• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2000년도 말뚝기초 학술발표회
• /
• pp.107-141
• /
• 2000

Large diameter piles can be defined as piles with diameter of at least 0.76 m (2.5 ft). In bridge foundation, large diameter piles have been used as pier foundations and their use has been increased greatly. In this study, static pile load tests for large diameter piles peformed in Kwangan Grande Bridge construction site were introduced. Also, various sensor installation methods for several types of piles (that is, open-ended steel pipe pile, drilled shafts and socketed pipe piles), pipe axial load measuring method, load transfer analysis method and pile load test results (pile-head load - settlement curve, and pile axial load distribution curve along the pile depth) were introduced.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2001년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.291-298
• /
• 2001

It is very difficult to accomplish load tests of piles with large diameter constructed on the offshore area, because of requirement for large scaled loading equipment and bad testing conditions. Therefore, so far in many cases pile driving dynamic formulas have applied to quality control, and recently dynamic load test method is widely used for confirming bearing capacities of such piles. However, in cases of piles with very large diameter about 2,500mm, it is nearly impossible for regular type load test methods of piles such as static and dynamic to apply owing to very large design load. This is case studies of load tests such as modified static and dynamic load tests of piles and point load tests of rock samples for estimating rational allowable bearing capacity of very large diameter piles constructed on the marine area.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2006년도 추계 학술발표회
• /
• pp.334-408
• /
• 2006

In Hong Kong, large-diameter (${\ge}600mm$) bored piles and large-section excavated rectangular barrettes are commonly used to support tall buildings to resist both vertical and horizontal loads. These piles and barrettes penetrate through and may found in saprolitic soils and decomposed rocks. Generally, the design of these large bored piles and barrettes involves considerable amount of uncertainty and design parameters must usually be verified by field tests. In this paper, over 50 full-scale load tests on large-diameter bored piles and over 15 large-section of rectangular barrettes in Hong Kong are reviewed and interpreted critically, in particular the degree of mobilisation of side shear resistance using a mobilization rating (MR) factor and a displacement index (DI) for floating bored piles and barrettes and rock-socketed piles, respectively. The author was heavily involved with many of these load tests. The diameter of the bored piles tested ranges from 0.6m to 1.8m and the depth varies from 12m to 75m. Sizes of barrettes critically reviewed include $2.2m{\times}0.6m,\;2.2m{\times}0.8m,\;2.8m{\times}0.8m\;and\;2.8m{\times}1.0m$ (on plan) and the depth varies from 36m and 63m. Based on these field tests, a new failure load criterion for large-diameter bored piles and barrettes is developed and proposed. The side shear resistance of the bored piles and barrettes is quantitatively analyzed with respect to local displacements, standard penetration tests, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) for rock sockets and using the effective stress principle. In addition, the effects of construction including post-grouting, construction time, side scraping and excavation tools on side shear resistance are investigated and reported.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2010년도 춘계 학술발표회
• /
• pp.351-359
• /
• 2010

Large PHC piles with a diameter of 1,000mm or larger were recently introduced for the first time in Korea. This paper presents full-scale static and dynamic pile load tests performed on two 1,000mm PHC piles and two composite piles with steel pipe piles of the same diameter in the upper portion, installed by driving and pre-boring. The objectives of the tests include evaluating pile drivability, load-settlement relation, allowable bearing capacity, and the stability of mechanical splicing element for the composite pile(a.k.a. non-welding joint). The performance of the large diameter PHC piles were thought to be satisfactory compared to that of middle sized PHC piles with a long history of successful applications in the domestic and foreign markets.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2000년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.277-284
• /
• 2000

Using the large diameter (D ＝ 2,500mm, L ＝ 40m) batter steel pipe piles, designed as compression piles but used as reaction piles during the static compression load test of socketed test piles (D ＝ 1,000mm, L ＝ 40m), static pile load tests for large diameter instrumented rock-socketed piles were performed. The reaction steel pipe piles were driven 20m into the marine deposit and weathered rock layer and then l0m socketed with reinforced concrete through the weathered rock layer and into hard rock layer. Steel pipe and concrete in the steel pile part, and concrete and rebars in the socketed parts were instrumented to measure strains in each part. The pullout amounts of reaction pile heads were also measured with LVDT. During the static pile load test, total compressional load of about 20MN was loaded on the head of test piles, but load above 20MN was not loaded due to lack of loading capacity of loading system. Over the course of the study, maximum pullout amount up to 7mm was measured in the heads of reaction piles when loaded op to 10MN and 1mm of pullout amount was measured. More than 85% of pullout load was transfered in the residual weathered rock layer and about 10% in the soft rock layer, which was somewhat different transfer mechanism in the static compressional load tests.

