• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.98-102
• /
• 2012

This paper diagnose subjects and measures the learning ability of students based on the goal of developing an assessment tool for education productivity based on multi-aspect evaluation conducted by ICEE at Honam University. Furthermore, develop an assessment tool for education productivity that provides a motive to bring detailed improvements in teaching methods through the diagnosis. In addition, a method for compensating the issues and improving the quality of subject is suggested to develop learning ability of students through applying the assessment tool. An integrated operated system of CQI is desired to be built along with quality improvement of education through measuring academic quality by studying the methods for enhancing academic and learning ability achievement from analysis of the curriculum provided in the "ABEEK program". Through this study the current state of education productivity is presented through analyzing the difference between students who participated in the "ABEEK program" and who did not participate, and operating a comparison between the student's comprehension on their majors and liberal arts by the multi-aspect evaluation that has been conducted for 2 years.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.36-45
• /
• 2019

Capstone design is a subject taught in a setting where students gather in a team, decide on their own selected topic, and collaborate with one another to perform a project. A fair assessment is very important in a team project-based capstone design course for students. Many instructors agree that harmonizing creative evaluation and outcome assessment is hard in capstone design class. In also, it is not easy to assess students' individual efforts and achievements fairly in accordance with team-based assessment practices. To resolve this issue in this paper, we have surveyed various engineering design education methodologies, and have modelled existing evaluating elements into a modified creative process and outcome assessment framework for team project assessment. In particular, we focused on a method of fairly assigning credits by combining team based and individual-level assessments. Analyzing students' achievement and grade evaluation and verifying the validity of the proposed method was performed.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.73-92
• /
• 2017

기록관은 사회의 기록을 저장하고 이용토록함으로써 사회를 지탱하는 기반이 되는 장소이다. 이에 본 연구는 기록관이 사회에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위한 프레임워크를 개발하였다. 제안 모델은 기존의 기록관의 사회적 영향에 관한 선행연구의 결과를 기반으로 하였으며 영향은 성과의 한 영역이자 축적된 성과의 발현이라는 점에서 대표적인 성과평가 모델중의 하나인 논리모형을 적용하여 개발되었다. 실제 측정을 위한 프레임워크 개발을 위해 광범위한 사회적 영향 중에서 지역사회 강화 측면을 측정하기 위한 모형을 제안했다. 초기, 중기, 장기 성과를 포함하는 제안모형은 기록관 이용을 통해 지식, 태도, 기술의 변화가 만들어 내는 사회적 참여활동의 증가를 측정하였다. 또한 시민의 사회참여의 증가로 인한 지역사회 강화를 최종 성과로 제안하고 있다. 제안된 모형을 기반으로 한 양적/질적 연구가 진행된다면 기록관의 사회적 영향이 분석될 것으로 기대된다

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.206-224
• /
• 2017

This article proposes a logic model for assessing the performance of the outcome of public research as a technology valuation method. It consists of two parts and eight steps. The first part is a scoring system and the second part is a validation process of the performance index derived from scoring by valuation method. The scoring in the first part generally requires a focus group method to find out the value drivers and make an evaluation table. The reason why we call it the technology valuation method is that the first part is derived from the simple evaluation of technology value using checklists for value drive. The second part is the regular technology valuation process. The model is designed for the measurement of unquantifiable outcome. Is knowledge or scientific outcome comparable to the measured outcome? If possible, how big is the unquantifiable outcome? This model is based on financial valuation techniques with clear or acceptable market data. Therefore, it cannot work solely for unquantifiable outcomes without comparable measurable outcomes, unlike economic valuation.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.552-564
• /
• 2004

Purpose: This study was to develop a client health status outcome evaluation instrument, and examine content validity, reliability, construct validity, and the acceptability of this instrument. Method: A preliminary list was made of such key information as standards, criteria, indicators and measures, by means of a broad review of literature within the field. After determining the preliminary instruments, the study sought to obtain examination, consensus, and modification of two groups of experts in the home-care field. Finally, the instrument examined content validity, reliability, construct validity, and the acceptability of this instrument. Result: The tool was considered of 13 criteria, 48 indicators, and 167 detail measures. The content validity index of the tool was above 0.8 according to the expert group. Regarding the reliability of the evaluators of standards 1 and 2, the degree of agreement between evaluators was high(96.4% through 98.2%). Construct validity in this study, the difference in the mean score between the baseline point and the follow up point of each of standards 1 and 2 was significant, and the mean score of the follow up point was more than that of the baseline point. After examining the acceptability of this instrument with practice managers and home care nurses in home care institutions, a positive opinion was given of this instrument, and it was indicated that to be useful and applicable in home care practice. Conclusion: The results of evaluating client outcome will contribute to overall outcome-based quality improvement and service marketing in home care by providing a constant gauge of home care effectiveness.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.3-13
• /
• 2009

