• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.299-336
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 변혁적 리더십과 조직 공정성이 심리적 계약위반 및 직무열의에 미치는 차별적 영향을 규명하여 실무적 시사점을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 직무와 조직에 공헌한 투입과 거기에서 얻은 산출의 관계를 인식하는 형평성이론, 구성원과 조직사이의 교환관계를 설명하는 사회교환이론 및 직무요구와 직무자원을 함께 보는 직무요구-자원모형을 배경으로 하였다. 제조업, 유통업, 금융업등 다양한 업종의 18개 기업의 277명을 대상으로 실증 연구를 진행하였고, 동일방법편의(common method bias) 문제점을 제거하기 위하여, 종속변수는 동료평가를 활용하여 측정하였다. 연구결과, 변혁적 리더십과 조직 공정성은 모두 구성원들의 직무 열의에 유의적인 정(+)의 영향을 미쳤고 심리적 계약위반에는 유의적인 부(-)의 영향을 미쳤다. 또한, 심리적 계약 위반은 변혁적 리더십 및 조직 공정성과 직무열의와의 관계에서 각각 부분매개역할을 하였다. 본 연구의 함의는 조직공정성이 직무열의와 심리적 계약위반에 대하여 변혁적 리더십보다 강한 영향력을 보이므로, 조직은 리더교육은 물론 공정성 확보가 필요하다는 것이다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2013

Social commerce has been gaining explosive popularity, with typical examples of the model such as Groupon and Level Up. Both local business owners and consumers can benefit from this new e-commerce model. Local business owners have a chance to access potential customers and promote their products in a way that could not have otherwise been easily possible, and consumers can enjoy discounted offerings. However, questions have been increasingly raised about the value and future of the social commerce model. A recent survey shows that about a third of 324 business owners who ran a daily-deal promotion in Groupon went behind. Furthermore, more than half of the surveyed merchants did not express enthusiasm about running the promotion again. The same goes for the case in Korea, where more than half of the surveyed clients reported no significant change or even decrease in profits compared to before the use of social commerce model. Why do local business owners fail to exploit the benefits from the promotions and advertisements through the social commerce model and to make profits? Without answering this question, the model would fall under suspicion and even its sustainability might be challenged. This study aims to look into problems in the current social commerce transactions and provide implications for the social commerce model, so that the model would get a foothold for next growth. Drawing on justice theory, this study develops theoretical arguments for the effects of transaction characteristics on consumers' distributive justice and purchase intention in the social commerce. Specifically, this study focuses on two characteristics of social commerce transactions-the discount rate and the purchase rate of products-and investigates their effects on consumers' perception of distributive justice for discounted transactions in the social commerce and their perception of distributive justice for regular-priced transactions. This study also examines the relationship between distributive justice and purchase intention. We conducted an online experiment and gathered data from 115 participants to test the hypotheses. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of nine manipulated scenarios of social commerce transactions, which were generated based on the combination of three levels of purchase rate (high, medium, and low) and three levels of discount rate (high, medium, and low). We conducted MANOVA and post-hoc ANOVA to test hypotheses about the relationships between the transaction characteristics (purchase rate and discount rate) and distributive justice for each of the discounted transaction and the regular-priced transaction. We also employed a PLS analysis to test relations between distributive justice and purchase intentions. Analysis results show that a higher discount rate increases distributive justice for the discounted transaction but decreases distributive justice for the regular-priced transaction. This, coupled with the result that distributive justice for each type of transaction has a positive effect on the corresponding purchase intention, implies that a large discount in the social commerce may be helpful for attracting consumers, but harmful to the business after the promotion. However, further examination reveals curvilinear effects of the discount rate on both types of distributive justice. Specifically, we find distributive justice for the discounted transaction increases concavely as the discount rate increases while distributive justice for the regular-priced transaction decreases concavely with the dscount rate. This implies that there exists an appropriate discount rate which could promote the discounted transaction while not hurting future business of regular-priced transactions. Next, the purchase rate is found to be a critical factor that facilitates the regular-priced transaction. It has a convexly positive influence on distributive justice for the transaction. Therefore, an increase of the rate beyond some threshold would lead to a substantial level of distributive justice for the regular-priced transaction, threrby boosting future transactions. This implies that social commerce firms and sellers should employ various non-price stimuli to promote the purchase rate. Finally, we find no significant relationship between the purchase rate and distributive justice for the discounted transaction. Based on the above results, we provide several implications with future research directions.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.969-991
• /
• 2018

