• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.3 s.133
• /
• pp.56-67
• /
• 1990

NATO 회원국의 상호공약이 40년간에 걸쳐 영국 방위의 기반이었다. 영국은 NATO에 효과적인 전력을 제공하는 것을 최우선으로 하여 왔다. 영국은 핵전력과 통상전력의 혼합에 입각한 NATO 억제전략에 부응하고 있다. 또한 영국은 NATO전력의 세기둥중 모든 것에 기여하고 있는 유일한 유럽국가이다. 전력의 세기둥이란 전략핵, 전역핵 및 통상전력이며, 유연대응전략을 떠받치고 있다

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• v.21 no.12spc
• /
• pp.689-695
• /
• 2021

The study is based on the elaborated normative and legal documentation regulating the national security of modern Ukraine and the normative and legal documents adopted by NATO in the responding policy to the challenges that arose after 2014. The main advantages of cooperation with NATO are ensuring military security, developing army standards, improving the country's investment climate, and reducing expenditures on the army. The disadvantages of cooperation with NATO in hostilities with Russia are not highlighted. Still, defined obstacles show that Ukraine is not ready to realize entry into NATO in the short term. Such factors include weak information support, corruption, and unclear diplomatic decisions.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.25-29
• /
• 2024

After the Russia-Ukraine War, NATO broke away from the peacekeeping strategy that it had maintained and declared that it would strengthen the multilateral security consultative body, pursue strategic stability, expand armaments, cooperate security, and strengthen dialogue and cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. Changes in NATO's strategy directly and indirectly affect Korea's security environment. Only by clearly analyzing this and establishing policies and strategies to respond to it can the threat be suppressed and national interests protected. NATO designates China and Russia as threats. By using cooperation and solidarity with NATO as an opportunity, we will be able to strengthen security cooperation and alliances, develop and expand the defense industry market, and expand opportunities to participate in the Ukraine reconstruction project.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.32 no.8 s.363
• /
• pp.73-77
• /
• 1999

1999년 3월 27일 북서대서양조약기구(NATO)의 전폭기들이 유고슬라비아에 대한 폭격을 개시한 뒤 꼭 3일만에 전쟁은 사이버공간으로 번져 나갔다. 컴퓨터 해커들이 NATO의 전자우편 통신시스템 교란작전을 개시한 것이다. 이것은 역사상 NATO 컴퓨터 시스템이 전시에 공격을 받은 최초의 사건이었다. 그러나 이 사이버전쟁은 오래 끌지 못했다. NATO는 '비장의 방패'로 해커들의 '창'을 물리쳤기 때문이다.

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.6 s.64
• /
• pp.134-138
• /
• 1986

이 논문은 현재 미에너지성에 재직중이며 NATO 석유계획위원회 위원장인 Tom Cutler씨가 Petroleum Economist지에 발표한 "The role of petroleum in Wartime"을 번역한 것이다. 이것은 미에너지성이나 미국정부의 공식견해나 정책이 아니고 NATO의 공식입장도 아님을 밝혀둔다.

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.8 s.78
• /
• pp.96-99
• /
• 1987

이 자료는 현재 NATO 석유계획위원회 의장인 미에너지성 소속의 Tom Cutler 씨가 Petroleum Economist사 87년 5월호에 발표한 글을 번역한 것이다. 아울러 여기에 게재된 내용은 사적인 견해이며, 미정부나 NATO의 공식입장이 아님을 밝혀둔다.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.4 s.146
• /
• pp.72-79
• /
• 1991

군사판매와 공동협력의 2가지 접근방법이 새로운 현실에 부응하여 완만하게나마 NATO내 비표준화장비의 표준화를 시도해 왔다. 미국과 독일간의 Roland/Patriot 방공미사일, 미국과 이탈리아간의 방공협정과 같은 합작품들은 1980년대 중반에 시작한 공동사업이다. 미의회에서는 동맹국 및 우방국들과의 협력활동을 지원해주었다. 1976회계연도의 Culver-Nunn법은 국무부가 NATO국가들과 광범위한 협력활동을 추진하도록 고무하였다

• Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
• /
• v.45 no.3
• /
• pp.335-347
• /
• 2017

Purpose: Defense government agencies in the world continuously try to improve operational efficiency in government quality assurance activities. The purpose of this paper is to propose some suggestions to enhance efficiency of government quality assurance (GQA) activities based on the analysis of the current quality assurance methods of advanced foreign agencies such as DCMA and NATO. Methods: In order to propose new directions, reviews and analyses are executed. (1) Former research results in Korea for enhancing GQA are reviewed, and their limitations are addressed. (2) Updated policies and procedures of the US DCMA and NATO are reviewed and their advantages are presented. (3) Current GQA policies and procedures are contrasted with those of US DCMA and NATO. Results: Suggestions for efficient Korean GQA activities are given in several aspects: GQA paradigm shift, clarification of GQA methods, facility-wide GQA, risk management for suppliers, counterfeit mitigation policy, data collection and control. Conclusion: Reviews on the government quality assurance policies and procedures of DTaQ, DCMA, and NATO are executed and compared with each other. The results of this research are expected to be useful guidelines to improve GQA policies and procedures in Korea, making it possible to realize more efficient GQA activities in Korea.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers Conference
• /
• 1999.04a
• /
• pp.21-21
• /
• 1999

예기치 않은 외부의 자극으로 인한 유도무기의 사고에 의해 인명 및 무기체계의 피해를 최소화하기 위하여 유도무기 둔감화 연구가 미국과 NATO를 중심으로 80년대 초반부터 활발히 수행되어 오고 있다. IM(insensitive munitions)은 예기치 않은 외부 자극에 노출되었을 때 성능과 작동요구조건을 충분히 만족시키면서 격렬한 반응을 최소화하는 무기로 정의된다. 1995년도까지 미 해군에서 사용하는 모든 전술 유도무기를 MIL-STD-2105B의 요구 조건에 부합하도록 둔감화 하기 위하여 1984년 미 해군에서 IM 프로그램이 만들어졌고, 1991년에 NATO의 NIMIC(NATO Insensitive Munitions Information Center)이 만들어져서 현재까지 둔감화약, 둔감 추진제, 복합재연소관 및 완화장치 등에 연구가 활발히 이루어지고 있다.

• Journal of Internet Computing and Services
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.59-69
• /
• 2022

For effective battlefield situation awareness and command resolution, information exchange without seams between systems is essential. However, since each system was developed independently for its own purposes, it is necessary to ensure interoperability between systems in order to effectively exchange information. In the case of our military, semantic interoperability is guaranteed by utilizing the common message format for data exchange. However, simply standardizing the data exchange format cannot sufficiently guarantee interoperability between systems. Currently, the U.S. and NATO are developing and utilizing information exchange models to achieve semantic interoperability further than guaranteeing a data exchange format. The information exchange models are the common vocabulary or reference model,which are used to ensure the exchange of information between systems at the content-meaning level. The information exchange models developed and utilized in the United States initially focused on exchanging information directly related to the battlefield situation, but it has developed into the universal form that can be used by whole government departments and related organizations. On the other hand, NATO focused on strictly expressing the concepts necessary to carry out joint military operations among the countries, and the scope of the models was also limited to the concepts related to command and control. In this paper, the background, purpose, and characteristics of the information exchange models developed and used in the United States and NATO were identified, and comparative analysis was performed. Through this, we intend to present implications when developing a Korean information exchange model in the future.