1 |
Appalachia Educational Laboratory, & Virginia Education Association, 1992, Alternative assessments in math and science: Moving toward a moving target. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED355256
|
2 |
Berry, R., 2003, Alternative assessment and assessment for learning. Paper presented at the 29th International Association for Educational Assessment annual conference, Crowne Plaza Manchester, The Midland, UK. Retrieved December 5, 2003 from http://www.aqa.org.uk/support/iaea/papers/berry.pdf
|
3 |
Duffy, T.M. and Cunningham, DJ., 1996, Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York, NY: MacMillan, 170-198
|
4 |
Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R., 1988, The action research planner (3rd edition). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press
|
5 |
Orpwood, G., 2001, The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 8(2), 135-151
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Paris, S.G., 1998, Why learner-centered assessment is better than high-stakes testing. In N. M. Lambert and B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association, 189-209
|
7 |
Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merrienboer, J., and Bastiaens, T.J., 2003, The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 23-42
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Yager, R.E. and McCormack, A.J., 1989, Assessing teaching/learning successes in multiple domains of science and science education. Science Education, 73(1), 45-58
DOI
|
9 |
Lambert, N.M. and McCombs, B.L., 1998, How students learn: Reforming schools through leamer-centered education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
|
10 |
Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., Taylor, P.C., and Chen, C.-C., 2000, Constructivist learning environments in a crossnational study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37-55
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Lee, M.-K., 2001, The effects of a professional development program for physics teachers on their teaching and the learning of their students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Iowa, Iowa City, LA
|
12 |
Liu, J., Pysarchik, D.T., and Taylor, W.W., 2002, Peer review in the classroom. Bioscience, 52(9), 824-829
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Champagne, A.B., Kouba, V.L., and Hurley, M., 2000, Assessing inquiry. In J. Minstrell and E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 447-470
|
14 |
Sivan, A., 2000, The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 7(2), 193-213
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Dass, P.M., 1996, Professional development: The Iowa Chautauqua model. Science Education International, 70(1), 18-21
|
16 |
Hargreaves, D.J., 1997, Student learning and assessment are inextricably linked. European Journal of Engineering Education, 22(4), 401-409
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Oh, P.S. and Shin, M.-K., 2004, Students reflections on implementation of Group Investigation in Korean secondary science classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication
|
18 |
Shin, M.-K., 2000, A study of effectiveness of the Iowa Chautauqua staff development model for reform of science teaching in Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
|
19 |
Zessoules, R. and Gardner, H., 1991, Authentic assessment: Beyond the buzzword and into the classroom. In V. Perrone (Ed.), Expanding student assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 47-71
|
20 |
Shin, M.-K. and Oh, P.S., 2003, Reflection on the Iowa Chautauqua Program as a science teacher inservice model. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 24(2), 74-81
|
21 |
Lorsbach, A.W., Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., and LaMaster, S.U., 1992. An interpretation of assessment methods in middle school science. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 305-317
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Sharan, Y. and Sharan, S., 1989, Group Investigation expands cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 17-21
|
23 |
National Research Council, 1996, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
|
24 |
Shepard, L.A., 1995, February, Using assessment to improve learning. Educational Leadership, 38-43
|
25 |
Brooks, J.G. and Brooks, M.G., 1999, In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
|
26 |
Eisenhower National Clearinghouse, 1999, Ideas that work science professional development. Columbus, OH: Author
|
27 |
Taylor, P.C., Fraser, J.C., and Fisher, D.L., 1997, Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293-302
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Willis, J., 2000, The maturing of constructivist instructional design: Some basic principles that can guide practice. Educational Technology, 40(1), 5-16
|
29 |
Yager, R.E., Mackinnu, and Blunck, S.M., 1992, Science/Technology/Society as reform of science in the elementary school. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4(1), 1-13.
DOI
|
30 |
Valanides, N. and Angeli, C, 2002, Challenges in achieving scientific and technological literacy: Research directions for the future. Science Education International, 13(1), 2-7.
|
31 |
Oh, P.S., Shin, M.-K., and Yager, R.E., 2003, Science classroom improvement through collaborative action research: the process and quantitative evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication
|
32 |
Black, P. and Wiliam, D., 1998, Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 5(1), 7-74
|
33 |
Herman, J.L. and Klein, D.C.D., 1997, American students perspectives on alternative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3), 339-342
|
34 |
Lin S.S. J., Liu, E.Z.F., and Yuan, S.M., 2002, Student attitudes toward networked peer assessment: Case studies of undergraduate students and senior high school students. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(2), 2002
|
35 |
Reigeluth, C.M., 1999, What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 5-29
|
36 |
Baxter, G.P., Elder, A.D., and Glaser, R., 1996, Knowledgebased cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 133-140
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Raizen, S.A, Baron, J.B., Champagne, A.B., Haertel, E, Mullis, V.S., and Oakes, J., 1989, Assessment in elementary school science education. National Center for Improving Science Education
|
38 |
Sharan, Y. and Sharan, S., 1994, Group Investigation in the cooperative classroom. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 97-114
|
39 |
National Research Council, 2000, Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
|