본 논문은 정부출연연구소 연구인력의 직무특성과 조직몰입과의 관계에서 조직공정성의 매개효과를 알아보고자 하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 국가과학기술연구회 소속 정부출연연구소 25곳에 근무하는 연구직 362명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여, 이들 관계를 알아보기 위한 다중회귀분석을 시행하였다. 그 결과, 자율성과 피드백 직무특성이 조직몰입에 정(+)의 영향을 나타내었으며 직무특성 중 자율성만이 조직공정성의 매개효과를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 기존 연구에서 거의 다루지 않았던 정부출연연구소의 연구인력을 대상으로 직무특성을 발견하고 조직공정성과 조직몰입의 관계에 대한 매개효과를 실증분석한 점에서 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.496-512
• /
• 2019

본 연구의 목적은 한국 사회복지 교육의 선구자이면서 한국 최초의 사회복지 독립학과를 설립한 김덕준(1919-1992)의 사회복지 사상과 사회복지 교육의 실천원리를 고찰하는 데에 있다. 김덕준의 생애와 사회복지와 관련된 행적 그리고 그의 사회복지 사상과 사회복지 교육의 실천원리를 살펴본 결과, 첫째, 샬롬의 정신, 둘째, 인간의 존엄성, 셋째, 십자가 사랑, 넷째, 사회정의, 다섯째, 경천애인, 여섯째, 이웃 사랑의 관계성으로 도출되었다. 이와 같은 김덕준의 사회복지 사상과 사회복지 교육의 실천원리는 현재 한국의 사회복지 교육의 문제를 해결할 수 있는 가치적이며 이념적인 사회복지사 양성의 본질적인 목적과 목표를 재정립할 수 있는 통찰들이라 할 수 있다. 이를 한국의 사회복지 교육에 적용하면, 사회복지사의 정의와 자세, 역할, 기능에 대한 내용으로 정리될 수 있다.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제59호
• /
• pp.161-188
• /
• 2019

범죄신고는 형사사법의 실효성을 높이는데 있어서 중요한 내용이기에 일반국민들을 대상으로 한 연구가 꾸준히 진행되고 있다. 그러나 우리사회 소외계층에 해당하는 북한이탈 주민들의 범죄신고에 대한 연구는 찾아보기 어렵다. 본 연구는 국내에 입국한 수도권 거주 800명의 북한이탈주민을 대상으로 한 설문조사를 기반으로 범죄피해의 신고의지에 영향을 미치는 요인을 실증적으로 살펴보았다. 법적 냉소주의 모델과 절차적 정당성 모델을 바탕으로 북한이탈주민들이 형사사법기관의 활동에 대해 느끼는 법적 냉소주의와 공정성 인식 수준이 북한이탈주민의 형사사법기관에 대한 범죄피해의 신고의지에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 가설을 검증하여 기대했던 결과를 확인할 수 있었다. 반면에, 도널드 블랙이 법행동 이론에서 제시한 종적분화, 횡적분화, 문화, 조직, 사회통제 등 다섯 가지 유형별로 도출한 사회조건을 기반으로 한 가설 대부분은 범죄피해의 신고의지에 유의미한 연관성이 발견되지 않거나, 상충된 결과를 보였다. 이 연구는 선행연구에서 소외되었던 북한이탈주민에 주목하여 범죄신고 의지에 영향을 미치는 요인을 살펴보았다는데 의의가 있으며 분석결과를 토대로 북한이탈주민들의 형사사법기관에 대한 신뢰도를 높이고 법적 냉소성을 감소함으로써 범죄신고 의지를 고양하는 방안에 대하여 논하였다.

• 농촌지도와개발
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.17-41
• /
• 1996

In the situation of rapid industrialization based on the lopsided development of economy since 1960, Korean rural society has faced a crisis of disruption. As a result, the civilian government has tried a few actions to change the circumstance. However, it is said that the coral polices were not satisfactory. Those who were concerned with the rural problems of these days argue that it is necessary to adopt new policies and further to change the policymakers` philosophies concerning the matter. The arguments are certainly based on the beliefs that the sound policies come from the sound philosophies. This study aims to analyze the existing rural polices and their policymakers` philosophies and to design of a new paradigm. For the purpose, this study was set there specific objectives: First, to overview the moor points of Quantitative Utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham and the Social Justice Theory of John Rawls, the contrasting frameworks of the moral philosophies; Second, to trace the major or trade of the rural policies since 1960s in Korea; Third, to analyze the policymakers` philosophies reflected on the rural policies; Fourth, to design a new paradigm of the rural policies. This study mainly adopted descriptive method based on the various source of government and non-government statistics, white papers and other researches. The major findings of this study may be summarized as follows: 1. The historical epochs of the rural policies in Korea was divided into the periods: (1) An organizational and institutional establishment for self-reliance of main crops and the New Village Movement $(1969{\sim}70)$; (2) An initiation of `open-door` policies to the foreign farm products $(1970{\sim}80)$; (3) Completion of the UR meetings and the recommendations of the Rural and Fishery Development Commission (1980-present). 2. It was found that the philosophical foundations of coral policies were directly reflected from the utilitarianism of the national development. Under the philosophy it was the modem sector of economy that was to spearhead the national development, and the rural sector was situated to the peripheral position and hardly in the spot-light. Therefore, it may be said that the present situation of the rural society was largely rooted in the model of economic development. 3. As a new direction of the coral policies, many studies were focussing on the NTC (non-trade concerns) functions of agriculture for the present and future society. The researchers argue that the cost of protecting and supporting agriculture and rural society may be higher than that of the burden which the nation should be bear in the case of failure of agriculture. Although it tray be true, however, it should be noted that the argument is another type of utilitarianism which prevailed in the past. As a philosophy of rural policies, utilitarianism is straight forward and persuasive, however, it has also limitations in terms of relativism in broad sense or social justice in specific manna. 4. This study suggests to set the philosophical foundations of rural policies on the basis of Rawl`s Theory of Justice mentioned earlier. It emphasizes the inviolability of social justice which was neglected for the national benefits timing the period of development dictatorship in 1960s and 1970s. The principles of social justice for coral people were identified as twofold; (1) The principle of the t equal liberty; (2) (a) Difference principle, (b) The principle of fair equality of opportunity.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제65권4호
• /
• pp.295-315
• /
• 2013

