The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Examination of NATO's Strategic Changes After the Russia-Ukraine War and Korea's Security Strategic Implications

러-우 전쟁 이후 NATO의 전략 변화와 한국의 안보전략적 함의 고찰

  • Received : 2024.03.05
  • Accepted : 2024.04.20
  • Published : 2024.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

After the Russia-Ukraine War, NATO broke away from the peacekeeping strategy that it had maintained and declared that it would strengthen the multilateral security consultative body, pursue strategic stability, expand armaments, cooperate security, and strengthen dialogue and cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. Changes in NATO's strategy directly and indirectly affect Korea's security environment. Only by clearly analyzing this and establishing policies and strategies to respond to it can the threat be suppressed and national interests protected. NATO designates China and Russia as threats. By using cooperation and solidarity with NATO as an opportunity, we will be able to strengthen security cooperation and alliances, develop and expand the defense industry market, and expand opportunities to participate in the Ukraine reconstruction project.

NATO는 러시아-우크라이나 전쟁 이후 그동안 유지해오던 평화유지 전략에서 탈피하고 다자안보협의체 강화, 전략적 안정성 추구, 군비 확충, 협력안보 및 인도-태평양 지역까지 대화·협력을 강화할 것을 천명하였다. NATO의전략 변화는 직·간접적으로 한국의 안보환경에 영향을 미친다. 이를 명확히 분석하고 대응할 수 있는 정책 및 전략을수립해야 위협을 억제하고 국가이익을 보호할 수 있다. NATO는 중국과 러시아를 위협으로 명시하고 있다. 우리는NATO와 협력과 연대를 기회로 삼아 소다자 안보협력 및 동맹 강화, 방산시장 개척 및 확대, 우크라이나 재건사업참여 기회 확대를 얻을 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. J. Shin, "A Study on the Process and Prospects of Bundeswehr's Rearmament: Focusing on NATO related Response to Military Threat from Russia," Defense policy research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 145-178, 2023. 
  2. W. J. Jang, "Changes and Implications of the Global Defense Industry Market After the Ukraine War," KIET, vol. 294, pp. 7-23, 2023. 
  3. K. K. Lee and Hyeon-Ju Seol, "A Study on the Factors of Changes in the NATO Strategic Concept," The Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 107-148, 2023.  https://doi.org/10.46226/jss.2023.7.30.2.107
  4. H. W. Jeon, "2023 NATO Summit and Korea-NATO Cooperation: Focusing on Korea-NATO ITPP," Korea National Diplomatic Academy, 2023. 
  5. M. S. Jung, "Innovation in how to combat the Army's military strategy for future combat victory", KoreaScience, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp.105-109, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.3.105 
  6. B. G. Park, "ROK-US Alliance and NATO: Change of Identity and Future of Alliance," Korean Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 295-314, 2020.  https://doi.org/10.34221/KJPS.2020.28.4.13
  7. H. J. Lee, "Analysis on the Neutrality Position of ARF with Regard to the Security Problems on the Korean Peninsula," Military research, no. 139, pp. 473-504, 2015. 
  8. I. H Park, "Security and Region: Conceptual Foundation of Security and the Possibility of the Northeast Asian Security Community," National Strategy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 33-62, 2010. 
  9. Benedict E. DeDominicis, "US, China and the Russo-Ukraine War: The Conditions for Generating a Mutually Perceived Hurting Stalemate and Consequent Ceasefire In Moscow and Kyiv", International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology Vol.11 No.4 177-191, 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17703/IJ ACT.2023.11.4.177 
  10. H. G. Kim, "Ukraine War and Reconstruction Project," KIET, vol. 300, pp. 65-80, 2023