• 한국지반공학회논문집
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.5-16
• /
• 2002

본 연구에서는 직경 1,000mm의 시험말뚝에 대한 압축정재하시험 수행시 반력말뚝으로 사용된 직경 2,500mm의 대구경 경사반력소켓말뚝의 인발거동을 분석하였다. 경사반력말뚝은 풍화암층과 연암층 10m에 걸쳐서 현장타설말뚝으로 소켓되어졌으며, 강관부는 강관과 속채움콘크리트로, 그리고 소켓부는 콘크리트와 철근으로 구성되었다. 각 구성부재에 작용하는 변형율을 측정하기 위해 센서를 설치하였으며, 반력말뚝두부의 인발량을 측정하기 위하여 LVDT를 설치하였다. 정재하시험중 재하된 최대인발하중은 10MN이었으며 최대인발변위는 7m, 잔류인발변위는 최대 1mm 정도 발생하였다. 인발하중의 83%를 풍화암층에서 그리고 12%를 연암층에서 지지하는 것으로 나타났으며 풍화암에 소켓된 철근콘크리트부와 연암에 소켓된 털근콘크리트부에서 각각 125.3kPa와 61.8kPa의 인발응력이 발생하였다. 따라서, 풍화암층에서도 인발하중을 충분하게 지지하고 있으므로 풍화암층은 마찰력을 크게 발휘하는 지지층으로 사용되었다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2002년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.390-397
• /
• 2002

In this study, static pile load tests with load transfer measurement for a pile socketed into weathered rocks were performed. Axial load transfers during static pile load test were measured and analyzed. Three large diameter piles socketed into weathered rock were behavior behaved as friction pile.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2010년도 춘계 학술발표회
• /
• pp.70-77
• /
• 2010

In this paper, a case study of drivability and bearing capacity of large diameter steel pipe piles at PTT LNG site in Thailand is introduced. The LNG facilities were designed to be founded on steel pipe pile foundations driven into the weathered rock formation overlaid by sand layers. The drivability analyses of open ended pipe piles were carried out using GRL WEAP program and the bearing capacities of the piles were estimated. Dynamic load tests were performed to evaluate end bearing resistance, and it is shown that the measured end bearing resistance is smaller than the calculated end bearing because the plugging does not develop sufficiently in case of large diameter pipe piles.

• 한국지반공학회논문집
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.5-11
• /
• 2006

광안대교에 설치된 두개의 대구경 말뚝(TS-1과 TS-2)에 대하여 최대 2000톤의 하중을 재하하여 정재하시험을 수행하였다. 시험 말뚝 TS-1의 경우는 연암에 근입되었고 시험 말뚝TS-2의 경우는 풍화암에 근입되었다. 재하시험 결과에 의하면, 지지층과 상관없이 시험말뚝 TS-1과 TS-2 양쪽 경우다 대부분의 하중이 풍화암에 의해 지지되었다. 추가적으로 펜타곤3D와 ROCKET 프로그램으로 수치해석을 수행하였다. 본 연구에 의하면 풍화암이 깊게 발달되어 말뚝 시공상 어려움이 있을 경우, 풍화암도 대안의 지지층으로 고려되어질 수 있다.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.67-73
• /
• 2017

최근 초고층 빌딩과 같은 대형 구조물의 증가로 인하여 기초의 허용 지지력 확보를 위한 대구경 말뚝의 수요가 급속히 증가하고 있다. 이 연구에서는 기성 대구경 PHC말뚝의 전단성능을 향상시키기 위하여 속채움 콘크리트와 전단철근을 사용하여 대구경 합성 PHC말뚝을 제작하였다. 제작된 시험체는 KS규격의 전단강도 시험방법에 따라 수행하였고 변위제어 방법으로 진행하였다. 전단시험을 통하여 F 시험체는 휨균열과 경사균열이 발생한 이후 급작스런 수평균열이 발생하였으나, FT 시험체는 수평균열의 발생 없이 말뚝의 전 지간에 걸쳐 휨균열과 전단 경사균열이 일정 패턴으로 발생하였다. 또한, 대구경 합성 PHC말뚝의 최대하중은 PHC말뚝과 비교할 경우, F 시험체의 경우 2.9배, FT 시험체의 경우 3.3배 이상으로 크게 향상된 것을 확인하였다. FT 시험체의 높은 전단 저항 능력은 전단철근의 배근으로 인하여 대구경 합성 PHC 말뚝이 우수한 합성거동을 하였고, 발생한 전단균열의 성장을 효과적으로 제어하였기 때문인 것으로 판단된다.