BTL 사업 추진 시 협상단계는 시설, 운영, 재무분야 등 성과요구수준서의 준수 및 반영여부를 겸토하고 그 수위를 확정하여 실시협약에 이르게 하는 단계로써 사업추진 전 과정에서 차지하는 비중과 중요성이 매우 높다고 할 수 있다. 그러나 국내 BTL사업 추진 시 협상에 관한 일관적 지표나 협상 후 성과를 측정하기 위한 표준화된 지표가 기준이 제시되어 있지 않아 시간적 낭비요인의 발생과 더불어, 기술 및 품질 가격 등 협상수위 및 결과에 대한 평가가 모호한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 협상 후 성과를 객관적으로 평가 검증하기 위한 방안 제시의 일환으로 VE(가치공학)기반 협상수행 성과평가 절차 및 지표를 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 문화시설 BTL사업을 대상으로 협상 시 고려해야 하는 항목을 6영역, 38분야, 135항목으로 분류하고 가중치를 분석하여 정량화된 평가 지표를 구축하였고, 이를 바탕으로 협상성과를 측정할 수 있는 지표을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 협상참여자에게 BTL사업 협상 전 중점 검토사항의 파악과 협상 중 피드백의 지표 및 협상 후 성과평가의 척도가 될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.70-77
• /
• 2012

Purpose: To evaluate the patterns of tumor shape and to compare tumor volume derived from simple diameter-based ellipsoid measurement with that derived from tracing the entire tumor contour using region of interest (ROI)-based 3D volumetry with respect to the prediction outcome in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 98 patients with cervical cancer (stage IB-IIIB). The tumor shape was classified into two categories: ellipsoid and non-ellipsoid shape. ROI-based volumetry was derived from each magnetic resonance slice on the work station. For the diameter-based surrogate "ellipsoid volume," the three orthogonal diameters were measured to calculate volume as an ellipsoid. Results: The more than half of tumor (55.1%) had a non-ellipsoid configuration. The predictions for outcome were consistent between two volume groups, with overall survival of 93.6% and 87.7% for small tumor (<20 mL), 62.9% and 69.1% for intermediate-size tumor (20-39 mL), and 14.5% and 16.7% for large tumors (${\geq}$40 mL) using ROI and diameter based measurement, respectively. Disease-free survival was 93.8% and 90.6% for small tumor, 54.3% and 62.7% for intermediate-size tumor, and 13.7% and 10.3% for large tumor using ROI and diameter based method, respectively. Differences in outcome between size groups were statistically significant, and the differences in outcome predicted by the tumor volume by two different methods. Conclusion: Our data suggested that large numbers of cervical cancers are not ellipsoid. However, simple diameter-based tumor volume measurement appears to be useful in comparison with ROI-based volumetry for predicting outcome in cervical cancer patients.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.163-178
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 공공도서관에서 운영하는 프로그램의 성과를 측정할 수 있는 시스템의 구축을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 로직모델을 기반으로 개발된 도서관 성과측정 프레임워크를 적용하고 사서가 직접 KOLAS에서 데이터를 반출하고 성과평가 시스템에 업로드하여 성과를 측정하고 결과를 출력할 수 있도록 시스템(LibOutcomes system)을 구축하였다. 연구 결과, 성과평가 시스템을 이용한 성과 측정은 시각적으로 결과를 확인하기에 유용하였다. 또한 웹 기반 시스템으로 구축함으로써 접근 및 이용의 용이성을 확보할 수 있었고, 향후 KOLAS의 한 기능으로 확장할 수 있는 가능성을 제시하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.141-151
• /
• 2019

Objectives: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison-Randall or Millard technique based on (qualitative) parent/subject and professional assessments. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and July 2014. A total of 56 subjects with unilateral cleft lip presenting for primary surgery who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to surgical groups A or B through balloting. Group A underwent cleft repair with the Tennison-Randall technique, while group B underwent cleft repair with the Millard rotation advancement technique. Surgical outcome was assessed using qualitative evaluation by the guardian/subject and independent assessors based on a modified form of the criteria described by Christofides and colleagues. Results: Of the 56 subjects enrolled in this study, 32 were male, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Fifteen of the guardians/subjects in the Tennison-Randall group were most bothered about the lower part of the residual lip scar, while 12 guardians/subjects in the in the Millard group were most bothered about the upper part of the scar. More noses were judged to be flattened in the Millard group than in the Tennison-Randall group. Assessors observed a striking disparity in scar transgression of the philtral ridges between the two groups. Conclusion: Essentially, there were no major difference in the overall results between Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison-Randall repairs. Both Millard and Tennison-Randall's techniques require significant improvements to improve the appearance of the scar on the upper part and lower part of the lip, respectively.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.83-88
• /
• 2016

In this paper, we surveyed from students and professors of Hanbat National University to examine the current state of running the introductory engineering design and to derive the direction of future improvements of the subject. A total of 783 students from nine departments and 12 professors who are in charge of the introductory engineering design participated in the present questionnaire evaluation. Outcome categories of the interest in their major and the learning of design theory appears relatively lower than other learning outcomes of the introductory engineering design course. Accordingly, it is determined that the theoretical aspects of designing should be emphasized in performing a team project. The design process, writing and presentation ability, teamwork theory are dealt in more than 70% of the departments, but engineering ethics, patent, visualization education had not been addressed in a number of departments due to their department characteristics. While a lesson outcome of the creativity resulted in the largest for the students, most of the professor feel difficult in increasing the creativity. It is urgent to develope of teaching methods in order to promote the creativity in the introductory engineering design course.