라의 평가와 수업 방법에 큰 변화를 가져오기를 기대해본다.

• 인지과학
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.175-197
• /
• 2019

고차적 사고를 요구하는 글쓰기는 배운 지식을 활용하고 발전시키게 한다. 학습 장면에서 글쓰기를 더 많이 활용하기 위해서는 동료평가를 도입하는 동시에 동료평가의 정확도를 높일 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 동료평가의 정확도를 높이는 방안으로, 평가 기준에 대해 학생들끼리 토론하게 하거나 전문가의 평가를 참고하도록 하는 두 방안을 탐색하였다. 대학생 150명을 대상으로 한 실험 결과, 동료평가 후 전문가의 평가를 참고했던 집단이 평가했던 글을 다시 평가할 때는 평가 정확도가 향상되었지만, 새로운 글을 평가할 때는 향상되지 않았다. 반면에, 동료평가 후 평가 기준에 대하여 토론을 진행했던 집단은 평가했던 글을 다시 평가할 때는 평가 정확도가 향상되지 않았지만, 새로운 글을 평가할 때는 향상됨을 발견하였다. 또한 토론 집단의 경우 평가 기준에 대한 토론에서 총 발언 수가 많아질수록 평가 정확도가 높아졌다. 이상의 결과는 평가 기준에 대한 토론에서 적극적이고 자발적인 논의가 활발할수록 이후 동료평가의 정확도가 향상됨을 시사한다.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.979-987
• /
• 2009

In this study, we compare the assessments made by self, peer and instructor in a statistics course. The goal is to investigate the following two questions: (1) Is it reasonable or fair to expect students to be responsible for assessing the work of their colleagues and themselves? (2) What are students' opinions about the learning effect after they participate in the assessment process? As part of the study investigating these questions, we designed a prototype for a Web-based assessment tool and a procedure to apply the assessment techniques in a statistics course. In addition, we collected and analyzed the data produced in the assessment processes from students and the instructor. The analysis results are summarized as follows: First, self assessment was not accord with instructor assessment, but peer assessment was similar to the assessment by instructor. This result reflected that it is reasonable or fair to expect students to be responsible for assessing the work of their colleagues. Second, peer assessment of their colleagues successfully helped students increase their understanding of the course, and the students increased their skills in the actual assessment process by assessing the work of their colleagues. Finally, many students indicated a high interest level on the assessments.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.215-229
• /
• 2018

Despite the importance of learning to do mathematical proofs, researchers have reported that not only secondary school students but also undergraduate students have difficulties in learning proofs. In this study, we introduced a new toll for learning proofs and explored the reliability and the validity of peer assessment on proofs. In the course of a university in Seoul, students were given weekly proof assignments prior to class. After solving the proofs, each student had to assess other students' proofs. The inter-rater reliabilities of weekly peer assessment was higher than .9 over 90 percent of the observed cases. To examine the validity of peer assessment, we check whether students' assessments were similar to expert assessment. Analysis showed that the equivalence has been quite high throughout the semester and the validity was low in the middle of the semester but rose by the end of the semester. Based on these results, we believe instructors can consider the application of peer assessment on proving tasks as a tool to help students learn.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.536-544
• /
• 2009

Purpose : This study aimed to examine the relationship between intragroup peer evaluation and self-directed learning readiness(SDLR) in an Introduction to Education class that used a team based learning(TBL). Moreover, it identified the specific components of the SDLR that predicted the peer evaluation results. Method : The research subject pool comprised of 87 $1^{st}$ students in D Health College. Each team was composed of 6~8 members, each of whom evaluated all other members on his or her team SDLR was measured by using SDLR-K-96. Results : SDLR and peer assessment scores had a positive relationship, confirming that SDLR was an important variable that could predict the peer evaluation scores. Among the SDLR factors, 'openness to challenge' and 'self-confidence as a learner' was shown to have the predictive power for the peer assessment. Conclusion : The colleges should provide dental hygiene students with learning opportunities on ability to do self-directed learning through diverse learning methods such as team based learning.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.67-87
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 초등학교에서 이루어지는 수행평가 실시에서의 문제점을 인식하고 자기평가, 동료평가 및 관찰평가의 실천을 통하여 평가에 따르는 시간적인 제약을 줄이고, 평가의 결과를 교수 학습계획에 반영시킴으로써 평가를 통한 초등수학과 교수 학습의 개선에 대한 시사점을 찾아보고자 이루어졌다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위하여 연구자는 초등학교 2학년 1개 반 학생 40명을 대상으로 자기평가, 동료평가를 실시하고 '재미있는 놀이를 하여 봅시다' 차시의 운영과정에서 관찰평가를 한 학기동안 적용하였으며 평가의 적용과정에서 얻어진 학생들의 자기평가결과물(수학일지, 자기평가지, 평가의 과정에서의 대화내용)과 관찰평가 결과물(체크리스트, 놀이 활동 결과물, 놀이의 과정에서의 대화내용)을 분석해 보았다.