이 연구는 유력한 지구시민권구상인 Rawls의 자유주의적 접근과 코즈모폴리턴 공화주의구상에 대해 지구적 정의론으로서의 윤리학적 기초를 연구하는 것이 목적이다. 의무론측면에서 자유주의적 국제주의에 경도된 Rawls의 견해는 국제관계의 불평등이 구조화된 경제의 세계화시대의 호혜성의 의무와 시민적 권리에 관한 의무를 반영하지 못하는 한계가 있지만, 코즈모폴리턴 공화주의는 지구적 차원의 반지배원칙의 구현을 주창해 의무론적 정당화의 기반을 갖추고 있다. 공리주의 면에서 Rawls는 자유주의적 국제주의에 입각해 개별국가들 간의 재분배를 거부하는 논리에 대해 정당화를 시도하고 있지만, 코즈모폴리턴 공화주의는 개도국시민들의 구조적 희생을 극복해 지구적 차원의 해악을 줄이고 효용수준을 획기적으로 개선할 가능성이 있다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권10호
• /
• pp.171-182
• /
• 2020

This research focuses on the importance of corporate social responsibility in building the company's reputation. Experts have studied CSR as an antecedent of a company's reputation, but the mechanisms underlying this process are rarely explored. Therefore, to fill this research gap, we demonstrate CSR's implementation combined with organizational justice based on discrepancy and equity theory. This study involved 210 employees in a family company. The study's analysis method uses Structural Equation Model (SEM), SmartPLS, with a five-step measurement and analysis procedure. The variables in this study are CSR implementation, organizational justice, employee trust, firm reputation, organizational objectiveness, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and job performance. The results found that some of the direct relationships stated were not significant, but all demonstrations of indirect links were substantial. Besides, optimal CSR and organizational justice provide a reliable and positive domino effect in increasing the role and consequences of employee trust and firm reputation. The findings in this study confirm that upstream-downstream job performance causality can be successfully achieved if job satisfaction has been realized, job satisfaction can be achieved if organizational commitment can also be recognized, and organizational commitment can be developed. Reflection and influence, rather than organizational attractiveness becomes essential.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.61-73
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to examine the determinants of union commitment and union participation intention based on the social exchange perspective and apply implications to union setting to improve union management. The results are as follows : Firstly, union commitment is the most direct predictors of union participation intention and mediates the relation both perceived union support and union instrumentality and union participation intention. Secondly, both perceived union support and union instrumentality are direct predictors of union commitment but perceived union support has more effect than union instrumentality on union commitment. Lastly, process related justices affect on perceived union support but interactional justice is a more Important antecedent of perceived union support than procedural justice. Unexpected finding is that union instrumentality has direct relationship with not only union commitment but also perceived union support. This finding is needed further research in the future.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.195-204
• /
• 2007

It is a general principle that the plaintiff takes burden of proof about negligence and causation in a civil compensation litigation. And it is the same in a medical malpractice lawsuit. Korean courts have made diverse efforts to mitigate the plaintiff's duty to prove in medical malpractice lawsuits under the name of justice and impartiality. One of those theoretical attempt is 'presumption of causation'. The Supreme Court, since 1995, has developed a new logic for the theory of 'presumption of causation' which is characterized by a phrase "layman's common sense". The Court presumes the defendant's negligence and causation when the plaintiff alleges and proves the facts which can be pointed out and expressed by a layman with common sense. And if the defendant fails to prove that the result was caused by other fact than own medical activities, the defendant shall be defeated. I realize that this theory has problem for justice and impartiality. I would say that two fators should be considered and added to this logic. First,are defendant's acts generally belonging to gross negligence which would cause that kind of bad result? Second, is it recognized that there would be the causation generally and statistically between the cause and the result?