• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.162-167
• /
• 2014

This study is to solve the public education's dilemma between the standardized education to maximize learning efficiency and the personalized education to maximize learning effectiveness, using the paradox management process. The process is based on combining the TOC (Theory Of Constraints) and TRIZ (Russian Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), which is a creative way of thinking to draw the synergic effect by pursuing simultaneously the conflicting elements. Through this research, a new concept of learning method can be suggested on a public course. Further research should be performed to develop a learning guideline based on the students' empirical study results.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.72-80
• /
• 2010

Recently, paradox management is a new paradigm to solve the management dilemmas. This is a new perspective and a creative way of thinking to draw the synergic effect by pursuing simultaneously the conflicting elements. As one method for the paradox management, this paper proposes a process of combining the TOC (Theory Of Constraints) and TRIZ (Russian Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) and applies to a dilemma case in business environments.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.213-225
• /
• 2019

Privacy paradox is a paradoxical behavior that provides personal information even though you are concerned about privacy. Social media users are also often concerned about their personal information exposure. It is even reluctant to describe personal information in profile. However, some users describe their personal information in detail on their profile, provide it freely when others request it, or post their own personal information. The survey was conducted using Google Docs centered on Facebook users. Structural equation model analysis was used for hypothesis testing. As an independent variable, we use personal information infringement experiences. As a mediator, we use privacy indifference, privacy concern, and the relationship with the act of providing personal information. Social media users have become increasingly aware of the fact that they can not distinguish between the real world and online world by strengthening their image and enhancing their image in the process of strengthening ties, sharing lots of information and enjoying themselves through various relationships. Therefore, despite the high degree of privacy indifference and high degree of privacy concern, the phenomenon of privacy paradox is also present in social media.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.5-33
• /
• 2004

This study explores how agents would make decisions responding to control mechanism in contractual relationship of their firm. Focusing on agent's averse behavior against control, system dynamics model for agent's opportunistic behavior is developed in view of agent theory and control theory. This SD model shows that control mechanism by contracts doesn't always play a positive role on corporate decision-making process and Control, especially in the over-controlled contracts, often makes a paradox accelerating agent's opportunistic behavior unexpectedly. This paradox provides us both theoretical and practical implications for the relationship between control mechanism and autonomous behavior for sustainable corporate management.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.19-27
• /
• 2007

알려지지 않은 불분명한 위협을 검출하는 내는 것은 모순이다. 존재하는 것이 알려지지 않았다면 어떻게 찾아 낼 것인가? 그것은 알려지지 알은 위험을 아주 짧은 시간 안에 위협을 정의(identification)을 할 수 있으면 가능 할 수 있을 것이다. 본 논문은 위험 검출 기법을 만들어 네트워크상의 알려지지 않은 위험에 대해 유연하게 대처할 수 있는 시스템 개발에 도움을 줄 수 있게 하기 위해 연구되었다. 이 시스템은 알려지지 않은 위험을 탐지하기 위하여 동적이고 유연한 상황 지식을 가진 로직을 가지고 시스템을 감시한다. 시스템은 새로운 위협의 검출뿐만 아니라 빠르고 효과적인 방법으로 위협에 대처할 수 있다.

• 동양고전연구
• /
• 제66호
• /
• pp.163-191
• /
• 2017

서사가 시작되는 권1에서 비유 예측 암시 역설 등은 모두 이혜란과 호홍매의 관계와 그 의미를 보여준다. 특히 이러한 기법들은 작품의 핵심 내용이자 주제로 볼 수 있는 '투기(妬忌)'와 이에 충돌하는 '불투기(不妬忌)'가 구체화 되는 상황과 그 배경을 제시해 주고, 주요 등장인물들의 관계와 그 관계 속에서 발생할 수많은 사건들의 특징을 미리 보여주는 서사적 역할을 하고 있다. 특히 두 명의 여성 주인공을 통하여 투기와 불투기를 보여주는데, 그 중 불투기의 모든 경우를 이혜란과 연결 지어 부덕(婦德)의 극치를 보여 주면서 서사를 이끌어간다. 반면 한 사람에 대한 사랑과 집착에서 발생하는 투기는 호홍매로 하여금 이성적인 판단을 불가능하게 하고, 질투심으로 인한 악행을 멈추지 못하게 한다. 결국 서사를 마무리 짓는 과정에서 투기의 문제를 집안의 문제로 인식하고, 투기 발생의 원인을 제가(齊家)에 충실하지 못한 가장에 있음을 강조하고 있다. 따라서 투기로 인해 발생한 일들의 해결 방안 역시 가장의 올바른 제가에 있음을 명시적으로 보여주고 있다. 이처럼 <화문록>은 투기와 불투기가 서로 충돌하면서 서사가 진행되며, 허구의 세계에서 구현한 가장 완벽한 부덕(婦德)을 가진 인물과 그 부덕을 통하여 가장 극단적인 투기를 보여주는 인물을 회과(悔過)시키는 과정에서 윤리적 교훈성을 보여주는 소설로 볼 수 있다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.153-169
• /
• 2018

Purpose Since human brains catch images faster than texts or numbers, infographics has been widely used in business in the form of "information dashboard" to enhance the efficiency of decision-making. Groupware, however, has neglected the adoption and use of infographics, in particular, in the idea generation process. Given that an overall performance of groupware-based idea generation is no better than that of the (paper-and-pencil-based) Nominal Group Technique, Jung et al. (2010) adopted the notion of infographics in the form of performance feedback to solve the productivity paradox. With the consistent results, which demonstrate beneficial effects of infographics on performance enhancement, an interesting observation that groups with the bar chart treatment performed better than groups with the dot chart treatment was made. The main purpose of this study was to find if there were a performance consistency between the outcomes from the previous study and the outcomes from the current study. Design/methodology/approach In experiment 1, we employed the same system used in the previous study (i.e., Jung et al., 2010). As individuals' contributions accumulated, the mechanism visually displayed individuals' performances two-dimensionally in the form of a bar chart or a dot chart. Then, we compared the performance outcomes from this study to the outcomes from previous study (i.e., Jung et al., 2010). In experiment 2, we modified the performance graph to test the effect of "playfulness" on performance by converting dots to car images. Then, we compared the performance outcome from experiment 2 to the outcomes from experiment 1. Findings Just like our interesting (and unexpected) finding in Jung et al.'s study (2010), the outcome confirmed a consistent superior performance of a bar chart. This implies that a bar chart is a better choice when stimulating performance with a visual aid in the context of groupware-based idea generation. Although a bar chart was criticized in a way that errors of length-area judgments are 40 ~ 250% greater than those of positional judgments along a common scale, such illusion turned out to be facilitating upward performance comparison better. Regarding Experiment 2, the outcome showed that the revised-dot graph is as good as the bar graph in terms of quantity and quality score of ideas. We attribute the performance enhancement of the resized-dot to the interaction between the motivational characteristic and the situational characteristic of playfulness because individuals in the revised-dot graph treatment performed better than individuals in the dot graph treatment. Given the order of performance (Bar >= Revised Dot > Dot) that the revised-dot treatment performed the same as (or lower than) the bar treatment, an additional research is warranted to reach to a consistent outcome.