The Journal of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구)

Korea Association of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Graphical Formats on Computer-Based Idea Generation Performance

  • Jung, Joung-Ho (Department of Management, Daegu Catholic University)
  • Received : 2017.11.03
  • Accepted : 2018.03.28
  • Published : 2018.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose Since human brains catch images faster than texts or numbers, infographics has been widely used in business in the form of "information dashboard" to enhance the efficiency of decision-making. Groupware, however, has neglected the adoption and use of infographics, in particular, in the idea generation process. Given that an overall performance of groupware-based idea generation is no better than that of the (paper-and-pencil-based) Nominal Group Technique, Jung et al. (2010) adopted the notion of infographics in the form of performance feedback to solve the productivity paradox. With the consistent results, which demonstrate beneficial effects of infographics on performance enhancement, an interesting observation that groups with the bar chart treatment performed better than groups with the dot chart treatment was made. The main purpose of this study was to find if there were a performance consistency between the outcomes from the previous study and the outcomes from the current study. Design/methodology/approach In experiment 1, we employed the same system used in the previous study (i.e., Jung et al., 2010). As individuals' contributions accumulated, the mechanism visually displayed individuals' performances two-dimensionally in the form of a bar chart or a dot chart. Then, we compared the performance outcomes from this study to the outcomes from previous study (i.e., Jung et al., 2010). In experiment 2, we modified the performance graph to test the effect of "playfulness" on performance by converting dots to car images. Then, we compared the performance outcome from experiment 2 to the outcomes from experiment 1. Findings Just like our interesting (and unexpected) finding in Jung et al.'s study (2010), the outcome confirmed a consistent superior performance of a bar chart. This implies that a bar chart is a better choice when stimulating performance with a visual aid in the context of groupware-based idea generation. Although a bar chart was criticized in a way that errors of length-area judgments are 40 ~ 250% greater than those of positional judgments along a common scale, such illusion turned out to be facilitating upward performance comparison better. Regarding Experiment 2, the outcome showed that the revised-dot graph is as good as the bar graph in terms of quantity and quality score of ideas. We attribute the performance enhancement of the resized-dot to the interaction between the motivational characteristic and the situational characteristic of playfulness because individuals in the revised-dot graph treatment performed better than individuals in the dot graph treatment. Given the order of performance (Bar >= Revised Dot > Dot) that the revised-dot treatment performed the same as (or lower than) the bar treatment, an additional research is warranted to reach to a consistent outcome.

Keywords

References

  1. Cleveland, W. S. and McGill, R., "Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 79, 1984, pp. 531-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080
  2. Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., and Valacich J. S., "Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups," Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 6, 1990, pp. 689-703. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689
  3. DeSanctis, G., "Computer Graphics as Decision Aids: Directions for Research," Decision Science, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1984, pp. 463-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1984.tb01236.x
  4. Diehl, M. and Stroebe, W., "Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1987, pp. 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
  5. Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., and Bright, G. W., "Making Sense of Graphs: Critical Factors Influencing Comprehension and Instructional Implications," Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2001, pp. 124-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671
  6. Garfield, M. J., Taylor, N. J., Dennis, A, and Satzinger, J. W., "Research Report: Modifying Paradigms - Individual Differences, Creativity, Techniques, and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2001, pp. 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.322.9710
  7. Gray, P., Mandviwalla, M., Olfman, L., and Satzinger, J., "The user interface in group support systems," in Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, Jessup, L. M. and Valacich, J. S. (eds.), Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993, pp. 192-213.
  8. Jarvenpaa, S. L., "The Effect of Task Demands and Graphical Format on Information Processing Strategies," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1989, pp. 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.3.285
  9. Jung, J. H., "The Effects of Objective Self-Awareness and Ostracism on Reducing Junk Comments in Computer-Based Idea Generation," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2010, pp. 313-336.
  10. Jung, J. H., "The Effect of Total-Identification on the Performance of Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2013, pp. 27-50.
  11. Jung, J. H., "The Effect of Real-Time Individual Process Performance Feedback on Computer-based Group Idea Generation," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2014, pp. 91-107. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2014.23.2.91
  12. Jung, J. H., "A Re-analysis of the Effects of Individual Personality and Idea Stimulation on Idea Generation Performance," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2015, pp. 133-154. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2015.24.3.133
  13. Jung, S. L., Lee, J. W., and Jo, L. H., "ERP Success Factors in Perspective of IS Success Model and TAM: Focused on Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Industry," The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2013, pp. 85-103.
  14. Jung, J. H., Schneider, C., and Valacich, J., "Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments," Management Science, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2010, pp. 724-742. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1129
  15. Kim, N. R., Hong, S. G., Kim, J. K., and Park, S. H., "Study on the behavioral model of co-creation by customers," Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2016, pp. 59-72. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2016.21.2.059
  16. Moon, J., and Kim, Y., "Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context," Information & Management, Vol. 38, 2001, pp. 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  17. Osborn, A. F., Applied Imagination (Rev. ed.), Scribner, 1957.
  18. Paulus, P. B. and Brown, V. R., "Ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming," in Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration, Paulus, P. B., and Nijstad, B. (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 110-136.
  19. Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R. B., and Hoppen, N., "The Illusion of Electronic Brainstorming Productivity: Theoretical and Empirical Issues," Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1999, pp. 378-380. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.378
  20. Robbins, N., "Dot Plots: A Useful Alternative to Bar Charts," Retrieved September, 2017 from http://perceptualedge.com/articles/b-eye/dot_plots.pdf.
  21. Simkin, D. and Hastie, R., "An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 82, 1987, pp. 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478448
  22. Tan, J. K. H. and Benbasat, I., "Processing of graphical information: a decomposition taxonomy to match data extraction tasks and graphical representation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1990, pp. 416-439.
  23. TM Radar Chart, Retrieved October, 2017 from http://www.tushar-mehta.com.
  24. Tufte, E., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, 2001.
  25. Venkatesh, V., "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, pp. 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  26. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D., "A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development of a test," Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
  27. Webster, J. and Martocchio, J. J., "Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1992, pp. 201-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/249576
  28. Yerkes, R. M. and Dodson, J. D., "The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation," Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 5, 1908, pp. 459-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503
  29. Zacks, J. and Tversky, B., "Bars and Lines: A Study of Graphic Communication," AAAI Technical Report FS-97-03, 1997, pp. 144-150.